590°

Sony Buying Xbox 'Simply Ridiculous' - Analyst

NowGamer: A leading industry analyst has slammed claims Sony should buy Xbox as 'simply ridiculous'.

Read Full Story >>
nowgamer.com
NYC_Gamer4124d ago

I believe Forbes wrote similar Sony&Nintendo doom articles too

tehpees34124d ago

Forbes is a joke run by haters.

dcbronco4124d ago

Forbes isn't run by haters. It run by business people. People that realize gamers cam be flamed into giving them hits on their site so that they can say they have a varied and extensive group of people looking at their site. It's all about making money on a dying industry. Articles hits create revenue lost by paper magazines.

Nothing to see here. Just a dinosaur trying to save itself from the tar pits.

blackbeld4124d ago

"Sony Buying Xbox"

No way!

Samsung Buying Xbox is way better.

morganfell4124d ago

And Jesse Divinich said GTA V was coming in 2012. He said that dance games were dying. He also felt Homefront was a good game and investors were wrong to dump THQ stock. The guy has been wrong so many times it is ridiculous. All of these analysts should be dumped into a fire pit and burned. Not because they are wrong but because their predictions, mostly erred, do more harm to the industry than good. It is humorous to note that so many believed MS purchasing Sony was such a realistic possibility but this is now far-fetched when the truth is both ideas were and are quite absurd.

I do not believe Sony or any other company would buy the Xbox division simply because MS wouldn't sell a business. They would kill it off first. I do think MS would be much more likely to strike a partnership with a company like Sony. Again I do not believe that will happen but it is certainly more possible than a sale. And a partnership between Sony and MS would be a juggernaut of gaming.

pixelsword4124d ago

I hope not, Microsoft is keeping Sony on their toes and vice-versa; Sony is keeping Microsoft on their toes as well. They are what Sega and Nintendo were in the 8 and 16-bit era.

AAACE54124d ago

Let's not forget that both companies have to face the portable market because that area is still taking away from traditional gaming.

BattleAxe4124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

"Divnich responded to claims by Forbes contributor Adam Hartung earlier today (Mon) that Microsoft should sell its Xbox Division to ‘someone like Sony’.

Hartung said: “The entertainment division will be spun off, sold to someone like Sony or possibly Barnes & Noble, or dramatically reduced in size.

"Failure is already inevitable. At this stage, not even a new CEO can save Microsoft. Game over. Ballmer loses. And if you keep your money invested in Microsoft it will disappear along with the company.”

I can see where Hartung is coming from. Heres why I think he is saying this:

1.) Surface may or may not take off

2.) the Windows Phone OS hasn't been all that successful

3.) Apple is appealing to more and more people in the Laptop and home computing space

4.) Sony could potentially destroy Microsoft in the next generation of the console war. Sony just surpassed the worldwide sales of the 360 while releasing a year later and with Microsoft having a 7 million console lead. Sony has beat Microsoft two generations in a row now.

5.) Google could potentially come out with a PC operating system in the next few years

6.) The SteamBox could begin to popularize Linux

Microsoft is really getting hit hard on all fronts, and I'm sure there are other areas where they are taking a beating like the competition from free office software such as Open Office.

airforcex4124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

BattleAxe,

1.Sony has not surpassed MS on worldwide sales. The report was a forecast of systems shipped by one company. A forecast is a prediction. In fact, 360 is still ahead by at least 1.5 million systems according to most sites. Notice how Sony has not made such claim.
2. XBOX has always been the underdog. MS shipped the system early precisely to counter Sony's dominance. The strategy worked. MS is ahead with 2 markets (US and Europe).
3. 360 dominates the US market (where the big bucks are made); it will do the same next gen due to XBOX Live.
4. Sony beat XBOX the first time, as expected. At most, it will tie MS this time around which is a lot to say for MS given that PS2 sold 157 million consoles. That's a considerable market loss.
5. They've been predicting the fall of MS and Xbox for years, and they continue to stay on top. At most, MS market share on the PC side will be smaller in terms of %, but in terms of total install base, no one comes close. There are a total of 66-70 million Mac users in the world. MS sold 60 million W8 licenses in a few months. Add W7, Vista, XP...
6. Finally, I own a PS3 and enjoy it! But I also like my 360!

pablo-b4124d ago

@ battleaxe

the thing is, you are a well known fanboy of the sony flavour! what you just wrote was a fanboys wetdream.

time to wake and change your undies i think

Ezz20134124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

@airforcex
1."Sony has not surpassed MS on worldwide sales. The report was a forecast of systems shipped by one company. A forecast is a prediction. In fact, 360 is still ahead by at least 1.5 million systems according to most sites. Notice how Sony has not made such claim."

so you are using vgchartes as your fact lol
you guys love to flip flop when ever it suit you

2. "XBOX has always been the underdog. MS shipped the system early precisely to counter Sony's dominance. The strategy worked. MS is ahead with 2 markets (US and Europe)."

the only place Xbox beat ps3 in it is USA
the rest of the world
ps3 beat it every where
and did you say Europe ??!! lol you can't be more wrong
ps3 beat it there too by alot

3. "360 dominates the US market (where the big bucks are made); it will do the same next gen due to XBOX Live."

again with USA=world lol
they do dominate USA
but guess what ps3 cought up with them and by now it passed them
USA help them but still they lost to ps3 worldwide
(which much more important than one place)
and fun fact ,the lowest selling ps home console still manage to beat xbox360 "at it prime" in sales and games

4. "Sony beat XBOX the first time, as expected. At most, it will tie MS this time around which is a lot to say for MS given that PS2 sold 157 million consoles. That's a considerable market loss."

even if you go by "vgchartes" (which you are using)
they show now that ps3 have 52.7% market share and xbox360 have 32.3% market share
http://www.vgchartz.com/art...

that's your site ...do you still trust it now or what ?!

5. "They've been predicting the fall of MS and Xbox for years, and they continue to stay on top. At most, MS market share on the PC side will be smaller in terms of %, but in terms of total install base, no one comes close. There are a total of 66-70 million Mac users in the world. MS sold 60 million W8 licenses in a few months. Add W7, Vista, XP..."

and if MS keep going with the same games with no new ips and force you to pay for online
they will fall big time
you guys thought exclusives don't matter but it did matter
that's why ps3 beat xbox360 in worldwide

6. "Finally, I own a PS3 and enjoy it! But I also like my 360! "

same
but i don't like my xbox any more
lost any faith i had for it

sikbeta4123d ago

What!? buying XBOX Division!? lol they simply don't have the money rofl...

NotSoSilentBob4123d ago

No Forbes isn't a joke run by haters, they have become a website looking for hits. The more outrageous the Headline the more hits they get thus the more advertising revenue they get.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 4123d ago
Dwalls11714124d ago

Someone was butt hurt and wrote this responce article in recored time lo impressive....

But honestly it makes sence... The only titles microsoft has of value is halo gears and possibly forza... just eliminate the whole war and let sony handle the release and distribution of these titles..and their own...

