670°

Final Nintendo Angry Rant

“Angry Joe” Vargas, a popular YouTuber that features over two million subscribers, has received a “content” violation from Nintendo on YouTube and that’s not, in anyway, a good thing.

Abash3310d ago

*Iwata is shown video by an employee*

Iwata: "Oh I see nothing wrong here, that guy likes being angry. He calls himself "Angry Joe""

xHeavYx3310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

Oh, to think that Minecraft is worth $2.5 Billion thanks to YouTubers and other free advertising. This is why Nintendo is becoming almost irrelevant to the gaming industry.

Crazyglues3310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

@ xHeavYx

Exactly, Nintendo does not get it, and this is why they fail.. Nintendo is becoming totally irrelevant and they can't even see it..

It's funny because Nintendo must be run by idiots, if you can't realize that having a video about your content going viral is the best thing for sales since slice bread then your company has the worst CEO's to ever run a business...

:(

thorstein3310d ago

While the point is valid, youtube subscribers don't care if Nintendo is getting a share or if the youtuber is getting a share, they just want to watch videos of a game they are interested in.

Therefore, if someone isn't going to show a Nintendo game, they will just find someone who does.

The mistake this guy is making is a simple one: he thinks he wields actual power. He doesn't. His hits will decrease and he will go the way of the dodo far before a 100 year old company will.

Thatguy-3103310d ago

Not only minecraft but games like The Last of Us really benefited from beign on YouTube. Like everyone is saying it's common sense that it's all free advertisement. We live in an Era where social media is important because that's how people get to know a lot of things. If you're not taking advantage of it you're shooting yourself in the foot.

PeaSFor3310d ago

https://www.youtube.com/wat...
killer is nailling it directly on the head, as always.

antz11043310d ago

Thorstein,

I trust Joes opinion a lot more than some greedy corporation. To me that's the definition of the best kind of power.

SilentNegotiator3310d ago

Nintendo is just trying to bully profits out of people that can't afford a dozen high price lawyers on staff like Nintendo can. We need a video website that will stand up for people using content under fair use.

RpgSama3310d ago

It's funny that on one side you have companies like MS and Sony that want you to share EVERYTHING, Screens, Videos, Recorded Gameplay, Live gameplay, Tweet about it, facebook it, tools for you to do montages of those videos of not only their first party games but EVERY GAME. Sony even added a button to it's controller just for that and a share play option where you can actually play games your friends have that you don't.

On the other side Nintendo wants you to pay to be allowed to share about games you already bought.

DragonKnight3310d ago

@thorstein: Joe absolutely holds power. He is the biggest reviewer on youtube right now and what he says does in fact carry weight. You think companies are going to ignore someone who has the attention of 2 million people?

You're forgetting something. Joe is big, and if he says he's gonna stop doing Nintendo videos in any way, then yeah people can go to other channels but what will also happen is that other channels will follow suit. Nintendo's partnership program is pathetic and unsustainable. No one with a brain and the ability to do basic math will sign up or even stay with that program for long when they have to cut their own ad revenue so much just for the privilege to not be able to have Super Smash Bros. videos on their channel.

thorstein3310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

@Antz,

Never said I didn't trust his opinion.

I am saying that number of followers doesn't mean he has the power to make a dent in what Nintendo does.

There is a huge difference. And if this gen has proven anything to us, it is a very simple lesson:

Players don't care what critics say.

They will care if they are shown a game that looks fun and may want to play it. In that way Joe loses out on viewership (no matter what the deal is.)

Remember, I am not defending Nintendo's actions, I am just stating that Joe's opinion isn't as powerful as he thinks it is.

pixelsword3310d ago

Nintendo hasn't changed since their old repressive NES days; and that will kill them as a company in the end.

WiiUsauce3310d ago

Completely agree. Nintendo needs a #NintendoreDirect. The same people responsible for getting Nintendo where they are are the same people driving them to the ground with their old mentality. Nintendo needs to change badly.

JOWAPPO3310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

@thorstein

"...youtube subscribers don't care if Nintendo is getting a share or if the youtuber is getting a share, they just want to watch videos of a game they are interested in."

You're not counting all the people who go to Youtube for the Youtuber, not just the game they're playing. AngryJoe may not be on Pewdiepie's level, but he's still a heavy-hitter.

