280°
4.0

The Order: 1886 Review- A Knight to Forget- Gameondaily

"A soulless, hollow experience bereft of any meaningful gameplay or replayability. "

Gaz from Gameondaily reviews The Order: 1886

Read Full Story >>
gameondaily.com
DarkOcelet3368d ago

4/10 means the game is broken. This game is not broken. It doesnt deserve such a low score.

Gazondaily3368d ago

No it does't. Where do people get this from? Who set this standard that a 4 represents a broken game?

Also what constitutes a 'broken game'? I could argue the game is broken by virtue of it struggling to find its identity.

If it puts you at ease, Gameondaily does not necessarily equate 4/10 to a broken game.

DarkOcelet3368d ago

By broken, i mean unplayable with horrendous bugs and sloppy framerate etc etc etc. But this here is stable and barely have no glitches. So that for me is defintely a 4/10. After that i start to look at the Graphics, Gameplay, Story, Characters. And add points to each one of those that are good.

This game is a 8/10 from me. I am really interested to see how the sequel will improve on the concept. I still think the franchise if they ever expand it has a very good potential to be a masterpiece.

Gazondaily3368d ago

"By broken, i mean unplayable with horrendous bugs and sloppy framerate etc etc etc. But this here is stable and barely have no glitches. So that for me is defintely a 4/10"

Yeah but where are you getting this 4/10 standard only being reserved for broken games from? I've seen a few people regurgitate this point. Who one earth set this worldwide standard?

" I still think the franchise if they ever expand it has a very good potential "

I agree there, like stated in the review but 8/10? Well fair enough, if you enjoyed it then who am I to say you're wrong.

I just think people gave Ryse such a hard time for the exact same reasons this falls short, and even more so. The Order is a failure for me.

DarkOcelet3368d ago (Edited 3368d ago )

Everyone has his standards and their opinions and that's my opinion that a 4/10 is broken but then again, I am not right because for me, i can rate a broken game a 10/10 if i loved a certain aspect of a game just like Deadly Premonition.

The game was bad by all means and had some serious issues on the X360 version but i still rated it a 10/10 because the story alone was a masterpiece that actually made me finish it three times and over 60 hours spent on it.

I think we can all agree that its just a matter of a personal opinion in the end. If you think The Order 1886 is a failure, i can tell you one thing...

One man's trash is another man's treasure. Even though you said failure not trash but you get the idea here :)

SuperDan-Dare3368d ago

"By broken, i mean unplayable..."

erm - sorry if a game is unplayable that's a clear zero. If I've bought a game that is unplayable, I've just wasted time and money on something I can't play.

You'd have to be insane to grade an unplayable game as a 4/10. I think the Order is ofcourse very playable but misses the mark a bit.

TheGreatGamer3368d ago

@Septic is right on this one. There is no standard in the industry for anything below 4 constituting a broken game it is a silly comment made by a n4g user and has since been regurgigated by those who feel that the order's low review scores are unjust but reviewers are perfectly able to score this game a 4 if they personally didn't enjoy it and found faults with it. It doesn't have to be broken to score a 4 or lower, just unenjoyable for the author.

3368d ago
Gazondaily3368d ago

@Ciporta

"You've made quite a few comments about this game, can I just ask do you own or or played it?"

I have completed it and I am the one who wrote this review.

-Foxtrot3368d ago

@Septic

If it's your review then I'm not surprised over your score.

Gazondaily3368d ago

@Foxtrot

"If it's your review then I'm not surprised over your score."

Yeah don't be. Some of us have standards.

Concertoine3368d ago (Edited 3368d ago )

Your review is fine, man. As long as you can justify the score, then a review is justified.

Why is everyone on this site so damn butthurt over this game? Ryse had mediocre impressions, then came out mediocre, and aside from a few this site didnt really care. This game though? Everyone's crying conspiracy theories, your opinions wrong, did you play it, etc

The same people saying you shouldnt chastise a short game are saying the game isn't short. The same people who hated on other (arguable) disappointments like Titanfall or Ryse are playing the victim card.

I just beat it, and yeah its a typical TPS. I really want the people defending this game with their lives to consider if ANY of us are even going to be talking about it six months from now. It'll end up just like Ryse, a disappointment enjoyed by a minority and forgotten by the rest.

@Foxtrot

So you can't understand a bad score for a divisive game. That's not any one reviewer or publication's fault, its yours. These sites all have different scales, a 6 or 7/10 from Eurogamer for example is pretty good.

Do you see anywhere near the amount of damage control and butthurt on a low score for other exclusives?
http://n4g.com/news/1398467...

-Foxtrot3368d ago (Edited 3368d ago )

@Sept

Standards? Oh I'm sorry I didn't think you understood the meaning of the word

@Concertoine

No one is "butthurt" people just don't understand scores like 2-5 out of 10 when the game is not that bad. It gives off the impression like it's broken and unplayable but it's not actually that bad.

Is it a 10? obviously not. A 9? Nope. Hell even an 8 could be pushing it but it'd defiantly not lower then a 6.

Most of these reviews don't justify the review scores as the review says something different to the final score. Not to mention other games that they have reviewed in the past sometimes get away with X, Y and Z despite the fact that on other games like the Order they criticize them for it. This isn't just aimed at the Order but other games which get harshly reviewed

Mr-Zex3368d ago

Septic, take a moment to see this from a consumers perspective. You see games like Call of Duty, Battlefield or FIFA, rehashed and released on a yearly basis still getting the 8-9's/10 these so called "professionals" give the games, disregarding the broken states of games, glitches, broken net codes or what not.

Then you get a review of a newly released game, seems eye popping, enjoyable at first glance and yet reviews of it are popping up around you 4/10, 5/10 and so forth. Automatically the human brain relates the higher scoring game to obviously a better experience, however in this broken review industry you can see that is completely not the case.

I personally feel that 4/10 is too harsh for the game especially considering the enjoyment I personally got out of it, again personal expereince, but of course we all have opinions and they differ and vary but with that in mind, that score just generally brings us to relate it with something as broken as E.T from the Atari 2600. Consider this almost a review of your review, but regardless I do feel as if this game has gotten too much flack just for trying something slighty new in the industry.

gangsta_red3368d ago

I love how everyone has their own version of how this game should be scored. Not only that but their own personal version of what a number score means.

Anything below of 5 means the game is broken or can't be played...how about if a game just plain and simply bad, can't that also warrant a score below 5?

I mean 5 is average can we all agree on that?

Then anything below a 5 means it's below average to poor, doesn't necessarily mean it's broken. And nowadays broken games can be fixed, this game isn't broke so it can't be fixed, so unlike DC, MCC and AC there's no point in coming back to re-review it.
This game is as it is.

