200°

5 Things Microsoft Should Reveal at Their Conference - Analog Addiction

Ever since the first news regarding Sony’s conference on February 20th broke out, everyone speculated that the company would announce their next generation console. They indeed announced it, but the conference also held many surprises: from new titles like inFAMOUS: Second Son or Killzone: Shadow Fall, to the new DualShock 4 controller, or to how accessible the new PlayStation is for developing, Sony had one of its best conferences in recent memory. So what about Microsoft?

Read Full Story >>
analogaddiction.org
Chaostar4079d ago (Edited 4079d ago )

They need to match the share button feature.

I get the impression that few people will really appreciate how much a brilliant innovation the share button will be until they actually start using it. I felt, although it was put across well, Sony haven't trumpeted this feature as much as they should.

If MS doesn't have a similar system in place it will be a huge feather in PS4's cap.

@vlad94pintea More than likely but since there's been no rumour or whisper of anything of the sort (unlike in Sony's case) you have to wonder if they have even thought about something like this. There's a small chance it just passed them by completely.

Captain_Mushroom4079d ago

Seeing as MS has recently been focused on more social aspects of gaming than actual games, I think there's a strong possibility they will come out with something similar.

user39158004079d ago

aS SOON HE SAID SONY HAD ONE OF THE GREATEST SHOW, i KNEW HE WAS A TROLL LOL.. sONY REVEALED SUCKED.

1 THING TO MAKE THE REVEAL BETTER, JUST SHOW THE CONSOLE AND YOU WIN END OF STORY.

StrongMan4079d ago

MS also needs a cloud gaming system to compete with the Sony owned Gaikai. MS can't seem to be able to get a simple cloud save system to work properly so I don't see how they can get cloud gaming to work.

lastofgen4079d ago

you do realize that ms's azure cloud platform is ranked highly, even first place ahead amazon's services in recent reports.

if anyone besides sony has the proper resources and man-power to successfully implement something akin to what sony showed off, it's Microsoft.

Dragos754079d ago

lol... Even though sony bought Gaikai I bet they are still behind. Saying that the service will be coming out in stages isn't very convincing. As for MS conference I'm sure they will stick to their guns and strong points.

greenpowerz4079d ago

The purchase of Gaikai was a short cut for Sony with Sony knowing MSFT is a head. Using Gaikai insures Sony can at least give the appearance of being on par to average joe.

SDF Repellent4079d ago

At the conference, the spokesperson from Gaikai just said they just got green lighted from Sony to develop their cloud system, which mean it is not even in the alpha stage yet. If you know anything about azure from Microsoft, then you know Microsoft is already ahead of Sony in that regard. Again, I expect nothing more from Stronman other than talking without any hard evidence and pro Sony.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4079d ago
Bigpappy4079d ago

Actually, M$ already has a system setup for sharing pics and vids from 360 to face book and a data base of there own. I was really implemented for Kinect games, but could easily be done in other core games. This is not a revolutionary feature as those who were eager to do this, just recorded their games and posted what they wanted to share on YouTube. That will still continue to happen by the way.

Chaostar4079d ago

Sometimes a revolution can be about more than creating something new, it can be taking something that already exists and making it easier and more enjoyable to use. In this respect, Sony most definitely does have a revolutionary feature under it's belt.

To my knowledge there is no share button on the 360 and MS have yet to implement this level of social interaction to XBL, what you mention is not comparable.

greenpowerz4079d ago (Edited 4079d ago )

There doesn't need to be a button for sharing features. The button is actually kind of corny and sounds half baked/desperate gimmic

If enabling a share feature had to be a face button MSFT could easily swap holding the guide button to turn off hardware *with* sharing, without the cheap gimmic dedicated button on DS4

^^(Kinect-2 is always live for console operating system instructions possibly having control of games not even developed for Kinect-2 in a gameplay sense)

Obviously Sony knows MSFT is working on spectator and recording features hence the PS4 reveal without a live demo of any of "their system/console ideas" on vaporware PS4 hardware.

jimbobwahey4079d ago

Sony gave a live demo of Killzone being played and then after the player finished the demonstration he utilized the share features to upload the gameplay video straight to Facebook.

It was actually pretty impressive.

Kalowest4079d ago

MS has Windows Azure, Skydrive, and Skype that they can
use to their advantage, when it come to making the 720 more social(like the PS4).

AngelicIceDiamond4079d ago (Edited 4079d ago )

1.) Make the new Xbox powerful
2.) Show hardcore exclusive games (none Kinect)
3.) Basic multiplayer needs to be free. With optional subscriptions.

EDIT: Kinect 2.0 is rumored to come bundled with every console. So if that's the case we won't have to worry about Kinect only games. Hardcore titles will still have the core functionality (controller) so all that means is all games will have some sort of Kinect feature. Think "better with Kinect" games Like ME and Deadspace.