I find it silly, the notion that the Youtuber will become irrelevant, not the other way around. Although that holds true outside Youtube, as well as for a small/faceless channel (and for an audience that just wants to see the game), just how much does that audience compare to the audience who watches AngryJoe for AngryJoe? Or TotalBiscuit for TotalBiscuit? Pewdiepie for Pewdiepie?

That is A LOT of people Nintendo are choosing to not let their games be advertised to on Youtube, all because they don't understand how it works like other companies do, so they see it as a problem, not a profit. That's their mistake.

When one Youtuber, by themselves, can have a channel with 35 times the amount of subscriptions than a massive company, AND said-company was on Youtube for 5 YEARS LONGER, that should tell you what people are more interested in between the two on that website.

When people are showing more interest in a gameplay video from a content creator instead of just a vanilla video, that should tell you something about that website. Between the two kinds of audiences, I'd put my money on the content creators, not just the games they're playing. I could be wrong, but one just seems to be more popular than the other.

RpgSama3310d ago

@thorstein

"Players don't care what critics say.

They will care if they are shown a game that looks fun and may want to play it."

I very much agree with that statement, but where will they be shown a game that looks fun? Not on Youtube or Twitch without paying Nintendo money, that's the entire point of this conversation, Nintendo is losing potential consumers with this attitude.

Big_Game_Hunters3310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

Yah because the 3DS is such an irrelevant system NO one owns one of those lol. Lets forget that their stock value skyrocketed when the DeNa partership was announced, yup their business decision are totally making them irrelevant LOL. Don't confuse their inability to make good home consoles with being bad at business. One part of the business=/= the entire business,because then you could say sony is good at business because the PS4. except Sony is generally awful at making business decisions and one or two strong divisions aren't going to change their image and junk stocks. Don't forget amiibos are selling out everywhere too, Totally irrelevant though right bud.

@silent stop saying its fair use, we both know its not. Salty joe here also admits its not lol.

I'm shocked by the amount of people so mad about Nintendo wanting a cut from people using their millions of dollars worth of investment and hard work.

Also this clown complains about having to buy controllers for a multiplayer game!? what PS and XBOX games let you play local multiplayer with only one controller? He thinks Nintendo owes him for buying their product? who does he think he is, i don't remember Nintendo asking him to advertise yet he acts so entitled.

He thinks people who buy Nintendo products are "somthing i won't say" because we don't care that he can't make more money leeching off Nintendo LOL!!

He also flat out defended the fact that EA is paying youtubers to lie and act like they like thier awful games LOL!!! what a tool.

subtenko3310d ago

I havent talked about nintendo ina looooong time and it's eerie, I mean Im not even having the good ol fashion fanboy wars about nintnedo like the early 2000's. Nintendo is gone :(

If only there were like Sony but stayed nintendo. They just need to change.... Why am I and millions or others not a fan of nintendo anymore if something wasnt right?

N4Flamers3310d ago

@big_game

You just like Nintendo do not understand how things work now. Just like joe said it's free advertising. People dont just read reviews anymore. People watch gameplay, watch streams, listen to you tubers to make their buying decisions. He said they were within their rights because they own the IP's, but they didnt take the time out to make the video, joe did. If you think he built his fan base on Nintendo then you haven't watched his videos. People subscribe to angry joe for him regardless of nintendo, i dont even know if there's a nintendo chanel i can subscribe to.

Godmars2903309d ago

Sadly, Nintendo became irrelevant with the N64 when they refused to move from carts.

higgins783309d ago

Minecraft is an example of videogames and YouTube working well together, but think, not ALL videogames will it prove quite as successful. Besides, some of us (myself included) don't want Nintendo to go down that path.

Broncos983308d ago (Edited 3308d ago )

@PeaSFor

No Killer did not hit the nail on the head at all if anything he embarrassed himself by looking like a utter fool with his stupid antics. Had he CALMLY and rationally pointed out where he disagreed I might have listened to why he thought Angryjoe was wrong; instead I turned off the video after 30 seconds.

+ Show (18) more repliesLast reply 3308d ago
3-4-53310d ago

* Stop complaining.

Stop acting like people won't be watching Legend of Zelda, Yoshi, Splatoon or Xenoblade.

ALL of the Youtube people could quite doing it and the interest in those games would remain the same.

Some of you act so entitled.

DragonKnight3310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

You give Nintendo's IPs too much credit. Old school gamers know the pedigree, new gamers look for games. If no one is talking about Nintendo's games, new gamers won't see them and will avoid them.

You're also acting like Splatoon and Xenoblade are even in the same league of exposure as Mario or Zelda, and nope they aren't.

ChickeyCantor3309d ago

It's not about known interests. It's about exposure. Angry Joe is right about how Nintendo is handling this.

Godmars2903309d ago

@ChickeyCantor:
Still, he comes off as being more than a bit entitled. Like he bought Nintendo stuff expressly for the purpose of streaming, that he was doing them a favor by streaming it, rather than buying a WiiU and game just to enjoy it. That somehow, after editing footage, doing a job he expected to be paid or rewarded for, he either knew nothing about the crap Nintendo was up to or that it wouldn't apply to him.

And frankly hearing him calling any disagreement to his opinion on this "haters" doesn't sit well. What Nintendo is doing is indeed crap, but he still isn't entirely in the right.

ChickeyCantor3309d ago (Edited 3309d ago )

"Still, he comes off as being more than a bit entitled."

He is doing FREE promotion for Nintendo, It's the best kind of exposure. Especially if you have a big audience.

AJ isn't entitled, he is merely expressing how Nintendo is not taking advantage of it. Sony does it. MS does it. Going against the current isn't always brave. It sometimes just profoundly stupid.

"ut he still isn't entirely in the right."

He also said that Nintendo should do whatever they want, it's their prerogative. It's also stupid because they don't have to.

Godmars2903309d ago

@ChickeyCantor:
Like I said: the way Joe phrased it, he bought a WiiU and games specifically for his channel rather than just for his personal use. That for him it wasn't free promotion, but an expense he expected to be rewarded for if only by people watching his channel. Which I believe is something he gets paid for.

xander707693309d ago

Angry Joe does get paid for it. So what? In any other industry the products company itself would have to pay for this kind of advertising and exposure.

You see, what is so frustrating about this situation is that Nintendo is not even benefitting their own interests. This is bad for all parties involved; it is bad for gamers, for youtubers, and for Nintendo themselves. It *should* be such a no brainer, Nintendo gets FREE advertising and generated revenue. The youtubers still get compensated for advertising, but the compensation comes from other adverts, and not from Nintendos wallet, so they still have incentive to advertise for Nintendo, or whoever. The gamers benefit because they can watch their favorite personalities play new games and make an informed decision when deciding whether to buy the game for themselves or not. It is one of the most sensible, benign symbiotic business models that could exist.

Nintendo is taking what should be a simple win-win situation and turning it into a lose-lose situation, because they are out of touch and greedy.

3-4-53309d ago

If you have a good point or idea, it can be ruined by how it's presented.

Angry Joe does this in LITERALLY every video.

ChickeyCantor3309d ago (Edited 3309d ago )

"That for him it wasn't free promotion, but an expense he expected to be rewarded for "

I don't believe he thinks he should be awarded for it. What he was saying is that he already payed Nintendo, how much more do they want?

He was already agreeing to their whole revenue cut. Now his video was taken down. It's not so much about being awarded as it's just Nintendo being completely dumb about this. Completely obliterating anything good that comes from streamers in regards to their marketing tactics.

Godmars2903309d ago (Edited 3309d ago )

@ChickeyCantor:
"I don't believe he thinks he should be awarded for it."

Then he shouldn't be talking about buying a WiiU and games for as if he were doing Nintendo a favor.

@xander70769:
A good portion of the point is that he gets paid for it. That he bought a WiiU, that according to you he even bought into Nintendo's BS sponsorship program knowing full well by my understanding of it that its rules are still arbitrary, and somehow now not only feels that he has a right to complain, but denounce anyone who doesn't agree with him. And its that last part that gets me the most.

Yes: Nintendo is totally wrong in how they're handling streaming and playthroughs of their games, but Joe's not looking any better for agreeing to those stupid policies then complaining for being caught up in them. Then saying what amounts to "F-U" to anyone who doesn't want to agree, console him or join him in some hug box of self entitlement on top of that.

And that is where he goes really wrong.

