520°

Microsoft boss on Xbox One setting records, plus more games and consoles selling

Last year, Microsoft enjoyed one of the most excellent holiday seasons from an Xbox One console and games sales standpoint.

Read Full Story >>
examiner.com
stuna13007d ago

"I think we need to work harder to be better than the other guys"! A true statement of course, but It felt like Greenburg was taking pokshots at the competition in a roundabout way, like they believe that the competitor doesn't belong in the position their in! Contrary to what some believe the competitor is doing or, not doing the consumer voice is being heard by their purchasing practices.

Breaking records are alway good, but in the same context the records being broken are only pertinent in relation to what they're being compared too! I think in context all involved consoles had personal records that they bested from previous cycles, but it's also left up to the degree those previous personal records were exceeded especially after factoring in the fanbases growth, because to a certain point it's expected to see more software and hardware being sold and brought in conjunction with that specific fanbases growth.

2pacalypsenow3007d ago

I think at this point MS is using whatever milestone they can to improve the image of the Xbox one.

Kribwalker3007d ago

The image doesn't need improving. It is the 2nd best selling console this gen, and it is selling better then any previous Xbox. Those are both wins. They are just under 20million sold according to EA (900k off so if say by March since January wasn't included in that number either) in just over 2 years. xbox gamers are enjoying their games and buying the products.

2pacalypsenow3007d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

That's fine that they have their loyal fanbase buying Xbox one's but 2005 and 2013 are a lot different, the game industry has grown from 12 billion in 2006 to over 90 billion in 2015 but saying the XBox one is doing better than Xbox 360 is not saying much when competing consoles are doing much better. Its no coincidence that Ms has stopped publishing sales or even shipped numbers, Ms has take an approach where they say they are only competing with themselves and that's not how it works that's just a cop out to not admitting the competition has a better product based on costumer demand. And a lot has to do with the Xbox ones initial presentation.

ShowanW3006d ago

it's doing WAY better than the 360 which is amazing considering consoles are suppose to be "dead"

The 360 sold like hotcakes (even w/RRoD happening at the beginning)

The PS4 is an anomaly (hey it happens). The One is by NO means doing bad. It's actually doing amazingly well. It's just that the direct competitor to the One is making it look bad, NOT that it's actually doing bad.

I'm sure Microsoft's record revenue stream over the past 2yrs helps them sleep at night.

Aaron is suppose to toot his own, or shall I say Microsoft's horn, that's his job. This is what he gets paid to do. Champion Xbox.

donthate3006d ago

Perhaps, but considering what MS turned around from and it is amazing what they have done. If you look at how MS turned around after the reception of Xbox One and compare that to Sony's turn around with PS3, and it is clear MS is very agile and responded far better than the competition.

During the PS3/Xbox 360 era, Sony spent almost the entire generation catching up in terms of features/PSN and in some cases never caught up. Even by today's standard PSN is still behind XBL. For example PSN still needs to be taken down for scheduled maintenance. That has never been part of XBL as far as I can remember going back to the beginning. Sony did come out with one good punch, and that was PS+. Kudos to Sony for thinking creatively.

So how did PS3 catch up? First it was a blu-ray player that cost half of the nearest competitor and was far better. Then Sony relied on Japan and other regions that have been Sony loyal for ages.

My point stands, MS has one fantastic team with good leadership that responds quickly to problems and changes course when necessary. The hallmark of a well run company. In this case division.

I'm excited to see what this year will bring, and what big surprises Phil Spencer is going to have for us at E3 and Gamescom.

Masterchief_thegoat3006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

@2pac is still lose to lose situation with ms..at the end of the day they f$$kup big time. People will not downgrade themself to play a system that lack third party and 1st party resolutions where Sony system does not lack in that department. Nobody want to play 720 and 900p on tv where mostly by now everybody should have full1080p hd tv. Sony made a successful console... Xbox one is barely getting that worldwide money compare to 360

BitbyDeath3006d ago

@donthate, Xbox one is selling less than PS3 at the same point in time, it is beating 360 though by about 1-2 million.

