140°

Fallout 4: 5 Things We Want to Happen

EasyGuidez: Fallout 4: 5 Things we must have in game With an establishment as enormously cherished as Fallout, it is a matter of unavoidability that before anybody has affirmed if the title will even happen, a throng of fluctuated gossipy tidbits are constantly circled conjecturing as to the specifics about the freshest Game. Desires could barely be higher.

Read Full Story >>
easyguidez.com
Physco3666d ago

yes Fallout 4 must have these killing features

Funkydesert3666d ago

They Should upgrade the vehicles

nope1113666d ago

Why does everyone want co-op? there are other games for that.

-Foxtrot3666d ago

So they can show off to their friends for like 1 week then go play another game while leaving single player lovers with a half arsed game.

Seriously the people who want this silly feature in games like Fallout/Elder Scrolls obviously don't think it through and realise what the consequences would be. This is a studio who can't even make a single player game without bugs, imagine what co-op bugs would bring....then you have the fact they would waste their time on those ones first instead of the game breaking single player ones.

Onenyte3665d ago

This post made me smile , I felt the love and you also kept it as real as possible , respect bro .

jocomat93665d ago (Edited 3665d ago )

because it will push the experience further.. . instead of having an ai companion you will have a player.. is that so bad? I love fallout and would love to play with someone with my customized character and explore the world with them. You don't need to use it. Now your gonna complain about the resources of it all now aren't you?

Hellsvacancy3666d ago

Bethesda will screw it up, they'll add multiplayer features etc, I can guarantee it

Bassmint3666d ago

Is it me or is this article poorly written? I take it whoever wrote this doesn't speak English as their first language

Edit: Ali Hussain. Yep, never mind i guess the atrocious grammer can be forgiven..

MasterD9193666d ago

Fallout is supposed to be played from an isolated perspective...you are the survivor roaming the wasteland, not with a group of your buddies- so I disagree that co-op or multiplayer would be necessary. Frankly, it hurts the experience.

I also think vehicles are unlikely as part of what makes Fallout Fallout is the fact that you are roaming the wasteland, not speeding through it in a buggy at 60 MPH. Todd Howard didn't think much of the idea when it was referenced before too, nor did he seem open to try.

I know the story will be great as they've heard the feedback from FO3 by now. I want upgraded graphics and a better-suited engine to handle the demands of a great open-world gaming experience. Bethesda has the right tools IMO, but I'm dying to see if they are on the right track to do so.

Show all comments (13)
90°

Two Decades Later, the Original Splinter Cell is Still a Masterpiece

They don't make games like this anymore.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
vgvill7d ago

Too dated in my book. The AI is way too unpredictable to be acceptable today. It's definitely a game of its time.

Jingsing7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Agreed with those sentiments. The quality of the CPU controlled characters make or break a stealth game and they are pretty poor in all the Splinter Cell games by today's standard. This is what led me to playing Spies vs Mercs all the time in later games just to get a better stealth experience from a real person. Arguably Sony are making better stealth games albeit not Tom Clancy stuff.

TheProfessional6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

You should stick with fortnite or one of the countless bloodborne style games then. What a joke.

rlow16d ago

I had a good time with the game. It is a product of its time. But when it came out it was a must have game for a lot of people. I wish Ubisoft would make another game in the series or at least a reboot.

vgvill6d ago

They are making a remake, I think. I loved the original game when it was released, but I tried to play it again in recent years and just couldn't get on with it. The same with the older Hitman games.

PrecursorOrb6d ago

Yeah chaos theory still holds up though I gotta say. If you’re a fan of the series I highly suggest you go back to that one. Ubi has said they are remaking sc for “modern audiences”. I don’t have a lot of faith for the future of that company

Chocoburger6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

Due to the lack of modern stealth games, and me constantly playing the MGS series, I've been looking for alternative stealth games to play, and went back and re-played the SC series recently. I wouldn't call SC1 or SC:PT masterpieces, there are AI issues, they're very much trial-and-error games, and that can lead to a lot of frustration. I also found the stories in this series to be boring, uninteresting, and just sloppily told. Cinematics are also of poor quality for both in-game scenes and CG cut-scenes, the soundtrack didn't leave any impression on me either.

Chaos Theory is better, but there was still a lot of room for improvement, and Double Agent (old gen ver.) was a sloppy mess that ended up a regression from CT. But still, at least they tried back then, these days Ubi-junk doesn't even try to make good games!

70°

A Matter Of Trust: What The Game Industry Should Do To Win Gamers Back

Skewed and Reviewed have written an Opinion Piece covering issues in the gaming industry, how current issues were issues years ago, and what can be done to help restore consumer trust.

anast12d ago

Nothing. It's up to the gamers to stop consuming content from companies that they don't agree with.

Garethvk12d ago

How do you know if you agree with it or not unless you play it? Which without conventions forces gamers to rely on trailers. Perhaps Demos should be made more frequently. But companies need to do better as well.

anast12d ago

Wait until release. Watch Gameplay. Exercise patience.

Garethvk12d ago

But is that not what they have now? Tons of gameplay or are you talking about watching actual gamers play it versus the trailers and streams? The big issue is that some companies pay streamers and influencers and they create content but for me; that is hardly a fair, unbiased, and factual look at a game.

1nsomniac12d ago

Get rid of the suits in the industry and job done!!

Garethvk12d ago

They usually are attached to the money sadly. It would be nice to have gamers in charge but you have so much money invested that business people are needed. Hence the issue; you need people who know business but are also gamers who know have an eye to the community. It sounds simple in theory that if you give gamers quality games that they want to play; money will be made. But that is not always so.

60°

From The Last of Us to Baldur's Gate 3: The success of the Game Music Festival

Marie Dealessandri speaks to Borislav Slavov and Gustavo Santaolalla about “the new golden age of games music”.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz