1040°

The Witcher 3 - Fans Claim 'Downgrade-ation' Is In Full Effect After Latest Trailer, Devs Comment

It seems the latest trailer of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt disappointed a number of PC gamers. While this trailer remains epic, its visuals seem to have taken a noticeable hit in various areas, as there were a lot of low-resolution textures on various environmental objects, the terrain itself, and some characters. And since the game is advertised as one of the most graphically intense games, these graphical compromises let down a lot of PC gamers.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
MonkeyOne3427d ago

The Xbox One and PS4 have 1.6 GHZ CPU's people.

They aren't magical boxes

Get over it

Abash3427d ago

I hate how some gamers see visually impressive games and automatically respond to it with "Why doesn't it look greater?!"

uth113427d ago

I've seen many good looking games dismissed as looking like shit or look last gen. Not everything needs to be photorealistic

nicksetzer13427d ago (Edited 3427d ago )

Man, the stark difference in point of view of downgrades on this article and the uncharted one are insane. In fact some of the same people in here whining about the witcher that were fine with uncharted. There was actual gameplay footage at E3 running on XB1, (@900p) looks the same (aka still amazing) as the video here, not sure what's with all the crying.

Ezz20133427d ago (Edited 3427d ago )

Every one love to scream "DOWNGRADE" on every single game those days
and then they turn around saying they only care about gameplay and graphics don't matter

Smh

Mr Pumblechook3427d ago

Rumour has it that the story that this would be 720p on XBO and 900p on PS4 was a deliberate fake plant by CD Projekt because of a 'partnership deal' The game will actually be 900p on both platforms and they claim will be that the XBO version was upgraded to match PS4, and deny that PS4 was downgraded to match XBO.

3-4-53427d ago

* Good way to look at games is this:(IMO)

For this series....It's the best looking game EVER in this series.

As long as it looks graphically superior and plays better than the last game in the series, it should be fine.

LamerTamer3427d ago (Edited 3427d ago )

@Mr Pumblechook

"the claim will be that the XBO version was upgraded to match PS4, and deny that PS4 was downgraded to match XBO."

And of course we all know for that to be true they would have also had to magically upgrade the xbone GPU to match PS4 as well.

If that was true and the xbone version with weaker GPU could be "upgraded to match PS4" then I suppose the PS4 could magically be "upgraded to match the PC". It don't work that way, although all of the morons giving disagrees must think it does.

It is amazing that so many still struggle with the concept that better hardware can always do more.

Big_Game_Hunters3427d ago (Edited 3427d ago )

The thing is at some point, it did look greater, but now its being held back.

I like pretty graphics, but i won't not play a game jus because its not the latest tech, but when one of the selling points of a game is a beautiful world and graphics then there is disapointment when there is a downgrade.

DOMination-3427d ago

Just because the ps4 cam do more doesn't mean it will in every game. Maybe this game xan run at 900p on xbone but it doesn't mean the ps4 will automatically have to be higher. It depends on whether the devs can he arsed to put in more effort or not.

Two generations ago, the xbox has a hdd and a 600mhz cpu compared to the paltry 333mhz of the ps2. Almist twice as fast. On the whole, there was little difference in multiplats back then. With the exception of a few games at the beginning of last gen, multiplats were generally the same on 360/ps3 despute radically different hardware. The same will happen this gen. Once devs get to grips with the xbox sdks there will be little difference with multiplats. Ps4 will still have tue edge and of course its capable of more but devs will eek more from the xbone and then use the lowest denominator to port like they always have done.

ShinMaster3427d ago

From article:

"...disappointed a number of PC gamers... these graphical compromises let down a lot of PC gamers"

They're talking about PC. Not consoles.

awi59513426d ago

The console versions that's why. If it was pc only it would killed peoples pc like 2 did. But since they are working on 3 versions the PC version suffered.