Masterchief_thegoat3006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

That the reason why halo 5 is the lowest in series because no support from worldwide compare halo 3 and 4 360 did way better. I love Xbox one but I'm not a fanboy ms should be happy na still buying X1 while getting little money in worldwide

2pacalypsenow3006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

@ShowanW

(The PS4 is an anomaly (hey it happens).)

I would agree with this if Sony didn't do this before was the Ps1 and Ps2 an "Anomaly"?

(I'm sure Microsoft's record revenue stream over the past 2yrs helps them sleep at night. )

I think you're confusing Microsoft as a company with Microsoft Xbox Division, because MS themselves have said that the Xbox division bleed's money for MS but Windows, Office and its cloud system bring in tons of money.

(Aaron is suppose to toot his own, or shall I say Microsoft's horn, that's his job. This is what he gets paid to do. Champion Xbox.)

That's fine that they feel that way but again it doesn't make it so.

Sony is relying on Playstation to keep their company profitable since even tho they have the best TV's on the market, Americans love cheap stuff which Sony is not. And Sony moving to the West shows how they are adapting to the market.

SoapShoes3006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

@Kribwalker but it isn't selling WAY better, just better and it's tracking at a slightly lower pace than the PS3 which 360 fanboys deemed a failure and made countless videos about like the "how to kill a brand" video.

dcbronco3006d ago

@Bitbydeath

I don't believe the PS3 had sold almost 19 million units in the first two years. The Xbox One has. Think you're wrong on that one.

2pacalypsenow3006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

@dcbronco

Ps3 had sold over 21 million consoles by December 31st 2008 which would end its second year in the market
http://vgsales.wikia.com/wi...

In contrast the Xbox 360 had sold 11 million in 2 years

http://vgsales.wikia.com/wi...

Based on this website at least that has sources directly from Sony

BitbyDeath3006d ago

@dcbronco, Dec 31, 2008 PS3 reached 21.3 million.

http://kotaku.com/5157636/s...

darthv723006d ago

"I would agree with this if Sony didn't do this before was the Ps1 and Ps2 an "Anomaly"?"

PS1 was the new kid on the block. It was different than what Nintendo and Sega fans were used to. So it shook up the industry at the time.

PS2 was the beginning of DVD but it's games (at launch) were no better than Dreamcast. Some even worse and none were DVD to begin with. Sony used their muscle with developers from the PS1 to stave off people from buying into the DC and many have said that they were wrong to have shunned such a system when they had the chance to buy it because of waiting for the PS2.

PS3 was the lowest selling PS branded console as consumers wanted something different and went with the 360 or the Wii. It still did fairly well but nothing like previous PS consoles.

PS4 is an anomaly. In some ways it is like the Wii. The wii sold to the hype of the system not the prowess of its specs. PS4 and XB1 are more alike than different. The XB1 has only one way to go and that is up. PS4 has sold to so many that at some point it will begin to taper off as those same consumer begin to pick up an XB1 to go along with their PS4's.

Compare the PS3 to the 360. Both selling roughly 80 million units. That doesnt mean that there were 160 million unique individuals who picked a side but a great majority of both those numbers are the same people. I dont know the exact number but to think that of the 80 million 360 owners that none of them also own a PS3 (or vice versa) is crazy. And the same thing will happen with the PS4 and XB1.

There comes a point where the cost of owning both is attainable and I encourage anyone to do just that. No need to limit yourself to a single platform if you have the means and the desire to play games not found on the other.

BlitzKing3006d ago

They don't need to prove anything. This is to improvise not showing sales.

XanderZane3006d ago

I don't remember Sony admitting that XBox 360 or Wii were performing better then their game console last gen when they were in last place. So why would you think Microsoft would admit something like that? Microsoft is doing the same thing Sony did last gen by hiding their sales or combining them. Did you think it was a "cop out" when Sony did it? Of course M$ will do whatever it can to improve its image. Every company does this with their brand.

nix3006d ago

@dbronco,

Whatever happened to "Google before you comment"?

