Approvals 10/3 ▼
PirateThom (1) - 4469d ago Cancel
NYC_Gamer (2) - 4470d ago Cancel
Nightshade386 (2) - 4470d ago Cancel
TheSanchezDavid (2) - 4470d ago Cancel
Emilio_Estevez (2) - 4470d ago Cancel
fluffydelusions (1) - 4470d ago Cancel
290°

Xbox Kinect was never designed for the 'hardcore' gamer

Microsoft explains the Kinect's original goal was for gamers to share their passion with their families

Read Full Story >>
gamezone.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Add/remove tag
Remove PC tag! this is an xbox360 story and has NOTHING to do with Kinect PC.
ATi_Elite4470d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4469d ago
fluffydelusions4470d ago

Well we know this know but long before it's actual release MS and their preview videos would want you to believe otherwise.

Colwyn4469d ago

xbox 360 was never designed for the casual gamers

SKUD4469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

Agree with colwyn. I've always seen it as:

Nintendo (current state): Casual. Games for kids.

XBOX: Hardcore console games. Not apologizing for it. I was ok with this.

Sony: The perfect blend of both. Always taking a chance on the unknown.

Everything is all mixed up now. There all fighting to be the same.

Mustang300C20124469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

It isn't for the core or causals or hardcore. It is simply for gamers. Time for people to let go of the labels that marketing folks made of gamers. We are all gamers. No one here can give an official defintion on what an actual casual or hardcore gamer is. Just their own opinion.

lifesanrpg4469d ago

@RedHemi300c

I disagree with you 100%. There is a difference between a "hardcore" gamer and a "casual" gamer...

I'd hardly consider someone who plays bejeweled blitz on Facebook to be in the same marketing category as someone who plays CoD religiously.

They may both play games, but they are too totally different markets. Hence the need to distinguish.

What you are referring to is when someone says "hardcore" is better than "casual".

Hufandpuf4469d ago

@that_whore

The Xbox is the mix of both, Nintendo is casual, and ps3 is hardcore. There are more casual games on Xbox than ps3. When families go out to buy a console they usually go for Nintendo or MS. when ps3 come to mind its usually metal gear solid, god of war, dark souls, and uncharted, hardly casual games.

4469d ago
Why o why4469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

RedHemi300c

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Even without that link should be able to tell there's a difference between a casual gamer that would never be on a site like this debating all things gaming to us. Core gamers also play casual games but its not their bread and butter or main gaming preference. Its almost like you cant acknowledge the difference between those who drive Subarus vs those who drive Prius's ...yeah they're all drivers but they're different just like a casual gamer from a core gamer

http://www.computerandvideo...

notice what games he refers to as 'core', notice that he differentiates between core and casual even though I personally believe that some games blur the lines

Ill throw a question out to n4g...Is Super Puzzle Fighter II core or casual....I think its core because of its complexity and learning curve even though on the surface it seems casual...Just a question.

@ gamingdroid.. Definitely.. anybody who says they haven't been a casual or dabbled in casual gaming is deluded BUT the point is people like us on n4g are definitely NOT in the same gaming category as soccer moms who couldnt tell and MMO from an M16

gamingdroid4469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

@lifesanrpg

So what would you call a gamer like me, that plays Angry Bird and Fruit Ninja on my phone?

Enjoys an occasional Mario Party or Kinect Sports, but also plays a lot of Gears of War, Mass Effect, CoD and so on.

We all aren't younger than tweenies and only play "hardcore" games. Some of us also loves to play in a social setting and others have families, that they would like to game with.

Gamer-Z4469d ago

@gamingdroid

I would say your "hardcore" you enjoy all types of games and not just the mass marketed pop games. Its funny how people on this site get insecure about their hardcoreness to the point where they have to ask Lol

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4469d ago
MariaHelFutura4469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

Uhhh. I'm pretty sure they said that Kinect would do games for the hardcore.

Pew.Pew.Pew. Comes to mind.