ChickeyCantor3309d ago (Edited 3309d ago )

"Then he shouldn't be talking about buying a WiiU and games for as if he were doing Nintendo a favor. "

He could be doing them a favor if they actually let streamers do whatever.

And you clearly missed my point on this. Him saying he bought a WiiU is not the same as saying "REWARD ME". He was simply saying that he was supporting Nintendo by buying these things and now Nintendo won't even let him have his video even though [he already agreed to share the revenue].

He isn't being entitled in the slightest, he is just frustrated that Nintendo enforces these dumb policies that shits on everyone.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3309d ago
Revvin3309d ago (Edited 3309d ago )

Thorstein you are spot on with your comments. These people who lets not forget make a living out of these channels show how vacuous some sections of society have become when they hold up people like Joe as someone who matters. This isn't about gamers its about someone sore that Nintendo want a cut from the money he makes using their IP to bring people to his Youtube channel. He's sore he is not making as much money as he would promoting a Microsoft or Sony platform plain and simple, he's just as commercial and money grabbing as he accuses Nintendo of being. See through the persona and see it for what it really is.

jdiggitty3309d ago

Not only that, he's acting like he's not breaking the law. Just because Nintendo has a different policy on protecting their trademarks than the other companies it makes them the assholes? His argument is that the other companies let him violate their trademarks, Nintendo should too. And it's free marketing.

Those other companies can change their policy at any time and sue him into oblivion. And it's possible, maybe, that Nintendo doesn't want anyone else in control of their marketing. You won't see him standing up for his just cause in court. He'll just make shitty youtube rants about how he's been wronged.

pcz3309d ago

nintendo are greedy control freaks and its going to be their downfall

Eddie201013309d ago

Killer is correct, Angry joe is playing you, would he really be interested in playing Mario party 10, I doubt it. He is a self promoting pi@@ poor advocate for gaming, or so he would have you believe. The You Tube version of Geraldo Rivera (sorry I insulted Geraldo) this whole thing was a set up to get hits and get paid.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3308d ago
maniacmayhem3310d ago

These youtubers should just ban Nintendo and their games instead of going through all this trouble.

Majin-vegeta3310d ago

Agree isn't Ninty the only company out of the big 3 doing crap like this??

Nintendo just seems to be so arse backwards these days.They need a good shakeup and a smack to the face to wake up.

The "No voicechat option"for Splatoon made me just not wanna buy the game at all.GG ninty

-Foxtrot3310d ago

The only way a shake up is going to happen is if Iwata goes and they bring in some younger guy who actually understands the way the gaming industry works these days.

Good online system, third party support, no gimmicks, powerful hardware, even something like Trophies/Achievements or as you've said voice chat etc....things to bring Nintendo forward and keep them up to date with the other companies.

The fact Nintendo have kept someone like Iwata in despite mistake after mistake he's made shows you that they treat the company as a friendly hang out then a business

rezzah3310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

Nintendo is the most traditional of the 3, and if they remain so they will burn themselves out.

Tradition remains the same as the industry and world keeps changing. It is okay to be this way, just dont expect to be successful long term in a business.

The nostalgia will aid them as it always has, but that fanbase will only grow older as the new generations will create their own nostalgia off newer things found within they own generation. I understand mario, link, and kirby game will be released within their generations, but the games will lack the familiarity of nostalgia; they will more options than just mario to occupy their time with. This is why a strong tradition mentality, lack of adaptatiom, will burn out even if it is successful for decades.

Edit: the first part of what fox said above is key info to hold onto. Nintendo can become a deadly force if a new adaptable face takes over the business direction.

Concertoine3310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

@Foxtrot

Let me start off by saying that i think this whole youtube thing is totally stupid and that i also think Iwata needs to go.

That said, it isn't a nebulous "Nintendo" keeping Iwata in. He's president, the only one within Nintendo with the authority to fire him is himself. The shareholders are keeping him in. And they certainly don't treat it like a friendly hang out, they want money. That's why they've been pushing mobile for years now.

They choose to keep iwata not only because it's risky to bring someone new in for the long term, but because of his history. Iwata is, by far, the most successful CEO in gaming history in terms of profit. They made more money in 2009 than sony and MS did the entire gen, combined. That's a massive number. It's hard to let success like that just go, and that's why they keep Iwata.

jmac533310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

@Concertoine Iwata can get fired from the board of directors. Nintendo is a publicly traded company therefore the shareholders make the final decisions. Iwata has been entrusted with the leadership but they could get rid of him at the drop of a haT if the company isn't turning a profit.