IAMERROR4124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

We going by sales? Then I guess the only titles Sony has of value is Uncharted, GOW, and Gran turismo. Let's face it both systems have some great games lets stop all this petty "XBOX GOT NO GAMEZ" argument/point. It only reflects yourself poorly.

gaffyh4124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

Wait...what?! It "makes sence" as you put it??

It doesn't make sense at all. Microsoft has sold over 60 million consoles this generation, and have raked in loads of royalties from publishers. So it doesn't make sense at all. Why would you join up with a rival, when you are already making money from the business? That only ever happens when a company is struggling very badly, and MS is far from struggling.

And you could say the same thing about Sony, the company may be struggling, but PlayStation is one of their most successful divisions, they wouldn't sell and they wouldn't want to join with a competitor in the field just to eliminate any "war".

Competition is a great thing for gamers. With MS, I seriously doubt we would have great games like Uncharted, LittleBigPlanet and The Last of Us on PS3.

gaffyh4124d ago

I meant to write "without MS" at the end of that last paragraph.

ShinMaster4124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

Not sales. What he meant was exclusive games worth getting an Xbox for. Which IMO were not enough for many people.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4124d ago
DiRtY4124d ago

This was not even a Forbes article. It was a random blogpost on forbes. That is basically as credible as a comment on N4G.

Anon19744124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

I wish Jesse Divnich had elaborated a bit. The article that Forbes had reprinted this morning went into detail regarding Microsoft's specific challenges, and this isn't the first time we've heard from analysts that Microsoft should consider selling off the EDD division (of which as of 2011, 99% of the revenue was related to the Xbox) due to poor return on investment overall.

The author, a Harvard MBA and former Pepsico and Dupont Exec, didn't say "Oh, they're going to sell it to Sony!" What he said was he expects Microsoft will either sell or dramatically scale back the division.

Rather than submitting a knee-jerk, "That's ridiculous" quote, I would have rather seen Divnich explain his position or offer a counter point, refuting the author's claims. "Sony's not buying and Microsoft's not selling" doesn't address a single point the author made.

You have to wonder if Divnich even read the original article at all, or if he pulled a N4G's and simply read the headline and responded, completely ignoring the article's comments?

Here's a link to the original.
http://www.thephoenixprinci...

Anyone care to offer a counter point as to why this guy's wrong? It's not like we haven't heard these types of rumblings before from analysts. I could see dismissing this if it were a one off article spewed by some random blogger with no business credentials, but that's not what's happening here.

kenshiro1004124d ago

Some people read what they want to hear. Well said darkride.

4124d ago
DiRtY4124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

Well going by your comment history, you will support the author anyway, but here is the main point.

He is lying.

His quote:

"The entertainment division will be spun off, sold to someone like Sony or even Barnes & Noble, or dramatically reduced in size. Unable to make a profit it will increasingly be seen as a distraction to the battle for saving Windows - and Microsoft leadership has long shown they have no idea how to profitably grow this business unit."

Truth: The division made 364 million USD profit in 2012, 1257 million in 2011 and 517 million in 2010.

Source: http://www.microsoft.com/in...

His quote:

"Cash will be burned in what Microsoft will consider an epic struggle to save the core of the company. But failure is already inevitable. At this stage, not even a new CEO can save Microsoft."

Truth:

Microsoft's net income (profit) as a company for the past years:

2008: 17.68 billion USD
2009: 14.56 billion USD
2010: 18.76 billion USD
2011: 23.15 billion USD
2012: 16.98 billion USD

http://www.microsoft.com/in...

His quote:

"Microsoft's monopoly over personal computing has evaporated. From 95% market domination in 2005 share has fallen to just 20% in 2012 (IDC, Goldman Sachs.)"

Truth: This statement is extraordinary stupid, because it compares every device and treats them as one market. So in 2005 MS had 95% market share. This number is for PC only (Windows vs Linux vs Mac). And since then it has gone down to 20%, that is what he implies. In reality, MS sold more copies of Windows than ever before. ( http://www.techspot.com/new... So how did that happen? Well the author decided to mix it all up. So suddenly every cellphone sold counts just as much as a PC sold. So according to this logic, MS lost market share to Symbian big time for example. Oh yeah, what a threat that was for MS... MS still dominates the PC OS market.

In reality Windows market share increased this holiday season from 91.45 % to 91.74%.

http://thenextweb.com/micro...

There you have it. Anyway, you will still support the author's point of view.

Oh and btw. Here is what the very same guy wrote about Sony last year:

http://www.forbes.com/sites...

Anon19744124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

Where the hell do you see me agreeing with the original author? I don't. I think MS has far too much invested in the brand to consider selling the Xbox at this stage. They spent so much getting to this point, why would they bail on their investment? I've never said otherwise.

This isn't the first time an analyst has commented that Microsoft would be better off to spin off the entire EDD and you can see their point if we're comparing the returns of the EDD to the rest of the company. However, check my comment history.

I've always maintained my opinion that Microsoft isn't going to back out now, nor should they. But Divnich didn't even offer that much. "That's ridiculous" isn't a counter point, nor does it convey any understanding in the slightest of what's even being discussed or why. Is it too much to expect a so called industry expert to be knowledgeable enough about that industry to offer a concise counter-point against the various claims made? All you have to do is actually go back to the beginning of the 360's cycle, do the math and realize that, from an "on the surface" business standpoint, they should probably be discussing new strategies moving forward.

The entire industry isn't standing still, it's moving on. That's the point being made here. Is Microsoft evolving or will they be left behind? Sony's in the exact same boat if they can't innovate. They're just both being left behind by different boats, hijacked by Apple/Samsung/Google.

I don't think it's too much to expect an industry expert to be able to intelligently comment on these points instead of dismissing all points with a flippant remark that proves he's not even paying attention to what was said in Forbes this morning.

Ju4124d ago

@DiRtY FYI, from your own link:

Entertainment and Devices Division
(In millions, except percentages)
2012 2011 2010
Revenue $ 9,593 $ 8,915 $ 6,079
Op.income $ 364 $ 1,257 $ 517

While your $364M sounds quite good, you should put this into perspective. For a record revenue of over $9B this is the worst result for the Entertainment Division since 2010 and the second worst in the group.

So, I understand why someone would argue they could simple "save" $9B buy selling this division off.

I don't believe this will ever happen. It's about prestige, too. And the entertainment sector will only grow in the future. MS wasn't very successful in this market - except with the XBox. But phones and tablets tanked; like all other attempts before to expand into this market. MS still makes more money than every. If the shareholders aren't getting nervous nothing will change anytime soon, I guess.

pablo-b4124d ago

@ red-ranger

darkride is indeed the pedlar of xbox doom and gloom blogs

here is the best of darkride

http://n4g.com/news/416137/...

http://n4g.com/news/921809/...

http://n4g.com/news/602869/...

http://n4g.com/news/570158/...

enjoy!! ofcourse he would try and say the xbox is failing lol

nukeitall4124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

What is there to elaborate?