Saigon3426d ago (Edited 3426d ago )

@Abash, All I can say is bubble+

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3426d ago
kcuthbertson3427d ago

People aren't upset that this could be PS4/XBOne Version...they're upset that it might not be. PC users feel like they might have been lied to when comparing to the Sword of Destiny Trailer.

Pandamobile3427d ago

A lot of people don't understand the distinction between trailer graphics and real-time gameplay graphics.

radler3427d ago

Yeah, it's not like the trailers are used to advertise the game to people and it's illegal to use misleading footage or anything...

Pandamobile3427d ago

Either way, how about we wait for the game to actually come out first before crying "downgraded".

radler3427d ago

Agreed. We should definitely buy the game to check for ourselves that it is in fact downgraded. Excellent suggestion, Pandamobile. Let me just reach into my wallet here and blindly throw money at a product that may or may not be what's advertised.

AliTheSnake13427d ago

I am so sick of these people.
If the game looks great, they cry they want 60fps.
If the game is 60fps they cry the graphics are not next gen.
Piss off man.

Pandamobile3427d ago (Edited 3427d ago )

Or don't buy it? Radler, no one told you to go out and buy the game to see if it's "downgraded". This shouldn't be a hard concept for you to understand.

If it's so important to you, wait til other people and sites like Digital Foundry have the game before making a definitive judgement.

remixx1163427d ago

Radler is such a negative person, dude just enjoy games and stop

starchild3426d ago

radler, just stop. You're so damn negative and your crusade is overblown and pointless. Games change throughout development, get over it. As long as they show us representative footage of the final build before it is released then everybody has a chance to do their research and decide if they want to get it or not.

awi59513425d ago (Edited 3425d ago )

@AliTheSnake1

You forget this was a PC title first and we shouldn't have to choose that. The console versions have degraded the game. Witcher 2 was a PC benchmark now its a joke now.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3425d ago
BG115793427d ago

Yeah, you are right but in case you didn't notice it, the story is talking about a supposed downgrade of the PC version.

Mithan3427d ago

Agreed. They can do so much, so what.

I can't believe 21 people disagreed with you lol.

Angeljuice3427d ago

On PC? The article is about PC graphics not console graphics fool.

Magicite3427d ago

most of latest PC games require 3GHZ core CPUs, so obviously consoles are in difficult position.

_-EDMIX-_3427d ago

consoles output 2X in terms of performance based on optimization...

The latest PC titles have been PS4 - XONE ports...

Kalowest3427d ago

This is why I'm building a PC with Sli GTX 970s :)

FastRedPonyCar3427d ago

I have a pair of 970's and a 4770k and it's fucking amazing... well except AC unity. That shit show is hilariously unoptimized.

starchild3426d ago

Really? AC Unity runs just fine on my single GTX 970. I set my monitor's refresh rate at 50Hz and I get a pretty solid 50fps. And if I cap it at 30fps (60Hz refresh) it's very consistent and free of stutter. I've had more issues with Far Cry 4 and Dragon Age Inquisition to be honest.

I_AM_ CANADIAN_19893427d ago

Witcher 3 was meant to be played on pc. I'm crossing my fingers that it has flawless sli scaling and decent GSYNC support. Only have 2 3gb cards so gpu scaling has to make up for it. :( I will always regret being clueless and thinking gpu memory stacked at the time of building my computer lol should just buy titan z when it gets dirt cheap.

awi59513425d ago

They were already turning to the console darkside with witcher 2. Because many reviewers said it was more optimized to be played with a console controller than mouse and keyboard.

TheXgamerLive3427d ago (Edited 3427d ago )

Xbox One is 1.75 GHz CPU, ps4 is 1.6.
Regardless, the game is going to look and play incredible. They've gave this their all and I'll guess a GOTY contender at least.

stonecold33427d ago

ps4 has 1.75 ghz and that info from wiki

showtimefolks3427d ago

I end it all the time on gaming sites where graphics aren't everything, yet it's the one thing most gamers complain about. Seriously

We are talking about CD Red Project here, they get what gamers want so let's give the game a chance. It's still few months from being released. I am sure it will be fine

Stop over reacting to everything

Angeljuice3427d ago

@MonkeyOne
"The Xbox One and PS4 have 1.6 GHZ CPU's people."

