MultiConsoleGamer3679d ago

Huge news!

I never thought this would happen. Best of luck to Square Enix. Sony has been their biggest supporter for many years.

UnwanteDreamz3679d ago

If this money goes to funding new fresh experiences im all for it.

pompombrum3679d ago

Someone needs to remake that video but change the music to the FF victory theme.

CrossingEden3679d ago

Thats actually the complete opposite of their financial situation. They are very much in the red compared to Nintendo and Microsoft, which is why they had to do this in the first place.

ZodTheRipper3679d ago

Good move, I would have done that right when Square announced that FF13 Versus is now a multiplatform release.

LexHazard793679d ago

@unwanted,

I dont think that money is going towards any games. Maybe the money is going towards R&D. Its not cheap1 developing VR and other experiences for the PS4, plus their 1st party games all have big budgets their so good.

AsimLeonheart3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

I do not think they are using that money to party... They probably sold the shares because they did not see any further reason for maintaining their stake in SE. SE is washed up now days and are no more the influential juggernaut they once was. The new gamers may find it hard to believe but during the second half of the 90s and early 2,000s Squaresoft's support determined the winning console of the generation. Now SE has ruined FF series, the company is going in red, share price is falling and is desperately in need of a hit to make them relevant once again.
Suppose Sony purchased each shares for $50 10 years ago when Square was on the boom and now the price has fallen to $30. They have already lost $20 on each share with no hope of recovering them. If the SE share price is expected to fall any further then Sony will sell the shares as soon as possible to mitigate any further loss.

mewhy323679d ago

Can't really blame Sony. Square isn't very profitable lately. I think this is just part of Sony's trimming the fat effort.

UltraNova3679d ago

I still remember the moment I inserted FF7's 1st out of 4 discs in my ps1 and started playing what turned out to be the reason for my life long addiction to video games...those were the days when Squaresoft was king.

Thehyph3679d ago

There's really only one proper explanation at this point:
Sony is selling off these shares because, at this point in time, it makes financial sense.

That's all there is to know. Lots of conjecture and anecdotal comments here.

GTgamer3679d ago

IMO Sony did the Right Thing they owned allot of share in Square Enix, a Company that has literally not been on its game lately especially with the latest Final Fantasy series But they did make some good games last generation like Sleeping Dogs/TR/DxRevolution but They are still struggling http://www.eurogamer.net/ar... then theirs FFVersus which was supposed to be PS exclusive but went multiplatform So is it really a Shock that Sony isn't supporting Square anymore :/.

Fluke_Skywalker3679d ago

4.8 billion Yen?
Is that not about £30 or something.

chrismichaels043679d ago

Sonys TV and PC divisions have been hurting them for years, but to say Sony "needs the money" and "isn't doing well" is ridiculous. Square Enix has been hurting as a game publisher for years. Plus their games are no longer exclusive to the Playstation brand. It made perfect sense for Sony to get rid of their investment with the company.

DragonKnight3679d ago

*sigh* There had to be someone start the doom comments on this hadn't there.

Mankey3679d ago

Nah.

Good Move.

No Point in hanging out the shares when Square is putting out Final Fantasy XV and Kingdom Hearts III on competitors platform.

Think of this from a business perspective.

chrismichaels043679d ago

It's hysterical how Sony-haters are trying to find a reason to bash Sony making a 4.8 Billion profit. Those are the same people that don't want to talk about "sales" when Sony reports higher PS4 sales over the competition....but they have no problem talking about behind the scenes sales reports when they can try and twist it against Sony.

stragomccloud3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

@UnwanteDreamz
Actually it's going to offset their losses to make their fiscal year look better.

@chrismichaels
Sony incurred a fiscal net loss for 2013 at about 1.5 billion. This is even after shutting down Sony's computer division and cutting loose 5000 jobs.

strifeblade3679d ago

But why would sony do this they are the saviour of gaming. Man they would do anything for money...

darthv723679d ago

Did they sell with the option to buy back at a later time? If not, then those shares are attainable by any company. Be it MS, Nintendo or even Square themselves...etc.

troylazlow3679d ago

4.8 million Yen = $46,939.15 USD

sooooooooo... my question is, why? whats the point?

this should be pocket change

SolidStoner3679d ago

@tbone567

Everyone needs cash. ASAP! ;)

XboxFun3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

Thats great that Sony can make some kind of profit for their struggling business. But at the same time it sux that they had to let go of what was the biggest company with the most popular frqnchise to do it.

oh well, I'm sure it was no big deal as Square knew Sony had to do it. Which is probably one of the main reasons sony couldnt keep FF exclusive to its platform contrary to what most on he said.

lol@ the spin the sony defenders are putting up. Remeber guys...sales dont matter!

scott1823679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

@DragonKnight

Yes, it's kinda sad that the trolls come out of the wood works to spout doom and gloom on these articles. What else is there for them to grasp at anymore?

chrismichaels043679d ago

@xboxfun - With a name like "xboxfun" commenting on a Playstation article....i should have known you were a comedian. Too bad you only have one bubble....I would have liked to hear more of your crazy stories.

gameon19853679d ago

Only a Sony fan boy would try and twist this as good news. Sony is selling off assets to stay afloat end of story. so that link couldn't be any more inaccurate. Like I said, Sony fans like to live in this fantasy land where ever thing is all well at Sony, and your reaction is proof. Then again, maybe you just didn't know better. However judging by the amount of disagrees you got most of N4g knows better.

hay3679d ago

At least It'll produce a quality title which Square is unable of doing.