Sony had to sell a building as their bonds are rated junk (by several both moody and s&p) and nobody will loan them money anymore.

Sony were forced to sell a building to finance their company, while Sony's Playstation business is one of their better performing "arms", and you tell me how they are going to buy anything.

Heck even Gakai was bought for almost half a billion, and they weren't exactly a great business.

The Xbox business would be worth far more and Sony simply couldn't afford to buy it. MS could financially buy Sony, but they would never do that, because then they would also get all the baggage that go along with it and they probably would only want the Playstation business.

They could far easier just throw money at the Xbox division and kill Playstation instead of buying Sony. It would be far cheaper, but obviously MS wouldn't do that.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4124d ago
doogiebear4124d ago

Sony doesn't even have enough money to buy Microsoft's Xbox division. I hate Xbox (due to lack of exclusives, lack of Japanese games, and greedy LIVE fee's) but there's no way M$ would sell Xbox as a franchise.

Persistantthug4124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

It needs to be understood that the division that houses Microsoft Games is not doing all that great. Even Microsoft Corp itself is under severe attack and alot of analysts don't see how Microsoft can't stop the slow and consistent market backslide.

Think about this:

Other than PC Windows related products, what else is Microsoft a leader in?

-Microsoft failed with Zune
-Games For Windows Live is a failure to VALVE/STEAM
-GOOGLE, FACEBOOK and others rule the internet
-Apple & GOOGLE are destroying Windows mobile platforms
-XBOX 360 is doing pretty well, but reportedly it's in "last place".
Also over the last 10 years, Microsoft has actually lost more money on XBOX Brand than it has profited.

*Has anyone ever wondered why Microsoft had to close ENSEMBLE, close DIGITAL ANVIL, close ACES, and close FASA studios?

*Has anyone ever wondered why, Instead of Microsoft buying their good buddies BIOWARE, it had to stand by and watch EA snap them up?

Because while it is true Microsoft has virtually limitless $......MICROSOFT GAMES does not.

Believe it or not, even though we all like gaming alot, Microsoft really does have bigger fish to fry (GOOGLE), and if Windows brand continues to slide like it has been, Microsoft could divest the gaming and/or entertainment division.

4124d ago
Cupid_Viper_34124d ago

@ Airforcex

Sorry bud, but the Xbox 360 only has a lead in the US Market, it trails the PS3 in both Japan and Europe.

imdaboss14123d ago

Everyone knows the reason why the xbox360 selling better in the united states is because people here like buying and repurchasing crappy product that breaks on them here..Sony is making a profit in the long run and they did already..I dont know why people keep saying Sony have financial issues when they dont at all..

otherZinc4123d ago

LOL! Glad another analyst checked that blog guy from Forbes.

Forbes shouldn't let fools write like that & attach the Forbes name to it. Most of us business grads see Forbes as credible, things like this will stop that.

M$ is taking its most prize possessions Halo, XBOX Live, & Kinect into the XBOX Next connected with Smart Glass.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 4123d ago
iamnsuperman4124d ago

What is ridiculous is nowgamer. A lot of decent website just decided to ignore the idiocy but nowgamer has released this and thought it was worth finding another annalist to say something else. They should have just ignored it like every other decent publication

Godmars2904124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

Have to ask: besides Halo, a collection of mismanaged studios and neglected IPs, what does the Xbox brand have to offer Sony?

I mean they have cross chat, just can't use it on the PS3.

jimbobwahey4124d ago

Sony already has cross-game voice chat anyways, it's a feature on the Vita. The only reason they haven't added it to PS3 is due to there not being enough memory dedicated to the XMB to support it. It's pretty much a given that PS4 will have it as a standard feature though.

Zodiac4124d ago

What does the xbox brand have to offer Sony? The brand itself, which is more important than a few games.

zebramocha4124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

So your saying if cod & gears were not on the xbox?it would have been slam dunk for Ms.

@irsh there is nothing wrong with Ms having a paid service but they are not investing any of that on proper games,(I mean games made for xbox and not peripherals.) I don't want pumping out 10 games a year but they should do more then just gears & halo.

DOMination-4124d ago

MS are investing though. They have 21 first part studios now ready to release games for next gen. In comparison, Sony have been getting rid of studios and only have 12 now. Half of which seem to be making ps3 games and not ps4 games.

Those figures suggest to me that MS are investing more for the future than Sony.

rainslacker4124d ago

I fail to see why Sony would consider the Xbox brand really necessary to own though. They have built up their own brand over the past couple decades...I'm sure you've heard of it. I'm sure Sony would prefer to have their own branded products in peoples home. While Sony makes a lot of products that don't carry their name, they have gone to great lengths to make Sony a household name. Using the Xbox only dilutes that name recognition, which would be particularly bad considering PS is one of their best and most widely recognized products.

Even the IP's that MS owns, while valuable, may not be worth investing in, as when it comes to games very few last the test of the long term. Halo is a great IP, and certainly worth a lot...but so was Doom back in the day...and now think how much that IP is really worth in this day and age. Fable? Well Sony has a lot of games that could compete with that in the back catalog. Forza? Yeah, they have GT. There are some others that MS owns of course, but those are the big ones. Some of the smaller ones may be worth picking up. Alan Wake for instance has a pretty decent following.

TUGA4124d ago

And why would Sony want the Xbox brand? To compete with their own brand? I could see Sony buying IPs or Studios from MS but that is it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4124d ago
SuperLupe4124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

Oh they can only hand back to Sony the 50million + customers they took from them this gen.

The Xbox's lifetime sales didnt pass 25 million when with the 360 by the end of this year they will be at at least 80 million. With Xbox out of the picture Sony would be back to the status they had the two last gens.

KMCROC544124d ago

Why is that a good thing & how does it benefit you if such stupidity were to take place.Please explain.

Irishguy954124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

Are you serious? Besides the Xbox brand you mean??

Jesus;.

Also, Sony couldn't afford Xbox, Cocozero is right. Xbox Live alone brings in a Billion a year. Sony only have 10 Bill and that isn't even money, it's Total assets.

I mean...why in the **** would MS sell something that brings a few billion a year for 1 single payment of just a few billion?(which is all Sony can afford and that's taking a massive risk)

Godmars2904124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

XBL's yearly billion is based on something MS has made required to have if you own a 360. Unless does the same, which they have though they give you something and make it a choice, its invalid.

No matter how many disagree.

@Red_Ranger:
So Sony's going to either drop GT or support Forza in tandem? More so when when GT sells more. Why even bring that up?

Likewise most of your suggestions are bewildering, if not delusional, because where things like Ratchet and Clank have seen entries this gen which were well regarded, something like Banjo or Perfect Dark weren't.

ArmrdChaos4124d ago

The market share Sony no longer has.

4124d ago
nukeitall4124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

The Xbox brand today is as strong as Playstation.

That alone is more than Sony can afford right now. There is a reason why Sony sold their NYC headquarter, and it ain't because they are sitting on enough cash!