-ducks behind couch-

jimbobwahey4469d ago

I'll never understand why people are shocked when Microsoft lie to their customers.

smashcrashbash4469d ago

Yeah that's what they said. That is what all of Microsoft's flunkies said. Remember how many people said Child of Eden would be THE game that would attract hardcore and almost no one brought it? But now most hardcore have shown they don't give a $hit it's backpedaling and damage control time

SilentNegotiator4469d ago

Plus, they're trying to market their "hardcore" games as the "best version" because they paid* devs/pubs for exclusive voice control. As if yelling at the TV is a better solution than to clicking the right bumper for the next gun setup, or memorizing commands to yell instead of holding a button and selecting it.

*(ps2 games and older had no issue with voice control, and with no compromises (see SOCOM, which had plenty of fairly opened up levels), and the ps3 has its own simple set for implementing voice control, so don't tell me that the reason for the exclusivity is Kinect's "powerful" application chip or setup for adding voice control)

FunkMacNasty4469d ago

Yea they did say that. And what exactly did they deliver for the "hardcore" crowd.. like some silly hack n' slash that was allegedly a survival horror game (was it called "Rise of the Nightmare" or something?? I cant exaclty remember), but it got terrible reviews. Then between 20 releases of cute and cuddly Kinect Shovelware, they release that Blackwater game, which also recieved abhorrent scores.

The closest they've come to so far to a hardcore Kinect-tion (excuse the pun, i couldn't resist) was head-tracking on Forza Motorsport 4, which is unncessary and I'd doubt any serious Forza competitor uses it.

So yea.. thanks for finally telling the truth, Microsoft. I guess I won't keep my hopes up for any cool peripherals that would make a hardcore game worth playing with Kinect integration.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4469d ago
Asgaro4469d ago

Hahaha.
Did anyone seriously expect they will make hardcore games for Kinect?

I thought after the Wii, people would know better.
Guess not...

NYC_Gamer4470d ago

only an idiot expected kinect to be hardcore focused

Godmars2904470d ago

You mean like the idiots in the MS PR department who kept saying it?

That MS as a whole is giving up on the *con*cept even though their Panzer Dragoon and Steel Battalion titles aren't out yet? Not to mention getting EA to attach voice command to ME3 instead of using a headset.

YodaCracker4469d ago

Headsets don't have built-in voice recognition software like Kinect offers...

4469d ago Replies(3)
kaveti66164469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

Microsoft's PR said Kinect would have hardcore games.

Edit: And down below PamPoovey, who joined 13 days ago, is saying, "Really.....because when Kinct was revealed all you guys have been saying is that it's for the core and always was...how we all love it and how it's already aimed at us"

"All you guys were saying...."

Joined 13 days ago?

13?

Why hasn't PamPoovey been banned yet?

Hicken4468d ago

Because people visit sites before they join them. I haven't been commenting on this site for a year, but I've been using it since about October 2010. My coworkers have been visiting the site for longer and have yet to make an account.

I don't generally agree with Pam Poovey, but in this case, she's right. Far too many people were all over the Kinect bandwagon. And yet, after all this time, that view has not been vindicated.

Knightofelemia4470d ago

Microsoft really screwed up the marketing instead of just family fun they should have also incorporated the hardcore gamer as well. Support of two fields brings in more money and sells more product. The Kinnect is alright great technology but marketed poorly its not family fun that has supported the Xbox but the harcoregamer is what made the Xbox what it is today.

Mustang300C20124469d ago

Oh shut up. Kinect is used for more than games yet it has sold over 18 million and a year later we got folks like you whining about who it is for? Grow up. LMAO how you claim it is marketed poorly yet it has sold as many as it has. Tell me what is the offical definition of a hardcore gamer?

DeathAvengers4469d ago

Yeah I don't really understand why people keep saying that. It seems like nothing can be "family fun" anymore and recieves hate for little or no reason. I mean, I've noticed that people are hating on MS for marketing THEIR product the way they wanted to and probably the way that would get them the most successful results. Seems like everyone wants a product that shows off gritty, gore-crazy games. This is what gaming has been reduced to.

4469d ago
PamPoovey4470d ago (Edited 4470d ago )

Really.....because when Kinct was revealed all you guys have been saying is that it's for the core and always was...how we all love it and how it's already aimed at us

It's only recently they've admitted the truth and thats because they know they've sold enough to make a profit now....the core suckers served their purpose.

http://www.technobuffalo.co...

http://www.computerandvideo...

http://www.vg247.com/2011/0...