Concertoine3310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

@jmac

Nintendo hasnt turned a yearly profit since 2011 i believe. This year looks to break that trend. Like i said, theyre reluctant to let him go for a couple reasons, enough to circumvent the fact that not only are they losing money for the first time since they entered the industry, but they've been losing it for going on 3 years.

_-EDMIX-_3310d ago

"The nostalgia will aid them as it always has, but that fanbase will only grow older as the new generations"

That is the problem there.

They can't keep just living off of that as gamers grow and they are not really doing their fans any favors by being left behind by normal gaming evolution.

Online play, DLC, new ips etc seem to be something Nintendo has no damn clue about.

They are always late to this and when they attempt it, its not really good or they have no clue about how to deliver it.

They need to be aware that Sony and MS are competition. Move, Morpheus, Kinect are things that will hurt them in the future as they are likely hurting them now.

Nintendo is no longer the only publisher that makes new concepts, they are not slowly becoming the one that keeps repeating the same dated ones over and over and over.

Now....lots of indie developers are out to be that new concept developer, games like Shovel Knight, games like Limbo, Braid, Transistor, Ori, No Man Sky, you name it and those new concepts are out to find new gamers and out to seek that creative attitude that Nintendo USED to have.

I've seen lately over the past couple gens, seen more rehashes by Nintendo then almost any publisher to date.

The new Ips they do create, they barely even fully support. Pikmin....3 games over the past 12 YEARS! Luigi's Mansion.......2 games over the course of 11 years.

Soooo this is there idea of supporting new ips huh?

easy example, God Of War....6 titles over the course of 10 years....if not less!

I'm not saying don't make Mario, or Zelda, merely support those new ips as much as they support there older IPs.

Nintendo's issue is they don't fully get they need new blood buying their systems JUST as much as old blood.

God Of War didn't stop the GT series, Sly series etc.

Why is Pikmin getting 3 titles in 13 years? Luigi's Mansion getting 2 in like 11? That is a bit nuts.

They are behind on business practices and its clear Sony and MS have a huge 1up (no pun intended...really) on Nintendo when it comes to business.

Nintendo know how to make great games as a publisher, but they are pretty slow when it comes to business.

Anyone wondering why Sony bought more teams then Nintendo despite Nintendo making more money then Sony last gen?

If you own a Wii U....I feel you should be asking Nintendo some questions regarding there management, the Wii U should not be at where its at right now, I feel the higher ups have misused the money made from the Wii as there is no reason why Wii U should be having huge long droughts.

They have the money to avoid it....yet the don't.

Good-Smurf3310d ago

And don't forget their "No charger on our new hardware BS"
It's like a middle finger to new customer like me.
I loved your Wii U but that business move and this one is ridiculous and greedy as fuck.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3310d ago
snoopgg3310d ago

I think they already have, have you seen the wii u sales. Really laughable.

SilentNegotiator3310d ago

Definitely. If Nintendo wants to live in the past, they should reap what they sow. If Nintendo wants another Gamecube on their hands, then they're on the right track.

hkgamer3309d ago

a bunch of people would not bother with nintendo videos anymore, they just dont want to give ad revenue away or possibly get videos taken down. however, there will be some who would take this deal. its a way to stand out from the crowd and make a name for yourself.

angryjoe is just being wierd, he knows what nintendos policies are, he made a video before about it and probably every youtuber around should know this so why did he put a another video up on youtube? did he do this deliberately so that he can make a rant video?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3309d ago
admiralvic3310d ago

While I can understand where some of these people are coming from (Joe and people with that much notoriety do make a lot of money for companies), I also see where they're coming from and sometimes find these complaints, while somewhat valid, also quite whinny.

Since I really don't want to get into a rant about it I'll say this much. As much as I enjoy making videos and watching others (guides anyway), some companies strongly discourage showing anything. I'm still angry I got a strike against my account because Arc System Works or Aksys didn't like I showed a little of the games story. Never intended to upload it all, nor did I intend to do anything else besides offer people the first couple of minutes (I think it was 15 minutes of a multiple hour long cutscene) and I received nothing asking me to take it down or saying I couldn't do it, yet I still lost the ability to upload videos past 15 minutes, make any money period and a bunch of other things. =\

Erik73573310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

Nintendo is the only company that does this...they are just out of touch with today's society. The online infrastructure is embarrassingly behind.