BlackTar1873679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

@troylazlow

Did you even read the article? The math is in the article. Maybe next time you get this excited you should fact check

4800000000 Japanese Yen equals
46915200.0000 US Dollar

@XboxFun FF isn't the biggest franchise and Square isn't the biggest either.

MysticStrummer3679d ago

Gotta love how the "Sony is doomed" stuff keeps on rolling, despite PS4's domination. Straws come in many graspable forms I suppose.

Square Enix hasn't made a game I was interested in for years and years, so I'm all for this whether it's to fund new projects or help pay for old ones.

morganfell3679d ago

Sony was just being smart and some people are insisting on finding doom. Mainly those that are supporting a console other than the PS4.

http://sqex.info/square-eni...

SilentNegotiator3678d ago (Edited 3678d ago )

@CrossingEden

Except Sony was profitable last quarter, thanks in large part to their gaming department. So, actually, yes, they're probably doing that about now, being profitable for once. Selling worthless shares for almost $50M USD is going to be another little push for another profitable quarter.

+ Show (28) more repliesLast reply 3678d ago
Gamer19823679d ago

Not surprising since S-E has basically turned on them the past generation making Star Ocean originally as an exclusive for 360 and bringing FF and Tomb Raider games to Xbox too. The only reason FF14 never came to Xbox was because of Xbox live issues. Sony is in the business of making money and when S-E showed zero loyalty to a major shareholder a major shareholder basically jumped ship.

As for what this means for the future who knows?? It means S-E has Zero backing from Sony now and although they are a huge company they aren't the juggernaut they used to be.

jetlian3679d ago

TR wasnt even part of SE till 2010!!! If sony was in the business of making money even if the games were sold on xbo they still would make money for sony.

Sony did this cuz they going broke and needed cash now. SE still gonna make ps games anyway

Nitrowolf23679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

"SE still gonna make ps games anyway"

You just proved his point. Why bother holding any shares if it's not going to benefit them in any way? SE has show int he past decade that the shares Sony own mean squat.

It's just like any other devs that SOny doesn't own Share for. Activision is still gonna make games for them, same with EA.

There's no denying that SOny isn't in a finacial crisis, but this TBH wa sjust a smart decision.

Death3679d ago

You guys make it sound like Sony didn't approve of Square releasing these games on other platforms. By releasing on the Xbox, Sony received part of the profits since they were pretty significant share holders.

DragonKnight3679d ago

@Death: No they weren't. They used to be significant shareholders, but over the years the percentage dropped from 20% to the now 8% that they are selling off. The height of the partnership between Sony and Squaresoft was Final Fantasy 7, after the merger it dropped off but they still maintained a presence.

You are correct that they'd receive a cut of the profit, but they'd have received more if SE games were PS exclusives.

k3rn3ll3679d ago

Xbox live issues? Pray tell

kingdom183679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

@k3rn3ll, meaning Microsoft most likely wouldn't have allowed the servers to be connected or what ever I can't think of the right term. PC and PS4, PS3 players are all connected on FF14, I'm sure Microsoft wouldn't have allowed that.

Deano73943678d ago

@ k3rn3ll MS don't wouldn't allow cross platform play, that is why they have no FF14.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3678d ago
SpadeX3678d ago

B-b-but I love her...

ArchangelMike3679d ago

I wonder, if the loss of FFXV exclusivity has anything to do with this. I know Sony are calculating the risk of investment in SE going forward, versus end-of-quarter profits; but I can help wonder if they would have still sold their shares if FFXV remained exclusive?

LightofDarkness3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

Doubtful. FF is simply not the money spinner it once was, and Sony decided to sell while share prices were still pretty high. Sony had a nice stake in SE, so SE doing well via multiplatform releases benefited Sony. Sony are not internet fanboys, they wouldn't take something like that as a perceived slight and would have been made aware of this decision long before the public were. I'm sure they even supported it at the time, Sony need money, which is the real reason why this is happening.

Sony have invested a HUGE amount of money into VR and their cloud services over the past 4 years, and will need a lot more before either project will come to fruition. That VR headset from last year was released as a reaction to pressure from investors to see SOME return on the investment in VR up to that point. Plus, Son'y partnership with SE has likely been unfruitful over the last few years, they have been struggling to maintain a profit and have eaten huge expenses over Final Fantasy XIV and their faltering mainline series sales. Eidos have basically been keeping them alive since 2010, it was a smart move for Sony to withdraw their stake and focus it on the direction they're really heading in. This is a good move by Sony, and really only highlights the industry's current opinion of Square Enix.

