I'm the editor, so the error is on me, not the writer.
Ultimately, he recommends the game and is sided with your position on it, so being "that guy" and patronising someone else's critique because of a single missed space just comes across as needlessly petty. We publish over a hundred reviews a year – it happens. But we do appreciate the heads up!
And to answer your question, yes, we do use a spell checker: grammarly.com. I hi...
If anything, Cage is criticised a little too unfairly. I've never heard anyone overrate him.
You've awarded it a distinction, yes, but that's not the same as scoring (x/y). There's also nothing wrong with that, and this is not an attack on your review or rating system. I too manage a website that abandoned conventional scoring for similar reasons as outlined in your policy. It's just these systems are not compatible with N4G's options. If you want to avoid the heat, just select "no score," leave the box empty, and include a compelling tag in the headline...
It's someone trying to fit their review system with N4G's options. It doesn't work. You just have to bite the bullet if you don't score and try to write a compelling headline to go with the review instead. D/0 means nothing.
It's a Soulcalibur thing. Most of the series' covers feature guest characters.
FYI, the reviewer recommended the sequel: https://gamecloud.net.au/re...
Just informed? It launched end of last month...
Dammit. Someone beat me to it. But more like EA Did Everything Wrong in 2017.
Ōkami is probably the most famous example of an extremely well received game that sold very poorly. So much that it killed the studio.
Some other examples off the top of my head include Earthbound, Beyond Good & Evil, Jet Grind Radio, Shenmue I & II, Grim Fandango, Psychonauts, Max Payne 2: The Fall of Max Payne, Vanquish, No More Heroes, and Valkyria Chronicles (until the PC port and re-release).
Shinji Mikami said before The Evil Within released that it would be the last game he directs. Tango Gameworks is still his studio, most of the same team are developing the sequel, and he's still involved as producer.
In saying that, though, he has said this before, but it looks like now he's got a studio established that he's finally going through with it and taking a more of a backseat role.
Along with microtransactions and DLC that's more expensive than when it launched.
Great to see Vaan no longer has exoskeletal abs anymore!
Both versions were worked on simultaneously and released simultaneously, so no. Just a clickbait title.
My most anticipated game of the year!
However, this review reads like it was written by an excited primary school student. It's not very informative.
Short supply. RE7 out this week.
Having played it the past week, I now have full confidence in the medium's potential to deliver experiences beyond tech demos.
I've been playing it a lot, and have had no problems in VR whatsoever (unlike games like RIGS and DriveClub VR which make me feel very sick). Just be smart and take a breather every hour or so and you'll be right.
So was the gamepad, allegedly, and they never came close to realising its potential.
Just to point out, this decision was made by Koch Media, not Square Enix. A PR company employed by Square Enix for countries they’re not handling directly. A PR company which is likely being paid based on results.
This could be more about Koch Media’s pay cheque than Square Enix wanting to hide less than average reviews.
I’ve dealt with PR companies for years, and they chop and change with who they represent. I’d like to know if Square Enix had any actua...
Score is actually 9.0. That's a typo.
Except that Mr. X starts out wearing a hat, and until you shoot it off, it's always there. And once you shoot it off, it never comes back. This basically confirms that there is canonically only one tyrant in RE2.