80°

Battlefield 4 Creative Director: "Steam Machines are healthy for the console market"

Gustavsson believes that these new products from Valve will open up the market to explore new and better ways of consuming games.

"Basically for different ways of accessing customers and giving them possibilities of play, I think it is super exciting...

The only thing I know is that from five or ten years from now gaming and especially how you consume it won't look like it does today. I do think with streaming services and new input devices and so on, it wouldn't surprise me if there is less need of hardware and more on demand gaming experience."

Read Full Story >>
gearnuke.com
AceBlazer133849d ago

does it matter since devs like these hold back games for parity? thank god for mods and exclusives

Hufandpuf3849d ago

More competition fuels innovation.

Kingthrash3603849d ago (Edited 3849d ago )

i just want to know prices...then i will know if its a console or a small but powerful pc. anything over a grand isnt a console imo.

@pandamobile just going off what the title says^^^

Pandamobile3849d ago

SteamMachines are not consoles.

MidnytRain3849d ago

I still don't understand the appeal of these things.

Pandamobile3849d ago

I don't see how you don't see. Competition is good. If Valve comes out and make a comparable or better device and service than the PS4 or One, that forces Sony and MS to innovate as well.

admiralvic3849d ago

In theory, yes, but not in practice. Simply being better doesn't instantly mean that companies will follow suit or that it will be remotely successful. This has appeared throughout game history and isn't likely to change.

Back in the Gameboy days, Sega released the GameGear, which was fully capable of using a rechargeable battery, back lit screen and color. It wasn't till AFTER the GameBoy Advance released that Nintendo started to match these features.

Likewise, original Xbox Live is better or at least on par with the current Wii U Nintendo Network, which is sad considering we're talking about a new console matching (in some cases falling short) to a service from 10 years ago.

This isn't exclusive to Nintendo being Nintendo either...

Xbox Live never really adopted a system like PlayStation Plus, though some might consider the short term "Games with Gold" them matching it.
Xbox Live hides apps like Netflix behind a paywall, where as the PS3/4, Wii U and even the Apple TV don't.
The Vita has a better quality touchscreen, graphics and more, though Nintendo didn't really have to meet Sony on that level to beat them.
I always found the Wiimote to work a lot easier than the PlayStation Move.
The Wii U gamepad was not a feature other companies tried to match. Sony had remote play first, so it looks like they're trying to push this feature now as the tech has finally caught up to the idea.
The only company who tried to match Club Nintendo was Square Enix, which was harder, but did offer better prizes. There is also Konami, which begs to be seen.

The list goes on, but a lot of ideas, even great ones like PlayStation Plus never forced other companies to innovate. So before we worry about what the Steam Box means for us, we need to see the price. If the thing doesn't sell, then it could be 100,000,000 x better than the PS4, Wii U and XB1 combined and it will simply be ignored. You also need to have a REASON to implement these changes to make it work.

darx3849d ago

Service wise they have both MS & Sony beat.

shahab913849d ago

Good. Steam machines, pc,ps4,ps3, x1,x360, psp, vita, 3ds, 2ds, wii, wii u, ouya etc. there is room for everyone. I love you all ^___^

Hufandpuf3849d ago

THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE!

A fight to the death I say!

Bolts3849d ago

The irony is, none of the Dice games will ever be on Steam Machines unless Origin goes Linux.

sovietsoldier3849d ago

WAS GOING TO SAY THE SAME THING + 1

70°

Why Are Steam's Recommendations Dogpoop?

Blindfolding myself and clicking a Steam page at random would serve me better recommendations than Steam’s algorithm

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
UltimateOwnage16d ago

Hmm, not sure I agree with that. The recommendations I get are usually pretty good, but then again I have pretty large library of games on Steam and hundreds of them in my wish list, along with lots of curators I follow for it to build recommendations off of. On occasion it will throw me a random FIFA game or something I've never bought or shown interest in, but mostly its decent IMO.

80°

5 Best Metroidvania Games on Steam (March 2024)

Dive into the best Metroidvania games on Steam, from hidden gems to top-rated classics, and embark on unforgettable adventures!

jznrpg27d ago

Skul is a metroidvania ? It’s on PS+ soon I’ll check it out. If it’s good I’ll buy a copy physically if they have one

Nacho_Z26d ago

If Pseudoregalia is one of the best I'd hate to see what the worst look like.

330°

Dragon’s Dogma 2 releases to mixed user reviews, as microtransactions criticised

Players can pay to edit their character, resurrect the dead and other actions.