MightyNoX3679d ago

I approve of this. Square-Enix has been making nothing but stupid decisions for years. They've been losing money, wandering in the desert trying to 'regain their core'

Exclusivity is already did WITH or without the shares, so why should Sony keep those? Better cash out while there's value in 'em still.

LightofDarkness3679d ago

Funny, with one game, Bravely Default, they gave their core hope. Then they were surprised that it was successful, and people wonder why their Japanese division have been circling the drain in recent years.

hay3679d ago

Bravely Default is by Silicon Studio, dudes behind 3D Dot Game Heroes, a reason why it's good.

AsunaYuukiTheFlash3679d ago

@LightofDarkness Bravely Defauly was developed by Silicon Studios.

Dark113679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

Yean Not surprising , sony need every $$$ they can get.
they has been selling stuff right and left in the past few months.

HugoDrax3679d ago

To put things into perspective, I read this comment from a mod over on IGN:

"Separately, the co and Hydro-Quebec announced that they have agreed to establish a joint venture to research and develop a large-scale energy storage system for power grids. Sony and Hydro-Quebec plan to establish the new company in June, 2014

So Sony is, wisely, looking to break into more profitable sectors. Good for them."

Not sure how much of it is fact, but everything isn't always a doom and gloom situation. Our job as gamers are to enjoy games, not concern ourselves with every single financial matter of Sony, Microsoft, or Nintendo.

Anon19743679d ago

@HugDrax. It reminds me of when Sony was selling off real estate when the real estate market started to pick up again and posted huge profits due to that. Many where "OMG, look how bad off Sony is that they're making profitable real estate transactions" when at the same time Sony was making billions in acquisitions.

We all know that Sony's facing an uphill battle to turn the company around in a changing marketplace, but so many are quick to focus on every slightest, perceived weakness while ignoring the everything else to do with the company.

This is a perfect example, where Sony's making an investment decision which results in a profit for the company and people are acting like it's some move made out of desperation. You're supposed to sell investments when it'll profit you. I'd be more worried if Sony wasn't making moves like this.

Revolver_X_3679d ago

@Hugo

What else would Xbots have to talk about? In 5-10 years we'll hear this again during the reign of the PS5.

Magicite3679d ago

I wonder how this gonna influence Square Enix?

lelo3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

What the hell is going on with Sony ?

They are selling a lot assets, like properties, hardware divisions (PC Vaio) or other company shares (Square Enix). Several people leaving, or getting fired, from their gaming studios.
All this is not good news for Sony!

SoulSercher6203679d ago

Care to explain why they NEED to keep their shares of Square Enix?

Dark113679d ago

Yeah they're so desperate that they're trying to liquidate everything they can now.

it could help them in the long run.

ps360s3679d ago

LOL

why would they need shares in SE?

You don't know much about the market I'm guessing

THC CELL3679d ago

Pc and laptops are dying. More people buying tablets these days. I recommend a z2 tablet. Amazing

Anon19743679d ago

Actually, according to the experts, this streamlining of operations is exactly what Sony should be doing to turn things around. They've been saying for years that Sony had become too bloated and should be reorganizing in exactly the manner we've seen recently. Slimming down is just what the doctor ordered.

Now as for this move, it makes perfect sense. The stock had been kicked all to hell the last couple of years and no one needs that type of volatility in their equity portfolio. The stock was trading at it's highest point since last year Square warned of "extraordinary losses" and Sony jumped at it to the tune of 48 billion yen worth of profit. There's nothing but win here for Sony.

It'll be interesting to see if the spin off of Sony's TV division this summer will help TV's return to profitability. The entire Japanese Television industry still seems to be in free fall. Only time will tell.

ginsunuva3679d ago

You haven't heard they've been in financial trouble for the past 7 years?

MrSwankSinatra3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

The problem I have is that they are getting rid of gaming assets when that's gaming is their only profitable division. You people keep talking about how sony and squares relationship hasn't been the best over the past generation, but that could have changed this gen. Don't expect to see any exclusive square stuff on PlayStation anymore. Sony has literally gone full retard.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3679d ago
EXVirtual3679d ago

I suppose this has to do with FF15 and KH3 going multiplatform. Oh well.
To clarify, FF15 is still going to PS4. Last time I checked, MS doesn't have any SE shares and if that's the way all 3rd party publishers worked, Sony would have too many shares on their hands.

ginsunuva3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

Why would this have anything to do with those games going multiplatform?!?

If you own stock, might as well keep it until you can sell it at a high point.

They're trying to get money from their assets. They aren't 12-year old fanboys who care about multiplatform games.

3-4-53679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

* At most I can see this money going into paying off debts, but 4.8 million yen isn't a lot of money.

* 4.8 Million Yen is ONLY $46,934.40

prankster3679d ago

Typo. If you read the article it's actually 4.8 billion yen.

Darrius Cole3679d ago

There is a typo in the title.

The profit is 4.8 BILLION dollars (with a "B"). That's somewhere around 47 Million US dollars.

Blaze9293679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

I guess Sony finally got around to playing the FFXIII trilogy....