Time to move on and just take this as an L, hopefully R@D will come back strong like bull for their sequel.

Concertoine3368d ago (Edited 3368d ago )

@Foxtrot

Lol, oops. I meant this review, a 6.8 is not really low.

http://n4g.com/news/1398384...

The comments on ryse, knack, any other console exclusive are not near as defensive. The only time i ever see people get so mad over a score is when Gamespot gives nintendo games bad scores. I cant understand it either way, opinions are opinions.

marlinfan103368d ago

"Standards? Oh I'm sorry I didn't think you understood the meaning of the word"

That's golden coming from you of all people

IGiveHugs2NakedWomen3368d ago (Edited 3368d ago )

I think i'm going to go through all of these reviews and I guarantee that 90% of the bad reviews parrot the same story.

Gamespot:
"As it happens, The Order is divided more or less equally into four disparate pieces: cutscenes, QTEs, walking around, and shooting."

the entire review focuses on this

Trusted Reviews:
"Think of anything that annoys you about blockbuster action games and it’s here, from the aforementioned reliance on QTE to pointless lock-picking and circuit-breaking sequences (both mercifully easy), uninteresting traversal, AI companions bossing you around, poor cover mechanics and rotten stealth sequences where getting spotted once means instant death. I swear, there’s a section later on where the combination of insta-fail stealth and Galahad’s propensity for getting stuck to low-lying shrubbery caused me to scream at the TV in incredulous rage. Don’t even get me started on the stupid werewolf battles, which mix shooting and QTE to bizarrely comic effect."

Giant Bomb:

"The game appears in a letterboxed format, one typically reserved for films. When applied to a video game, the forced borders make your view of the action look small. I felt a little claustrophobic in some spots, because it was difficult to get a bead on the action. Are the borders there for artistic reasons? Or are they there to prevent the developers from having to keep an often-terrific-looking game from running at full resolution? In the end, it doesn't matter."

"a lackluster story that fails to make good on its initially compelling premise, and a set of jarring Quick Time Event setpieces that aren't especially interesting from a gameplay or a storytelling perspective."

Most of these reviews center around the same topics, QTEs, Black Borders, cutscenes. Of course none of them noticed the real flaws in the game, such as enemy NPCs and their rigidly scripted comments and movement, The QTEs with half-breeds having no variety, and the missed opportunities to include action/combat sequences in certain chapters.

Some reviews are so inept (Digital Trends) that they basicly say "I don't like the letterbox format. It has too many QTE's, and what little gameplay there was, we've all seen it done before in Gears Of War."

Just lazy. Absolutely shameful and lazy like the cookie cutter games that they love and defend so much.

DigitalRaptor3368d ago

@ Septic

"Yeah don't be. Some of us have standards."

Yeah..... double ones.

TrollityTroll3368d ago (Edited 3368d ago )

Same guy that gave Titanfall an 8 now complains about lack of content, poor story and terrible AI?
What were you saying about standards?
Oh wait, DigitalRaptor pretty much covered that aspect ...

http://www.gameondaily.com/...

Gazondaily3368d ago (Edited 3368d ago )

@Digital

Yeah I've seen quite a few double standards. Trust the Sony contingent to convince the masses on here that the vast majority of reviews on this game are wrong and that there is some conspiracy over here.

All these rabid fanboys who couldn't tolerate QTEs in Ryse or lack of content in games like Titanfall or Evolve are now lapping this game up that falls foul of all those things and more because it's a Sony exclusive.

Pathetic.

@Troll

Didn't Titanfall actually have a game beneath it all? Newsflash: it actually had GOOD GAMEPLAY. Gameplay seems to be a luxury the Sony contingent on here cannot afford because they'd rather watch some cinematics and press triangle to release a balloon than actually play the game.

And the review mentions lack of content and deals with the issue of A.I that so many people who haven't played the game pretend to understand.

Graphics over gameplay. Thats all the die hard Sony contingent here care about, unless of course that's the case on a competing platform. Then it's all good.

TrollityTroll3368d ago (Edited 3368d ago )

The fact that you keep talking about "Sony contingent" and "rabid fanboys attacking XB games" just reflects your true nature/agenda, you do realise that?

And newsflash, The Order had good gameplay as well. Not that you would ever have given it a chance. The shooting is responsive and satisfying. The weapons punchy (especially the thermite rifle and the shotgun). My main frustration (with the gameplay) was either you couldn't, or I didn't know how, to change angles when in cover (e.g. go around a corner whilst still in cover). But apart from that the shooting was solid.
The insta-fail stealth parts annoyed the hell out of me as well.

From someone who tries to review games I'd have thought you'd know the difference between a QTE and an interactive cutscene. And even just basic environmental interaction. But hey-ho, carry on trying to convince everyone you're completely impartial. Say it enough times you might even convince yourself.
Unless you plan to mark down any game that requires a button press to open a door or inspect an object (being the vast majority) down for QTEs. Judging by your post and review history I'm sure you will ... for certain games

3368d ago
hasamalaha3368d ago

I think Titanfall definitely got a pass in a lot of areas.

No single-player.
No story.
7 year old graphics.

If you want to say The Order should not have been a full-price game, the same should have applied to Titanfall.

Drekken3368d ago (Edited 3368d ago )

Your review and opinion are garbage. I score it a 1/10. I mean, thats just my opinion... man.

Gazondaily3368d ago (Edited 3368d ago )

@Troll

You what? So I guess all the gaming media got it wrong?

The Order has good gameplay? Let me break it down for you and the other defenders shedding tears over The Order. Yes I refer to the Sony contingent because their ridiculous behaviour needs to be called out and frankly their reaction to this is pathetic.

1) Gunplay - for the most part it's solid but it's not abundant enough. It does nothing new. It's super easy, the one shot snipers or powerful revolvers are enough to kill the shoddy ai that just turtle in one place. Only the shotgun guys pose a challenge and that's only because they sponge bullets and spam bullets at you.

Qtes- are you seriously trying to downplay the fact that they are only relegated to opening doors? Complete utter bs. They are everywhere. What's the logic in pressing triangle whilst the guy is having a convo with someone. It's the scene where they release people on the airship. Wtf is that? Or when you're on Teslas lab and all you gotta do is inspect these random items and rotate them in your hands. You do that throughout the game. Wtf?

3) stealth section - they just chucked that in there to fulfill a checklist and this shows how shoddy the ai is. You're supposed to get the keys off the guard but lo and behold, you have to kill every single guard because the last one to be alive will always have it. Never mind. It's not that a big deal but the actual gameplay was so poor here. This is two gens old kind of nonsense.