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
AdonisIsBeast35d ago

Who cares as long as it’s optional

phoenixwing35d ago

paying to edit your character is kind of crap as far as microtransactions go

Xristo35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

I hate any/all MTX in a paid game (especially a full-price game)... but know that you can spend in-game currency (RC), which you get from killing mobs, to completely remake your character.

phoenixwing34d ago

@xRisto how much did it change the gameplay though? Changing your character would have probably not cost any rc if they weren't hellbent on getting money by making it inconvenient

koga8834d ago

You can literally edit your character using in-game gold, dropped from monsters or obtained from selling items, as soon as you reach the first main town. You can even use Rift Crystals obtained from other people using your pawn or dropped from monsters to change your entire character or Pawn. It's paying to avoid doing something that is literally in the game.

PRIMORDUS34d ago

They are lucky there using Denuvo or their game and all future DLC etc. would be for free. 🤣

phoenixwing34d ago

@koga you completely missed the point i was making but go ahead and act like i'm being the wrong one

lucian22934d ago

you can pay ingame currency though; why are ya so derp

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 34d ago
Crows9035d ago (Edited 35d ago )

Capcom cares quite a bit....hence why it was kept from reviewers and initial impressions.

As far as optional...yeah...ALL mtx are optional. That's not the problem. The miss the mark entirely.

Heck buying the game is "optional" too.

The fact that they were hiding this is scummy as hell. I was going to buy this day 1 or day 3. Now I'm reconsidering the purchase entirely because as the reviews point out...there are certain design decisions which have not changed but funnily enough seem to be remedied by these mtx...

In other words they may have left certain features in the game in order to monetize them. So the mtx affected the development of the game in a negative way.

garos8235d ago

I'm certainly not buying it anymore. It has affected at least one sale from me. I'll pick it up second hand

peppeaccardo34d ago

Very close to buy the game at a discounted price but not anymore.
Bad business practice and hence they do not get my support/money !

warriorcase34d ago

It wasn't kept fromreviewers s though. Twitter reviewers are saying there was mention of mtx's in the reviewers guide

-Foxtrot35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

STOP. USING. THAT. SHITTY. EXCUSE

God damn man

Look how DLC changed after Oblivions horse armour, within 10 years most developers took the absolute p***. What was said then aswell? “It’s only optional who cares?” Now look where we all are.

There’s no half measures with these things, when will people realise this.

jwillj2k434d ago (Edited 34d ago )

Oh it’s gonna get worse. Ng+ locked behind mtx, “cool downs” preventing you from playing for more than 3 hours at a time unless u pay the mtx for unlimited access, main campaign bosses, in-game music, certain dialog, difficulty modes, certain npc interactions, all locked behind mtx, etc.. etc. gonna end up being like the NBA 2k games eventually paying for cross overs and shit… They gon get mid-evil on our asses.

OMGitzThatGuy34d ago

I can guarantee most of the items you can buy with mtx and ingame currency wouldn’t exist in ANY paid form if the main goal wasn't monetization. If the goal is to give idiots who are willing to pay for basic game features as mtx a way to do things faster then the only ones the mtx hurt are the non paying players as you are now locking features behind a grind that you chose to put in the game that you are essentially admitting to creating some type of time sink. I have never heard of a game locking basic character editing behind a ingame paywall, it’s usually just an option.

Chard34d ago

Takes two to tango though - unfortunately people buy this garbage which incentivises the behaviour. It's an inevitable outcome of the profit motive

thorstein35d ago

@Mario

Yes. And so are resurrection "Wakestones." You can find them but they're rare.

victorMaje35d ago

Buying the game is now very optional too. If you don’t know why then you don’t get it.

shinoff218335d ago

Because it's only a door way. That's why we care. We've already seen some shit since Mtx was introduced.

Rimeskeem35d ago

1. DD2 is an ARPG with 8 different playable classes
2. There is no multiplayer aspect to the game
3. You can only have one character (have to pay for more)
4. You cannot delete the character unless you go into the game files
5. The game is $70 dollars upfront

Having to pay for more character slots in a game that *features* 8 playable classes is pretty much not optional for an ARPG.

Angyobangyo34d ago

Judging from steam reviews, gamers care. Not plastic gamers. Why didn’t Itsuno mention such MTX would be available in-game? Why weren’t the MTXs there for review copies?

Kiryu199234d ago

Who cares is how all this started. The many many excuses. Please keep defending these greedy publishers and unfair tactics. We be gamers are the problem

Horse armor

$10 online passes if buying a used copy

Cheat codes gone and are replaced by micro transactions

Unlocking stuff by playing games behind micro transactions and XP boosters

It’s only cosmetic

No one is being forced to spend even though publishers are literally making their games more grindy to force people to play

Full priced games have mobile game type micro transactions

$70 priced games because higher development costs while making record profits and laying off record number of employees

And to play the game early pay us extra $20-30 on top of full price

Release games now and promise to maybe fix them later only to abandon the game

Day one patches that make the games worst

If it’s your favorite game defend the publisher if it’s not hate on another publisher for similar content

SixFrvgz34d ago Show
+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 34d ago
kenpachi35d ago

Must have picked up some EA crew to put this in the game

robtion34d ago

Yeah these are really bad ones. Directly impacting gameplay too. Super scummy move. I hope nobody buys them.