Erm, its actually PC fans who are complaining about the visuals being downgraded on their particular version. Maybe you should read before imparting your "wisdom".

MonkeyOne3426d ago

I didn't read anywhere in the article that said the trailer was a PC version of the game.

The "worry" is from PC gamers which is ridiculous considering how the modding community usually makes games (that are modifiable) look 10 times better than the original release.

On consoles the Witcher 3 will probably look roughly similar to Shadow of Mordor

On the PC the game will look as good as your hardware will allow

starchild3426d ago

Lol no, it clearly looks far better than Shadow of Mordor. That game is only decent looking, while The Witcher 3 looks amazing.

3427d ago
GUTZnPAPERCUTZ3427d ago

X1 1.75ghz - PS4 1.6ghz. But yes they both are underpowered, especially compared to their previous iterations which both had 6-7 cores @ 3.2ghz with PS3 having the beefier CPU

awi59513425d ago

Yeah there are phone cpu's out with higher clock speeds lol.

Kumomeme3427d ago

actually what people are getting worried are wherever the pc version also will suffer from downgrade

past few years pc gamers had suffer few downgrade issues

before people already being suspicious over downgrade on screenshot released
even before there are claim from a dev saying witcher 3 gonna get downgraded and all those presentation were just advertising stunt

frezhblunts3426d ago

Still like why do the pc gamers worry about graphics so much? It can still be a good/ fun game. It is like they want a beautiful open world game with nothing in it but the environment to stare at the graphics.

ShinMaster3427d ago

From article:

"It seems the latest trailer of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt disappointed a number of PC gamers... these graphical compromises let down a lot of PC gamers"

They're talking about PC. Not consoles.

frezhblunts3426d ago

Fanboys think their ps4s has the best graphics and can do anything. I have a ps4 and there are a lot of problems with it. Just remember the possible downgrade probably helps the gameplay better. I have a wii u and yet most people will say well thats a weak old gen console because their ignorant, I can admit I played the best games on their this year just watch the VGAS they won awards. Still I am sure Witcher will still be a good game.

DanteVFenris6663426d ago

Ps4. It's only 400 bucks it can sit on my tv stand all day long. Yes I do hook up my PC occasionally but it's annoying. I'll play with a few downgraded textures frames and res instead of putting up with how uncomfortable PC gaming is. Yes I depending on the game releases sometimes I game more on PC, but I still prefer console. It's nice to just sit down, controller turns system on and play. I don't want best graphics I want the games with improved graphics from PS3 which there is a good gap with some good gameplay

Animal Mutha 763426d ago

I agree but then devs shouldn't show content that is either BS or just not capable on the target machines.

The Industry is so full of bait and switch its criminal (or at least it should be).

Tzuno3426d ago (Edited 3426d ago )

well that's the weakest part in the entire console, AMD and in top of that 1.6 that sucks monkey balls.

Gamer19823426d ago

the games not gonna look better than dragon age most probably. Do people think there boxes are magic?? Most early videos were taken from alpha, see the issue with alpha is they either look bad or way better than final game. Watch Dogs was the worst example of this in recent history.. I am used to this over the years of gaming but it seems people are new to this?? Or are just blind to it?
You should check out the game closer to launch or from reviews. Twitch is really good these days to check out quality as there's always early copies being streamed on there now. You cannot downgrade a game that has not been released that's a fact. So stop claiming graphics have been downgraded when the games not even out..

People feeling ripped off and they don't even own the game yet..

+ Show (17) more repliesLast reply 3425d ago
Forn3427d ago (Edited 3427d ago )

I think the game looks freakin' awesome. A lot of fantastic games on the way next year. People complaining about all these new incredible looking games need to quit gaming.