It's to fund Sony's ongoing losses!

TUGA4124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

I disagree. MS managed to sell more consoles than Sony just 1 year out of 6, meaning that Sony sells consoles at a faster pace than MS, despite the fact that their console has constantly been more expensive than the 360. Not only that but even the after MS big push to enter the "casual" market with Kinect, Sony still sells more consoles than MS.

The Xbox brand is stronger than it was last gen while the Playstation brand is weaker, but i doubt that Xbox brand is as strong as the Playstation brand. Not only that but IMO the reason why MS ate a big chunk from Sony's market share this gen has more to do with Sony's mistakes rather than MS successes.

nukeitall4124d ago

@TUGA:

Sales alone does not determine a brands strength. Ferrari has tremendous brand strength, yet they don't sell as many cars as Toyota does in a month all year.

That said, other than Japan, Xbox 360 sells as well as Playstation 3. You claim price as the reason, but it doesn't change that for a long time, the PS3 was riding on the Playstation name, not on the product!

To each their own, but Xbox is no longer the industry joke, and a brand even Sony fears:

http://n4g.com/news/1158634...

We no longer hear from Sony:

"Beating us for a short moment is like accidentally winning a point from a Shihan [karate master], and Microsoft is still not a black belt."

"We do not care." [On competition from MS and Nintendo]

TUGA4123d ago (Edited 4123d ago )

You forgot to mention that a single Ferrari has the price of 5 or 6 average Toyota cars, you forgot to mention that a Ferrari isn't at all the most convenient of cars for dayly use and you forgot to mention that Ferrari and Toyota aren't even competing for the same market. A Toyota may even be considered a necessity while a Ferrari is nothing more than a luxury that only a select few can afford. Comparing PS3/360 to Toyota/Ferrari is like comparing oranges to apples.

Sony may respect and even fear Xbox brand but that doesn't mean that the PS3 brand isn't stronger than the Xbox brand.

Godmars2904124d ago

Or denial.

Like I said before; if Nintendo were to go under and had to sell off IP, Mario would be the first thing to go.

But MS? Even though all they've really got is Halo most point to the subscription service they've all but made mandatory. Nothing else they've done comes close yet the best people trying to defend them can come up with is empty rhetoric and poorly presented ridicule.

Lvl_up_gamer4123d ago

With the amount of ignorance you are talking there is no point.

It's been covered time and time again on this site the successful IP and services that MS have it's become a seriously broken record.

You should be researching instead of spreading your pro-sony ignorance. Here I will educate you.

IP's.

Halo - as you know which would end the argument right there as the Halo franchise is a multi-BILLION dollar franchise.

Forza - Highest ranked racing sim on consoles SINCE RELEASE. This gen Forza has generated MORE profits combined then GT5 AND gets a by-yearly release keeping the IP fresh with new content and better gameplay with each iteration.

Dance Central - Since it's release in 2010, Dance central has sold over 5 million copies combined. That's amazing when you consider the amount of Kinect units out there.

All RARE IP's that still belong to MS such as Killer Instinct, Banjo Kazooie, Conker etc. Just because MS doesn't utilize those IP's, it doesn't mean they don't exist. Just like MS's IP's from last gen that they chose not to bring over to this gen like Amped, Blinx and Crimson Sky's.

Then there is Kinect which has broken record sales for peripherals.

Now lets talk about the BIGGEST money making machine MS has under their belt that ANY company would KILL for. Xbox Live. XBL makes BILLIONS on a yearly basis. To even think for a second that PS+ and HOME combined make more anything near what XBL makes just solidifies my comment to your ignorance.

This gen Sony and MS have sold 70+ million units while Sony has lost billions this gen, MS have made billions this gen....so obviously IF Sony could buy out the Xbox brand then it would be Sony that would be making hand over fist BILLIONS a year just on the Xbox brand alone instead of losing billions like Sony has been doing.

SO yes Godmars, I stand by my comment that you are COMPLETELY ignorant and short sighted. Your blind loyalty prevents you from seeing the BIG picture which is MS have been more profitable this gen with their xbox brand alone then Sony has been this gen with their PS3 brand.

StrongMan4123d ago (Edited 4123d ago )

"Forza - Highest ranked racing sim on consoles SINCE RELEASE. This gen Forza has generated MORE profits combined then GT5 AND gets a by-yearly release keeping the IP fresh with new content and better gameplay with each iteration."

The fact that you have to add ALL Forza games to beat the sales of GT5(9 million) says it all. LOL

"Dance Central - Since it's release in 2010, Dance central has sold over 5 million copies combined. That's amazing when you consider the amount of Kinect units out there."

Three Dance Central games ONLY sold 5 million? That's not good. LOL Dance Central 3 isn't selling at all.

"All RARE IP's that still belong to MS such as Killer Instinct, Banjo Kazooie, Conker etc. Just because MS doesn't utilize those IP's, it doesn't mean they don't exist. Just like MS's IP's from last gen that they chose not to bring over to this gen like Amped, Blinx and Crimson Sky's."

LOL, NONE of those games would sell and MS knows it. That's why they won't make any of those games. Blinx.........LOL

"Then there is Kinect which has broken record sales for peripherals."

It's not selling any more. It's been at 20 million for over a year now. All Kinect games flop in sales now too. Check Fable the Journey, Steel Battalion, and Dance Central 3.

MS is in dead last place this gen whether you like it or not and that also says it all. They release a full year ahead of Sony and Nintendo and ended up dead last behind Sony and Nintendo. Your blind allegiance to MS is blatantly obvious, Chunkylover.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4123d ago
Cocozero4124d ago

Sony couldn't afford the Xbox even if they wanted it.

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney4124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

They should just buy halo gears & kinect name from them that is the whole xbox. Everything else flops in comparison. no? Take those 2 away and and what else will sell the console besides a better version of Cod? NO reason to buy the whole division.

mr_kubrick4124d ago

Sony is in such a deep financial trouble they couldnt even buy Kinectimals if they wanted to.

WetN00dle694124d ago

^That.
Sony is in a multi billion dollar debt. They cant afford to buy anything. Here is hoping the Ps4 pulls them out of the shit hole they are in.

Ezz20134124d ago (Edited 4124d ago )

@mr_kubrick & @wetn00dle69

yet sony can offord making those amazing ps3 exclusives which are tons like what's coming this year alone
yet they just bought gaiki
yet they can offord making lots of movies
yet they can offord making music
etc. of other sony divisions

EDIT : of course i will get disagrees when i state facts
this is N4G after all

stuna14124d ago

People are killing me with the Sony can't afford the buy this bit! If that was the case then why they still sinking money into things like Giakai or the Vita!

It's simple because Sony understands the concept of how to make money! You have to spend money to make money, this is a undeniable fact that all business majors should know.

Why do countries have stimulus programs? The same reasons businesses have them! To stimulate spending but, more importantly to stimulate growth and ultimately PROFIT!