CrimsonWing6935d ago

Yet Helldivers 2 gets a pass? Y’know a GotY contender by the name of RE4 had them and so does Devil May Cry V. The funny thing is I enjoyed both of those games thoroughly without having to buy a single microtransaction.

What I do consider a valid complaint is not being able to start a new game or being able to edit your character. That’s kind of a seriously baffling decision, but then I think how I played Dragon’s Dogma 1 and I never edited my character and I just did a 100% playthrough on a single file and didn’t start a NG since. So, I don’t think these are really going to impact me, but I can see how it will others.

Crows9035d ago

Helldivers 2 is a live service game where everything is obtainable in game with incredible ease.

Not sure about re4 or DMC but nobody is giving anyone a pass ...this article is about dragons dogma 2...not those games.

What is valid are in game features made to supposedly force you to think carefully only to have a surprise online store offer solutions to built in problems for more money.

Goosejuice35d ago

Those same things they are selling can be found Ingame as well. U can buy the character editor through merchants with gold. Don't get me wrong..I dislike these mtx they are doing but you don't need to buy them to be able to get them.

CrimsonWing6935d ago (Edited 35d ago )

Oh my bad, I can’t bring up games with microtransactions that nobody had a sh*t fit over. My mistake.

I love how people move the goalpost.

Crows9034d ago

@goose
@crimson

All mtx sucks. I'd rather helldiver's not have them because it makes me wonder if the rate at which you collect materials. That said. The games features are all fully enjoyable and aren't affected by the mtx.

That's not the case with dragons dogma 2...they left in place features that are supposedly part of the challenge of the game only to let you buy your way out very conveniently. I didn't look through all of them but I've heard some are rare but can be purchased with more money now. Even more so in a game about managing weight load there's a tent, I believe, that you can pay more money for that weighs less than your typical tent...not all sure on all the mtx and I'm aware that you can purchase many through in game vendor but they're incredibly useful mtx that are obtained much more slowly in game...or even a limited amount of them.

Instead is selling fast travel...just let us don't for free....or instead of selling cosmetic changes...how about letting us do it for free...

Nothing in helldivers comes close to this abomination

Angyobangyo34d ago

One is a single player game and one is a live service game. One is $40 vs$70. And most importantly, one game is there to spread democracy.

Ironmike34d ago

It's not incredibly easy for certain things in helldivers though u still have grind quite bit but u ate correct in saying u can eventually get enough medals to purchase stuff

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 34d ago
Moegooner35d ago

Read your comment again and maybe, just maybe you might realise how dumb it was.

CrimsonWing6935d ago (Edited 35d ago )

What was dumb about it? That I pointed out the hypocrisy?

garos8235d ago

It was extremely scummy that capcom hid this from reviewers. I have no doubt this game is good but these type of microtransactions don't sit well with me. They've lost a sale from me

Lionsguard35d ago

I was going to pay full price to support this game because I've been waiting for it for forever but I think I'll wait until I get it for free from Epic or a Humblebundle monthly.

Redemption-6435d ago

I am not defending Capcom, as I am not a fan of MTX in single player games. I do however belive they were open to reviewers about having MTX in their game. The reviewers just decided to leave that part out. Which is very disingenuous. There are some companies that get away with these things. Image if this was done by EA, Ubisoft, or even Activision? I am positive those defending Capcom, would have had their pitchforks ready if the companies listed above did this

anast35d ago

That's why reviewers can't be trusted. In fact, they are not reviewers at all. They get free codes to talk about stuff they don't understand nor care about.

Sanctusone34d ago

I mean it was pretty obvious to anyone with eyes...one of the items you get from deluxe edition was in game items.
1500 Rift Crystals - Points to Spend Beyond the Rift (A)
Which honestly I figured they kept a similar mtx system like DMC5 and the optional red orbs.

Lionsguard34d ago

1500 Rift Crystals doesn't mean anything. The first game had Rift crystals too, you just earned them by people hiring your Pawn and you get it from certain quests.

anast34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

A reviewer's job is to point out the obvious of a product as though they were the consumer. This means reviewers, to do their actual job, would need to review the complete game: the edition they are reviewing, how they got the game, technical aspects, story, and monetization scheme. Since, it is obvious that MT's are a part of the game, it would need to be reviewed. This way people can be informed, so they can decide if they want to play this style of game/monetization scheme.

For example, AC Origins was bad with Mt's. I had to farm side missions or pay to advance the story. This was after I already did close to 25 or more side missions. While I was grinding there were constant reminders that I could pay to ease the grind. I would have never bought the game if it were reviewed properly.

Show all comments (78)