"Some companies"... companies like Arc System Works aren't that big compared to Nintendo,EA, or Sony btw so that example is not really helping your argument, they are not a major company.

Please tell me what major companies act as stupid as Nintendo on this issue..I know Microsoft and Sony don't do stupid crap like this
Yes EA and few others did have issues with it...a long time ago...but now they allow it.

He has every right to complain because the more he complains and gets attention for this the more this will help Nintendo change.........
I for one think they are and I think Nintendo Network will co-launch with their new console and I think Nintendo Network will be a overhaul of their own network(probably will connect and use your phone too)

_-EDMIX-_3310d ago

If you guys know me on N4G, you clearly know I'm not a huge MS fan, but even I have to agree that Sony nor MS do any dumb crap like this.

Sony didn't have great online for PS2, XB's online set the trend for the norm of console online gaming.

Sony made sure that PS3 would be toe to toe with Live.

PS3 launches with PSN...PSN at launch (mind you, I remember the very FIRST DAY!) It wasn't that great, it was bare, BUT it had the minimum needed to compete.

Send a message, add a friend, play online.

Later on PSN would not only get better, it was by the end of the generation RIVAL XBL! Many then would even debate Live vs PSN. The fact that it was even debatable by many shows that despite Sony not having experience like MS with online, they could learn and even seek to BEAT MS at one of the best features known from this company.

This helped Sony, this helped its gamers, I for one played well over 700 hours COD4, 500 hours of Killzone 2, 300 hours in TF2, and so on. I put deep, deep thousands of hours in many online games over that gen, BFBC2, GT5, etc. All because Sony had a plan to be BETTER then they were last gen. period.

Example.

MS.

They where KNOWN for being way, way TOO American, brodude better came to mind. FPS, for da "hardcorez" yet this hurt then a lot their first outing.

Second time around, MS had bagged one of the most known RPG directors in gaming Sakaguchi! Though they only had like 3 games under MS, that along with MS seeking to get Final Fantasy, having XI, welcoming every Japanese game that they can into the MS library was something that not only changed how MS was NOW seen in gaming, it put to rest the image they had last gen as a "FPS" only or "hardcorez" system and now it was a everybody system.

Enter Kinect, enter Move.

Sony and MS are business that KNOW how to adapt.

What? Sony did something wrong last gen? Well its not the case this gen.

Same goes for MS.

Nintendo is the only company out of the 3 that seems to have no clue what they are doing in terms of the near endless mistakes they make.

Mind you...I own a 3DS and have no plans to get a XONE thus far. This is very much just an objective look at Nintendo and its questionable practices.

remixx1163310d ago

@edmix

Exactly, MS and Sony improve off of each other, they need each other.

Sony improved its online infrastructure thanks to MS, you know party chat, and the like. As well as how to make the console easier to develop for and a better controller along with the PS camera.

While MS had to see after how last gen ended they had to step their game up, fanboys won't admit it but MS knew they lost games wise. So they had to put a visionary at the helm (Phil) and now the games are starting to ride in. They are even trying to make a push for Japanese games even they know sony has a firm grip on Japanese devs.

Now they are both pushing in areas they were lackluster in. Sony with shareplay damn near revolutionizing online gaming when it works right. While MS is using azure clouds to try and deliver unique gaming experiences on the xb1.

Nintendo refuses to watch and learn and chooses to just ride gimmicks and nostalgia, its time to get their head in the game and join sony and MS on the fore front of the sporadic gaming industry.

RmanX10003310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

First off, Joe didn't buy the console since fans donated for it. I feel it is safe to assume he would not have bought one of his own accord. So saying he bought all this stuff like the controllers and games is voided since he wouldn't have bought them without fans giving him a console to begin with. Basically I'm saying he chose to spend that money on those things because he just happened to get a WiiU. I'm not trying to say he doesn't have a point.