SamPao3427d ago

Spoiled brats :)

Lets wait for the final result :)

Xof3426d ago

Don't expect much different. CDPR sucks at optimization. Just look at the texture scaling the n TW2. Anything short of the highest setting yielded PS2-level textures.

DarthSocio3427d ago

I'm a console gamer, but PC owners shouldn't have to suffer graphical downgrade so that some level of parity could be achieved across all platforms.

IC3_DEMON3427d ago

Someone who has a brain and can put themselves in other peoples shoes. Bubble for you.

Roccetarius3427d ago

I doubt there's a downgrade, considering their past trailers have been fantastic as well.

Either way, here's the full answer to this question. http://forums.cdprojektred....

LOL_WUT3427d ago

I think no system should have to suffer any graphical downgrade whether its PC, PS4 or the X1 ;)

LamerTamer3427d ago (Edited 3427d ago )

True but it looks like MS is throwing their financial weight around in the dev world to insure "X1 has the same quality experience and graphical quality as other platforms". That would be fine but for the fact that the xbone doesn't have the same quality GPU hardware as other platforms and is at the bottom of the heap this gen for that. As a result xbone would always be a bit less in the graphics dept if all platforms were taken advantage of. Any other result and parity is the culprit, it is just math regarding the GPUs in these things.

Feralkitsune3427d ago

I bet the game hasn't been downgraded, it's CDProjeckt they deliver.

ShaunCameron3427d ago

Welcome to the downside of multiplatform game development.

CaptainObvious8783427d ago

You're dam bloody right, and it's good to see you getting so many agrees.

It's interesting, because when I say the PS4 shouldn't have to suffer a graphical downgrade because of the xbone I get disagrees left, right and center.

I wonder why that is?

LamerTamer3427d ago (Edited 3427d ago )

Why? Fanboys. They still think that DX12 and the cloud is going to make up for GPU hardware with less CUs, ROPs, shaders, etc.

ShinMaster3427d ago

PC games don't have issues with parity. That is only consoles.

Most PC games don't take full advantage of high end hardware anyway.

NuggetsOfGod3425d ago

Un thats becuz of parity! Lol

ShinMaster3425d ago (Edited 3425d ago )

No, parity is when developers have two or more versions of the same game at the same graphics settings. Multiplatform PC games are still capable of achieving higher resolution, framerate, AA, etc.

The games I'm talking about are MOBAs, MMOs, RTS and indie games, which are some of the most popular PC exclusives.

DanteVFenris6663426d ago

Their just graphics(face palm) I never get upset over downgrade. Especially for consoles. If it's not possible on the system then it's not possible. Some people are just dicks that act like making a game is easy and magical.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3425d ago
i8urCAKE3427d ago (Edited 3427d ago )

CD Projekt Red has confirmed that the problem is due to youtube's compression and thus it looks crappy. they are uploading the better version now.

they said there will be NO DOWNGRADE so i still have hope

the_dark_one3427d ago

http://www.gamersyde.com/ne...

then tell us there was no downgrade. maybe there wasnt no downgrade on pc and the trailer was of the console version, we dont know. but normaly in this case when a game is coming to pc and consoles the trailer is from pc since its the one that could be more shiny

elninels3427d ago

It was at "maybe there wasnt no downgrade on pc" that I wondered, where did you learn to use language?

Your comment is lost on me because the quality of your thoughts and your ability to express them is only as good as your quality of language used.

Also the quality of image available is only as good as the quality of hardware available. Most will not run max settings or even much close to it.

So with this "downgrade" or without it won't matter to most gamers.

Show all comments (124)
110°

The 7 Best Western RPGs: Immersive Adventures

RPGs are often huge, sprawling endeavours. With limited playtime, we have to choose wisely, so here's the best western RPGs available today.

SimpleSlave20d ago

"I started playing games yesterday" the List... Meh!