Meanwhile I find it funny everyone is pointing the blame and reason at Square Enix. Last time I checked, they were doing just fine and with Disney purchasing the Marvel license, Kingdom Hearts just became as big as ever. Then FF15 incoming too.

So how exactly is Square the "not stable" ones? Financially or just in your little minds? What "risk" does Square currently have for it's shareholders lol? Lettuce he reality - since we apparently have so many accounting majors on N4G. Gotta love the career variety of the members on this website. Me? I'm just a gamer ;)

BlackTar1873679d ago

Hey Blaze,

Square posted a loss last year of over 100 million USD and i also believe they posted a loss for the fiscal year in 2012.

neither company is doing just fine unless you consider multiple losses over a 2 yr period.

AceBlazer133679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

Good on Sony's part, I would've done this the moment KH3 and FFXV went multiplat. Putting Kingdom Hearts on the Xbox, what a load of bs. Why put KH3 on Wii U,on PS4, you know the brands that have been pushing it since birth, when you can put it on Xbox a platform that never had a thing to do with the series. Dammit Square Nintendo deserves KH3 almost as much as PlayStation.Then you have them weaseling FFV13 out of exclusivity by renaming it FFXV.Just sad.

Still love them for Kingdom Hearts though, but they screwin up lately. (Yes I know this most likely goes beyond 2 games going multiplat, this is just my view as a gamer).

AnotherProGamer3679d ago

Weird how Sony has been big share holder of Square Enix but they have been making multiplatform games and exclusive games for other platforms like 3DS

geddesmond3679d ago

Its about time they did as owning so much in SE did nothing for them exclusive wise. Now lets see if SE can afford to spend 10 years making a game when it has different investers it has to answer too.

randomass1713679d ago

The decision will most likely help both companies in the long run. Recovery is a long road but both Sony and Square can find their own way. :)

ITPython3679d ago

They sold over 9 and a half million shares and only got 4.8 million yen? (which is like $46,000 US dollars).

So each SE share is like a fraction of penny (something like 0.004 of a penny per share).

I dunno, Sony had $46,000 in SE, that's not that big of an investment. Even if they had 4.8 million dollars in SE, it wouldn't be that big of an investment for a company like Sony.

AsunaYuukiTheFlash3679d ago

TYPO.It is actually 4.8 BILLION yen.

ITPython3679d ago

Ah, that makes more sense. $46 million US dollars is incredibly significant!

Gotcha53679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

@MultiConsoleGamer
Ha ha... I remember back in the days when Nintendo was a big supporter of Square.Until Sony stuck their noses up Square ass. Now they see that Square Enix is not what Square once was being a profitable developer.The same can be said about Tecmo Koei.

Geoff9003679d ago

Sony isn't doing that hence them selling a lot of their divisions and doing massive restructuring, no business does this unless they aren't making enough money.

Square Enix was an investment it by owning shares of company doesn't mean that games will only come out on your platform, SE have made games for Nintendo before. Companies ALL companies heavily invest in various products, companies etc for a number of reasons.

@chrismichaels04

"It's hysterical how Sony-haters are trying to find a reason to bash Sony making a 4.8 Billion profit. Those are the same people that don't want to talk about "sales" when Sony reports higher PS4 sales over the competition....but they have no problem talking about behind the scenes sales reports when they can try and twist it against Sony."

So because someone states the truth it must mean people hate Sony?

Sony is a business, which isn't doing that well, hence it's massive restructuring, selling of businesses, selling it's shares, this is what companies do.

Having the lead market share on a console isn't that important, when you consider how big Sony actuality is/was. Putting the emphasis on one brand to succeeded is a huge risk, more so when there are other companies in the market.

Sony used to be the leader in virtually everything from T.V's, audio, gadgets, etc now that has pretty much gone for them.

MS doesn't need the Xbox succeed, they could just carry on with Windows, and other services, some other company could take their place in the market.

Business is business, it's complicated just because someone says something about your beloved company, doesn't mean you should dismiss them.

fenome3678d ago (Edited 3678d ago )

I would've done it the day they went from Squaresoft to Square-Enix, but that's just me. I don't actually have stock in this market, I just play games :D

EDIT:
@Geoff900
I didn't see your post till I dropped mine already. I like Sonys first-party games better than anything Square-Enix comes out with nowadays anyways. I would've dropped 'em off too, sooner than later.

This isn't something said lightly either, I grew up on Final Fantasy, they are some of my favorite memories in gaming. Back in the day, when they were still Squaresoft, that might've been different, but things have changed hard.

I hope we get some of those old-school games again, I really do, but this industry is changing like crazy. Hard to say what's what right now, E3's right aroung the corner though, hopefully that's when we really start finding out about the good-good..

+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 3678d ago
UnwanteDreamz3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

I cant help feeling this way just a little. I used to love Square but I haven't played a FF game in over a decade.

blackbeld3679d ago

Finally Sony.

Its about time.