NOW WITH THAT SAID, I agree with a lot of what he has to say. Although I think he's a bit confused that everyone gives Nintendo a free pass. Of course blind fanboys will but anyone with any amount of common sense will acknowledge when a company has FAILED in areas. Joe's points are 100% correct. Nintendo is a senile company stuck in Medieval times and refuse to truly come to the modern era. They say they're adapting but with stuff like this I have to think "This is... adapting?"

I have so much to love and hate with Nintendo. I love their games. Almost always guaranteed a full, content filled game with fun gameplay on top of accessibility, while at the same time, showing a lot of love to fans and showing that they value the fans and some requests like Lucas returning to Smash4 and the fan ballot voting.

But every time they do this sort of copyright thing, their entire youtube policy, and that cease and desist against that non-profit SM64 HD level demo, I want to slap them. I can't believe a company thinks they can get away with something like that and not receive backlash. They only hurt themselves immensely when they do these sorts of idiotic things. It makes me question if I should even support their products sometimes because they're so backwards that I feel like I have to be a parent and say "You can't have this money until you learn your lesson."

Joe has every right IN MY OPINION to be angry about this. And I hope one day, Nintendo pulls their heads all the way out of their 3DasseS and have a strong following beyond their hardcore fans.

garrettbobbyferguson3310d ago

Joe has every right to be angry about a company not wanting him to profit off of their hard work and intellectual property? What the hell is wrong with you people? If you want to use music in a commercial, you have to purchase the rights to use that music. If you want to riff over a movie, you have to get the rights (Mystery Science Theater don't just rip movies for free you know).

Meanwhile, Nintendo is archaic for not wanting some clown on youtube to make profit off their content? Any company would be completely in the right if they did this. Joe should consider himself lucky he has even gotten away with it this long.

RmanX10003310d ago

The problem is that his Mario Party 10 video was technically a transformative work. He made edits to the video, he had a camera with him and his buddies while they were all chatting and having a good time. He didn't upload raw gameplay and demand money in order to view it or claiming ownership of it. And like Joe said, they can only benefit from a bit of free advertisement. I would like to say though, I'm not even a fan of Joe's. I don't watch any of his content other than whatever reviews my friends show me. No offense to him or the work he puts into something, I just don't watch it very often.

But more so to my main point, the backlash Nintendo gets from fighting bigger youtube game review channels like Joe's only hurts them. Joe mentioned specifically CD Projekt Red who is completely fine with people doing videos about their games. They wouldn't benefit from tagging every video of The Witcher and pissing potential buyers off.

Fighting youtubers for copyright makes you look petty. The money they made from Joe's video is probably next to nothing compared to the chance that some of his fans may have went and bought a WiiU and MP10 because Joe was enjoying it. Nintendo would've potentially made a much larger profit if they didn't fight over such petty things.

I love Nintendo's products and the WiiU is the only 8th gen system I own. And they do have every right to throw copyright around. But the fact is, it only hurts them because it stops people like Joe, from showing off their games and potentially selling more WiiUs. Youtubers can make a difference when it comes to game sales. I Am Bread (which I don't own), Five Nights, Goat Simulator, and hell, even Shovel Knight may not have taken off were it not for youtubers playing them.

Maybe I could've elaborated my point more previously? I don't think it's right of Nintendo to do it, despite they have the right to do it. Basically, it doesn't hurt them to just let it go.

antz11043310d ago

Hey, like Joe said: if people like you want to keep supporting Nintendo and their business practices....awesome, that's your thing.

DragonKnight3310d ago

For the umpteenth time Joe is NOT making money off of Nintendo's work. Joe is not claiming that Mario Party 10 is his game, he's not claiming to own the rights to it, he's not claiming he works for Nintendo. Joe is making money off of people wanting to see his reviews of games, and his reactions in Let's Plays. Remove the Nintendo games and people still would be there looking for the content HE provides.

I don't understand you corporate defenders. It's not a difficult concept.

Also, @RmanX1000: Joe didn't need the donations to buy a Wii U, he decided to use the donation money to buy one since fans wanted him to. Your point is completely irrelevant there. He has just as much a right to complain as anyone because, in the end, he did earn that money. People chose to donate because they valued his work.

Erik73573310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

When he says everyone gives them a free pass...he is not talking about the gaming community,he is specifically talking about the fanbase of Nintendo...