At some point all businesses go through some kind of rough transition, but that is the purpose of restructuring.

Sure Sony might not be able to afford what Microsoft has to offer, but they are far from being counted out, after all this isn't a sprint, it's a marathon.

rainslacker4124d ago

Regardless of whether they have the ability to buy them, my question to you is why would they buy them? I know they're money makers, but realistically Sony has games that compete with all of those. Why dump lots of money into something when you already have a similar product, particularly if MS was willing to give those up, which would only mean less competition for their own products.

Kinect maybe, but Sony could just invest in it's own device...oh wait...they have.

Name recognition would be all they would be buying...and for the price of those products they could spend half as much and market their own alternative and probably achieve the same thing.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4124d ago
tachy0n4124d ago

microsoft CAN buy playstation. thats what i think its more believable rather than the other way.

SignifiedSix4124d ago

Microsoft could buy sony 100 times and still be in the clear lol.

B1663r4124d ago

Dont exaggerate. With their current cash supply, Microsoft could only buy Sony 5x over.

Show all comments (117)
930°

Microsoft Closes Redfall Developer Arkane Austin, Hi-Fi Rush Developer Tango Gameworks, and More

Microsoft has closed a number of Bethesda studios, including Redfall maker Arkane Austin, Hi-Fi Rush developer Tango Gameworks, and more in devastating cuts at Bethesda, IGN can confirm.

Moegooner16h ago(Edited 16h ago)

Hi-Fi Rush studio??? Seriously?? Goes to show quality matters lil to MS.

Worst gen ever. All big 3 battling are for who sucks the most. They just keep one upping one another.

-Foxtrot16h ago

This does feel like a “quick Sony is getting shit on for Helldivers, let’s announce it now to minimise impact”

thesoftware73016h ago

That is silly. Let's say there is some weird conspiracy. This announcement would effectively take ALL the attention away from the HD2 situation, especially since there is no longer an HD2 situation. I don't think anything will minimize this impact.

Tacoboto16h ago

... so they announce it on a Tuesday? 36 hours after Sony cleared up everything?

You people care more about the next conspiracy than anything else.

Nevermind that Sony followed the golden rule of minimizing impact by announcing horrible news on a Friday.

Eonjay16h ago

The constant weekly weird Sony drama is part of the industry's problem. Everyone else feels they can get away with murder. Also, what is the point of spending all that money if you just start shutting studios down. And... Redfall wasn't Arkane's fought. Microsoft new the shape the game was in but needed something for GamePass after a whole year of no releases into the service. Them taking it out on Arkane seems really disingenuous and distasteful. And WTF did Tango do? Didn't Todd just release a statement saying how he would never retire. Fire his ass.

romulus2315h ago

Well if that was the reason for the timing it didn't work.

darthv7215h ago

wow... i did not have them closing Tango and Arkane Austin on my bingo card.

Hofstaderman15h ago(Edited 14h ago)

Yes it does. Arkane Austin I can understand but Tango Gameworks made an excellent game in Hi Fi Rush.
On review, it want really all on Austin for Redfall and its failure, they were forced to make a multiplayer games when their expertise was always single player driven first person games.

-Foxtrot14h ago

Guys I’m not being all that serious…relax

Outside_ofthe_Box14h ago(Edited 13h ago)

"I don't think anything will minimize this impact."

It already has. Notice your comment(or lack there of) vs HD2.

On another note, I would like to see Microsoft buy more studios and do more shadows drops on subscription services like they did Hi-Fi Rush. It's great for the industry I was told by people on here.

Zeref12h ago(Edited 12h ago)

I'm pretty sure that's exactly how it works. Same thing with layoffs. All of a sudden everyone has layoffs around the same time

Cacabunga11h ago

MS will always make it to amaze me by showing the worse version of themselves every single time..

peppeaccardo11h ago

MS proving to the world that ttheir leadership cannot drive success from these new acquisitions. They have ran the numbers and they have realized that long term, without a clear direction from the motehrship, these are a loss for the company hence they need to be cut. I might be wrong but I am absolutelly sure that if these developers would have not been purchased by Microsoft they would be still on business. A shame ...

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 11h ago
Einhander197216h ago(Edited 16h ago)

10/10 deflection, the ol' Sony too deflect...

Let's not discuss the fact that PlayStations struggles have largely been caused by the fact that game pass has reshaped how consumers spend causing them to spend less as they play what is on subscriptions and don't buy games as much because they either have become subscription gamers or they fear the game will come to a subscription so they don't buy things.

And it's not just PlayStation, the whole industry has been effected, many big studios are struggling across the board to match sales targets from pre-game pass releases which is especially apparent in things like sequels.

Heck the best example was Microsoft's own Starfield which should have easily blasted past 10m sales by the end of 2023 going by sales of similar Bethesda games yet was only able to achieve 3m which of course was almost entirely on Steam.

Moegooner16h ago

Or maybe it's because Sony hasn't released multiple worthwhile SP games like they normally do each gen and the ones they did released actually sold well.

Layoffs aren't because studios are struggling, but because major publishers want to maximise profit gains.

Profchaos16h ago(Edited 16h ago)

Absolutely it's a service that's changed the way we view and consume games overall for the worse games have little value when they are part of a sub and become disposable doubly so if they are a day 1 freebie often it's the kiss of death for a game to be day 1 on gamepass as PlayStation players look at it like why do I have to pay 60 dollars for back 4 blood, payday 3 or outriders it'll be on PS plus soon enough and funny enough those games always fail to meet expectations sales are poor and longevity is poor.

When I see a game get a day 1 tag outside of first party my first thought is always something is wrong with it and it can't stand on its own feet so the publisher has made a deal to recoup development cost.

Even first party games have dropped in quality noticeably so since gamepass with gears 5 being the only good release I can think of since gamepass started

Petebloodyonion15h ago

Wasn't aware that Gamepass is available on PlayStation.
Or are you telling us that a service from a console lacking in sales is so great that it affects the morale and buying habits of ppl lacking access to the service?

Also pretty sure that saying all of them competing for who sucks means the whole industry and not just Sony and MS.

Nitrowolf215h ago(Edited 15h ago)

This is what people online want. They just don't know or understand it. So many have warned about consolidation, and exactly what they have fear has been happening

This isn't the end, expect more bought out studios to be closed in the next few years

Hofstaderman15h ago

Spot on. All in the name "growth" to appease investors and shareholders. Can't sustain the lie though...it will always implode as illustrated by these closures. Applies to MS and Embracer.

TiredGamer9h ago(Edited 9h ago)

This. ^

Publishers are slowly mitigating all development risk since every new big/medium budget game has become too big to fail. Games are too expensive to make and the profitability for titles rests on a hair’s edge. When you need to sell 5 million copies of a game to be profitable, you know that we’ve turned a new page in gaming. The real victims here are the smaller studios/games that bring so much character and variety to the industry, like with Hi-Fi Rush.