Volkama3679d ago

On the other hand the Enix side have been churning out some pretty good games in recent years. Deus Ex, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider spring to mind and I am especially fond of the extra effort they put into their PC versions.

adorie3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

lol@Volkama

That's EIDOS. Cause I didn't know Enix developed those games otherwise.

randomass1713679d ago

Play Bravely Default on 3DS. That game is more like an older FF game.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3679d ago
morganfell3679d ago

Agreed GamersHeaven. Other than TombRaider Square has been on the slide for a while. Those using this news to attack Sony are the same ones that were also damning the FFXIII series and talking about how Square had lost their touch. Yet they think Sony is wrong for dropping their shares and walking.

How many times has Square went for the money instead of being loyal to Sony? Yet Sony is supposed to keep a poor investment? No, just no.

jetlian3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

loyal to sony?! lol only thing a company is loyal to is money. I for one cant wait for FF15, KH3 and TR2.

right on starchild didn't even think of those. 6 series i like i'd say they are my second favorite next to ubisoft

starchild3679d ago

I have no problem with Sony making a business decision they believe to be best for their company.

But aside from Tomb Raider Square Enix have also published games like Deus Ex Human Revolution, Batman Arkham Asylum and Sleeping Dogs, and those are some of my favorite games of the last generation. So unless all Square means to you is Final Fantasy I don't see how they are on the slide as a company. At least not from a gamer's perspective. I don't know what their financials look like.

RGB3679d ago

@starchild,

Those games were developed by the Eidos name which Square purchased. Only Tomb Raider came out long after Eidos acquisition.

Sleeping Dogs is the only noteworthy title they have published outside of former Eidos developers & Square franchises and that was in Activision hands before anyway.

Thief was botched, same with Hitman. They canned a Hitman project too. Square had a few good titles last gen, but most came from their Eidos teams, not them.

Sums up the Eastern market really.

maniacmayhem3679d ago

"Square went for the money instead of being loyal to Sony?"

Loyal??

Why would Square be loyal to Sony? Shouldn't they have been loyal to Nintendo since that s where they got their big start and success?

Why is it that some people on this site think that these companies owe others anything...especially when their IP's didn't even originate on the console of their choice.

morganfell3679d ago

If you grew up and lived in Japan like some of us you would understand. But since your didn't, you don't.

Geoff9003679d ago

Loyal to Sony? Sorry but if you are an investor, it doesn't make the company you are investing in 'loyal'.

SE has been making Nintendo games for many years for instance.

The fact that Sony has shares of a company makes no difference, the actual reasoning to them selling off their shares are simple, the first thing you do if you want to do if you are losing money is sell everything you can, get rid of people, and invest heavily into a new product (in the hope it sells).

I think you guys need to get out into the real world, the world doesn't run on loyalty, honor etc, it simply works on money.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3679d ago
Not-A-Cat3679d ago

If this means more money for first party studios then its all right

shadyiswin3679d ago

actually Volkama is dead on square enix did publish ,tomb raider,deus ex and sleeping dogs. Also did a good job with Just Cause and other random titles.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3679d ago
ArbitorChief3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

Sheesh, more assets being sold, Sony really want to post a profit for this quarter.

TomShoe3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

You don't even know what you're talking about.

Do you even know why they're doing this? As far as we know, Square Enix is struggling as a company, and Sony may be selling their shares because of their current volatility in the market. Risk is the last thing Sony needs right now. They need a steady source of profit in the wake of a large restructuring effort. Who knows how Square will fare in the long run, those shares may be worth nothing in a few years.

THINK/RESEARCH before you go typing your "Sony is dooooooomed!" nonsense, will you?

ArbitorChief3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

I didn't say Sony were doomed? All I said was Sony sold their assets (aka Shares) to most likely recover from their $1.1 billion loss, like they've been doing the past few months (e.g. Sony stores closed, 5000 employees fired, numerous Playstation developers fired, new IPs cancelled, etc) Just same old for Sony as of right now, it's a good move for Sony, they need to recover from their poor financial annual statement.

@Iamnsuperman
That could be true definitely, but considering the timing and the fact that Sony have been selling off assets like crazy as of recently and that their financial quarter is coming up soon, the most obvious answer is just Sony selling more assets to have more cash on hand to post a profit for the quarter.

Gamer19823679d ago

Indeed the money they get from them shares they could pump into a new studio or expand a 1st party studio.

LexHazard793679d ago

Thats a reach dude! You say as far as you know, but you dont know. Its all speculation on your part. Sony is also having financial issues. They are selling real estate, shares. Theres been layoffs. Yet you sit here and type as if Square is the only ones having problems. Sony is probably in a worse position than Square Enix.

randomass1713679d ago

He didn't really say anything about Sony being doomed though, just that they wanted to make a profit. Which isn't really untrue, ANY company wants to make a profit.

Geoff9003679d ago

SE, isn't in the same situation as Sony, SE is a software house, the risk isn't high as making hardware/software/etc.

Like every company on the planet, when they aren't doing well the first thing they do is sell off everything they can, shares, sectors, and lastly they get rid of staff something they HAVE been doing.

Geoff9003679d ago

He didn't say Sony is doomed, he stated that they want to post a profit this quarter.

Sony is doing what all companies do, it sells it's stocks/shares, companies, and gets rid of it's staff it need to post a good quarter for investors/stocks and shares to invest.