3006d ago
ShowanW3006d ago

@pacalypsenow...

The PS2's hitting the magical $199 price point, and disposable income sure helped a TON.

They cut the price by $100 in 2002, a month before E3 or so.

This made it equal in price to the Gamecube and $100 cheaper than the OG Xbox.

Gamecube didn't have the library to compete and Microsoft didn't have the library nor price point to compete.

Microsoft was able to compete w/ 360 (seemed to do most things right except for RRoD fiasco) amazing games hit at the right time and the price point was just right.

PS4 and Xbox One came out a week apart, both gonna have pretty much the same games (except 1st part exclusives) but a incomplete message (depending on who you ask) and $500 was self strangulation to a point.

DarXyde3006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

Kribwalker,

Being second is not at all bad, but in a competition between three consoles, being second best also makes you second worst. It's a matter of perspective and Microsoft is likely looking at this in such a way.

They all could do more to win us over, but I think all three of them are doing a good job, honestly.

To Microsoft though, they probably feel they have to do even more to improve the image and it's a great mentality to have. I don't know what Microsoft has riding on this generation, but it must be something for them to be pulling out so many stops (the price drops, updates, backwards compatibility, what have you).

dcbronco3006d ago

@nix

What ever happened to comprehension skills. Saying I don't believe isn't a statement of fact. Following it up with I believe again indicates speculation. Develop your comprehension skills before commenting.

kraenk123006d ago

@XanderZane you might check your numbers...or are you talking about the U,S. solely?!

kenwonobi3006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

It would do Xbox well to compete. We all know what happens once a console grabs a huge lead. If the lead is too great then all 3rd party and exclusives flock to it after a time. It's hitting critical mass levels already. The release of virtual reality is imminent, Uncharted is almost upon us, this is said to be the PS4 consoles best year for exclusives. We are watching perhaps the beginning of the absolute end where PS4 just laps the competition.

+ Show (19) more repliesLast reply 3006d ago
Gazondaily3006d ago

" A true statement of course, but It felt like Greenburg was taking pokshots at the competition in a roundabout way, like they believe that the competitor doesn't belong in the position their in! "

So its a true statement but you 'feel' like it was a shot at Sony? So then, what would you have him say? Just curious. tis all/

stuna13006d ago

Yes it's a true statement , but I just used a except from the whole article, and reading it you'll be able to see that the article as a whole was basically used by Greenburg to make Microsoft seem that they were doing something above and beyond what anyone else being in their situation would do. Which they are not!

rainslacker3006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

The concept is similar to the pre-launch E3.

When Sony said you could trade or sell your games without restriction, or that connecting to the internet wasn't required on the PS4, it's 100% true. Doesn't mean it wasn't meant as an attack on MS...more than a pot shot by anyone's standards.

I don't know if I'd consider Greenburgs statement a pot shot. Lot of self-praise in the games line up part(which is understandable given his position, but the second part seemed more humble and admitting that they understand that people are expecting MS to do more to be better. Whether he believes that personally only he can know, and whether people think they are doing better is purely subjective.

yeahright23006d ago

Remember back during the launch window of these new consoles Sony was taking some potshots? "this is how you share your games on PS4" and such. Everything they said was true but it was viewed as a potshot. Same thing here. It's always in poor taste though. Doing it from Sony's position seems petty, doing it from MS's Seems like a bruised ego. and from Nintendo it would seem desperate. All it does is preach to the choir anyway.

showtimefolks3006d ago

on this article no matter which side or even if your are writing a neutral comment you will get disagrees lol

i like the direction ms is going as in under dog role but PR people like major nelson do nothing but give xbox a bad image. look at his statements last gen and you will clearly see that he likes taking cheap shots

phil spencer has done a lot to repair the image but untl people like greenburg are there xbox brand can never grow from the fratboy image

is xbox one a bad console? absolutely not but end of the day it will be compared to ps4 not xbox360. MS needs to face the music just like sony did last gen and man up about it. all this changing of goal posts every other month isn't doing xbox any favor

if ps4 perfect? absolutely not. 2015 should have been a better year(for us gamers) I am a ps4 fanboy yes i said fanboy but even i can admit that last year ps4 didn't deliver many block buster titles now that's all about to change

i jst don't want sony in resting mode just because they have almost double the install base. i want them to go full throttle and deliver awesome/amazing experiences