4) Fighting lycans. Press x To dodge. Shoot. Press triangle to execute. Great fun. They didn't even bother mixing up the button prompts. And they chuck this crap at you about 3 times in the game.

5)* Spoiler *Elder lycan boss fight. Full qte sequence repeated twice... Copy and paste. Thats how the game ends.

6) where's the exploration? Why are the levels so confined? You've funnelled through the game via cutscenes.

@above

Excuse me for not taking your opinions seriously. You guys clearly wouldn't know a good game if it smacked you in the face.

OB1Biker3368d ago

They could give it 1/20 to get their clicks I would not bother reading that thing.

'Bereft of any meaningful gameplay' for the so little I read in the first sentence is already a shameless lie and not an opinion.

Ron_Danger3368d ago

"I just think people gave Ryse such a hard time for the exact same reasons this falls short, and even more so. The Order is a failure for me."

"I have completed it and I am the one who wrote this review."

2 quotes from Septic in this comment section. Now the score makes sense...

Interesting how you've been trashing The Order on n4g for a while now, post a scathing review, then play the Ryse victim card here...

IGOTBAKINGSODA3368d ago

Almost every time a game gets 5 and below it means the game has major technical problems... Whether it gameplay or graphical... I find it funny that you have so many bubbles yet you're clearly seem biased... Look Ryse was a good game but it had frame rate problems when too many NPCs were on the screen etc... But that game was a 7-7.5 at best... You say this game was a failure for you? So what failed exactly ? The gameplay was polished and well done... No it didn't bring new ideas that we haven't seen before but was still completely solid... AI wasn't horrific, the frame rate was rock steady, the weapons were fun to use... And the graphics... Do we really need to say anything about those graphics?

The Only faults this game has are ... Almost no replay value ( in terms of modes outside of the story, and it was a tad too short... Hmmmm two bad things.... Everything else that you could possibly conjure up would be extremely nit picking ( which all games can be nit picked ). You're just part of the bandwagon crowd that made small hills into mountains... I can respect differing opinions all day but saying its a fail is either poor word choice on your part or you have a very narrow game catalog and don't step outside of the usual games you've accustomed yourself to...

This game is definitely a 7-7.5, maybe an 8 if youre obsessed with the graphics...
It's people that are biased and or narrow minded that are screwing up these reviews and bad mouthing this game... The Order has its faults as do other games but it's far above these low scores that have been given... I'm not talking crap my friend but please enlighten me by using a bubble or two to tell me why this game fails you... I've given you just a few logical facts now I'll wait for your rebutle

Prime1573368d ago (Edited 3368d ago )

Even doing the math, septic, how does this game rank a 4?

This review gave the graphics an eye popping score, just reread his paragraph. So even if this terrible reviewer gave a 9 or 10 on graphics, how could he get an average of 4? Gameplay and story would have to be... 2 each to get 4.333/10 (and that's with graphics as a 9).

Judging the elements:
Graphics: 9.5/10 There was actually a point in time I thought I was looking at a movie clip, and then I moved my character.

gameplay: While there isn't much (which is maybe the biggest gripe giving it low scores), the gameplay itself will still stand above average, so let's give it a 5 because that's the biggest complaint. (I'd give gameplay a 7.5, personally).

Story: not new, but still well done: 7/10

The average of those components is: 7.16/10.

What does a 4 actually represent then? It would have to be an unplayble, jumbled mess of shiate. (basement crawl as an example got a 4 for those reasons, a 4! That boring, broken game getting the same scores as The Order?!?!?!).

This game is above average on so many levels, yet is getting below average scores? How does that make sense?

No, it does not warrant a 8.5+, but certainly not below a 6. Same as Ryse.

rhcpfan3368d ago

@Septic

There aren't a lot of reasons to argue here, logic and rationality always gets thrown out the window every time, especially when it comes to Sony exclusives. I don't even know why I still read the comment section if I'm being honest.

MysticStrummer3368d ago (Edited 3368d ago )

"I could argue the game is broken by virtue of it struggling to find its identity."

Care to list some reasons for coming to that conclusion? Once again, as with Destiny, I'm floored by how many people apparently expected something different from what was previewed over and over. The Order does not struggle to find it's identity. You simply don't like it's identity.

Edit - @Prime - Well said. That's what I've been trying to get at too, but guys like Septic think that if you say the game doesn't deserve the lowest scores then you must think it's a 10/10, which I've seen very few people say even if they like it.

MysticStrummer3368d ago (Edited 3368d ago )

Bah. This comment was slow to appear so I added what I said as an edit to the comment above.

poor_cus_of_games3368d ago

Seriously septic you're on another the order article. For someone that doesn't like the game you sure do have a lot to say about it. Besides game on daily is a joke of a site with some of the worst reviews that I've ever had the mis pleasure of reading.

mav8053368d ago

Where people get it from, is when was the last time you saw a 4/10 from a major review site? It basically means that game is absolutely terrible, or broken in major ways.

I have no plans to buy The Order, and have not played it, but even if we shifted the entire grading paradigm to mean that 5 is an average game, then I doubt The Order would qualify as 'below average'. It has above average or excellent graphics, presentation, VA, etc. And probably below average length & replayability, which should constitute a large portion of the score.

So 4/10? Even if the game doesn't suit your preference (as it does not suit mine), it seems like an unjustified low score.

thekhurg3368d ago

Every time you post all it looks like is "XBOX RULEZ!"

Mkai283368d ago

Tell me this ppl, what if this game was exclusive to wiiu or Xbox one? Would you all say that the review scores are too low? Most of the ppl defending this game, you can look back on their history how they made fun of RYSE, which I might add is the better game.

You " gamers " deserve this, you're telling developers what you want. ( graphics)
What games are these, killzone shadow fall, DriveClub, The Order 1886 were all mediocre. Are you starting to see a trend here?

Shoot third parties are the only thing keeping the PS4 alive now..

MannGamer3368d ago

@Septic
If this is indeed your review then I can understand pretty much everything.
Let me help the others understand you better. Those are other articles written by you:
1)You give Forza Horizon a 9
2) In your playstation article you like using the expression:"LAUNCH LINE-UP- ‘GREATNESS DELAYED’"
3) Article title:TITANFALL: THE BEST FPS OF 2014
4)Article title: XBOX ONE VS PS4 DEBATE: ‘PS4 HAS NO GAMES?’
5)Article title: SONY AT E3 2014- GREATNESS DELAYED?
6)Article title: INFAMOUS: SECOND SON REVIEW – GREAT POWERS, IRRESPONSIBLY HANDLED
7) Article Title: xbox-one-twitch
XBOX ONE’S SUPERIOR TWITCH STREAMING SERVICE JUSTIFIES DELAY
8)Article title: Titanfall-Game
TITANFALL: 6V6- STRIKING THE PERFECT BALANCE

And there you go people on N4G, I present you Septic.