It looks to me that Hi-Fi Rush did not fulfill financial expectations for moving the GamePass needle, and the sales from the PlayStation port experiment did not measure up either. So it gets the boot.

Sad day and era for gaming.

notachance5h ago

yeah smaller ABK studios like Toys For Bob are now in dangers

notachance15h ago

I just don’t know how the hell a company that can spend $67b to purchase a publisher decided that it’s okay to close the studio that produces their best game last year.

Whoever the higher up there that decides this is completely out of touch of how the game industry works, the damn xbox division as a whole would’ve been closed already if they weren’t sustained by other MS divisions.

shinoff218315h ago

I got in an argument with someone on reddit and they weren't haven't that Xbox isn't propped up by other divisions argument. They swore up and down that Xbox was pulling its own weight. I just stopped after a couple back and forths

TiredGamer9h ago

Didn’t move the GamePass needle and the PlayStation port couldn’t save the return on investment….

dumahim15h ago

So this is what happens when you're pleased with the sales and investing in the studio? Good guy Phil at it again.

Sonic188113h ago(Edited 13h ago)

From Aaron Greenburg:

"Hi-Fi RUSH was a break out hit for us and our players in all key measurements and expectations. We couldn’t be happier with what the team at Tango Gameworks delivered with this surprise release."

😂😂😂 🤥🤥

Lightning7713h ago(Edited 13h ago)

Once again MS creates their own problems and they create their own animosity. Idc about their shitty excuse and "reasons" they're a incompetent company, plus all their Xbox fanboy influencers are dwindling I noticed. How many excuses can you make for a company like MS? Consoles are down and they're losing their own fanboy influencers also. That's all they had to cheer lead them now they're leaving them. Pretty nobody will be on MS dude no matter if they (if they ever but I doubt it) get their act together.

Trashy ass ppl and company....

If they go under eventual it's because of their own doing nobody else's.

porkChop11h ago

Yeah overall this gen is pretty shit. Everyone is making horrible decisions, great devs are getting either gutted or entirely shut down regardless of quality or success, very little in the way of innovative games, etc. This industry needs to see some drastic changes.

badz14941m ago

where are all the cheerleaders for MS acquisitions amid all these?? you guys happy now? this will not be the end of it, maybe just the beginning!

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 41m ago
shadowT16h ago(Edited 16h ago)

Tango Gameworks and Arkane?

RaidenBlack16h ago

Arkane Austin (Prey developer)
Not Arkane Lyon ( Dishonored developer)

Crows9015h ago

Prey was fantastic. Red fall was shit because they were forced to do shit they didn't want to make.

Atkane Lyon did death loop I believe....I hated that one.

shinoff218315h ago

I personally liked prey more.

RaidenBlack14h ago

@shinoff2183
Because Prey was creative and different
Other than the live service Redfall, all other single-player Arkane projects have been creative and interesting

Tankbusta4014h ago

@Crows90

So just because people don't want to do something in life...bad quality is excused? Look what happened over that bad quality? no more studio

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 14h ago
MrDead15h ago

Will be more soon, I've said it before I can't see MS keeping Bethesda. I think they'll strip it's IPs and slowly close everything, it's what they do.

VariantAEC14h ago

No one wants to admit it, but yeah MS has a long history of pillaging other smaller corporations for IP and dispensing with everything else.

Zeref12h ago

That doesn't make any sense lol. How would they make money from these IP'S with no developers?

MrDead11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

@Zeref
"That doesn't make any sense lol. How would they make money from these IP'S with no developers?"

MS don't care about the studios, they want the IP's. They'll keep the big ones in house, the game engines they run on and licence the rest. Stacks of cash to be made from licensing IP's ...or just sit on them so no one else can use them.

blackblades8h ago

@Zeref silly fool, buy them for the IP have there other studios make the games using the IP names to sell them. We all know having a popular franchise name can sell

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 8h ago
Einhander197216h ago(Edited 16h ago)

Well xbox fans you got what you asked for... and honestly deserved...

It was so easily predictable that game pass was never going to be able to support all these studios.

If Microsoft can't win they are going to burn it all to the ground...

Countdown to Phil Spencer telling us "it's better for the gamers this way" yet again.

Barlos15h ago

Agree but gamers didn't ask for people to be out of work.

VenomUK14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

@Barlos They indirectly did. Every person who made a wish list of who Microsoft should buy next and were sending tweets to Phil Spencer and Xbox with proposed studios, played a part.

The saddest part is the studios were closed because of the underperformance of their last games, and if they had been given a chance then their next games could’ve been great and succeeded. But it is the same old Phil Spencer Microsoft problem which is not giving them a chance, and that’s why he is not able to manage game studios.

VariantAEC14h ago

Yeah they did. Just because they refused to see what everyone with a brain was telling them doesn't mean they didn't know. They were told, they should've put up a fight and they didn't. This is the result. But who knows even if MS' fans weren't such boot-lickers, MS could've carried this out against their fans wishes anyway. Unfortunately, we have the hardcore MS defense bots running to deflect from any bad news and maybe, just maybe, MS felt empowered to do more damage as a result of their fans cheering this all on.

anast13h ago

They sold themselves out. Once people buy you they can do what they want. None of this should have been a surprise. When companies get bought out, they eventually get dismantled.

shinoff218315h ago

Xbox fans were to busy daydreaming of Ms curbstopping Sony they didn't look at the big picture.

Einhander197214h ago

Not disagreeing at all.

I want to add that from the day Microsoft announced game pass, before they even started buying up studios it was obvious that game pass wasn't going to be able to support itself.

It was so dumb that they doubled down on it by spending 100B on a service they knew only existed through subsidization.

They should have realized there was no way that adding massively more costs on a subscription they were subsidizing was certain to fail. Especially after seeing how it had devastated sales across the platform as a whole.

Heck by the time this generation started during covid when the console sales were similar PlayStation was already outselling xbox on multiplatform games 8:1 yet they still doubled down on it.

14h ago
Relientk7716h ago

This is beyond wrong. Like wtf!? Especially Tango Gameworks with Hi-Fi Rush. I've heard nothing but good things about that game. Just because Arkane Austin screwed up one game release doesn't mean you need to close them. It sounds like they were forced to do a multiplayer game when they're a single player studio. They could have made a Prey 2 or some other game next.

Just wow awful news.

Einhander197216h ago

Apparently PlayStation owners didn't buy enough copies of Hi-Fi Rush...

romulus2315h ago

"Xbox says Hi-Fi Rush was a success "in all key measurements" amid rumors of poor sales. Following rumors that Tango Gameworks' Hi-Fish Rush didn't meet sales expectations, Xbox marketing VP Aaron Greenburg is defending the "break out hit" as a success by all metrics."

According to Aaron Greenburg it was a success so they shouldn't have even needed PlayStation owners to buy it. That being said, I bought it and really enjoyed it, it's a great game. Shame MS closed them down.

RpgSama15h ago

@Romulus23

All lies by the Green Bug, that just means that a lot of people fired bullets or whatever in the game, that's the key measurements they care to share.