Why o why3006d ago

Im with this guy

If ms were honestly really only competing with the 360, MAYBE they shouldn't of made any comments when their console came out on top for the 2 months of last year. By that I mean anything that highlights the fact it sold better than something its supposedly not competing against. Seems silly but the sane all know its pr and thats his job. Adjust goalposts and paint the product in the best light. ALL COMPANIES DO IT. Although greenberg was one of the most vocal and annoying pr guys of last gen, I understand its his job but SOME of his antics last gen make many view his comments this gen with a high level of cynicism

UltraNova3006d ago

"is xbox one a bad console? absolutely not but end of the day it will be compared to ps4 not xbox360. MS needs to face the music just like sony did last gen and man up about it. all this changing of goal posts every other month isn't doing xbox any favor "

+ 1.

otherZinc3006d ago

XBOX ONE definitely has the better AAA Games, this is what I bought into next-gen for. I didn't jump into next-gen to play Indie Games. If that were the situation, I would've purchased an Ouya.

Letthewookiewin3006d ago

Lol that's really funny. A mediocre Halo, a couple raceing games and a timed exclusive. X1 has nothing on PS4. And will be completely buried in 2016.

3006d ago
3006d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3006d ago
FallenAngel19843007d ago

The good news for Microsoft is that Xbox One is outperforming compared to the Xbox 360 commercially in its first two years so that it is now the fastest selling Xbox console.

The bad news for Microsoft is that Xbox One is underperforming compared to the PlayStation 3 commercially in its first two years so that the fastest selling Xbox console is selling slower than the slowest selling PlayStation console.

ThePope3006d ago

What does that matter? In 3 generations against more and stiffer competition than either the PS1 or 2 EVER faced MS and the Xbox brand have become a video game powerhouse right up there with the PS brand.

The PS3 was only the slowest selling console because it had real competition in the X360 which it had never faced from the likes of Nintendo or Sega. The Xbox 360 dethroned a brand that sold 130 million consoles the previous generation and ended in a basic tie with the PS3.

What MS has done in a market that Sony dominated for 2 full generations is remarkable. And the future looks bright for both consoles.

On top of that if Euopeans didn't have this general dislike for things American (and the Japenese don't like anything not Japanese for the most part) the gap would be much smaller this gen. But IN MY OPINION the general dislike for Americans and their goods hurts sales.

donthate3006d ago

MS win here with the Xbox 360 is that Xbox One was able to survive one of the biggest PR mistakes of a product reveal.

If you look back, and see what MS did and how that influenced how we game today, and it is clear that MS is not to be underestimated. Now look again, and see how MS recovering from one their PR misstep.

MS consistently takes risk, and when they loose the bet, they double up, change course and head in again.

Thatguy-3103006d ago

The ps3 was the slowest selling Playstation console simply because of the 600$ price and 1 yr late start. The only way Microsoft can compete is buy releasing earlier at a cheaper price. Atm they're still getting outsold even though the gave cheaper sku's

ThePope3006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

@DCboy

First of all the PS4 and X1 are priced the same. Facts, are a funny thing.

Sony had FAR more to worry about than the $600 price point and head start of the X360. The PS4 was inline with price within 12 months, and a head start stops no one from buying another console. A lack of a killer app does. That was its biggest issue.

The PS3 was the slowest selling because the X360 was Johnny on the spot with games, features, and a far superior network.

Sony figured it would just repeat the success of the PS2 and didn't have to work for it. That bit them hard and MS made HUGE inroads in the the PS fanbase.