I'm in the same boat as you...I love Nintendo games...
But I hate how they are so out of touch with today's Society and their Online infrastructure is just horrible. They also like the idea of "my way or the highway" with 3rd party companies,hence the lack of support from 3rd party. Granted, 3rd party did not exactly want to develop on wiiu because of the lack-luster sales but it just was not that great to develop for in the first place if you weren't first party.

hkgamer3309d ago

angryjoe has every right to be angry, its part of his work to put videogame content played online. however, nintendo did put thee policies up and youtubers especially angryjow should know this already so why would he bother putting another video up? did he do this so he can get his video taken off so that he can make a rant video instead? he should have known better.

its a stupid policy, but its 100% legal and nintendo has enforced it so why bother making more videos? obviously nintendo will make hardly any money from this, but their stance is that they dont want any youtube videos of their games. if you do want to then join that policy.

sm64 hd taken off is a grey area thing. it doesnt hurt nintendo too much but they have the right to protect their ip especially if that guy is ripping models and textures from their other games.

gamerfan09093310d ago

This guy is such a bloody attention seeking fool. His shtick is getting older and older each vid he makes.

aPerson3310d ago

Actually, I'd say he's getting better. When he first started, I found him slightly annoying... These days he is usually my go-to reviewer when a new game comes out (if he's reviewed it). He gave Dying Light a 6, and even though I LOVED it, it's difficult to argue with anything he said in his review. He's always fair.

paddy953310d ago

Unlike IGN. Paid for reviews suck!

morganfell3310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

Paid or unpaid, any jerk with a soapbox, an opinion, and no grading standards who runs their mouth and unfairly influences gaming sucks.

Nintendo is wrong here and so if joe. He can get angry all he likes but he runs his mouth about the hard work of people in the game industry, talented people when he lacks talent, and that is how he makes his living - on their backs at our expense as he inflfuences our hobby with nothing more than an opinion.

This is the same joe that failed to properly research a game and its feature as he slammed it only to later be proven wrong.

Revolver_X_3310d ago

I used to sub him, but he eventually annoyed me to no end. He knows Nintey's policy. He knows it will get claimed. At this point, I feel he does it just for this type of video.

Erik73573310d ago

He's opinions to me are very brutal, unforgiving, and unbiased compared to allot of major outlets that don't raise a lot of attention on shitty things in the gaming community(example: Evolve, a game filled with dlc at launch)

Show all comments (182)
80°

Nintendo's Massacre Of The 3DS And Wii U Is Finally Complete, Regrettably

Hanzala from eXputer: "The cruel hammer of Nintendo has fallen. Farewell, 3DS and Wii U, you surely brightened my life and many others; you won't be forgotten."

280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10113d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref12d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde12d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197212d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville12d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218312d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos12d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 12d ago
isarai13d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref12d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan12d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00711d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197213d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

13d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

12d ago
12d ago
Zeref12d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde12d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197212d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier12d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto12d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218312d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto11d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
Hofstaderman12d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts12d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts11d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)
90°

Nintendo's War Against Player-Made Content Will Hurt The Company In The End

Danish from eXputer: "Nintendo has historically gone against player-made content and emulation of its games. This has done much to harm the company's image."

XiNatsuDragnel19d ago

I agree nintendo hire some these folks to help in your games it'll help imo.

banger8818d ago

They need to stop announcing these mods and fan remakes until they're finished. Finish it, upload it, and then if Nintendo dmca's it tough shit. Once it's online, people can share it around, even if the original download gets taken down.

Jingsing18d ago

True, but most modders need constant admiration during the process to motivate them.

PRIMORDUS18d ago

Yup, once it's a torrent nothing can be done Nintendo is helpless at that point. But it would be wise if they just had a site on the dark web, it's also easy to use with Tor and no one will bother you.

mastershredder17d ago

This is all coming from the mouth of short-sighted fandom and grifting madness.
No.... it wont. There is a clear defined reason why they don't. This is nothing new. Make your own shi7 from your own original ideas especially if you are trying to capitalize of it it. Duh.

Yeah, hire people that have zero respect or understanding for an established process. Wow. Yep. Totally makes sense.

shinoff218317d ago

Those guys that made that sonic game got a gig from sega or something along those lines and that game was dope as hell. One of the best sonics as of late.