Don't forget your MGS's, your GTA's, and your other indie/diverse genre games that we lack nowadays.
It's because it's a bit too much of a gimmick. I always feared that while Dual Screen gaming is extremely convenient (watching the Pats game, then playing a bit more of Final Fantasy during commercials sounds awesome) and can be useful (playing a football game with the plays on the controller's screen so your friend won't see) for a lot of games, but there's not enough you can do with the Wii U that makes it better than the 360 and PS3. The fact that it can be argued that ...
It's because it's a bit too much of a gimmick. I always feared that while Dual Screen gaming is extremely convenient (watching the Pats game, then playing a bit more of Final Fantasy during commercials sounds awesome) and can be useful (playing a football game with the plays on the controller's screen so your friend won't see) for a lot of games, but there's not enough you can do with the Wii U that makes it better than the 360 and PS3. The fact that it can be argued that ...
People cause violence. Many people used to play Mortal Combat with blood turned on, and the only crimes they've committed was a speeding ticket, if that counts.
Ps1 and Playstation Pocket wasn't Cross play, it was mostly a memory card that could play it's own digital games.
I would like it if Lightning was on the list.
Sorry but I had to say it.
Well, there's different types of video games. The overall goal is interactive entertainment, and some give you it with good fun gameplay like Mario, quick decision making like Tetris, and captivitating narratives like in Past Final Fantasies and Persona.
And it's funny, cause a lot of games never feel like they are worth $60, most games feel like they are worth $20 at most.
I knew Playstation 4/Omni was virtual reality!
please be for only $49.99 with GameCube BC
An analogue stick drastically makes it harder to aim and shoot quickly enough. I will give you that about fluid movement though.
They release Mario, Pokemon "rehashes" for the younger gamers/as games for those who want more fun bright games.
"There’s so many different graphics cards, processors, GPU’s, CPU’s, monitors (still no idea what one of these is) that when I look at the back of the box and peek down to the system requirements, I just say “fuck it” and take it anyway. A simplified method would be much appreciated, but I don’t think we’ll see one."
Really, you don't know what that screen that use the computer on is called? (hint hint, its called a monitor)
dumbass....
I will honestly admit, I tried it.
Keyboard and mouse give you way more control for shooters... I like how he neglected that
I think it's because the gaming industry wants more lively games like Nintendo games, not always having a generic FPS or sequel that many people would often need two buy the first games to play or serious games
So you don't like the NFL because of it's name? smh
That wasn't very funny
I don't think it;s fair for Nintendo games to be considered rehashes or kiddies. Just because they have more brighter environments and aren't all about shooting or having realistic looking shit all the time that doesn't mean it's meant for kids only. And the Mario "rehashes" are for hardcore gamers that were too young to play the older games, and hey, he's iconic as a character. The Wii still has games that appeal to older gamers, and in fact they had some of the...
I don't think Nintendo did well with the Wii U, this time.