At least they're trying to rebuild their image after the beta. It doesn't matter if you're a fan or not, you know a lot of people aren't buying BF3 because of it.
You have a life. And you're posting on N4G? Come on deadpoole, stop kidding yourself lol, might as well just game on PC, it does look better.
Yes, the PSVita is awesome. I'm getting one. The graphics on it are revolutionary for it's size. Dual joysticks. The back/front touch interface is even something that I've really wanted. But... still, the comment you posted isn't very relevant to the discussion. The graphics are outdated. PS3 graphics at 540p isn't a difficult process, which explains the price pretty well. Too bad we can't stick a GTX580 in that bad boy.
Nobody thinks he's funny anymore.
With the optimized textures and shaders--for lower end machines.
And that's what makes the graphics more impressive--the level of realism in them. Forza over-emphasizes graphical effects in order to make the game look visually appealing, and most cars drive more "fun" than "realistic."
These are also really terrible screenshots of BOTH games. Just atrocious. Who the hell is in charge of this sites art direction?
It's UK server issues, nothing more.
This is the same thing they said about Crysis 2. "We fixed the screen-tearing! We fixed the bugs! It runs at a solid, smooth 30FPS!"~not exact words, but pretty damn close. Anyone on N4G who was around earlier this year remembers this whole deal when the gameplay was shown. Then they leaked gameplay of the optimized versions to a blogsite, and everyone felt reassured. So I went out, pre-ordered the game, anticipated it, bought it, took it home and put it in my PS3. And went through ...
Then I guess BF3 doesn't need to be successful, because the people that will make this game successful ARE complaining about the 'meh' console gameplay. Look at these comments. You don't see disagrees when they say "not buying," you see consistent agrees. And the people that are disagreeing make up a very small amount of the commenters (except for comments like yours, where the opposite can be said)--which will keep the BF series a niche community to MW3 by compariso...
J&D and Jak 2 were probably what got me interested in the games industry--I loved the artwork and gameplay mechanics, the drastic change in gameplay aesthetics--almost everything about those two games. In fact, I loved them so much, it actually led me to want to become a game dev. Though the chances of actually leading development on a game are quite slim, I'm going to school for game development--hopefully someday I'll get the chance in this hell of an industry, even if it is a s...
And I can't enjoy this masterpiece until Christmas time D:
Why did I leave my console at home???
CURSE YOU PC GAMING!!!
But look at the BFBC2 community, or the KZ community, or even the R3 community, and you'll see that PSN is ripe with maturity.
Seriously, the bandwidth usage that a 20+GB file is going to utilize is pretty heavy, they should be able to track down everyone who downloads this illegally. It's just easy money for Bethseda and their lawyers (we all know they're looking for some, just look at "Scrolls").
Not that I don't love Bethseda Softworks--they have made some of my FAVORITE games: Oblivion, Morrowind, FO:3, and they now own id Tech. But their intellectual property division is fi...
It was sarcasm in order to give people a laugh.
They do, but if you play PC games IRL you can see the difference is drastic. Most people don't get too close to their TV screens to realize how shitty textures look on consoles, especially at 600p. But on a small, 17-20" 1600p monitor 2-3 feet away from your face where you're viewing the game in 1080p, you can see the beautiful difference. Many console screenshots look great when they're four inches across shrunken down, but full size tend to appear pixellated and dirty, unli...
Anyone who thinks that a console is superior to a PC, disagree to this comment. Anyone who has common sense, either agree or pass by the comment. I want to know how many stupid people there are on N4G, and this is the best way to figure it out.
Obviously, I will get disagrees, because people actually believe that a PC rig that can outperform the PS3 requires a lot of time and trouble. It doesn't. You can buy a shitty low-end desktop PC made by HP or Dell, with an AMD 2.7G...
I understand. You guys get all the hype from us veteran players who've logged 400 hours of gametime in Cyrodiil and the Shivering, yet you can't understand how we could have possible abstained that torture. It's the same reason I could never get into Half Life 2--yes, it's a great game, but it's mechanics and graphics are quite outdated, even with 12GB of mods I can't understand the interest like the people who played it at or around release.
I don't understand how you hate Oblivion, unless you played it like yesterday. Play it 5 years ago and that game was the SHIT bro.
They've sold almost 100 million Wii consoles, with plenty of profit to benefit them in their way through failure.
I've always felt like every *other* Nintendo console is successful. N64 was a huge success, then Gamecube was 'meh.' Then the Wii, now the WiiU (which seems to be kinda 'meh' so far). Sure the GC had great games--as the WiiU will--and it delivered the graphical performance, but it wasn't as successful as the PS2.
He's not saying anything new, so why do you care? PCs are always cared for after consoles, and are rarely ever the lead platform for games. RAGE was designed for console tech in mind, remember.