Everyone makes mistakes. That's why people have erasers, whiteout, the backspace button, etc. So where were these super handy tools when the New York Times published an article today detailing a guide for "Some Essential Hardware?"
Today in the Technology section of the New York Times several gross mistakes were made in the area of videogames hardware. Despite clearing the Nintendo Wii hurdle without a scratch and giving it a pretty decent description, where the article really falls to pieces is its account of Sony's PlayStation 3 and the Xbox 360.
"Those who have spent the day trading carbon credits have another opportunity to save the planet, this time from aliens in Halo 3, the third edition of the Xbox 360 game. The PlayStation 3 game Gran Turismo 5, a hyper-realistic, high-speed journey, is one of the best sellers for that Sony console, which starts at $299. Microsoft's Xbox starts at $280. Both are built around the multicore Cell processor, which allows numerous tasks to be done simultaneously."
Did you find them?
1. Gran Turismo 5 is "one of the best sellers" for the PS3. Oh really? That's pretty impressive since the game isn't even out yet.
2. The PS3 costs $299. Nope. No it does not. Lowest price is actually $399, but go ahead and keep the hope alive.
3. Both the Xbox 360 and the PS3 are "built around the multicore Cell processor." Sorry, they are actually quite different, particularly in that whole Cell processor area.
Interview with Stephen Russell, Actor for (Nick Valentine, Codsworth, My Handy) in Fallout 4 which is a vast open world role playing game set in the apocalyptic wastes of Boston, the Commonwealth. The career goes further with other Bethesda games from Starfield to Prey to The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim.
This looks like a great way to play.
Rocksmith+, the award winning music-learning app that teaches you guitar and piano with thousands of hit songs, is coming to PlayStation and Steam on June 6, and is available to wishlist now on both platforms.
A look back at 4A Games' admirably consistent post-apocalyptic shooter franchise.
that's funny....(:D)
"Big" isn't big enough to describe how big NYTimes has effed up.
lol, and this is the new york times. thats kinda sad.
this is wat happens when the silly little media try to get in on our gaming like when they showed off killzone 2 as halo 3. Its like a new fad for the media to report on games things like this are bound to happen.
No more USA today game reviews we dnt need em. i honestly dnt believe the reviewer even plays the game.
and they say those who read the paper are smart. if they're informed by the uninformed, what does that really make them?