300°

Sony Failed To Get People Talking About Move. Have Some Statistics.

Nukezilla took a look at all the coverage the big three got during the E3 week, and the results don't look good for Sony.

"Interesting, to me at least, is how Nintendo got nearly as much coverage as Sony and Microsoft combined (Nintendo were mentioned in the titles of 142 posts, while Microsoft and Sony were in 91 and 89 respectively). Nintendo had far more articles written about their press conference than either of the other two, and during the rest of the week they consistently held the fictional “most discussed company” spot."

Read Full Story >>
nukezilla.com
HBandell5470d ago

While it isn't stone-cold fact, it's certainly hard evidence to suggest that Sony's huge focus on Move for a lot of their conference didn't sit well with its audience expecting a slew of games...

sikbeta5470d ago (Edited 5470d ago )

It's pretty much what Sony Do always, they make an ADD-ON, then Support it but never get a "core" status or take it like Something as important as the Console in first Place, If They want to Promote Move, they can make a PS3 Bundle replacing the DS3 and putting the Move as Standard, that's the best way to do it IMO, but there is nothing suggesting that, They'll Rely More in the Coca-Cola Deals and such...

Edit:

WTH with disagrees, did I say something Bad about the Device? No, I'm just saying that Sony is giving people an option rather to Tell them that they Need to go Buy it Right Now with Loads of advertising and such....

@Colonel-Killzone

That's True, but take in consideration the [IF] in my first Sentence, I'm not saying it's necessary, I'm saying that [IF] Sony want to make the Device more "important" they should do that, it's more than obvious that They were thinking and taking in consideration that Option before me, but as Always Sony Give The you OPTION Rather than FORCE you, that's why they have a Deal with Coca-cola, that's a Great Support...

Colonel-Killzone5470d ago

HELL NO. MOVE should be a optional thing. Especially where move doesn't work for all games replacing the DS3 thats a stupid move. If anything just include them both but never make it mandatory in some bundles.

whizyup5470d ago

Yeah. People already know how to play PS3 games, so stick a move in there and let them play PS3 games. Why take away the DS3??

ViciousBoston5470d ago

um, they did replace the DS3 with a move controller in a bundle. Did you watch E3?

NecrumSlavery5470d ago

Move is why we don't have to settle for Standard Definition anymore. ie dead Space Extraction. and yes Move is very noticed. They showed more Core games with it than casual. I'm waiting impatiently for Epic Mickey HD to hit PS3 next year.

sikbeta5470d ago (Edited 5470d ago )

@ViciousBoston

That's the Move Bundle, I was talking about something like the wii, making the Move Standard and taking the DS3 as an Option...

Forget about my first Comment, you didn't get What I wanted to say and that's because it seems like I didn't express Myself Clearly...

Edit:

Guys, I wasn't Trolling, I'll buy Move cos I like the thing and it's proven that It can Work Great with Every Game, I wanted to point out something given the "motion-race" going on right now with loads of article "guestimating" winners and sales or crap like that...

Snoogins5470d ago (Edited 5470d ago )

We knew what to expect from Move, especially seeing some of its product during GDC. It showed up at E3 and proved itself effective, precise, and with little to no lag (you'll get there, Tiger Woods). The press loved it. Similar to what we've seen to a Wii-mote, but on steroids. Nothing more needed to be said.

Microsoft made big promises for this past E3, and all eyes were on the hyped Kinect. Old concept, new tech, promising unseen experiences. It was the toast, the main thing to talk about, and not necessarily for a good reason. We all saw how laggy Kinect is. So did the negative press (not just independent bloggers, but respectable journalists as well). Other than the typical Microsoft PR, the first-party dev fluff and the traditional CliffyB cheerleading, hardly anything good was said about it. Personally, Kinect shows promise (and limitation), and if they can ever fix the lag problems that have existed since ground zero, they might have something special.

TL:DR - Move speaks for itself, familar concept, knew what to expect, not much more needing be said; Kinect rode on an ocean of hype and crashed down in disappointment, internet and media exploded discussing said disappointment.

5470d ago
- Ghost of Sparta -5470d ago (Edited 5470d ago )

@ bigwheel: My comment is factual. No point in picking out the negative ones, they all are.

