MMGN: Is it possible to be good at a game, but still in the bottom 50% of players? What’s the cut-off?
Skewed and Reviewed have written an Opinion Piece covering issues in the gaming industry, how current issues were issues years ago, and what can be done to help restore consumer trust.
Nothing. It's up to the gamers to stop consuming content from companies that they don't agree with.
How do you know if you agree with it or not unless you play it? Which without conventions forces gamers to rely on trailers. Perhaps Demos should be made more frequently. But companies need to do better as well.
But is that not what they have now? Tons of gameplay or are you talking about watching actual gamers play it versus the trailers and streams? The big issue is that some companies pay streamers and influencers and they create content but for me; that is hardly a fair, unbiased, and factual look at a game.
They usually are attached to the money sadly. It would be nice to have gamers in charge but you have so much money invested that business people are needed. Hence the issue; you need people who know business but are also gamers who know have an eye to the community. It sounds simple in theory that if you give gamers quality games that they want to play; money will be made. But that is not always so.
Marie Dealessandri speaks to Borislav Slavov and Gustavo Santaolalla about “the new golden age of games music”.
A famous actor from Starship Troopers has showered praise on Helldivers 2 and said he is open to the idea of playing General Brasch.
When you can clutch a game
I consider myself a good player only if I regularly score the most points on my team. At the end of a Halo online match, I look at the score board and I'm usually the 1st or 2nd on the list with the most kills.
That's when I consider myself a good player. It's when you can consistently show that you succeed at a game more than everyone else.
That's my opinion at least.
If you're able to play it casually and still do very well.
All I know is, the babies quitting out of every domination game because the opposing team is up slightly in order to protect their precious k/d are NOT good. It's getting ridiculous, and I really hope next gen has more penalties for constant quitters.
I'm glad he points out one can be a successful team player and help your team win without being at the top of the board.
Just got done playing some racists guys on live that thought they were good because they just camped power weapons and couldnt even face me in a 1v1 fight without outter assistance.
Another way to know that your good is when you can when in a 1v1 with fair weapons or beat someone who has the obvious advantage with a weaker or starter weapon.
Example: In my match with the racists I beat there designated Boomshot guy with a simple gnasher and open space. Immediately after doing this His friend got stiff knees and stayed away from me.