JasonKCK3368d ago

You Sony guys need to let things go. All this crying over low review scores is hurting your fanbase. You guys have no problem trashing other platform exclusives but when it comes to Sony it's "hands off" It's hypocrisy any way you look at it. Half the people here defending The Order are the same people who trashed Ryse for the exact same things, but now it's unfair.

Gazondaily3367d ago

@Mystic

"Care to list some reasons for coming to that conclusion? Once again, as with Destiny, I'm floored by how many people apparently expected something different from what was previewed over and over."

I was giving an example of how a game could constitute being 'broken'.

The Order doesn't necessarily struggle to find its identity with balancing the TPS and cinematic experiences, but as the review says, it executes neither element to any appreciable degree. It's not so much the identity I don't like, its how completely shoddy the execution was.

Also, with Destiny, gamers were alluded to a far more ambitious experience than what is basically Borderlands. When Bungie talked about a persistent world, flying to different worlds in ships etc, we of course took them to task when the actual game fell short of what the game was hyped up to be. When the previews came in, that's when they got critiqued.

In fact, we did that piece here:

http://www.gameondaily.com/...

@Manngamer

I like how you missed out so many of my other submissions:

* SONY VS MICROSOFT: WHO WON GAMESCOM 2014?- Sony
* Who Won E3 2014- Sony
* ONLY 115K XBOX ONE’S SOLD IN APRIL – THE TRUE REASON FOR THE DIS-KINECT
* XBOX ONE DROPS KINECT- WHAT AN ABSOLUTE JOKE
* THE XBOX ONE PRICE CUT = DESPERATION?
* NO TITANFALL ON PS4 IS DISGRACEFUL
* WHY TROPHIES ARE BETTER THAN ACHIEVEMENTS
* PLAYSTATION PLUS PUTS XBOX LIVE TO SHAME

And on and on...

And there you have it. An example of fanboy trolls and their selective amnesia backing up their BS lies and consipiracies.

MannGamer3367d ago

@Septics
Thanks for the clarification. It seems like I was wrong about thinking you were just Xbox One who truly believes what he wrote, but instead I have also realize that you would even contradict yourself in your article just to get click, like people say here click bait article...
So you have wrote those 3 articles:
1)SONY AT E3 2014- GREATNESS DELAYED?
2)MICROSOFT E3 2014: A SOLID SHOW BUT LACKING SURPRISES
3)* SONY VS MICROSOFT: WHO WON GAMESCOM 2014?- Sony
So I am a little confuse here, one got "greatness delayed" the other was "solid but lacking surprises" but for some reason "greatness delayed" won? You probably suffered "amnesia" while writing one of those
Then you wrote those 2 articles:
1)NO TITANFALL ON PS4 IS A BIG DEAL. DEAL WITH IT
2)NO TITANFALL ON PS4 IS DISGRACEFUL
There you go again "amnesia".
There you go, I cannot wait for you next contradiction, maybe it will take a while since you'll be more carefull about those article.
Thanks again for opening my eyes even more.

NuggetsOfGod3367d ago (Edited 3367d ago )

Lol look at all the tears! Amazing!!

+ Show (37) more repliesLast reply 3367d ago
TGR3368d ago

On your scale, sure, however this website's review scale may be entirely different to yours. HAving said that review scores are totally pointless anyway.

DarkOcelet3368d ago

Maybe like you said, its in my scale, for instance Raven's Cry is a 4/10 from me because its broken but if it is fixed then its a 6.5/10. Thats how i see it.

I just find it difficult sometimes that games like this score 4/10 and games like Gone Home which can be finished under an hour and cost 20$ 9/10.

Prime1573368d ago

This review gave the graphics an eye popping score, just reread his paragraph. So even if this terrible reviewer gave a 9 or 10 on graphics, how could he get an average of 4? Gameplay and story would have to be... 2 each to get 4.333/10 (and that's with graphics as a 9).

That's right, he'd have to give the gameplay and story a COMBINED score of 4 to rate this title a 4 overall.

Here's what the reviewer said About graphics:

"You cannot talk about The Order: 1886 and ignore its visuals, unless of course, you’re Stevie Wonder, in which you are excused from it because really, even at a cursory glance, The Order will wow you instantaneously and fool you into thinking that what your retinas are witnessing are nothing more than impressive CGI fare. But no, The Order: 1886 really is that good looking and stands as the best example of the PlayStation 4 and its impressive capabilities. Whilst the title itself achieves this by being quite linear, the good looks are comprehensive in almost all areas, from some downright jaw-dropping character models, incredible detail in world objects and awe inspiring level design. The visuals are in the best of class and truly make us excited about the future of these consoles. As it stands, The Order: 1886 is the best looking next-gen title and we don’t see anything on the horizon that can top it and that possibly includes Uncharted 4."

I know right? Best looking game on the ps4 so far, that's a 10 to me in that regards. I used 9 in the example above.

thekhurg3368d ago

They gave Unity a 4/10 (and it was actually broken).

The metric is there.

Prime1573368d ago

Thekhurg, I don't see how unity getting a 4, especially as a broken game, proves that there is a metric on this site.

Gazondaily3367d ago

Take it from the owner of the site, this is OUR metric:

If we give a score of 1/10 or 2/10 then chances are, its broken. But that doesn't mean its only relegated to broken games.

Had we reviewed LocoCycle for instance, it would get a 2/10. Its not because its broken. Its because its s***.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3367d ago
ChronoJoe3368d ago

That's nonsense Ocelet and anyone with anyone that's spent our time within our industry should know it. Are you seriously telling me that a game can be unbelievably tedious, poorly designed, and incoherent yet by your standards it still receives at least a 5 so long as its playable? This makes no sense.

Surely as a medium of entertainment, if anything it matters most if the game is in fact, entertaining? Whether or not the game is 'broken' only becomes a factor if that entertainment value is disrupted by these attribute.

The 1-10 scale represents a games entertainment factor based on various aspects of both the games design and functionality. Neither of the two have cut-off points where they influence the score as a review is very much a holistic interpretation of the games entertainment value, by the individual reviewer. To tell him or her that they are wrong or that their score means something you've decided to impose is absolute nonsense.

Reviews are there to guide the consumer. The consumer is looking for entertainment value, not necessarily whether the game is 'broken' or not (only significant a factor if this reduced functionality reduces the games entertainment value), therefore even the most broken games could obtain high scores if they represent incredibly high entertainment values (e.g. Skyrim), and the most functional games can also achieve low scores if aspects of their design fundamentally reduce the games entertainment value (e.g. The Order 1886).