Again the PS brand was old and established when the Xbox brand launched. When the PS3 launched it was coming off of a banner generation and no one INCLUDING MS thought they could do well against them. History now shows MS was able to eat Sonys lunch last gen and steal huge amounts of market share.

Congrats to Playstation for selling well this gen. It doesn't change the fact that Xbox is doing extremely well and is as big of a name as Playstation. Companies would pay billions to be in MS position.

badz1493006d ago

This is what I don't like about Xbox fanboys opinion. Xbox one is losing 2:1 in sales, not a little but in the volume of 36 vs 18 mil just 2 years in the new gen but because of it still selling faster than 360 by overcoming the bad reception of its reveal, it's considered a "win".

The PS3 was neck and neck with the 360 in the end, overcoming $600 launch price, 1 to 1.5 yr headstart of 360, helped Bluray becoming the defacto disc format for movies by beating MS-backed HD DVD etc but for them, the PS3 "lost"! Funny

How does it feel now that the xbone is selling at a lower rate than the console that "lost" last gen? Still feeling like winning?

ThePope3006d ago

@BadZ

See you like to quote numbers so what do you think about these;

The PS brand lost 50+ million sales to a console that was only on its second version. It did this with the best blu ray available, a backlog of games that were the best in the industry, and a "loyal" fanbase.

badz1493006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

@ThePope

I stated nothing but facts in my comment but do you have any proof of this "PS lost 50+ million sales to a console that was only in its 2nd version" thing like you stated in yours?

If that is true...what makes the Wii owners? Are you gonna say PS lost 80 mil of sales to the Wii too? You know...since the GC sold like 22 mil the gen before that. And what about those who bought several 360s or PS3s?

Seriously, there is no such thing as sales lost just like piracy=/=lost sales. Last gen 360 gained 80+ mil sales just like the PS3 did. End of story. This gen is about capitalizing that fanbase to keep the number or expand them. Last gen, the 360 and Wii did that better than the PS3. The only thing lost and gained is the market share.

That's why I said xbox fanboys opinion are funny because believe it or not, some, even within the execs still believe that there are another 60mil 360 owners out there still waiting to upgrade to the xbone like others don't matter! MS need to change that because it seems like what they are doing is focusing on the fanbase, not so much about attracting new ones. Maybe that's the reason the are not that popular worldwide because they don't appeal to new buyers, only existing 360 owners. This is my opinion though. Where I live in Asia, the xbone is not selling. It's all about the PS4 over here.

The truth is, there is no 60mil 360s still active out there. Maybe not even half that. Because if that is true, game sales will reflect it but we know last gen software sales are declining fast.

Why o why3006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

Lol @pope

Delusions of grandeur

Ok so a year headstart isn't anything anymore.

Please tell me how much marketshare ms would of lost if they entered this gen a year, year plus later than the ps4. Some people make no sense.

Did you really think it was just the 360 that ate into the ps3 fanbase.... the wii or pc didn't exist i guess.

Seems many are coming back to the ps brand as there is no waiting time to game this gen. Ms have shown they didnt want to go head to head last gen with their rushed console.....this gen, no such luck. Can't blame the ever increasing gap on the bodged reveal, price, kinect or confused message anymore. The ps and xbox are global brands its just out of the two, the ps has a true global following and boy is it showing

3006d ago
yeahright23006d ago

Sooo what you're saying is.. "what does that factual statement about PS3 vs X1 sales matter? Here's some spin that paints Xbox in a better light."
I mean PS1 never faced competition from Nintendo? really?
And yes, just about a tie with PS3 slightly on top when comparing 360 and PS3 sales, But 360 had over a year head start, so when you look at first year vs first year, then 2nd vs 2nd and so on, 360 doesn't look as hot. Still hot, but not as much.

BIGBOSS083006d ago

this comment is beyond a joke...sony have 2 home consoles that have sold over 100m. one of them is the highest selling system ever with over 150m. their lowest selling system still matches the highest selling xbox system. sony are now again going to glide past the 100m mark with PS4. that will make it 3 home consoles past 100m sold and your putting xbox in the same bracket as that? xbox has a LOOONG way to go before becoming a powerhouse like the ps brand. you ignorant as hell bro.

kraenk123006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

@ThePoope

"It doesn't change the fact that Xbox is doing extremely well and is as big of a name as Playstation."

