I'm happy to hear this. It's a charming game and I'd imagine it'll get the attention it deserves on ps4. If I recall correctly, it was released on the same day as the Xbox One which didn't help it gain any exposure to begin with. Still won lots of awards though.
What worries me about this service is that all the other publishers will follow suit if it's successful and eventually we'll find ourselves in a situation where content or even full games are locked away from those unwilling to subscribe.
*wakes up in the morning* -> "time to troll ps4 articles!"
I hope Sony gives the Vita one last shot and announces a couple of big titles - there's an interview from last year where one of Sucker Punch's lead developers hinted a Vita title was in the works. Yet, no Infamous on Vita yet. Have to wait and see.
Edit:
The interview: http://youtu.be/TvnGOHHljoo...
As one of the comments on the video says, 'He let it slip, you ca...
Guerrilla Cambridge as well.
Highly doubt this generation will last that long.
PS4 and Xbox One are Current Gen consoles.
Couldn't have been expecting much then.
Except a physical copy is available to play within minutes, whereas a digital copy takes hours. Meaning not only can you play a game you've just bought much sooner, but when you inevitably fill up the hard drive on the PS4, it isn't a hassle deleting and later re-installing physical games - same can't be said for digital copies.
This site gave the original a 10/10 and then an improved version 8/10. Right.
Watch the end of the video.
We've already seen clips of MM's game from the PS4 reveal. It's nothing like that.
@ChickeyCantor
Yes, they're a business. They make games. They sell these games. They make a profit. Doesn't make this acceptable though. If you want to defend these practices, be my guest. Unlike yourself, I'm pro-consumer and think BS like this needs to stop.
"Why the hell do people even care about these trivial dlc content to begin with? I'd never pay for an alternate skin."
In this case, it is indeed trivial. Howe...
Some interesting points. I agree that Microsoft will want to appear more generous than Sony in the coming months. I wouldn't be surprised if the first AAA title appears on Games with Gold before the IGC, nor if the quality of games being offered by Microsoft surprises that of Sony's. Obviously I have no idea what the budgets of either side are, but I would assume Xbox's can be supplemented by Microsoft to a greater degree for strategies such as these. Guess it then just comes down...
Umm, Picnic, sorry to burst your bubble but I don't think the "lol" denotes sarcasm. Not in the case. Nor do I think it does usually.
Anyhow, here's a few examples of Future_2015's recent post history:
"ya screw that im gonna get it cheaper for pc and play it at on my 4k monitor at 60fps hopefully"
"weather the ps4 version is the lead version or not PC will still have higher preset graphics to choose fro...
Don't see how you can think that makes it okay. It's not part of the base game. You shouldn't be forced to pre-order a game from certain retailers to get access to content which should part of the game in the first place. Need an incentive to get people to pre-order? Throw in a poster or a key ring. Better yet, just show enough of the finished game that people know it's worth having day one.
"How could you feel ripped off that over a year later a game that you had purchased got a GoTY edition that has more value than the base game."
This isn't a GOTY edition. It's a remaster.
ND announced some new multiplayer DLC is planned. Whilst it may just be some new maps, I wouldn't discount a survival game mode. They know lots of people want it.
Why's this not part of the core game if it's already been made? This is just crazy.
Reminds me of Dead Nation, which is a good thing. Day one download for me.