Plus, as Septic suggests what even constitutes broken? Why does broken coding somehow have a president over broken design if they are both capable of wholly influencing a games entertainment value?

JimmyHACK3368d ago

LOL, a review score does not represent the functioning state of a game.

MSBAUSTX3368d ago

Tell that to the reviewers who rated Master Chief Collection below an 8 because of the problems with the match making in upon it's release. Double standards abound my friend.

ChronoJoe3368d ago

It depends if the games technical hits affect its entertainment value. I would argue that matchmaking issues that effectively prevent one from being capable of playing the games multiplayer component have rather heavy implications on its entertainment value and therefore it's easy to see how these factors would have affected the games critical reception.

3368d ago Replies(1)
joab7773368d ago

I agree. The reason it is getting low scores is two-fold...length and price. If it had replayability or cost $40, it would be getting 8's and above and the story would be about everything they did right.

In a day when we are getting Bloodborne, The Witcher 3 and MGS5, it's hard for ppl to be happy w 6-8 hrs for $60.

The great thing is that the engine is done and a sequel will be much bigger. Remember Drake's Fortune. It ended up much better after 3 games.

ChronoJoe3368d ago

I actually don't think $20 price difference would have had much of an impact. Looking at games that have launched as $40 titles before such as Sly Cooper 4, critics have shown no leniency because the game was a $40 title.

1nsomniac3368d ago (Edited 3368d ago )

Of a scale of 1-10 surly 5 is an average game & 4 is very slightly below average??

Either way I've not played the game so couldn't say either way what I believe the game deserved.

The lack of content & game length is obviously going to be a big factor though when you're charging so much.

hasamalaha3368d ago

Sorry Dark, just can't agree with you. You can't start with a 4 just because there aren't glitches.

I'm not saying this game deserves any score in particular, as I haven't played it.

Christopher3368d ago (Edited 3368d ago )

Nah. 1 and 2/10 means the game is broken. 4/10 doesn't necessarily mean broken, just not fun, not engaging, not filled with the content expected, poorly written, poor sound, and/or poor quality graphics.

It can mean there are bugs and glitches, even some minor game breaking ones, but that's not a necessity for a 4/10.

When you look at a score, you should use it a tell of how much they got right as it relates to the opinion of the author, not how much of it works as intended.

@Septic: how would you rate the game if it cost only $30?

Gazondaily3368d ago (Edited 3368d ago )

I don't know if it would change my opinion of the game at all. I just didn't like what I played. It was just so shoddy. The QTEs were so ridiculous to the point of almost being insulting.

I did not expect the game to be such a blunder.

True story :(not that anyone will believe me here) I fell asleep after a couple of hours in the game, with the controller in my hand. It forces you to do eveverything it's way,even the pace at which you move your character. So you're painfully mashing the stick in to run but he won't.

I know I have a bad rep here because of my admittedly consistent defence of all things Xbox but after I completed this, I really thought that many people on n4g would be in agreement of this game's failings.

I'm not gonna lie, people's awkward defence of this game is frustrating to me. If they enjoyed it that's fine but when I read posts saying things along the lines of oh it's just haters and the all reviewers are useless, it boggles my mind that people agree with that nonsense.

The game is just poor imo. I don't want to 'play' a game like it ever again.

MannGamer3368d ago

@Septic
That is your opinion while you don't enjoy the game, people who have played it are having a good time, specially people who were not compromised by the US media.
On amazon UK, France, Spain and German the game holds a 4 star review from the gamers. Those are the people that probably don't read English or US reviews and enjoyed the game for what it is.

Christopher3367d ago

@MannGamer: What does telling Septic it's "his opinion" do to somehow take away from it? I think we all get that it's his opinion, but the opinion of others doesn't suddenly make his opinion any less valid than anyone else's.

I'm happy people are enjoying The Order. Same as I'm happy people still get enjoyment out of new Pokemon games even though I think it's about as outdated as Tetris only they don't make a new Tetris game every two years. Regardless of what enjoyment people get out of those games, I just don't see it as a reason to enjoy the game myself or to think that just because others are enjoying it that my opinion of it is any less valid than theirs.

garrettbobbyferguson3368d ago

If a 4/10 is broken, what does anything lower mean to you? That they're non existent?

JeffGUNZ3367d ago

lol thank you. A broken game is a 0 out of 10.

wonderfulmonkeyman3368d ago (Edited 3368d ago )

No, see, that's not broken.
A 1 is broken.
A 2 would be broken, but with a novelty worth at least watching a video for.
A 3 would be heavily flawed but not unplayable.

A 4, is one step below the middle, meaning just slightly below average.

For the sake of post length, I'm going to stop there, because at this point, you get the point.

People keep operating the 1-through-10-scale the same way that they would a 1-to-5-scale, and that doesn't make sense.

The Order, depending on personal opinion, may not be a superb game, but it is most certainly NOT broken.
Anyone saying it is while giving it a 4 out of 10, isn't using the 1-10 scale right.

JeffGUNZ3367d ago

Why even give it a 1? A complete broken game is something that doesn't work. Something really buggy which makes it relatively unplayable would be a 1 or 2.

Svinya3368d ago ShowReplies(1)
3368d ago
nosferatuzodd3368d ago

Lets give the order a low score and the idiots will come runing and give us thr clicks we so desperately need. dont you guys get it its a click bait, a horrible one at that

ChickenOfTheCaveMan3368d ago

It's like that Family Guy when people were "doing Kermit" aka licking frogs. All the cool kids were doing it.

Now only the cool game reviewers are trashing The Order, if you're not you're just stupid.

To these reviewers, don't forget that "Everybody knows you never go full retard.".

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 3367d ago
SuperDan-Dare3368d ago (Edited 3368d ago )

I think it was visually a stunning game, with a nice story but falls down on a number factors.

- lack of replayability once completed
- the length of the game
- the price tag of the game in light of the above two points.

I think some games can be too long, I'm thinking dragonage as an example, but once you complete that there's still a multiplayer aspect which you can dip into. This is polar opposite and IS too short.

In fact the Order is very much like a condom - once you've used it all you can do is throw it away.

RINGOELGRINGO3368d ago

I think that is the first time I have ever seen a game compared to a condom.