GribbleGrunger4469d ago

a little harsh but difficult to disagree with. have any of you seen the latest Starwars promotion? here, take a look at the future:

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

PirateThom4469d ago

"A controller... not as clumsy or random as a Kinect. An elegant input device, for a more civilized age."

LackTrue4K4469d ago

all they need to do is, replace the audio with Gilligan's Island theme song playing. That way an Xbox owner will feel no shame JUMPING OUT THE BOAT!

EVILDEAD3604469d ago

'Really.....because when Kinct was revealed all you guys have been saying is that it's for the core and always was...how we all love it and how it's already aimed at us'

LOL @ that not even being CLOSE to what happened when Kinect was revealed.

The best part is the fact that NONE of your article links come close to saying it either.

The truth is when Kinect was revealed all of the media said it would fail because they said the 360 'core' gamer wouldn't buy one and the casuals were owned by 'nintendo' who wouldn't trade in theor Wiis for a 360 and Kinect.

Fast forward and the millions and millions of Kinect owners are made up of ALL types of gamers, just like the Wii.

Kinect is a hands down success because these internet ducktales simply don't represent reality when you log off.

Some of the biggest Kinect heads I know still spend a gazillion hours on Liver working on their 4th prestige in COD.

Both Micrsoft and Sony created their niche in the motion control space.

Kinect has or will be implemented in some way into almost every hardcore game genre there is by the end of this year.

At the end of the day, those games as well as Kinect are still optional.

Evil

4463d ago
PirateThom4470d ago

http://news.softpedia.com/n...

""There are many [hardcore games] coming," he said to CVG. "This is sort of scratching the surface of what's happening, but we've got Child of Eden here today, we've got Twisted Pixel's Gunstringer... and certainly you're going to see more. We're not even a hundred days since we launched Kinect yet. It was very intentional with Kinect to go out and deliver blockbusters like Kinect Sports and Dance Central - games that resonated with a broader audience.""

http://www.g4tv.com/thefeed...

"According to Microsoft's UK marketing boss Stephen McGill, hardcore Kinect games will be shown off in 2011."

http://www.industrygamers.c...

"Kinect isn't designed to alienate the hardcore gamers who've put Xbox in the position it's in today, however. Microsoft still hopes to create games for the core gaming crowd on Kinect, Albert Penello, senior director of global marketing for Xbox 360 told IndustryGamers."

Odd statements to make previously then.

Why o why4469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

Thom...Its not nice to play with shotguns and its never fair to pont them at peoples faces...lol

Pr is just that...Pr Many fans believed the 'kinect can do core hype' but the demos the fake shows and the tech itself made the skeptics sound like haters when they were mostly just saying what they saw NOT and believing what they were told like the kinect defenders. Couple years later and the best game ive played on kinect is fruit ninja....no sign of anything core...that has been replaced by intergration which many people predicted from the bloody get go (also called haters)

Worst thing is people will STILL label people who have stated things similar to what Microsoft are now saying as haters or whatever.

Peeeep Peeeep Peeeep

PirateThom4469d ago

Everyone but the diehards prediected the "you are the controller" nonsense was never going to apply to core games. I'm not even sure what the point of the integration is for the most part but Kinect does what we all knew it would do well. Dance Central, Kinectimals, Disneyland and Seasame Street.

Panaru4469d ago

Eesh, man, straight for the jugular. Have a "well said" bubble vote.

GribbleGrunger4469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

@piratethom: but will those statements register with MS fans? you know the answer

EVILDEAD3604469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

Where did they lie in ANY statement made about hardcore games?

Article #1: Came out last March. Just like the article said Micrsoft's intention all along was to initially capture what made Nintendo a hit with games like K.Sports and Dance Central. They then talked about how 'Eden' came first with Ginslinger and more coming. The article then talks about how they gave more tools to 3rd party such as facial recognition and voice control in hopes it would lend to more creative games in the hardcore space.

Article 2: LOL @ you going back to November 2010 for that one. In the article they were talking about 2 of the Japanses hardcore games that are still coming Steel Batallion and Suda 51's 'Codename D'.

