Gamer Limit writes "First things first: the very notion of someone being completely objective is ridiculous. Everyone has their preferences and their biases. "
A famous actor from Starship Troopers has showered praise on Helldivers 2 and said he is open to the idea of playing General Brasch.
GL compiles a list of some of the most mind-blowing video game narrative twists in recent memory, from The Last of Us to Outer Wilds
With articles like these cant you tag the games mentioned so that we can know ahead of time if there’s a spoiler to avoid?
Not clicking on your article otherwise.
Discover our top video game adaptations of popular board games, from Bloodbowl to Wingspan & get your board game friends into video games!
I believe there needs to be a middle ground established. I agree a lot with what is said here; it’s important to delve into the emotional responses players evoke from a game. At the same time, since the price of new release games can range anywhere from $20 to $60 on average, with little to no distinguishable differences to offset the quality, it’s important to be somewhat objective about the game.
A good reviewer is able to weigh every factor / emotion that went into the game, and deliver a coherent review that’s informative to its audience.
Excellent, excellent article. I've been thinking along the same lines for quite a while now. Thanks for writing it up in such a focused way.
There's no reason that professional reviews can't be almost fully objective, and they should be.
COuldn't have said it better myself. :-)
Agreed!