How about a few RPGs that deserve some love instead?
1 - Alpha Protocol - Now on GOG
2 - else Heart.Break()
3 - Shadowrun Trilogy
4 - Wasteland 2
5 - UnderRail
6 - Tyranny
7 - Torment: Tides of Numenera

And for a bonus game that flew under the radar:
8 - Banishers: Ghosts of New Eden

DustMan20d ago

Loved Alpha Protocol in all it's glorious jank. Great game.

SimpleSlave20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Not only glorious jank, but the idea that the story can completely change depending on what you do, or say, or side with, makes it one of the most forward thinking games ever. The amount of story permutation is the equivalent of a Hitman level but in Story Form. And it wasn't just that the story changed, no, it was that you met completely new characters, or missed them, depending on your choices. Made Mass Effect feel static in comparison.

Alpha Protocol was absolutely glorious, indeed. And it was, and still is, more Next Gen than most anything out there these days. In this regard at least.

Pity.

230°

All the Essential Video Games Everyone Needs To Play At Least Once

Given the medium's wild diversity, this primer of the essential video games everyone should try is a good place to start.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
thorstein44d ago

.... from the 2000s (mostly).

shinoff218344d ago

I can't fk with this list. They missed on alot of games probably before the writers times. Also I know people loved some portal but I was never a fan.

Cacabunga44d ago

Tomb Raider 1
Driver 1
Abe’s Odyssey
FF6
King of Fighters 94
Mortal Kombat OG
LINK 2 the past
Street Fighter 2
Resident Evil 1

Inverno44d ago

Infinite but not the first two games? Witcher 3 but not the first two games?? GTA V but not literally any of the games before it??? Portal 2 but not the first? Also if you're going to play Shadow of The Colossus play the remaster and not the remake. Can't say I disagree with the list but my man it's all over the place.

Name Last Name44d ago

I mean some sequels are objectively better and you don’t need to play the whole series.

Inverno44d ago

But most of these games have a story to follow, sure you can catch up with a YouTube vid but where's the fun in that?

LucasRuinedChildhood44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

A list like this isn't telling you not to play the previous games if you want to. It's just giving you legendary games to play.

But tbh, you don't always have to force yourself to play every entry in a franchise to get to the better ones.

- The vast majority of Witcher 3 players never played the first 2 and had a great time. The first 2 games aren't in the same league.
- The GTA games are self-contained with the odd fun reference. You can easily jump into any of them.
- The Shadow Of The Colossus remake looks and controls better than the original (plus it has a 60fps option while the remaster is just 30fps). New players will enjoy it more.
- Portal 2 is a lot better than Portal 1 and takes the concept much further gameplay-wise. Storywise, Portal 1 is fairly light too. Not that you shouldn't play it but realistically ... you'd love Portal 2 whether you play it or not (at lot of Portal 2 players have never played 1).

Bioshock 1 is the only one I agree with you on simply because it's one the best games of all time and arguably better than Infinite. No other setting like Rapture.

Looking at the list, I'd recommend playing Uncharted 1 before 2 but no doubt, 2 is the legendary one you have to play.

Inverno44d ago

I get it, but that's just my opinion on his opinion. I just think that before you play a sequel you should still play what came before it. Maybe it's just me but i find it fascinating playing through the first game in a series and seeing how it has evolved through its sequels. Like I said I don't disagree with the list, other than SoTC which I strongly believe the remaster of the original should be played above the remake.

AuraAbjure43d ago

Awesome list! Hot take on Fear (and it's hard af expansion Persaus Mandate!) Bioshock Infinite is stellar, so is the Witcher 3 and you nailed it by having Ocarina of Time. So many fantastic games! Gotta play 'em all! Next one on my list is Prey after I beat Dead Space 2 and Splinter Cell Conviction.

Show all comments (11)
80°

The Best Video Game Romances of All Time

Wealth of Geeks explores some of the best gaming romances that have stolen our hearts over the years.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com