Volkama3368d ago

You can lend The Order to a friend. Or put it in your mouth.

lifeisgamesok3368d ago

Lol funny analogy but it actually makes sense

ChronoJoe3368d ago

You could actually, play it again at a later date, or play it on a harder difficulty if you have not already. It's replayability is similar to that of movies, if you liked it then you're quite likely to play it again at a later date.

hasamalaha3368d ago

I hope you're not talking about the condom.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3368d ago
moegooner883368d ago

Thoroughly enjoying the game. If you don't mind the relatively short length. I would defo recommend it.

danny8183368d ago

Those of you complaining about the low score, please keep in mind these are opinions about the game. If the reviewer didn't like it, than you cant do anything about it.

MSBAUSTX3368d ago

I don't think it deserves a 4/ personally. I would put it close to a 7 or so. Great story but painfully short for 60 bucks. That is my $.02

Show all comments (112)
350°

The Order: 1886 pushed visuals hard in 2015 - And still looks stunning today

Digital Foundry : Released in February 2015, The Order: 1886 was a stunning PlayStation 4 game at the cutting-edge of rendering technology, with visuals that still hold up today. The game's release pre-dated in-depth Digital Foundry coverage, something we're looking to address with this new video! Ready at Dawn's game never received a sequel and never received a PS4 Pro upgrade, but thanks to developments with exploited, older firmware PS5 consoles, we can now show you the game running locked at 60 frames per second.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
VenomUK278d ago

The gameplay was bland and extremely frustrating at times with unnecessary QTE combat at points. But the world and the lore and the characters and the story were fantastic. I’ve always wanted a sequel. I still hope Sony will surprise us one day.

shadowT279d ago

Sony missed the opportunity to acquire Ready at Dawn Studios.

Tacoboto279d ago

But... Sony didn't want Ready at Dawn. Clearly

mkis007278d ago

I'm guessing had 1886 turned out more positively they would have.

RaidenBlack279d ago

And let's not forget,
Ready At Dawn showcased The Order 1886 running on PC at 60fps at SIGGRAPH 2015
https://www.dsogaming.com/n...

isarai279d ago

I still stand by my theory that this game just released at the wrong time. Almost every outlet spent a lot of time in their reviews ragging on the game for not being an online experience, everyone was in the Destiny hype train and at the time they wanted EVERY game to follow suit, bashing any game that didn't. If this were released after everyone realized how much that wasn't future, people would've appreciated it more. I loved it, and I'm always disappointed that we'll never get a sequel

Tacoboto279d ago

That doesn't seem to be true about outlets complaining on the lack of online. The review summaries on Metacritic are very consistent: Amazing graphics, but shallow gameplay and a very short length with little reason to return.

Here's an example of how *little* time IGN spent talking about multiplayer:

"With no multiplayer, and no reason to revisit the short and stunted single-player campaign once it’s been completed, there just isn’t a lot to it."

It's the final sentence. They don't even take the time to say "online multiplayer"

MrChow666278d ago (Edited 278d ago )

"Amazing graphics, but shallow gameplay and a very short length with little reason to return."
You are right, that's what everbody was saying at the time, never heard anything about it not being online.
I've been thinking about trying this game for years, I may get it now that it's dirt cheap, no big loss if it sucks

MrChow666278d ago

Oh, add to that bad enemy AI, I remember that from the reviews, I saw a video of a wherewolf boss fight with a very weak AI

thorstein278d ago

And there we glowing reviews for shorter games. It was one of the times where hating this game was "cool."

CrimsonWing69279d ago

Can you show me the reviews that rag on it for not having an online experience?

I’m not doubting you or anything. I’m just being lazy.

isarai279d ago

Sorry, not multiplayer, open world is what I meant.

Tacoboto279d ago

That's also fake news, isarai. Again, the game was consistently criticized for what it was (Pretty but extremely short, extremely linear, hand-holding, no replayability), not for what it wasn't (multiplayer/open-world)

isarai279d ago

Nope, every review uses the term "linear" several times as if it's some inherently bad attribute. Not fake news at all. Since then there's veen plenty of short and sweet single player linear games that get lots of praise, again after the reality of everything being open world set it and it wasn't as great as everyone thought. But at the launch of the last gen everyone had open world fever, and especially the first couple years "linear" was a con in many games reviewed

Tacoboto279d ago

That's your own contortion assuming criticism of its extremely linear design is suddenly a call for it to have been open world.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 279d ago
zumlauf14279d ago

You totally made up a claim regarding an overall review consensus that isn't true. And, instead of just ignoring being called out for it, you respond with "oh actually i ment to say OPEN WORLD". Which literally isn't true either. You can't show us one review that bashed the game for "not being open world". And, somehow the other guy is getting downvoted. Over a bullshit liar.

isarai279d ago

Games were being criticized at that time for any game that wasn't open world or online. So yeah I got one mixed for the other, doesn't change my argument one bit that it would've been received better if it released later. People are agreeing because if you were not riding the "online and open world" hype train at that time, it was blatantly obvious there were biases in play for how games were criticized. Now after all that has happened since people want to say "oh wait these games were actually pretty good" cause they know better now

Rude-ro278d ago

The gameplay was very shallow and when one says repetitive, it is by the very definition for some fights. As in, completely identical but different setting.

The game has amazing potential.
The graphics, the lore, characters…
This could most definitely have been all corrected with a sequel and became a franchise hit…
Still would love to see an attempt.

Ie fantastic premise and moments that shine…
But it had its downfalls that deserved the negative marks.

thorstein278d ago

It was the "game to hate" when it launched. And right here, on this site, we saw people posting stories that were outright fabrications about the game. It was weird. The game launched, it was fun, a really cool game but the hate was too much. And so were the lies.

Minute Man 721278d ago

It was just too short....but I loved every minute of it....double dipped and grabbed the ultimate CE

babadivad278d ago

That isn't true. I remember people talking about how incredibly short it was and the somewhat janky gunplay.

KwietStorm_BLM278d ago

First I'm hearing of this. I don't know what multiplayer has to do with anything. The game was just dull. Amazing graphics, great narrative, great lore, boring gameplay sprinkled in pieces between cutscenes, and lackluster AI and controls.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 278d ago
anast279d ago

People cried this game was too short. No people are crying because games are too long.

isarai279d ago

Pretty sure everyone is complaining about bloated games lately but ok

anast279d ago

Thank you for the ok. I needed that.

RaidenBlack279d ago

Games like Ubisoft open worlds not enjoyable lengthy games like Elden Ring or Baldur's Gate III

anast278d ago

I get it, but people also complain about the main stories being too long or just games being too long in general because they are "adults".

Show all comments (50)
230°

The Curious Case of The Order: 1886 - A Retrospective

Ready At Dawn cut their teeth developing spin-offs for PlayStation Portable and porting games to consoles. When they got a chance to establish their own with The Order: 1886, its poor critical reception ostensibly halted their trajectory. Can one middling game really sully one’s reputation in the eyes of Sony?