Only in the U.S. And UK. The X1 is selling 4 to 5 times less than the PS4 in most other parts of the world, so no...The XBox brand is far from being as big of a name in gaming.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3006d ago
Masterchief_thegoat3006d ago

@fallen Is still a lose to lose situation from ms that what happen if ms should put more effort on worldwide than na because it barely getting some little money

PhoenixUp3006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

Well to be technical within in its first two years on the market the PS3 wasn't actually Sony's slowest selling console, the PS1 was. The PS1 sold less than 13 million globally by the end of 1996 compared to PS3 selling 21.3 million by the end of 2008. It was only after FFVII released within its third year that PS1 dramatically exploded in sales.

As for Microsoft, they should just be glad that Xbox One is still their most successful console yet. However XO selling slower than PS3 is a travesty. The XO had one of the most succussful launches ever, yet its sales afterwards couldn't keep up the same rate. PS3 however was able to keep a stronger consistent rate in comparison on a monthly basis. That's why after 19 months on the market the rate XO was selling fell below the rate PS3 was selling. In fact XO somehow managed to sell 2 million less than PS3 in its first two years.

That just goes to show how important the global market is as a whole at the end of the day.

voodoochild3463006d ago

It's because Microsoft still thinks that releasing almost every decent exclusive they have in a 3 month period is the way to go. Where Sony has a theirs spread out so sales are more consistent and and the games don't cannibalize each other. See latest tomb raider game for example.

rainslacker3006d ago

I'm gonna move a goalpost here, since people keep moving it around anyways.:)

Given the market at the time, 13 million was extremely impressive. PS1 was pretty much on fire, and no one was really competing with them...which probably helped them have those then impressive numbers.

It's really not unlike what's happening now. Sony's numbers are impressive, and one could reasonably argue that it wasn't until rather recently that they actually started facing some competition as MS wasn't doing much up until this past holiday.

I don't really want to get into an argument with anyone that Sony was actually doing less(the whole no games argument BS), I'm just saying that many within the market saw Sony as the only choice, which placed the PS4 in the same place the PS1 was as being the most desirable console among the market...just now, the market is much bigger.

I don't think any company should ever be upset with outdoing themselves from prior terms. However, moving it back into a historical outlook, one has to asks how MS feels about being the one struggling to keep up with the competitor they actually came into the market to compete against. This gen, so far, is very similar to the PS2/OGXB gen, where MS brand appeal is much less than Sony's. On the plus side, they seem to get plenty of discussion from the forum goers/YT'bers and the media itself...which is certainly a big step over the OGXB.

PhoenixUp3006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

@ rain

The PS1 sold less than 13 million units at the end of 1996. It had sold 9 million by the end of October 1996 and 13.50 by March 2007. I can't get the exact number of how much it had sold by the end of Dec 1996 because Sony wasn't as vocal about the numbers, but logic would dictate it'd be below 13 million.

Also PS1 sales weren't on fire in its first two years. Throughout 1996 it managed to sell as much in the US as GameCube did in the region in 2002. The N64 almost managed to sell as much hardware units in the four months it was available in 1996 in the US than PS1 did the entire year. In fact this continued into the following year where the N64 outsold PS1 for the first 8 months in 1997 in the US. The N64 was the fastest selling system ever in the U.S. at the time in its first 15 months.

In Japan the PS1 had a much weaker start in its first two years than the SNES. The Saturn also had better sales in Japan in its first two years than PS1.

Europe was the only place PS1 went pretty much unrivaled throughout its entire lifecycle. However its sales initially were still mediocre, only selling 3 million in total in the region from Sept 1995-March 1997.

