260°

What Happens to Nintendo if the NX Fails?

It's hard to think of Nintendo without a console, but it could happen. We look at one end of the spectrum.

rjason123027d ago

Nothing, they move on and make another console lol.

princejb1343027d ago (Edited 3027d ago )

Yup. Nintendo has loads of cash thanks to their handheld division and wii

Eonjay3027d ago

Yeah, well you may be shocked to learn that companies with money don't actively operate in a way that doesn't produce more money. This is to say, we want the NX to be successful, but if it is not, they have tons of options. So yes, their money, but more importantly their IPs actually mean that they are sitting on an enormous goldmine.

ruefrak3027d ago

That's what everyone thought about Nokia too...
Money only lasts so long.

never4get3027d ago

Nintendo NX won't fail, if it is more open, able to, install linux, android, steam, do school work, office work, be a dev kit, use external gpu, etc, ie be a personal computer. XD

mikeslemonade3027d ago

Nintendo is done after NX. The NX will fail. That being said I will be buying a NX day 1 as soon as it's avalible for preorder on Amazon.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3027d ago
3027d ago Replies(5)
pcz3027d ago

they will continue making innovative doorstops

marloc_x3027d ago (Edited 3027d ago )

I prefer the one with definitive wedge shape, works brilliantly!

3026d ago
rjason123027d ago

Except for the fact that they are always making money on consoles and games regardless of how they do. The Wii U is a "failure" sales wise, but they are still making money off it, albeit not as much as from amiibo or 3DS lol.

3027d ago Replies(2)
benji1013027d ago

ABizzel1 They were 250 million in profit last year. Not sure where you get your numbers, they were mor profitable than sony's ps division in 2014.

sprinterboy3027d ago

@ben
250m or go third party selling 20m mario karts, mario etc for billions of profit each yr.
I love what nintendo has done over the yrs but if nx fails i see nintendo going 3rd party which is the best business dicision for company and also reaching out to more gamers with there popular franchises.

wonderfulmonkeyman3027d ago

@ Sprinter

Anyone not willing to get a Nintendo console for Nintendo IP's, doesn't truly value Nintendo IP's and wouldn't prioritize them over their shooters, sports, and realism-pushers from AAA third parties.

Nintendo has no chance at gaining an audience on other systems.
People need to quit port begging.

3027d ago Replies(1)
3027d ago Replies(1)
3027d ago
3027d ago Replies(2)
3026d ago
+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3026d ago
nyobzoo3027d ago

They'll probably reassess and go heavy on Mobile

Kalebninja3027d ago

Where'd you get that analysis from?

truechainz3027d ago

Probably because mobile revenues are growing in a space that is competitive but not gushing with quality. Nintendo is starting to dip their toe by releasing games this year, but have the potential to be a dominant force on that platform if they release standout quality software and market it well. Makes more sense than going 3rd party because there is more money to be made on mobile than on consoles. This is all of course if the NX doesn't make its way to a profitable space.

Crimzon3027d ago

Nintendo really struggles to support their consoles with software. They were quite open about how the transition to HD with the Wii U was really hard for them and it shows with how infrequently they put out software, so I've no idea how they're going to manage to support the NX at this rate. It's painfully obvious that they should exit the hardware market and focus solely on software, but whether they're willing to swallow their pride and focus on their strengths is another matter entirely.

I think everybody agrees that Nintendo makes excellent games. I also think that if many people were being honest about it, they'd agree that they make terrible hardware. It's clear what they should focus on going forward, and I know I'm not the only person who would happily buy Nintendo games but refuses to touch their consoles because of how poor their support is.

Eonjay3027d ago

"Nintendo really struggles to support their consoles with software. They were quite open about how the transition to HD with the Wii U was really hard for them and it shows with how infrequently they put out software,"

I disagree with this a bit. Nintendo takes its tme releasing software because as you stated, they are really quality title through and through. But, the lack of support isn't because of this, its because the 3rd parties are nowhere to be found.

Microsoft's Greenberg stated in an interview that about 80% of game sales comes from 3rd party on its console. One imagines that Sony has similar figures. So then, the problem is that the Wii U has a HUGE vaccum of titles that Nintendo isn't supposed to be filling. Thats where the Activisions and EAs and Ubisofts and WBs come in and fill out the lineup.

rainslacker3026d ago

Nintendo has some of the best 1st party support of any console maker. They routinely release quality games, both with existing franchises and new IP's.

Where they struggle is in keeping strong 3rd party support for the long term. Even the Wii, which had tons of 3rd party support, didn't have strong support for many mainstays from the various publishers. With WiiU it's practically non-existent due to how poorly 3rd party sold at the beginning...although the reasons for those poor sales are likely more down to the publisher rather than Nintendo.

Wii was a strange anomoly of 3rd party support, because despite having the huge install base which did buy games, there was no overriding sense that big 3rd party games actually would sell on the system...so it was often overlooked. Smaller games though were making tons of money due to huge install base and low investment in the titles. But that doesn't go a long way in getting respect among the gamers themselves, which is why the Wii was mostly dismissed last gen...not unlike why it's mostly dismissed this gen.

LastcenuryRob3027d ago

All Nintendo has to do is build a system that third party companies want to develop on and pay for a couple of high end exclusives. They can not just rely on their in house games.

Show all comments (77)
80°

Nintendo's Massacre Of The 3DS And Wii U Is Finally Complete, Regrettably

Hanzala from eXputer: "The cruel hammer of Nintendo has fallen. Farewell, 3DS and Wii U, you surely brightened my life and many others; you won't be forgotten."

280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10112d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref12d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde12d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197212d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville12d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218311d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos11d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
isarai12d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref12d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan12d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00711d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197212d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

12d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

12d ago
12d ago
Zeref12d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde12d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197212d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier11d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto12d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218311d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto11d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
Hofstaderman12d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts12d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts11d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)
90°

Nintendo's War Against Player-Made Content Will Hurt The Company In The End

Danish from eXputer: "Nintendo has historically gone against player-made content and emulation of its games. This has done much to harm the company's image."

XiNatsuDragnel19d ago

I agree nintendo hire some these folks to help in your games it'll help imo.

banger8818d ago

They need to stop announcing these mods and fan remakes until they're finished. Finish it, upload it, and then if Nintendo dmca's it tough shit. Once it's online, people can share it around, even if the original download gets taken down.

Jingsing18d ago

True, but most modders need constant admiration during the process to motivate them.

PRIMORDUS17d ago

Yup, once it's a torrent nothing can be done Nintendo is helpless at that point. But it would be wise if they just had a site on the dark web, it's also easy to use with Tor and no one will bother you.

mastershredder17d ago

This is all coming from the mouth of short-sighted fandom and grifting madness.
No.... it wont. There is a clear defined reason why they don't. This is nothing new. Make your own shi7 from your own original ideas especially if you are trying to capitalize of it it. Duh.

Yeah, hire people that have zero respect or understanding for an established process. Wow. Yep. Totally makes sense.

shinoff218317d ago

Those guys that made that sonic game got a gig from sega or something along those lines and that game was dope as hell. One of the best sonics as of late.