Read Full Story >>
lordsofgaming.net
moriarty1889745d ago

Wanted a sequel for this game so much. It was left wide open for one with the ending it had.

porkChop745d ago

Sony did file a new trademark a while back, so you never know. Though if I were to guess it would be a reboot rather than a sequel.

REDGUM744d ago

The Order was great from my playthrough and really enjoyed it. The same with Days Gone. Both, amongst others out there, deserve a follow-up. Anyone who actually played through the complete games knows there were hidden gems in and around these 2 games. Too many out there put too much faith in reviewer's opinions instead of thier own and get put off or join the hate bandwagon.
Seriously, gamers need to game & not read or view other people game with added opinions thrown in.
Honestly, if you haven't played either of these 2 games yet, do yourself a favour, pick it or them up, forget anything you know about them & just play it for yourself & create you're own opinions.

Ninver744d ago

I ignored the reviews and went straight to the store to but the game. Thoroughly enjoyed it I might add. If only Sony had the balls to summon enough faith to reboot or give us a sequel. Maybe even a prequel done right and make it a 3 part series. Wasted opportunity for a really different exclusive if you ask me.

barom744d ago

Days Gone is really an exceptional game though it feels like it took a bit of time for it to get interesting.

The Order 1886 was unfortunately not very good. Super beautiful game with beautiful cinematics but felt incomplete and don't really remember much happening at all in the game i.e. it was kind of bland. A sequel where they learned from their mistakes would be very intriguing though and I would have bought it.

monkey602744d ago

I loved Days Gone and I would have loved a sequel.

I didnt like The Order. There was enough there for me to give a sequel a chance if they improved on bits but I'm losing no sleep over the absence of it. I thought the 1st one was genuinely terrible for a multitude of valid reasons.

S2Killinit744d ago

I really enjoyed it. I was hoping for a game in the same world but less linear. With lots of that sweet lore.

YoungKingDoran744d ago

Yeah with the tech sorted and expanding on the existing assets, they could/should have been able to do a trilogy that gen. What happened..

moriarty1889744d ago

Agreed. Such an interesting title just abandoned. Makes no sense. As I said the ending of the game sets up for a sequel perfectly.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 744d ago
porkChop745d ago

Incredible graphics and presentation. Great use of photo mode. A really interesting premise. The actual gunplay felt solid. The game just needed to be longer, and the levels could have been a bit less constrained. More enemy variety as well. At full price it just didn't have the value, at least in my opinion.

I would like to see a sequel or reboot, which I think is more likely. It would need to be a new dev as Ready at Dawn are part of Oculus now

robtion744d ago

I think Bluepoint could do a good job. They have the technical capability if Demon's Souls is anything to go by.

MeatyUrologist744d ago

Agreed. Because of all the bad reviews I waited until the end of last gen to buy it, but was really surprised. The only knocks against it were length and linearity. Really loved the visuals, atmosphere, story, and characters. The gunplay was actually really well done with unique and fun weapons.

You mentioned the photo mode, and this was one of the best examples I have seen. They actually allow you to add filters and modify the visuals in the photo mode, and then apply those to the game. I have never seen that before or since. I really wish more games would allow this. Give the users more control over how the game looks to cater it to their tastes.

uth11745d ago

This was a weird one in that the community hated the game but also demanded a sequel

SonyStyled745d ago

Because it’s literally a 5 hr game, yet had the same quality offering of the other AAA Sony games that are tens to hundreds of hours of gameplay.

I used a walkthrough trophy guide for the platinum to not miss any collectibles in one run, it took 8hrs. I thought it was actually a pretty great game, but always wonder why that level of game development didn’t continue for a 15hr single player campaign.

robtion744d ago

I'm part of the community and I loved it.

I think a lot of the hate was from people who didn't even play it jumping on the bandwagon. Clearly there was the usual hate from xbox fans but also from insecure PC players as the graphics were (still are) phenomenal.
The game is a flawed gem. A new entry on PS5 would have great potential (doubt it will happen though, Sony isn't into risk taking these days).

Eidolon744d ago

All the early hate was a people who haven't played it and were quick to call it a QTE game.

AuraAbjure744d ago

I'm an Xbox fan and I'm planning on getting a PS4 pro one day to play this game along with gravity Rush 2 and others.

coolbeans744d ago

-"I think a lot of the hate was from people who didn't even play it jumping on the bandwagon."

Can we please stop retreating back such tired defenses? It's had a heavily mixed reception ever since critics PLAYED the game back then, and justifiably so. Even trying to rope in "insecure PC players" just shows how shallow this view actually is.

745d ago
Shiore2u745d ago (Edited 745d ago )

Can't ever forget those terribly designed lycan fights.

ClayRules2012744d ago

Ugh, I love this game! But yes, those lycan fights were terribly designed, for real.

Overall though, solid gameplay.

Show all comments (37)
540°

Sony Files A New Trademark For The Order: 1886

The Order: 1886 has received a new trademark filed by Sony. The trademark application is for a video game, implying that they want to extend it.

Read Full Story >>
novicegamerguides.com
zsquaresoff880d ago

I hope they give this game another chance, it had an incredible story and gameplay, It was just unfortunate that the game length was extremely short.

Magog880d ago

The team that made it was bought by Facebook. I don't see why they would continue the series with a new team rather than just make a new IP.

Neonridr880d ago

I guess it's still possible that another studio could take another swing at it. But yeah, Ready at Dawn was bought by Facebook.

darthv72880d ago

would be cool to see an oculus version.

CrimsonWing69880d ago

It wouldn't be the first time this has happened. Bungie and 343 come to mind with Halo.

Magog880d ago

@CrimsonWing69 the difference is Halo was still successful. In my mind they should have put the series to rest when the original creators got tired of it but Microsoft love to flog the series so there you go.

ALMGNOON880d ago

am pretty sure Sony owns the IP so that doesn't matter at all.

GamingSinceForever879d ago

So what other great games has that studio produced since being bought by Facebook?

Magog879d ago

@GamingSinceForever they made Lone Echo a well received VR game.

Lord_Sloth879d ago

The team was, but that doesn't mean all of them left Sony. It's entirely possible that several of the employees still work for Sony.

Rhythmattic879d ago (Edited 879d ago )

"The team that made it was bought by Facebook."
Yes.. Not the IP...
Personally, The IP has soooo much potential for exploration.......If done right.....
Which brings me to your post... Unlike FB... Sorry, Meta.... A team is not IP, and with an even better team working on such said IP, It could be a winner...