As I said earlier, it was only after FFVII that the PS1 sales dramatically increased. Towards the end of 1997 and onward was when the PS1's sales were, as you put it, "on fire." ;)

So at the end of their second year on the market the PS1 at about say 11.5 million, PS3 was at 21.3 million, and XO was 19.4 million. So we'll actually have to wait until the end of these platforms' third year until we can factually say that "Microsoft's fastest selling console is selling slower than Sony's slowest selling console."

Sorry for the long info dump, but at least it's educational.

As to your point, the situations between the PS1 and PS4 were different. From 1996 to most of 1997, the N64 was a serious sales rival to PS1. From 1994 to the beginning of 1997, the Saturn was a serious sales rival to the PS1 in Japan. Everything really changed after FFVII. Throughout all of the PS4's lifecycle it pretty much dominated every region from day one, with the only exception of Japan where Wii U still somehow manages to come out on top in certain months.

Microsoft should only be concerned with trying to make Xbox more of a global brand. They should consider themselves fortunate that they're the only console manufacturer who's successive systems have always sold more than the last, but there's always room for improvement.

ScorpiusX3006d ago

Cool now keep it up till the end of this gen and hopefully carry over into the next console gen .

CaptainObvious8783006d ago

If there is another xbox console.

ScorpiusX3006d ago

This pretty much has him stating it on the table.

http://www.onlysp.com/phil-...

rainslacker3006d ago

Given how much effort they're going through to improve the brand, and it's image, I can't imagine that MS has no intention of giving it another go.

If they were really thinking about not going into next gen, we'd already be seeing a much more drastic shift in their publishing habits, as opposed to trying to make the Xbox brand even more ubiquitous. If they weren't moving forward with the Xbox brand, we'd see a lot more talk about Windows overall as a gaming platform, as opposed to an integration of the two platforms into one...albeit both distinct from one another.

Rookie_Monster3006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

Congrat Phil and team on the great XB1 success so far. Outpacing the X360 at the same time frame even with higher Pricing, tougher comp from Sony, and no one year advantage that the X360 had is a testiment of how good the XBox brand has come. Proud owner.

3006d ago
UltraNova3006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

Oh GOD...the xbox really has no competition other than its self...

yeahright23006d ago

I was very happy with my X1. It's a fantastic console. But a cautionary tale, I finally bit the bullet and bought a gaming PC, and now.. I don't really have much use for my X1. Seems like all the exclusives I care about are on PC as well. Still a good console that I'd recommend, just not to someone with a gaming PC.

Dark_Crow3006d ago

MS has created a powerful brand. This coming e3 needs to be another show of force.

They can't seem to get into the Japanese market and Sony takes advantage of that without needing to do anything.

Europe hates all things american so that's another disadvantage.

Considering all that.. it's still selling really well. Oh and I left out the reveal pr mess which has been the biggest mishap in gaming history and yet they continue to sell.

DragonDDark3006d ago

Europe doesn't gate everything American. lol
The 360 was selling better in Europe last gen for quite some time.

lastking953006d ago

Didn't ps3 outsell 360 by 20 million in Europe? Xbox brand just isn't strong enough in Japan and EU to outsell PS. Sales in NA compared to EU is night and day. I think MS realized this and put more focus on it's self and the customer rather than the competition which has been great for the brand. They used to come off as money hungry now they come off as doing what's best for the customer.

pyroxxx3006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

Last King,.. True but at least it was selling,.. now it is non existent ,.. To the point it looks more akin to Asia than US ,.. and even in US they will be lucky if they finish this gen only 10 million behind

jb2273006d ago

I don't think nationality has much at all to do w/ the success or failure of either console really. Sony is the highest selling console in America & if any country has a history of rooting for the home team it'd be ours. MS does fairly well in the EU, Great Britain especially are huge Xbox supporters for the most part.

XBO is doing fine but it isn't underperforming compared to the ps4 because of any kind of irrational distaste for American made products. The PS4 is most likely doing better as it is a more powerful system initially launched at a cheaper price point w/ more focus on games during its reveal.

rainslacker3006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

While us American's can ra-ra ourselves quite overzelously over the stupidest things...which sometimes aren't even things to be proud of, we still don't really give a damn where something is made, or if it's even part of our home team.