Your comment is butthurt and worthless.

hybridtheory125470d ago

Ghost's comment was ON TOPIC. On topic of the above comments to be exact. so idk y u r reporting

darthv725470d ago

Would this type of motion control been possible using the existing sixaxis with a plug on ball type of device?

It might have looked a bit strange but it certainly seems more cost effective. Everyone who has a ps3 has a motion controller and with the little ball and the camera it should have been able to achieve the same effect.

They could also have been able to bundle in the little usb ball with every system like nintendo does with the chuck and the wii controller.

Maybe they did try it that way first and then decided to settle on a fully independent wand style. Just a thought.

Aquanox5470d ago

@ Ghost Sparta,

I'm surprised how your posts hasn't been reported as trolling but what your link demonstrate is that Kinect has been successful enough to make the boys go rampant on damage control mode, finding every bit of non-positive text around the net to pretend it wasn't.

I don't really see many people excited about Move and that's because the technology has been around and working for 4 years now. This is just a minor improvement over WiiMote Plus and the only way Sony could get people excited about it is software, which so far, has been limited to very short demos. If Sony manages to creat a nitch of move controlled games appealing to either hardcore or causals, then maybe it will become a major hit but they will always be compared to Nintendo's titles and charisma. On the other hand, Microsoft is trying to open a new window in gaming with control-less gameplay and while it's still a technology in development it has the potential to differentiate itself enough to NOT be compared to Nintendo and have a target market on its own, which is way more smart but also much more difficult to achieve and risky.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 5470d ago
kissmeimgreek5470d ago

i think there biggest obstacle is going to be marketing and supporting 3D and Move at the same time.

STONEY45470d ago

Move wasn't a huge focus, it was the topic for about 20 minutes of the conference. Now Microsoft, more than an hour was devoted to Kinect, and almost everyone can agree the conference was just awful.

Christopher5470d ago

Soo... 100 articles on people complaining about how Kinect isn't for core gamers is better than 10 articles on people talking about the features of Move we've known for the last six months?

Not very worthwhile statistics...

raztad5470d ago

You speak the true my friend.

Most articles about Kinect were stating how disappointing the device was. If I was Sony I wouldn't want that kind of publicity.

nnotdead5470d ago

about time someone speaks the truth. i have no idea how well anything is going to sell, but the whole tracking thing seems flawed and untrustworthy.

rkimoto5470d ago

I would have been more interested in seeing statistics of who gathered the most positive coverage on the different companies' products.

This doesn't tell me much, unless you're one of those that think that "any publicity is good publicity"... I'm not in that group. I'm pretty sure there are more articles about the Twilight movie stars than about Meryl Streep or Russell Crowe, et al.

Chaos695470d ago (Edited 5470d ago )

Lolipos have sold billions and MOVE looks like a lolipop so people are gonna go crazy over that.

Cueil5470d ago

at least until the Owl shows up

nycredude5470d ago

HBandell
You guys make it sound like it's a bad thing they aren't pushing the move like it's the next best thing in gaming, like MS is doing with Natal.

You also make it sound like there is no games or something. I expect games from Sony and they haven't disappointed. I am glad they haven't lost their focus and will continue to provide awesome games for us.

I am not talking about Move cause I already know I will pick it up so I'll check it out when I get it. It is to me just an add on, and I will treat it as such. Those thinking MOve and/or Natal will revolutionize gaming are just dreaming.

Inside_out5470d ago (Edited 5470d ago )

M$ is the only guys doing anything new. Once something like Milo and a couple of other titles hit mainstream, it will be Sony WHO and Nintendo WHAT??? Milo was playable behind close doors to a very select few. Peter Molyneux says it's 10x more impressive than last E3....REALLY???

M$ since E3 have started to push the new 360 with many adverts, as November nears, they will start a hard push for all things 360 and Kinect including a rumored new 360 bundle with, yes, another new 360 console.

Sony will have alot more to say at GDC. Right now, they are pushing 3D and surprisingly, that crappy Mod racers I've seen on commercials. Sony needs a head shake. The Nintendo 3DS seems to have caught them by surprise and now they are running around like a chicken without a head...Sony, they only do everything including PANIC.

BTW...that's funny Sparta, how you think N4G is the ONLY media. The article went right over the PS3 guys heads.