Def wont be 1886 infinite,

deleted879d ago

Exactly @Rhythmattic Could you imagine if The Order was handed over to a studio like Santa Monica?! The Order 1886 set up a really nice setting and lore... now the idea could be pushed to the next level by one of Sony's high tier studios. It may be too much to ask to get one of the big dogs on it, but one can dream.

It could even work out that someone like Santa Monica create a smaller team just for creative vision, then hand over the busy work of building that world to one of their subsidiaries like the newly acquired Valkyrie Entertainment, which specializes in high tier support work.

Magog879d ago (Edited 879d ago )

@Lord_Sloth Readyatdawn were never owned by Sony so no, none of their employees stayed with Sony. Order 1886 was a second party game funded by Sony but developed by an outside company.

Neonridr879d ago

@GamingSinceForever - Lone Echo and its sequel are some of the better VR games out there with a great story and some awesome VR integration. The second game only came out in October of this year, so it will be some time before we see their next project.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 879d ago
_SilverHawk_880d ago

Hopefully playstation-5 will have a sequel to the order 1886.

FlavorLav01880d ago

Please let one of the big boys take a swing at it and slay us with an awesome game. Naughty Dog, Sucker Punch, Sony Santa Monica, and Sony Bend could all do this IP justice.

Magog880d ago

Why would any of Sony's teams want to take their time and resources to work on another studios unsuccessful IP instead of their own unique ideas? Generally speaking Sony doesn't assign their top teams games to make they let them make what they want and are passionate about.

senorfartcushion879d ago

It’ll be just to hold on to the rights. They’re not making a new one. A remaster in 5 years is most likely, but until then, no.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 879d ago
FlavorLav01880d ago

If it had been marketed correctly as a strong narrative experience and sold for $30-40 instead of full price, the game would’ve big a huge success and we’d have guaranteed sequels. Loved the game, hope more from this IP is on the way.

Rhythmattic879d ago

It def cut corners though.. The Wolf fights where copy and pasted, the gun mechanics, decent... But the World was what made it... Maybe your standard gun mechanics, but never the guns....

The round table needs to be fleshed out....

ChasterMies880d ago (Edited 880d ago )

Short games are ok with me. Everyone loves the Titanfall 2 campaign and it was only about 5 hours. The issue is gameplay, and frustrating controls that did not need to be frustrating. Other than that, the look and feel was fantastic.

porkChop879d ago

Titanfall 2 also had an excellent multiplayer mode though. As excellent as the campaign was, no one would have paid full price for just that.

Ramboforlife880d ago

Totally agree. If it was a 20-30 hour campaign, it would have sold very well. It deserves another chance.

Livingthedream879d ago

Nah it had mediocre to terrible reviews. Don’t really know anyone who actually loved the game, but there was potential. They should give it another go same studio. Lol

Rude-ro879d ago

This is not that type of game.
I can not think of a single story driven game that does not have endless fetch quests in a forced open world type game that comes close to 20 hours.

Let’s be realistic…
Either way, the game had issues that can easily be remedied and make for an amazing sequel and I hope it happens.

senorfartcushion879d ago

It was good but had a terrible
Cliffhanger. An actual second half would have skyrocketed the game’s status. TLOU 2 was over 30 hours long for some people.

porkChop879d ago

It really just needed to be twice as long. I can put up with super linear, tightly scripted gameplay as long as I feel like I'm getting my money's worth. But the game was so short with little replay value. And the length prevented the lore from being properly realized.

I'm interested as long as they can flesh out the length. Possibly open up the gameplay slightly without detracting from the movie-like scripting.

-Foxtrot879d ago

Yeah I really liked the overall world and Sir Galahad

(SPOILERS)

Having Werewolves and then vampires opened it up to so many possibilities, who's to say other mythical beasts couldn't be introduced.

EmperorDalek879d ago

The story was good until it ended on a cliff hanger, I wouldn't call it incredible. The gameplay was dreadful. I would like to see an improved sequel however.

itsmebryan879d ago

@zsquare

Maybe I'm missing something but, wasn't that game panned after much hype as not very good and poor gameplay? Metacritic is 63% and user rating of 6.7 and by no means consider a hit.
Actually a new developer could be good for the game.

Flewid638879d ago

Limited gameplay mechanics too but I REALLY enjoyed what was there.

alb1899879d ago

Yep, I always liked the atmosphere and characters of this game. I think it can be a really good game if they put emphasis on the gameplay.

DarXyde879d ago (Edited 879d ago )

I don't know if I would say the gameplay was "incredible." The lore was fine and the weapons were awesome (and truly a standout visually, no questions asked). I'm impressed they got a game looking this good to run in such a stable condition when you consider the tech last gen. I only played it on base PS4, and that was really a marvel.

But that all said, the gameplay didn't stand out for me at all. Felt like a pretty standard affair and, as you said, the length was pretty short. Granted, I got it on sale for $12, so I don't feel bad about that purchase. It didn't really linger so the point was really to tell the story they wanted to tell, which I can respect.

I also hope they give it another chance, but I would prefer if they really made it stand out. There's a ton of creative talent over at PlayStation, so if Ready at Dawn had learned from the shortcomings of the first game and they're willing to solicit feedback from PlayStation studios, it has great potential.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 879d ago
NovusTerminus880d ago (Edited 880d ago )

I really want another one, I bought it day one zero regrets. I enjoyed it a lot and has lots of room for a sequel.

HOWEVER

USPTO policy is that a trademark only be updates with visual proof once every ten years after initial filing, and since the game is still for sale on the PlayStation Network it is likely just a paper work error that will be corrected so that they can continue selling the game digitally.

RaidenBlack880d ago

Yea ... I initially though this might be for a near-future res+fps boost and/or a PC port, paving way for 1887.

GhostofHorizon880d ago

It was a really good game but there was a ton of room for improvement all around. If they had another crack at it, it could be something special.

Eidolon879d ago

A lot of games before and since have made absolutely shameless attempts at making a great experience that ended up falling short. This game gets the worst of it because of hype. And it's actually has really good narrative and gameplay. Tell me one thing NOW that it did wrong that other games aren't doing. Tell me.

BenRC01879d ago

I really like it, bought the special edition years after release, expecting an average game but was very pleasantly surprised

Relientk77880d ago

I really liked the concept, but the game wasn't perfect. It definitely had some flaws. The graphics not being one, they were insane. The coolest guns in the game were only usable for a short period of time. I believe there were like 2 werewolf fights that were basically identical which people pointed out. I'd love for the series to get another shot.

masterfox880d ago

hope there is a sequel, first one was and still is stunning from every aspect, from gameplay, visuals , music, etc, you name it, it literally the whole game is realtime cgi!, imagine what a PS5 can do to it!

Show all comments (88)