All companies do this around this time of year.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3679d ago
iamnsuperman3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

Or:

1. Square Enix isn't stable
2. Sony doesn't want to loose more potential money/value
3. Sony sells shares in a company whose value could drop further

I think a lot of companies would do the same regardless of financial stability. For Sony this is even more important

andibandit3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

how are all your outcomes focused on there must be something wrong with SE.... I find it more likely that it's just part of Sony's reorganization step.

LexHazard793679d ago

Im a Sony supporter, but at some point the Sony fanboys need to realize that Sony is not doing good(as a whole, and I dont mean that their DOOMED either). And from all the articles on N4G we should all know this. So im wondering why some many fanboys are out defending Sony as if all their financial woes have been cleared!

Also if Square is in such trouble, why they not selling off their IPs? They have some of the best IPs ever created in gaming history, Square is good baby!

GarrusVakarian3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

*Sony doesn't make any effort to make a profit, goes into "junk" status* -

"Lol, Sony are broke! PS4 is DOOOOMED!"

*Sony makes concious efforts to make a profit* -

"sheesh, more assets being sold"

Seems to me like it's 'damned if they don't, damned if they do'.

buttclown3679d ago

Both sides of the fence are the same, people just don't know it.

marlinfan103679d ago

what do you expect. thats how it is with these fanboys for both companies

randomass1713679d ago

Sony and Nintendo get a lot of that it seems. :(

MultiConsoleGamer3679d ago

Just when Square-Enix was starting to turn things around.

http://massively.joystiq.co...

iamnsuperman3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

Probably why they did it now. That game (even though it was risky) was a big boost for Square Enix but is that enough for long term stability (keeping an investment). A bit too risky.

Volkama3679d ago

I don't think Square-Enix are any worse off for this deal.

Charybdis3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

True its assets being sold with probably as goal to free up some capital for new or existing projects.

To be honest I would have preffered sony buying a majority share in square instead of selling their shares. I would have loved to see an exclusive ff7 on the ps4.

Anon19743679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

Sony Financial Holdings buys and sells securities on a daily basis and other business units regularly invest in the stock of other companies. At the end of the day with this sale, SCEI made a profits.

I can't believe there's people out there that are trying to spin a company making business decisions which profit their companies as a bad thing. And, by the way..they didn't sell the shares for 4.8 billion yen, that's what they expect to profit off the sale. The shares were valued at approx 16 billion yen.

"Sony just made a business move that saw them profit on a company who's stock is trading at the highest point since it warned of "extraordinary losses" a year ago? Dooom!"

Absolutely ridiculous...

LexHazard793679d ago

Best one ive read so far. Bubble up!

LoveOfTheGame3679d ago

Haven't really seen anyone trying to spin this in a bad way. Only people who think that and defend Sony with their lives lol.

It's simple, Sony as a whole have not been very profitable. In order to increase profits they are trimming fat all around the company. The shares in SE were deemed unnecessary and could be sold for profit.

Pretty simple business right there. Sony isn't doomed, but they do need to make decisions like these to move the company forward.

Anon19743679d ago

Are you kidding. There are numerous comments hear trying to spin this negatively. Just skim the page and you'll see a bunch.

But you're 100% correct. Sony's doing exactly what they should be doing, and exactly what the market wants them to do by streamlining the company, "trimming the fat" and generally slimming down their size and product offering. They started these restructuring efforts years ago. You can't really spin selling a stock for profit negatively, but plenty are trying to. As if making money through stocks is somehow some desperate indicator instead of the entire point of investing.

maniacmayhem3679d ago

@Darkride

And we also have numerous comments from people like you trying desperately to defend this action and turn into a positive. Funny you can't do the same for MS as you in the past as you constantly submitted "Xbox 360 is doomed" or "MS is selling Xbox" articles and blogs. Even though MS is in a better financial situation than Sony ever was.

Sony needs the profit but selling off Square to do it? I feel that is a bad decision since Square is still a huge company with one of the only RPG IP's that sells like gangbusters. Square might have had some missteps in recent years but a company like that always has ups and downs. No doubt with Vs. and KH coming they will see a surge in sales and popularity again.

I think it would have been best for Sony to hold on to its shares.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3679d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3679d ago
MeteorPanda3679d ago

Why though? Square is picking up and just before 15 releases?

TomShoe3679d ago

No reason to have stocks in a company if you're not getting anything out of it (FF exclusivity, etc.)

Shad0wRunner3679d ago

FFXIV is PS3/PS4 exclusive....aside from being on PC. But I mean....it's not on 360/XBox One or Nintendo. So, there's that.

Kayant3679d ago

@Shad0wRunner

It's only a console exclusive because of MS's policies with cross-platform play.

http://www.mcvuk.com/news/r...

Geoff9003679d ago

Exclusivity means nothing to an investor, MS owns the majority of stock of Bungie it doesn't mean Bungie games will be exclusive to MS's platforms.

Investing in a company is a way to off set taxes, to help stabilize a company among other things.