DOMination-4079d ago

You don't need a share button for that. Just have it on the in game guide button menu. Besides, the sharing ideas Sony showed the other day was a copy of the ideas that MS had in their leaked document.

dcbronco4079d ago

@Chaostar

Halo 3.... Uploading and sharing video since 2007.

Chaostar4079d ago (Edited 4079d ago )

I can see I've accidentally hit a nerve with some people here. I concede whatever point you're all trying to make, I really don't care. All I said was that there's a small chance MS might not implement a similar thing, which as far we know for sure could be true, no matter what services they currently run or if a game implemented a similar feature in 2007.

I will reiterate that Sony has innovated the idea by running with it and implementing it into their entire system, revolutionising how we share gaming moments with our friends.

I'm also aware that it's not the button itself that is the innovation, it's their commitment to make it just work and the general ease of use that make it different from anything we've previously seen. That is not taking away from MS who may very well have exactly the same setup and I'm NOT going to be pulled into an immature 'who did it first' argument.

dcbronco4078d ago

It's not that you hit a nerve. Doing this system-wide is a great idea. It's just that it isn't a Sony innovation. If you search the Internet and find a copy of the Microsoft leak that MS lawyers have tried to remove, it list this very thing as a part of the next Xbox. Along with an Apps CPU(MS plans a APU for Apps) and several other features the PS4 will have.

You just have to understand that you're on a site where there are two camps of morons that spend their collective two brain cells trying to make one company seem better than the other. Applauding one company for doing things and hating the other for the same thing. Doing things at the system level has been a thing Microsoft has pushed since the 360 was announced and Sony fans have hated it as forgetting the hardcore. So it comes off kinda fanboyish when someone call Sony innovative for doing things MS gets criticized for.

You're just collateral damage. Don't take offense.

Chaostar4078d ago (Edited 4078d ago )

All you're arguing is that Sony didn't do it first? That's where I seem to have touched the nerve with xbox fans here, Sony have come out and showed us this first and not just rumour and leaked documents (in which I could find no mention of this feature btw, please provide a link) we've actually seen it work live onstage.

I most definitely understand how the fans work here, there's no need to tell me, and I'm trying my hardest not to get drawn into this moronic debate. The fact remains that Sony have taken an idea and produced a real world, working feature and demonstrated it's possibilities whereas MS hasn't... yet. I'll let the fanboys argue over who came up with the idea first because frankly, I don't care and, if you truly are not the thing you seem to despise, neither should you.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4078d ago
JackAndJizz4079d ago

1through 5 in no particular order.

1.kinect2
2.Halo/Gears/Forza
3.DLC
4.Timed Exclusives
5.Xbox Live Fees

NoobJobz4079d ago

That's what you want them to reveal? Hmm. Interesting.

Riderz13374079d ago

Halo 4 just released and Gears of War Judgement isn't even out yet. If you expect a Halo/Gears title at the reveal, get ready to be disappointed.

MadMen4079d ago

I can guarantee you this, your digital content WILL transfer.

I am appalled at SONY for this not being done on their system completely unacceptable.

HalfNerdHalfAmazing4079d ago

I already know MS gonna show us halo 5 & GOW 4 when they announce the next xbox

BanBrother4079d ago

WOW!!!! Microsoft to reveal God Of War 4? Amazing. Not even Sony thought of doing that!!! /s

But yes, I would be not surprised at all to see another Gears and Halo. Those are quality titles, but I'd like to see MUCH more than that if I m going to buy a 720.

Angainor74079d ago

In my opinion these are the 5 key things that next xbox needs in order to compete with PS4.

1) NEW IPS (at least 4), except Gears, Halo, Forza and Alan Wake.

2 No block of used games and limitation of the 'always connected' option.

3) Backwards Compatible.

4) RAM 8GB at least.

5) Beautiful Design.

Show all comments (42)
110°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv7212h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

purple1011h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos1h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

XBManiac29m ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad15m ago(Edited 14m ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

300°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere1d 8h ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN1d 6h ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos1d 3h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN20h ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo22h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies18h ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion1d 8h ago (Edited 1d 8h ago )

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger1d 6h ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Mr Logic16h ago

What a stupid thing to say. The elites give 0 fucks what we say on an obscure website in the comments section.

Crows9015h ago

You can always reach out and give them jobs at your company man. Don't wait

Profchaos1d 8h ago (Edited 1d 8h ago )

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto1d 8h ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos1d 7h ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long1d 4h ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel1d 7h ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos1d 5h ago (Edited 1d 5h ago )

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator1d 6h ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (21)
280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10112d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref11d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde11d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197211d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville11d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218311d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos11d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
isarai12d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref11d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan11d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00711d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197212d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

12d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

12d ago
12d ago
Zeref11d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde11d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197211d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197211d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier11d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto11d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218311d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto11d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
Hofstaderman11d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts11d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts10d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)