JsonHenry5470d ago

No one is talking about it because 90% of the news sites are complaining about Kinetic instead!

sinncross5470d ago

Sony's huge focus on Move for a lot of their conference?

Did you even watch it? I'm going to guess no because the Move showing was like a fraction of their entire conference.

captain-obvious5470d ago

ummm ??
the fuck are those graphs ???
they looks like they were made by some kid

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 5470d ago
Nike5470d ago (Edited 5470d ago )

That Kinect and 360 are so high on the "console names" and "main announcement" in terms of sheer volume of coverage, is because of a large amount of negative coverage. Which wasn't just confined to reactions towards the device - many stories about Kinect criticized the presentation of it's main conference, along with devoting 2/3rds of the Microsoft conference to Kinect. So while there many be a lot of coverage for it, we can't assume it's all sunshine and lolipops.

Theonik5470d ago

Agreed. in addition to that MS paid-off mainstream news sources to get natal featured everywhere. Here where i live we rarely get game adds let alone have something game related on the news.

Mahr5470d ago

"So while there many be a lot of coverage for it, we can't assume it's all sunshine and lolipops."

That may very well be true, but are you familiar with the phrase 'There is no such thing as bad publicity'?

005470d ago

I love meself some statistics.

ALFAxD_CENTAURO5470d ago (Edited 5470d ago )

''Sony didn’t do quite as well as many were expecting, at least as far as quantity of coverage goes.''

Lol at that statement.

sikbeta5470d ago

lol indeed, WTF that's suppose to mean anyway...

Nike5470d ago

You know what they say: Quantity beats quality every day. /s

Seriously, having good coverage over the majority of stories - even if the total number of stories is less - is better than having bad coverage over the majority - with the total number of stories being very high (because we all like to pick us some bones).

Baba19065470d ago

we are not humans, we are dancers!

Anyway im kinda excited for the ps3 move controller. i dont see the problem. i allways wanted to have motion controller on may ps3 that works. so yay.

Show all comments (80)
470°

Nintendo Switch 2 sales shatters records, most-sold console in 24-hour period

The Nintendo Switch 2 has set a new record by selling over 3 million units within 24 hours, tripling the PlayStation 4’s previous launch day sales.

Read Full Story >>
tweaktown.com
Jin_Sakai7d ago

Crazy. Switch 2 is going to do very well.

darthv726d ago (Edited 6d ago )

No doubt, but.... the current price is out of the realm of the average parent / kid to buy like the SW1 was. So this launch achievement is from those of us with more disposable income.

The number of SW2 specific titles pales in comparison to the variety of SW1 games that get a performance boost right out of the box on this. And like the SX and PS5 before it, you can bet the majority are going to be using it as a means to better enjoy their existing titles that can benefit.

This may have been quick out of the gate... so was the WiiU. I quite enjoy it for what it is, but am keeping my expectations in check.

GenoPurpel6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

The Switch 2’s price point is great and fine and it’s still cheaper than the current gen of consoles aside from the Series S.

The only place I think they will fall short is their software sales, which also in turn may affect the hardware sales but not significantly. Parents will be fine paying for the system for their kids, but one look at an $80-$90 price tag for a single video game, that is where a lot of people will draw the line. Maybe not so much the people who are in the “willing to pay because I buy deluxe editions anyway” crowd, but for parents specifically, more sacrifices are gonna need to be made in their choices of gifts for their kids.

OtterX6d ago

As a parent of 3 with a very modest income, it was very affordable bc I already had an immense library of games, and the Mario Kart bundle came out to only about €50 more than a standard bundle. Both Zeldas were upgraded w Family Expansion Pass that I already had. Many games were upgraded for free. The only additional game I bought was Fast Fusion for 14.99 which was a great purchase!

Killer2020UK6d ago

People seem to forget that the Switch was $299 at launch which in today's money is roughly $400. That makes the Switch 2 a $50 increase when inflation is taken into account compared to the original.

Yes, people have less spending power on average compared to 2017 (Switch launch year) but this is not the MASSIVE price hike that people are making out Nintendo to be doing.

raWfodog6d ago

“No doubt, but.... the current price is out of the realm of the average parent / kid to buy like the SW1 was. So this launch achievement is from those of us with more disposable income.”

It could also be many people rushing to buy to avoid any possible tariff hikes in the future, but I think it’s still a good sign that many people still want physical consoles. Congrats to Nintendo! I’m not getting one at this time though (unless I get it for a Xmas present for one of my kids).