Wow Pirate Thom..you completely missed what Microsoft said in the 3rd article..let me help.

'Regarding core gaming on Kinect, he elaborated, "Core gamers will say to me, 'What is Kinect going to do for me?' Well, you probably have a girlfriend, or you have a sister, or a brother, or a niece, or a nephew, or a wife, or a mom, or an aunt who you’ve probably wanted to have experience, you know, the kind of stuff that you enjoy. And oh, by the way, we're doing some really cool stuff with dash navigation and the people who experience it really get a kick out of the sort of virtual reality/Minority Report style. And oh by the way, we just launched the thing. At no point have we ever said, 'I don’t have any interest in having core games come out on Kinect.' We wanted to come out and make a statement that said, 'We want to try and do something different than the Wii, different than wands and hands, something that’s magical, that takes away the abstraction, and I want a bunch of new types of games created.'

Again, they have been up front about Kinect from Day one.

They never needed Kinect to control shooters as the 360 controller is perfection for Shooters.

Bottomline Kinect topped the motion control experiences that Nintendo Wii had a monopoly on.

They led with a few core type experiences in it's first year, but we are now in year two and we see what's on deck.

Sports games ARE core games and Fifa, Madden, and Tiger Woods are the biggest core sports games on earth..all will use Kinect to control them this year. (See Tiger Woods impressions of Kinect after hw played for the first time)

You have Mass Effect 3, Ghost Recon, Rainbow Six etc.

Plus you have Project Draco, Steel Batallion, and Fable: The Journey.

It's all still apart of the 360 experience. The controller isn't going anywhere for core period, but when you want different experiences that you and your family can enjoy then Kinect provides that option.

If not you can simply not play or own one and whine on the internet about how no one should enjoy it because you don't.

Millions chose option 1...we know where to find who chose option 2

Evil

PirateThom4469d ago

I'm glad you're able to clear up these PR statements... even though they're completely contradictory to what Microsoft are now saying.

EVILDEAD3604469d ago

Who has to clear them up? Simply read them. Since day one they have been saying who they were targeting Kinect to. But when the hardcore question kept coming out they have always said they wanted the implementation to make sense. They have been all about game experienced geared toward what Kinect does best.

The strategy has clearly worked thus far if it didn't there would be a thousand articles exclaiming it failed.

Evil

Why o why4469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

Evil, you may feel they came good on their claims but thats if you blur the lines between core and casual games. A sports game is core but that same sports game with limited application of kinect is not. That is not core gaming on kinect as you know as well as most of us do that complex hair trigger inputs that make sports games core cannot be achieved and the proof is the fact there are no complex sports games available. Try not to take what im saying the wrong way but telling me how well kinect is doing is irrelavant here. MS and many members here on n4g were telling us kinect could do core and will produce core games...Everybody knew who kinects target audience were so mentioning that is a moot point, anybody who feels it wasnt primarily aimed at the casual market and is now accusing ms of foul play is playing dumb or truly ignorant.

"I think we know that hard-core gamers will be the first to go out and buy it, as they are with any product," Moore told CVG. "So we know we have to have a wide range of experiences, from things like [an] animals game to games that are more geared towards the core."

MS have stated (please google) that it can do core but we are still waiting. Not saying kinect isnt fun or successful im just saying it cant do core gaming by itself.

Heres an article that feels some games will address a perception some feel doesnt really exist and that is that their is a core game expectation for kinect

http://www.nowgamer.com/fea...

On paper some of those games do seem to be more on the core end than casual BUT judgements will have to be made after playing these titles. Ill also say that core is different for each person but according to greenbergs definition core games are the games like crackdown, gears, forza and any other game he states are core in the interview i posted earlier. That fable is a core game dumbed down and the closest to core gaming kinect will probably ever have is something that requires an additional input device be it pad stearing wheel or wand. Ive no personal issue with that as I predicted that well over a year ago but what i do have an issue is calling forzas kinect intergration core gaming thus saying kinect has core games when that clearly isnt the case. Can you play forza with kinect alone......exactly

EVILDEAD3604469d ago (Edited 4468d ago )

This is pure entertainment. Look this isn't rocket science we definately get where Pirate Thom and of course we know where Why o Why stands.