ChozenWoan3679d ago

I was thinking the same. With FFXV just around the corner.... 6-24 months from now (hopefully) why sell now. Then again, SE has shown almost hostility and disdain for the PS brand throughout most of Gen7, so it can be understandable that Sony would feel it's time to part ways with an unstable and unreliable "partner". I kinda wonder what took them so long now that I think about it.

Anyway, great news for Sony.

Mikefizzled3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

When you say 'just before' what do you mean? As I referred to the Oxford English Dictionary and that said you've stretched it their sir.

GuruMeditation3679d ago

Dude, you can't invoke the Oxford ED whilst substituting 'there' for 'their'. That's, like, 25 to life in grammar-prison.

Mikefizzled3679d ago (Edited 3679d ago )

I edited my comment by changing the subject to a place and forgot to change the 'their' in question.
Don't worry I'll show myself to the gallows...

KwietStorm_BLM3679d ago

Should have sold em sooner and bought exclusivity for FFXV. El oh el

Show all comments (265)
370°

Square Enix Declares $140m Loss Amid Game Pipeline Shakeup

Final Fantasy VII Rebirth publisher Square Enix has declared a $140m loss based on a shakeup of its internal development pipeline.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
Furesis12d ago

What are they doing over there? Sounds like they canceled something big. I read a rumor a while back about ff9 remake . Here "Final Fantasy IX has gone through a very challenging development, the game is still in progress but may undergo changes drastic enough that we won't hear about it for a couple of years."
This could be one of the reasons if the rumor is true. That was Silknight i don't know how credible he is but it's something and it would make sense.

-Foxtrot12d ago

I hope IX is still on the cards

Just a straight up remake which they expand a little bit nothing over ambitious

If IX dosent happen then VI and VIII will never be thought of.

Kakashi Hatake11d ago

6 and 8 were way more p popular games despite today's cult following of 9.

blackbeld11d ago

I want my FF8 remake! Can't believe they cancelled it.

TiredGamer12d ago

What are they doing? Sales are falling and the costs are out of control. Big releases need to be absolute sales home runs now, and Final Fantasy sales have stagnated.

Now we know why Square didn’t fall over themselves to remake the original FF7 all these years ago. It certainly wasn’t a license to print money, at least not with what the expectations were. Each of these full on remakes drains an enormous amount of company resources for a razor thin profit margin.

TwoPicklesGood12d ago

Breaking the game up into multiple parts was a mistake IMO.

blackblades11d ago

The loses came from cancelling games nothing else.

Tapani11d ago

They lost the magic in the remakes. And the story is incomplete. The original FF7 is still way better. The Remake / Rebirth are just fan service. Like an Anime/Manga with "optional" filler content. FF7 had pretty much zero filler, it was paced extremely well, and still today flows much better than the grindy story and spongey enemy battles in the remakes.

babadivad11d ago

If they released it at once on all platforms, they would have made all of their money back. Could have been on to an FF8 or 9 remake. Ready to cash in again on nostalgia like Capcom. This is their fault for trying to milk the title.

Once I head they were breaking it up into parts, I lost all interest.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 11d ago
neutralgamer199211d ago

I hope people understand usually when a loss is declared it means a game which had been in development got cancelled. For example Sony Santa Monica before GOW-PS4 had cancelled a project which Sony had spent 7 figures on

As far as square is concerned they release a bad game once a year. Forspoken anyone?

For those making comments on remake not selling well, I hope y’all realize that Sony is the only reason this remake is happening. If Sony didn’t fund it the remake wouldn’t be happening. Just like Konami didn’t want to remake SH2 because development costs of 100 plus million

shadowT12d ago

Do not miss Final Fantasy 16. Great game!

raWfodog12d ago

I'm waiting for them to release the complete edition bundle, but it's definitely on my list.

PhillyDonJawn12d ago

Wth is going on with the gaming industry?

mandf12d ago

Corporate investors taking everything

TiredGamer12d ago

Not rocket science. Compare sales numbers, development cycles, and budgets to the previous gens. We are all collectively burning up the industry from the inside out. Expectations are ludicrously high now for every release and sales are dropping for even the most prestigious of series.

We used to be satisfied paying $50-60 for a game that took 1/100th the budget and staff to make. Now gamers feel cheated if they have to pay the same for a game that took 100x the budget. We may be reaching the end of the line for this model of gaming.

wiz719111d ago

@tiredgamer I think your point is one that ppl don’t understand and you hit it on the nose .. some gamers don’t want to take accountability but it’s some of the gamers fault the industry is where it’s at .. we as gamers set the standards for the industry not the shareholders , ppl forget that the shareholders and the industry want and need OUR Money. Both the Xbox and PlayStation are seeing a drop in hardware , the industry is very stagnant right now.

Tacoboto11d ago

Speaking to Square:

Turns out their mismanagement wasn't related to the western studios they dumped to Embracer, but their own fault.

With regards to Xbox - a good way to kill your brand is to pull support on high quality titles and only dump B and C-tier titles to it

With regards to PC - Epic Games Story exclusivity for any duration and piss-poor optimization will hurt you.

With regards to FF Pixel Remasters - y'all messed up by barely releasing them on physical, like wtf that was free money!