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6d ago
1Victor6d ago

Congratulations Nintendo on finding the happy medium between their weak console and their invincible handheld plus learning from Sony and clearly defining the new console from the old unlike their Wii and Wii U just add a higher number simple yet effective 👍👍

victorMaje7d ago

Are people that keen on $90 games?
Is it true some remasters will also be $90?

DankSinatra6d ago

Tell me you don't research without telling me you don't research.

victorMaje6d ago

Nope. I didn’t research, I don’t own any Nintendo consoles and I had read on here something about $90 games on switch 2, so I guess it’s good now, people can calm down. Have a nice day :)

1nsomniac6d ago

I bought the Switch 2 I won’t be buying games at MK prices. I don’t ever pay over £45 for my games. Even my Nintendo switch exclusives I never paid more than £33 for.

franwex6d ago

I think the typo you put was meant to be $80.
Anyway, the answer to those questions seem to be yes.

victorMaje6d ago

Looks like I’ve been enlightened about the amount. Happy to see it’s not $90.

Sgt_Slaughter5d ago

Don't get your news from clickbait TikTokers/YouTubers, only go to the source (Nintendo) or reliable new outlets like IGN.

No game is $90 on the Switch 2, and they will never go there. Most games will be under $80, too.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5d ago
gold_drake7d ago

cool
wasnt expecting it not to sell well

Profchaos6d ago

Its crazy that it's both the highest selling console on day 1 and people can walk into a store and buy it with no pre order

Ashunderfire866d ago

Yup while I was waiting in line from Best Buy for Switch 2, like I did for Switch 1 back in 2017, every waiting 12am was going to get a Switch 2! I was in the no preorder line too!

My friend manage to get 4 Switch 2s at his GameStop store, that was lowkey not busy at all. Got them all for himself and his family. Super easy to get a Switch 2 over PS5.

Profchaos6d ago

The struggle to get a ps5 was real had mates wait over 2 years for stock i got lucky and got it day 1 but still

Ashunderfire866d ago

I know and I also struggled getting a preorder for the PS5, when Walmart, Best Buy among other retailers open their preorders a day early before most of us realize it. I got my PS5 launch day thanks to YouTube Live Streamer Jake Randell. He helps people get preorders and launch consoles.

Neonridr5d ago

the PS5 also released during a global pandemic.

Ashunderfire865d ago

It’s funny how I got disagrees for speaking the truth for what I experienced getting the Switch 2. Nintendo had more copies of Switch 2 than Sony for the PS5.

Don’t be butthurt about this very fact. People on here disagreeing with crazy reasons lol

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5d ago
hiawa236d ago

Doesn't that mean Nintendo made sure they had plenty of stock available at retail.

Profchaos6d ago

Yeah it's nice to see they prepped for it

adamwparker6d ago

Yeah, I remember reading an article over two years ago with Nintendo stating that they were going to do all that they could to make sure their next console didn't have the PS5/XBox reseller swiping /no stock fiasco happen to them.

Looks like they made sure production met demand. Refreshing to see that the reseller thing didn't trend and I hope a lot of people who bought multiple units for the sole reason to resell then at $1000 are now stuck with them.

jznrpg6d ago

It also means there isn’t a chip shortage when PS5/Xbox came out during pandemic

gold_drake6d ago

to be where fair, we had a current gen come out during covid ha

repsahj6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

I remembered I tried 7 pre-order events during the PS5 launch. I gave up and ended up buying 1 from a scalper. But now, I already secured 1 pre-order Switch 2 unit in my country very easy and without problems.

Neonridr5d ago

kudos to Nintendo for ensuring a healthy amount of stock.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5d ago
Terry_B6d ago

Unlike the Switch 2 , the Playstation 4 was not sold on the same day in most regions.

6d ago
Show all comments (77)
210°

Activision Forces Adverts into Call of Duty Black Ops 6 and Warzone Loadouts

With the launch of Call of Duty Season 4, Activision quietly put adverts inside loadouts for Black Ops 6 and Warzone, sparking a backlash in the process.