But, once again, Pirate Thom used 3 article links that literally showed that Microsoft has done exactly what they claimed.

Why O why will jump in multiple articles claiming that soccer moms are the ones who buy Kinect, but then NOW he's pretending that he's some avid Kinect player.

'Couple years later and the best game ive played on kinect is fruit ninja....no sign of anything core'

LMFAO @ the best game YOUVE played. You don't own or play Kinect you freely admit it why claim Fruit Ninja now because you read what ACTUAL Kinect owners say they enjoy.

Here's the bottomline, no matter how Why o Why or any of the Kinect detractors have to downplay EVERY Kinect game as dumbed down or not hardcore, but that's his opinion and he's not the audience that is interested in what Kinect has to offer.

For instance Game Informer reviewed 'The Gunstringer' and said this:

'The Gunstringer proves that Kinect can appeal to hardcore gamers looking for fast-paced action and a great story.'

The Wii mainly won last gen on the strength of Wii Sports and later Wii Fit. Now we see that Just Dance is the game that sells more Wiis than Zelda.

Right out of the gate, Kinect matched and topped all 3 of those experiences with Kinect Sports, Dance Central, and Fitness Evolved.

Sony's strategy with Move has been to market it mainly as an alternate controller with existing hardcore games.

Kinect is adapting that approach with the 'Better' motto. Kinect has now been used in core games such as Forza 4, Halo Anniversary, and Child of Eden.

Now this year it will continue with Fifa, Madden, and of course the upcoming Mass Effect 3.

Nobody is claiming that games like Fable:The Journey and Sorcery are on the level as Fable, Elder Scrolls or Final Fantasy. But what it is is a hardcore franchise built up from the ground with Kinect in mind and that's all you can ask.

If people havent figured out that Micrsofts hardcore gamers already play Gear 3, Halo Reach, Call of Duty: MW3, Black Ops, and Elder Scrolls by the millions as it is. They never need Kinect to compete with those franchises. Wghat it does is allow those gamers that want to play fun experiences with family and friends and have an alternate in the mutli-media space as well..they have an option.

And like I've said millions have chosen that option in only a year and a few months since launch.

Evil

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4469d ago
Oner4469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

PirateThom with the undisputed facts & links (though it's clear there are those who will try no matter what)...

But is anyone else <reading or hearing> a sheep's "Baaaah...Baaaah..." when it comes to some of the statements/excuses being said in some of these comments?

Or is it just me? LoL! >_<

Anyway, great post Thom!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4469d ago
Show all comments (80)
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community702d ago
300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community825d ago
Knightofelemia825d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog825d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry916825d ago (Edited 825d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

825d ago
CrimsonWing69825d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming824d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer79824d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember824d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog825d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop825d ago (Edited 825d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog825d ago (Edited 825d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop824d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic824d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop824d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic823d ago (Edited 823d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 823d ago
Aloymetal824d ago (Edited 824d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic824d ago (Edited 824d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf10825d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar825d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf10825d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell825d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf10824d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv72824d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming825d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog824d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming824d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming825d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)
120°

Pivotal Decisions in Gaming History - Xbox Goes All-In on Kinect

Xbox 360's Kinect had flopped yet Microsoft insisted on mandatory Kinect for Xbox One, driving the price up and alienating their potential customers.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1001d ago
darthv721001d ago

the tech was pretty damn good but their focus on making it the centerpiece was not. Had they opted to keep it as a secondary or even tertiary device, it may have found new use for AR/VR.

PrimeVinister1001d ago

Maybe. But they were two early for VR and too late for motion control

1001d ago Replies(2)
Godmars2901001d ago

Their focus was marketing metrics. Information gathering for targeted advertising. Also "event curating" or head counting for special TV events. If MS had had their way with always online and mandatory Kinect pre COVID, as and during it they'd likely be turning into dominant presence in many Western homes. Be getting subsidized by Disney and other streamers as well as the NFL.

Thing was, Kinect as an actual game system, its games, just weren't ready. MS moved on it too soon. Thankfully.