And lastly, you don't help a franchise by releasing a mainline title that undermines every title that came before it. FFXVI was a DMC-like with bottom-of-the-barrel side quests and I can't imagine that helping Rebirth at all considering its marketing is directly tied to how big that game is.

Tacoboto11d ago

Sony is getting their best titles and with the most polish, so what about it? Nintendo gets their top properties too, for titles that can run on Switch hardware.

It's the other fanbases that get the second- and third-class treatment from Square. If that's due to agreements with Sony, that's not a Sony issue but a Square one for accepting those terms. Sony is doing its best to look out for Sony.

wesnytsfs11d ago

sales and stupid practices like exclusives.

TiredGamer12d ago

The industry implosion is continuing. Sky high budgets, prolonged development windows, stagnant sales numbers, and falling currency values (inflation) are wreaking havoc on the legacy industry. AAA games will slowly become the rarity.

CS712d ago

Sad. Rebirth was one of my favorite games in a long time. Should have sold more.

CrimsonWing6912d ago

Oh I’m with you. What’s worse is they can say, “Well we tried to make this amazing game and spend all this money on, but not enough people showed an interest. So no more of these since we can’t take a hit like that.”

The industry is going to take a dramatic shift. Mark my words on this.

rpvenom11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

I think there is quite a large portion of individuals like myself who held out on buying it on PS5 because I can get it on PC eventually. To be able to mod the game and also have custom graphical settings to my liking

gold_drake11d ago

same

but im not sure if it matters at all. im sure they made sony pay a hefty sum for the 3parter to come on ps5 exclusively. so watever they made in sales, might have come bk in profits for square, but i dont know
and we dont know what "underperformed" even means for square.

Show all comments (43)
130°

Square & Bandai Namco Being Honest About Quality Is A Step In The Right Direction

Saad from eXputer: "After suffering from massive financial hits, Square Enix & Bandai Namco appear to be turning over a new leaf but I'm still unconvinced."

Nerdmaster12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I was talking about games with some Japanese guys here in Japan, and it seems like around here Bandai Namco has a fame of making low-quality games, with the occasional gem.

About Square Enix, I believe they lack the capacity to improve. They should learn with Capcom (although even Capcom still makes some bad mistakes), but I don't think they ever will. They keep chasing whatever is new at the time (blockchain, AI...) to say "we innovate", without considering the public perception and if these things actually improve the games or not. Them releasing too many small games with no advertising also shows a lack of trust in its own products. Even with their biggest games, like turning FF into an action game with XVI and the very divisive plot changes regarding whispers and timelines in VII Remake, shows them trying to attract a new generation of gamers without understanding what made the series so big in the first place.

shinoff218312d ago

I want a true ff7 remake. With thatcsaid I'm way happier with 7 remake then I was with ff16. I'd still prefer turn based but square keep chasing these Lil kids

Snookies1212d ago

Man, it is perfectly fine to prefer turn based. Turn based is amazing. But there's zero reason to call anyone who likes action games "lil kids". Liking one gameplay system over another does not make you more mature in any way.

VersusDMC12d ago

People love the new FF's overall...the problem is the abundance of 7's they release that lose money or make very little like diofield, star ocean divine force, Valkyrie asylum, harvestella, foam stars, etc. Advertising wouldn't have saved those games. Apparently Forespoken had a big Advertising budget but we saw how that went.

shinoff218312d ago (Edited 12d ago )

Star ocean divine force actually sold well from what I've read not ff type numbers but well enough. Was a dope game to.

FinalFantasyFanatic12d ago

Bandai Namco is going to Bandai Namco, I do believe that Square Enix can't change without changing the entire management, they've had these issues for more than a decade and haven't learnt, I have very little faith they can course correct. I'll still buy their better remasters/remakes like Star Ocean 2 though (not FF7R).

Asterphoenix12d ago

Namco is just milking the same Sword Art Online with lack of budget as well as anime IPs that don't go to decent developers like Jujutsu Kaisen and My Hero Academia. Namco deserves their losses and no future Dot Hack or Xenosaga remaster :(.

Square allocated lot of their budget on Forspoken was a mistake. Square always had management issues. Star Ocean 2 was a great remake and I found their recent entries of FF(16 and Rebirth) better than 13 and 15.
I think they were better than 360/PS3 generation where Square went really downhill.

CrimsonWing6912d ago

I don’t know why NOW they decide on this, but I guess later is better than never.

80°

I’m Glad Atlus & SE Changed Dates To Avoid Competing With Shadow Of The Erdtree

Saad from eXputer: "I'm glad I don't have to choose between Square Enix, Atlus, and FromSoftware due to bad release windows and Shadow of the Erdtree."

H918d ago

More intelligent than guerilla games

raWfodog17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

Atlus is releasing their game one week before Erdtree, SE is releasing theirs one week after.

HZD released four days before Zelda, HFW released one week before Elden Ring.

It seems to me like they are still releasing their games too close to Erdtree.

VincentVanBro16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

What a word vomit, rambling, turd of an article that simply states the obvious. Classic exputer.