Tango did NOT deserve to be closed down, they have not released a single bad game.

Crows9015h ago

That's usually what happens when you don't release it at the same time as other platforms....same thing happened with tomb raider reboot sequel. MS got exclusivity for a year and then when it came to PlayStation it barely sold. Nobody cared anymore.

shinoff218315h ago

Still waiting on the physical release pre order window

VariantAEC14h ago

Well... I did my part. Hi-Fi Rush is a good game, but I don't think its MS' style. We don't really know how well it did or didn't perform by the numbers or whether it broke even. This could just be another MS blunder.

Elda12h ago

Exactly. MS purchasing a 3rd party studio & keeping games off of other platforms probably hurt them in the long run, then finally putting Hi Fi Rush on PS which in turn PS fans probably didn't care to buy & support Hi Fi Rush after a year later of release. Hi Fi Rush was released on Gamepass so it probably never really made any money selling solely.

Eonjay12h ago

@romulus23

Let's hope it didn't sell well because that would make this worse. Also I could have sworn I read an article about their next game in the works.

Seraphim10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

I was wondering if that played any part considering the timing, though, XB claimed the game to be a success last year only on XB & PC. Regardless MS f'd up there too. They shadow dropped HiFi on XB/PC last year at the perfect time. This year when they released on PS not only had the hype died, but there were so many solid games available the first 3 months of this year to play.

I almost bought it on PC last year, but now that it dropped on PS I just have far too many games to play to bother...

If MS needs PS and even Switch sales they need a better strategy. At the very least a release date where players are more inticed to buy said game. The problem is always going to be that if they want exclusives the hype for these games will be dead a year later. The exceptions might be some of their heavy hitters.... 2 cents

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 10h ago
CrashMania16h ago

I can only imagine the little amount of revenue both games generated, sent straight to gamepass and excluded from the largest current gen console userbase. Not to say both games would have done well if they were on PS5 too, but you heavily damage to a games revenue when you put it on a stagnating sub service for a poorly selling console, can't really see people going out in droves to sub to GP to play this.

shinoff218315h ago

Gamepass subs(most of Xbox players) don't buy games all like that so it's not sustainable. It's reality.

RaidenBlack16h ago

Yea Austin made one of the most creative game of last gen with Prey and were forced to take risk with Redfall and now the whole studio is being closed.

Aphrodia15h ago

Yes, that Tango gameworks/ Hi-Fi closure was an eye opener for me as well. Neither played it nor was interested in it myself but all I heard was everyone acting like it was the second coming of guitar hero or something.

I don't know what else to say other than modern gaming is an overwhelming sea of mediocrity and there's not enough voices of reason speaking up and saying that most games made these days are just not very good.

shinoff218315h ago

Your playing the wrong games then. There's always been shovelware type games. Going back to wii, snes, nes, ps1 Xbox og. That's a bs blanket statement. As an older gamer since atari days I'd personally say this is a great time. If you can't find anything to play. That's on you

With all that said in no way or form am I speaking of multi-player games, gacha, or whatever. I'm strictly speaking on single player games.

Aphrodia12h ago

you are hilarious. trying to validate your comment by excluding over half of the games out there today. Pathetic man.

Neonridr14h ago

I'm more devastated at the loss of The Evil Within.

Chevalier4h ago

Wait I was told Xbox had great engagement numbers?! Some Xbox fans said they bought games when I told them Xbox customers don't buy games?

So Xbox bought studios to keep games off other platforms and forgot they conditioned Xbox customers to not buy games. Whoops.

So anyone else think Outer World's 2 dies 🤔? I'm thinking a small game losing out on Nintendo and Playstation gamers buying will kill this IP. But it's okay Xbox fans can get more COD! Halo, Gears and Forza! Woot that's a 'win'. Yay Gamepass FTW

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4h ago
CrashMania16h ago

Can't wait to see the usual try spin and play this down. So much for the heroic MS and Phil saving these studios eh.

Eonjay16h ago

By the end of the day IGN will be talking about how this is right for the industry. Don't worry, Microsoft's PR is making the call now.

RpgSama15h ago

Tango did NOT deserve to be closed down, they have not released a single bad game, and I'm sure Arkhane failed just because they were both rushed and pressured into making a GaaS game they had no experience in doing and no support to get it completed out of the gate.

PrinceOfAnger16h ago

Not a big deal only hi fi rush was good

Sony has closed
Manchester studio
Japan studio
Pixel opus
London studio
Ready At Dawn ...

RupeeHoarder16h ago

The difference being Sony has a large group of other studios that have done something positive. Microsoft just closed the studio to the only good game they released in the past year (Hi-Fi Rush).

CrashMania15h ago

They all suck as well of course. But MS spent 10s of billions on these publishers for mass consolidation, every made a song and dance about how MS would save them, using their endless Windows, 365 and Azure money to keep them open forever and how Phil was some hero.

Nothing is safe unless it makes money, even for MS.

romulus2315h ago

It is a big deal.

Microsoft has closed
Fasa Studios
Digital Anvil
Ensemble
Lionhead Studios
Press Play
Arkane Austin
Tango Gameworks

Einhander197215h ago(Edited 15h ago)

Wow how far back do you want to go back.

Lionhead Studios
Aces Game Studio
BigPark
Carbonated Game
Digital Anvil
Ensemble Studios
FASA Studio
Good Science Studio
Hired Gun
Microsoft Studios Japan
Microsoft Studios Victoria
Team Dakota
Xbox Entertainment Studios
Xbox Live Productions
Lift London
Access Software
Salt Lake Games Studio
Twisted Pixel Games
WingNut Interactive

And more before this, this was just their cuts during xbone era that Phil cut while he was at the head.

And some of those PlayStation studios were merged not closed, most of the UK studios were folded into each other.

Japan Studio was renamed to Asobi not closed, aAsobi was an internal team of Japan Studio the "closure" the press misinformed people about was more or less a name change, the studio is in the same building and when the change happened less than 5 people mostly leadership positions chose to leave the studio to form Bokeh Studio, which still works closely with Sony.

And even if your deflection stood on it's own, Microsoft spent 3 Billion 3 years ago almost to the date to buy Zenimax and has already closed 2 of it's biggest studios and decimated Zenimax's support studio structure.

It's no wonder Todd Howard was talking about "more frequent releases" and letting other studios make their IP's games. The days of big budget huge Bethesda games is over...

In fact sadly Microsoft has ushered in the end of big budget gaming as we know it with their obviously unsustainable subscription industry change.

And I feel fully confident that this isn't the end of studio closures from these recently purchased studios.

Abnor_Mal15h ago

Ready At Dawn was never a Sony owned studio, and only made a few smaller God of War games and a Jax and Daxter spin off, and of course The Order1866.

They are currently owned by OcUlus Studios.

MrDead15h ago

How many times has MS fired Bethesda staff since they purchased it? I think it's been three rounds so far

BehindTheRows15h ago

Deflection is the finest form of delusion.

shinoff218315h ago

London studio what have they made recently. Really the worst one was Japan studio. That sucked.

In reality though your deflecting. The fact of the matter is Ms just closed the studio that made their highest rated game in years. That's insane.

Hofstaderman15h ago

Also many of those staff were absorbed into other studios.

VariantAEC13h ago(Edited 13h ago)

Ready At Dawn was never a PS first party studio.
Manchester was closed and it was proposed that London should be closed, but their website is still up with no news about it being closed on their official site anywhere. So it's possible that the proposed closure just did not happen to get fufilled. Meaning London Studio *MIGHT* still be open running lean.

Edit: Japan Studio was closed with some staff making up the new Asobi Team Studio who's first title was the PS5 pack-in game "Astro's Playroom." Pixel Opus was closed and not replaced or spun-off their only games were Entwined and Concrete Genie they also helped publish Journey according to Wikipedia.

Chevalier3h ago

Man you got crap info

Sony never owned Ready at Dawn. It's now owned by Oculus.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/...

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3h ago
Tacoboto15h ago

Phil needs to step down. What kind of usual spin do you want?

More and more people lose jobs but the people at the top stay the same. Hardware sales tank despite billions and billions spent. The math is plain and simple.

Sonic188114h ago(Edited 14h ago)

I'm still trying to figure out what was the real reason to acquire Bethesda for millions or Billions of dollars if you're closing down studios 🤔 What were their true intentions 🤔 I mean do Microsoft really want to be a third-party publisher? It sounds like they're confused.with their future in gaming

VariantAEC13h ago

@Sonic1881
To rape each studio for their sweet succulent ultra-valuable IP. This is Microsoft's favorite past-time.

Show all comments (204)
300°

Microsoft Survey Asks About Handheld

A new survey from Microsoft has further hinted at the possibility of an Xbox handheld being in development.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
EasilyTheBest7d ago

This is definitely happening, I just hope they have 2 versions one with a much bigger screen.

GamerRN7d ago

I'll be happy with this, and a PC console hybrid that rivals anything we have power wise

Number1TailzFan7d ago

The problem with bigger devices is playing them on your side in bed, Vita and before that was fine. Since the Switch you gotta have a gooseneck holder & controllers detached so you can lie down holding them, or your arm will quickly get tired.

1Victor6d ago

@thesofware: “A much bigger screen than what?”
A gaming laptop 🤷🏿🤣

Kosic6d ago

Than the screen originally planned...duh... :D

darthv726d ago

it kinda already did... https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...

They are just gauging interest in one of their own.

crazyCoconuts6d ago

A Xbox version of Logitech G-Cloud?
I mean, why bother? Not like the G cloud is flying off shelves and what would Xbox add to make it better?
They're surely not going to create bespoke architecture here and there are already a few Windows handhelds out there. I have little confidence in their ability to put together an attractive UI in the way Steam did. So I doubt anything will come from this.

KicksnSnares7d ago

Day One buy for me if they'll make a dedicated handheld device.

darthv727d ago

i have that logitech g-cloud. Its a sweet little piece of kit. I like that it can also install games from the play store unlike the other android based handheld.

mudakoshaka7d ago

It sure is! Don't understand why you get the down-votes. Whoever does not like the G Cloud must have been dropped down a well, head first, when they were of a younger age.

PassNextquestion7d ago

I wonder if Microsoft will perform better in Japan if they do actually make a handheld since everyone says handheld and mobile are king over there.

TiredGamer7d ago

This looks like the future of the game industry... all three platforms with a handheld option.

I wonder if the Playstation Portal is a technology test-bed/prototype for a future Playstation handheld?

rlow17d ago (Edited 7d ago )

It’s a possibility but I can’t help but think would that be the best way to go about it? Though it would give you data on how much it is used and game type. It’s still not a true portable device and so people approach it differently. I think that data on phones, tablets, and of course the competition would give a better indication.

But I really think if Sony is considering a new PSP that could play ps5 games, now would be the time to dive in. Honestly, if they do this, it would be huge.

Traecy7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Doubt if Sony PS wants to support a new handheld with first party games. Something they lacked with the Vita. What they should do is have a handheld that is like the PS Portal which can play all games but play those games on the go as well as at home. Something like that is a better investment.

TiredGamer7d ago

Agreed that you will probably never see a separate line of games specifically for the handheld (a la PSP or PSVita). The modern economics and expectations of game development make that cost prohibitive. What makes more sense is if the full-fat game on PS5 or PS6 has a special "handheld" profile that is automatically optimized for the lower spec handheld. There would be some significant compromises compared to the bigger console variant, but it would be the same game overall and would only require a single purchase.... somewhat what the Switch does with a lower resolution when playing handheld versus docked.

Show all comments (51)
310°

Xbox Games Showcase Followed by [REDACTED] Direct Airs June 9

- Xbox Wire - Mark your calendars! The Xbox Games Showcase followed by [REDACTED] Direct airs June 9. More info inside.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
bionicstar7d ago

Will they show Fable 4, Stalker 2, GoW 6 & Perfect Dark?

PhillyDonJawn7d ago

Crossing fingers for Fable and perfect dark. And State of Decay 3

RaidenBlack7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

And maybe Clockwork Revolution, South of Midnight, Contraband, Project 007 & OD? lol
and whatever happened to Everwild ?
+ that rumored Wu Tang RPG

Sonic18817d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Will they have official release dates and gameplay?

anast7d ago

Another game pass event with their plans to go all streaming.

7d ago
Lightning777d ago

It's an Xbox showcase that they have every year.

Make smarter comments for once.

anast7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Tell me what a smarter comment is.

If they don't sell game pass the entire time, then I will be wrong. All of this can be proven once the show gets underway. Let's wait and see.

InUrFoxHole6d ago

@Anast
Anything you didn't type. Good day sir!

7d ago
7d ago
7d ago
7d ago Replies(1)
Lightning777d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Wow too easy.

You went from MS going all streaming to selling gamepass content in which we all know they are.

Which one is it?

Pretty clear you don't know what a smart comment is at least you admit you don't know.

7d ago
anast7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

"Another game pass event with their plans to go all streaming."

It's both. I would worry about your own intelligence at this point. It seems that there is not enough to go around for you to worry about how smart other people are.

Lightning777d ago

It's just a regular event announcing games. Nice one captain obvious they're gonna mention gp stuff like they do every year what else is new.

The all streaming part is just you, being you I guess. They have streaming options but going all streaming again is just you pulling stuff outta thin air.

anast7d ago

You don't know what a smart comment is or isn't. You're welcome for the help.

Lightning777d ago

No you said something dumb then you tried to back track and mention GP.

Again make smart comments for once.

anast6d ago

And we have broken record syndrome.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 6d ago
darthv727d ago

Wonder if they will address the handheld rumors....?

jimb0j0nes7d ago

For a brief moment I thought we might get a whole Direct for Gears 6 - seems like it's COD though!

Show all comments (44)