Atticus_finch1001d ago

Sorry but it was incredibly bad for gaming. The thing barely worked as intended and the games were broken shovelware. And let's not forget all the lies from Xbox to try and sell it. What happened to Milo?
It's like Xbox it's a perpetual lying machine.

PrimeVinister1001d ago

I had almost forgotten about Milo. It looks so unbelievable in retrospect. How did anyone believe it?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1001d ago
TheEnigma3131001d ago

Kinect requirement, TV focused, DRM, and $100 buried Xbone before it even stared.

PrimeVinister1001d ago (Edited 1001d ago )

I think Kinect was the worst of the bunch. They reversed DRM overnight and try to play down the TV stuff when they realised it made them look disinterested in gaming.

Kinect stuck around for six months, preventing sales and making more and more people upset when they dropped the Kinect and the price.

Atticus_finch1001d ago

Don't forget the inferior hardware which affects their game development to this day.
And the constant boasting and lying that hasn't change very much to this day.

kayoss1001d ago

I was kind of excited for the kinect. It had potential. That was until i tried it at one of their Microsoft store. The thing was so laggy and worker who was there, had no clue what he was doing. It kind of made rethink about buying an Xbox One with Kinect.

PrimeVinister1001d ago

I had already been turned off of the idea by Kinect for 360. Even when it worked, the games were bad and showed no potential.

Wii made you understand what they were going to do with it within about 10 seconds of Wii Sports. It went on to become a bit of a joke but at least it worked and had a purpose.

Thundercat771001d ago

The damage to the Xbox brand was so hard that til this day they are just the last place brand in the market.

PrimeVinister1001d ago

Totally. They haven't been really all that relevant since.

Godmars2901001d ago

That has to do with repeatedly failing, having to reaffirm only to again fail at creating a competent flow of decent games.

@PrimeVinister:
Until Game Pass and BC are mentioned. Only for the point to be missed.

kayoss1001d ago

thats because they dont know what they want to be. A gaming console, Television, or a gaming service?

Godmars2901001d ago

@kayoss:
They wanted, expected, to be Steam. To have everyone coming to them and paying for the privilege. That's the exact mentality on display when they tried to push always online.

brewin1001d ago

Its sad because the Xbox one version of Kinect was actually pretty solid. Not for motion games, I couldnt care less about those, but for the other features that are now commonplace in the gaming ecosystem. Things like voice control and optional motion features in games. Stuff that Sony did with the PS camera was pretty sweet and they could have done some of that stuff with Kinect.

The tech was pretty sweet when implemented right though. Who remembers the implementation in Dead Rising 3?! You could lure zombies away by saying stuff into the kinect, it was a bit hokey at first, but it actually enhanced the game significantly once you learned all the different voice commands. There was and still is nothing else like that!

The focus on TV seemed to be an issue for people, but the TV pass through had some real potential. They could have had cable companies giving the XBone out instead of cable boxes! I understood what they were trying to do, but they needed to show the games too, and thats where they lost the core gamers. Being able to jump right to a sports event or TV show with out leaving the console was actually a pretty cool thing. I spent many nights switching between NHL games or TV shows and jumping right back into my games seamlessly, just by telling Kinect to do so. It was better than people care to admit, but I loved it!

People say XBone had no games, but on launch I got Dead Rising 3, AC Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Killer Instinct, Battlefield 4, Forza 5, and Ryse. That was actually a pretty solid lineup in hindsight! Then later on it got gems like Quantum Break, Dead Rising 4, Sunset Overdrive, Gears 4 and 5, the Ori games, Rare Replay, Forza Horizon 3/4, State of Decay 2, ReCore (SUPER UNDERRATED GEM), Halo 5, Halo Wars 2, and all the great 3rd party stuff as well! I dare anyone who sat on the Xbox One to go back and give it a shot now.

It was actually a pretty great console all things considered. Yes the PS4 had better 1st party stuff, stuff that MS just couldnt top or even compete with, but there are some really great games that a lot of people missed out on that they would probably really enjoy if they actually played them. Thats why I recommend a Series S and Gamepass to a lot of people, as its a great way to get an awesome lineup pf games for super cheap!

Show all comments (22)