14d ago
14d ago
lukasmain14d ago

Putting Ads in a pay-to-play Premium title? Well done Microsoft. Well done /s This is really scummy.

jjb198113d ago

This game will never change because these sweatlords love buying up all the skins and bundles that become obsolete the following year. They're the ones perpetuating Activision's greed.

VenomUK12d ago

If Microsoft introduces adverts into its other games I hope it can do them without disrupting the immersion of the game world. So for example in the new Fable game it would look out of place if there was a billboard advertising Cadillacs.

A far better way to do it would be to have a wizard conjure a 'dream cloud' in front of your character and then in the cloud you can see the Cadillac car and see the text with price and availability and hear a booming sales voice promoting the car. That would work so well as it wouldn't be a billboard and completely, 100%, fit in with your character's adventuring in Albion. Doesn't that sound so much better?!

crazyCoconuts12d ago

@venom, or how about our of 100 farts in Albion, 1 of them has a Cadillac pop out

VenomUK12d ago

@crazyCoconuts That’s undeniably off-beat - but it could really work!

13d ago
Show all comments (19)
410°

Xbox's first-party handheld has been sidelined

Xbox's handheld ambitions continue unabated, but the focus is shifting towards improving Windows 11 for third-party handhelds — for now. The Xbox Series X 'Melrose' successor is safe, with development continuing at full pace.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
16d ago
16d ago
16d ago
shadowT16d ago

Is there really a market for handhelds next to mobile?

Vits15d ago

If they run the same games as the main home console, then yeah, sure.
But if they need specially tailored games just for them? Probably not, unless there isn't a home console for comparison (see Switch).

RaidenBlack15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

I am kinda low-key happy this happened.
Dont want another Series S situation (games to be designed from 4 to 12TF scale and not 10 to 12TF).
Hope PS follows suit as well. Tablet SKU sharing with console for 10th gen, will just continue the cross gen -esque development/design phase/nature.
Want a proper 20+ only TF rasterized next-gen plz (+ frame-gen and the lot).
If anybody wants to continue the cross-gen, the Series S|X, PS5 will remain for that. And Switch 2, if you gotta go even lower in the TF range.

ABizzel115d ago

Yes and No. All of the PC handhelds combined have struggled to sell 7 million units, which would be a flop for any “console”. So the market is extremely niche because of price and target market (the informed hardcore gamer / casuals aren’t picking these up).

These handheld PCs are $500 or more, and offer at best Xbox Series S performance levels, so it’s best for MS specifically to just partner with ASUS, instead of investing millions if not billions.

Sony can make their own with custom AMD hardware due to their partnership, and stronger global brand for hardware. But even then it brings the question, of being a lower resolution PS5, and what does that mean for PS6 cross-gen (likely another generation where the first 3 - 4 years are just upgraded last-gen games).

Kosic15d ago

Imagine a Wii U style console, where the tablet doesn't rely on the console it's self, you download the game on the console under the TV and play in 4k glory, then you can remote play, get some unique game features if using both console and handheld in tandem. Then you can download the games in 720-1080p to play on the go, continue your progress, and continue on the TV when you get back.

Sony could get away with this due to exclusives, and that would be a reason for sales. Look at the portal.

I can picture seeing new hardware having some sort of GPU dock, where the handheld runs 1080p, and the dock has additional hardware to bring in 4k/60 specs.

I do think handheld gaming is going to be a strong future, imagine Nintendo release a new upgraded GPU dock for the Switch 3, every 2 years. More frames, sharper graphics on the same game for an extra £150 for a dock with a built in GPU chip. Console cycles doesn't have to be renewed, just the hardware can be improved by them reselling docks to us again and again with small/yearly upgrades like mobile phones.

GamerRN15d ago

Did you just imply that Sony can make a better stronger handheld than Microsoft? You do realize we are talking about Microsoft, the tech giant, right? If Microsoft can't make one that's cost effective, Sony definitely can't...

Brand and market share means nothing when you are a trillion dollar company

ABizzel114d ago

@GamerRN

It has nothing to do with what company can do it, or what company can spend.

For anyone taking a basic business class there is a term called ROI, and Xbox home consoles are selling at an all time low, meaning their ROI on a handheld is a risk that doesn’t make sense, even if they can afford it. Businesses are there to make money and it doesn’t make sene for MS to invest in a handheld that’s a companion device when their current home consoles they’ve spent 20 years working on are at an all time-low, when they can invest with little risk with what ASUS already has to offer.