MS success with the 360 in America had nothing to do with MS being an American company. MS, in general is the giant most Americans would want to see fall...even though they don't really understand why...and probably just do so because we like to see giants fall for some reason.

badz1493006d ago

@Dark_Crow

"They can't seem to get into the Japanese market and Sony takes advantage of that without needing to do anything."

Just stop right there! Your ignorance is too much to handle for just one comment! You really think that Japanese buy the PS4 over Xbone because of "nothing"?? Did you even stop and think that there are more games that Japanese like on the PS4 compared to the Xbone is the reason for it? Do you even know that, despite being almost irrelevant elsewhere, the Wii U is still competing hard with the PS4 over there due to its GAMES?

Seriously, no need to be in ignorance just so you can paint a happy color on the Xbone! The Xbone is no winning in anything as of right now!

Dark_Crow3006d ago

Wow. You took my comment and just made up the rest of it to fit what you think I said. The japanese very clearly buy the ps4 for games that aren't in the Xbox.

Your response as just as ignorant as you claim mine to be as you assume a lot about what I think or know based on a little forum post.

IIFloodyII3006d ago

Europe don't hate all things American, where did you hear that?
The only reason the Xbox brand never really challenged the PS brand in the EU is simply because MS don't care about the EU, outside of the UK, and most here just look at it as the American box for Americans. Also branding half of Europe as second tier countries didn't help.

Me-Time3006d ago

Yeah. Your comment is being nitpicked and I don't see the reason for it. I really don't like Xbox One, but there's a lot they should be grateful for in the competition they're not going to catch up in, not in the slightest.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3006d ago
Show all comments (125)
260°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv7223h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle10h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic18818h ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio7h ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Lightning773h ago

What he said was facts. How he plays games is no concern of you. Don't get too mad about it.

Cacabunga10h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

shinoff21839h ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga8h ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

itsmebryan4h ago

@shin
Well keep it simple Sony 's operating income is down 26% and Microsoft's is up 32%. No MS spin there, just facts. 😉
Cheers

romulus233h ago

Odd that a company that touts you dont need the hardware to play is already touting another console in the works.

darthv722h ago

They are not reliant on the HW but still want to maintain a presence (no matter how small) is a good thing. It shows commitment to the craft. It reminds me of SNK and how they made games for their own hardware (Neo Geo) while also making them for others because they knew there was a market to do so. They knew they would sell more to others but also sell to their own niche fan base.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2h ago
purple10113h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos12h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

DOMination-2h ago

In the last two years they've started exiting the consumer market altogether. All of the newest Surface products are business models only. They can't seem to work out what they want to do with it.

XBManiac11h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple10111h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic9h ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

MrDead2h ago

The only growth MS will get out of the console industry is if it supports it's rivals platforms. Xbox is a pointless machine now. I can see them on a big push for live next, and they won't give up on trying to buy Steam.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2h ago
Show all comments (35)
300°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere1d 20h ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN1d 17h ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos1d 15h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN1d 8h ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo1d 10h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies1d 6h ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion1d 20h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger1d 17h ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Mr Logic1d 4h ago

What a stupid thing to say. The elites give 0 fucks what we say on an obscure website in the comments section.

Crows901d 3h ago

You can always reach out and give them jobs at your company man. Don't wait

blacktiger30m ago

You own nothing snd be happy. I'm sure you heard that

Profchaos1d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto1d 19h ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos1d 19h ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long1d 16h ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel1d 18h ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos1d 17h ago (Edited 1d 16h ago )

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator1d 17h ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (23)
280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10113d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref12d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde12d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197212d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville12d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218311d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos11d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
isarai12d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref12d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan12d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00711d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197212d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

12d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

12d ago
12d ago
Zeref12d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde12d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197212d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier12d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto12d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218311d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto11d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
Hofstaderman12d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts12d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts11d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)