Well, I believe I should get the beta keys for several reasons:
1) I posted right after the first comment, so you know you know I know I'm special. And by special, I mean better than everybody else. Not in a selfish way, just in a 'haha, I'm better than you, seriously, I am. Haha! We're joking but I'm totally serious.' Kind of way. Like that. Haha. Get it?
2) I made my own avatar instead of using one of the default ones. That took time...
I really want this too. So I'm just going to post after you in the hopes that they see this.
;)
Time erodes the value of almost everything made by mass production in order to compete with the next best thing, and on rare occasion after a time it can antique certain items to increase their value.
Of course you'll be paying $60 day 1, and $20 for the first expansion day 1, and then another $20 for the next expansion day 1, but remember, you got to play them day 1, nobody spoiled any details for you on the internet, and your experience is lustrous instead of lack-luste...
When ISPs get their shit together and start offering real service to everyone OnLive could potentially take over. The average consumer's internet speeds aren't fast enough to keep up with the service. If you paid more for your internets you'd get the results you wanted.
When ISPs get their shit together and start offering real service OnLive could potentially take over. The average consumer's internet speeds aren't fast enough to keep up with the service. If you paid more for your internets you'd get the results you wanted.
Using Skyrim's Dawnguard as the cover for this article is in bad taste though.
It's content will have the same length and quality of an expansion, we just call it DLC now because we have an easier way to distribute it.
Plus it's Skyrim. How greedy do you have to be to say you didn't get enough from the content on disc? Should have used Mass Effect 3 screenshot...
I associate my character with myself, so I play a dude even in MMOs. I don't have any real personality problems like that. I thought it was a lot gayer to deal with people hitting on me in a video game when I was playing as a girl then it is to look at the back of my character--it's even weirder to act like a woman in the game. I don't get the sexual stigma behind that virtual character, it doesn't compute to me since it's not real and has no associations to my personality...
If you're associating with your male character's butt, you may want to think about your own sexual insecurities.
Only reason I play the game is Zombies. It's worth the $40 I buy the game used off Craigslist. I do it because A) it's cheap and B) it saves me from giving my initial investment to Activision. It's not wrong to buy used games when you actually have a good reason.
People hate CoD because it's the top selling game of the year and doesn't innovate at the regular industry standard because it has a formula that "sells." On the internet, you see more people bitch about CoD's problems. Because the problems CoD has are all potentially fixable, and CoD is the top selling game of the year, people want to see the quality service they simply aren't getting. Which leads to more bitching.
Why make a TES game based on lore? HMMM I dunno sounds like a good idea. I mean we didn't make an innovative sandbox RPG game with great questing elements and lots of player freedom. We certainly didn't make a great game before that allowed players to create and add on content to their experience, nor did we allow players to pick their own factions and allow their experience to grow as a journey rather than a crappy MMO that's already been done before.
Well, since...
They get almost two years to dev each CoD after CoD4, not one single year. There's a team that develops the game, a team that plans for the next game while the game is still in development, a team that works on DLC and maintenance after it's release, and a team for a team that makes teams for other teams. They're just easy to pop out, since most of the components are already made for the game. I know they're turning a piece of shit, but it still takes a long time to make even ...
“We have been working hard to create an online world in which players will be able to experience the epic Elder Scrolls universe with their friends – something fans have long said they wanted"
...
NO. No we really don't care about that. We want an MMO with Elder Scrolls gameplay. First/Third person, realtime combat, decision making, interesting quests, stealth, items, etc.
Please don't deliver a WoW clone based on TES lore.
@Shaman
It's a Treyarch CoD game, Treyarch CoD games play at 'visceral' 60fps, or in layman's terms ~40fps on consoles.
I always thought he was either chocolate vanilla swirl or the darth vader type.
Please be futuristic. Please be futuristic. Please do something new CoD. For the love of gaming, PLEASE Activision, we beg of you!
iPad 3's chipset is designed to run at a resolution over twice that of the typical rendering capacity of a modern console game. No, an iPad 3 could not run games like Battlefield 3 and Skyrim at 1500p even with the proper coding, so don't fret. But, if someone had the patience to code and develop an AAA game for the iOS and ran it around 600p natively the truth is that it would indeed outperform current gen consoles. However, the problem with that is the iTunes Store/App Store servers...
Technically smartphones haven't superseded console graphics, since they can't yet play at least 600px height resolution games at 30FPS. Tablets? Yeah, I'd say the iPad 3 could outperform a console, if you had about 6-10GB of space per game and the patience to either download or sync it to the device.
Yes, gaming PCs were already better than gaming consoles at their release--albeit an equal rig would cost you around $800-1000, PCs were indeed more advanced. Stop di...
Yes, lets cut the Vita price! Two months after it's release. Dumb article.
Biscuit? Nah, I think it just sounds portly.