This is why Sony can build a better device, because they have less risk involved, meaning they can invest more in their own product, and they already have an exclusive partnership with AMD on creating features and hardware. So in this specific case, YES Sony can built a better handheld, due to custom hardware, customer tools, low level APIs, compared to an off the shelf product running Windows or a Window Xbox kernel =.

TheEroica15d ago

I play steam deck primarily... Don't play consoles or mobile. The deck covers it all.

badz14915d ago

@shadowT

The Switch is a handheld, so will the Switch 2. what are you on about?

Cacabunga14d ago

To run native games offline? Anytime

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 14d ago
CrashMania15d ago

Funny to see the alt already damage controlling and having a meltdown with multiple accounts in the comments already.

Sad for MS if true, a dedicated handheld would go down a lot better than a rog ally 2 with an Xbox sticker on it I think.

crazyCoconuts15d ago

It couldn't have succeeded for a number of reasons. Now they've retreated to the Windows front and trying to keep that relevant for gaming. How long before Windows Central realizes there won't be a real console successor to Series X either?

Lightning7715d ago

Except there is. That project is reportedly full speed ahead.

Outside_ofthe_Box15d ago

@Lighting77

So was the handheld until today...

Lightning7715d ago

@outside obviously not since they sidelined it and they wanna see how the Asus does. Are you saying they're gonna cancel the next console?

crazyCoconuts15d ago

@lightning - I'm admittedly trying to box you in here - Do you think the next Xbox console will have Steam on it?

Outside_ofthe_Box15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

@Lightning

Here we go with having to spell everything out.

If I told you yesterday that Xbox was going to sideline the handheld console what would your response have been? Probably something along the lines of "I doubt that since Phil has been talking about it for some time now"

My point is just because they are "full speed" ahead now does not mean that will not change in future. As we have seen with the handheld. Do you understand what I'm trying to say now?

Lightning7715d ago (Edited 15d ago )

Box me in? No you said the same thing you've always been saying for years now. Those are the rumors to have Steam integration.

What about it

If you told me they were gonna cancel it tomorrow it would nothing more than fanboy talking points. I only wait for credible sources not what someone else says.

Also this is the handheld not a full blown new console. The Asus is yet to release and they're waiting to see how that thing does. Critical thinking is my strong suit you should try it some time if you can. But Ok cool well you hang your hat on that I guess. Main New console is gonna get cancelled even though the handheld is a different marketing device than the main the console itself.

__y2jb15d ago

I think there is a 75% chance there will not be another Xbox. There is zero reason to buy one now. No way it can possibly sell more than 10m units after Xbox went third party.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 15d ago
BLow15d ago

That's what they do. Goalposts shift like the wind.

I'm really confused on why they are making a "first party" device and also have a Rog Ally with their sticker on it. Make this make sense. How is their own device going to be any different?

Your console doesn't sell and they expect a handheld to?

RaidenBlack15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

The Rog Ally one is gen agnostic ... as you deciphered, it was to be the updated Rog Ally but just with Xbox branding. PC handheld with some Xbox features.
The handheld Xbox is/was supposed to be sharing the same gen/ecosystem with the next-gen (10th gen) Xbox. Think Series S but handheld ... it'll run the Xbox OS or whatever the next Xbox will run.
...
As for anybody wondering/confused why MS is doing another Xbox console ... coz mainly its the 10th gen of home consoles next, which started wayy back in 1972 for the 1st gen. And MS wanna be part in it, in the 10th anniversary gen of consoles. If they gotta bow out, they can't do that at 9th i.e just before 10th. They wanna stick around till the 10th or the X-th gen and check what the fuss happens.

Outside_ofthe_Box15d ago

Curious as to what excuses the spam was saying. Because prior to this news, the Xbox handheld was used as proof that Xbox is still committed to the hardware space. This handheld being scraped is not a good sign...

15d ago
Outside_ofthe_Box15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

@Spam
You can replace scrapped with pushed back if you like. It's not a good sign either way.

15d ago
1Victor15d ago

asq3= obscured: “ What’s your source on the handheld being scrapped? “
Read the article from Microsoft own website and one of your favorite quotations site when it’s something bad about Sony.
Oh BTW good luck with your next SPAM account.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 15d ago
Show all comments (77)