110°

Online Connection Required: A Non-PC Gamer's Guide to Understanding the Rage

GP Editor, Marshall Henderson writes, "When I heard about Diablo III's need for a persistent connection, I was annoyed. I mean, this wasn't undiscovered territory, as Ubisoft had been pulling shenanigans like this for a while, but this was the first time it affected anything I actually wanted to play anyway.

Most PC gamers responded similarly: Lots of profanity, claiming the games were developed by Satan, and swearing to the skies and the seas that nothing in the world could persuade me to buy this game. For non-PC gamers, though, there was a somewhat different response. Instead of outrage, it seemed to be more in the, 'What's it matter?' family."

Read Full Story >>
gamepodunk.com
ATi_Elite5076d ago (Edited 5076d ago )

Get over it!! actually it's no big deal in this day and age.

0. Never take advice from a non PC Gamer!

1. If your a PC Gamer with a $1000 PC and you do not have the Internet well my friend your priorities are in the wrong place. Get The Internet by any means necessary.

2. Only cry about Online connection DRM if the game is solely a SP experience which now a days 99% of all QUALITY PC titles (dam them console ports) have a well made MP part to them.

3. I can't see too many people playing Diablo 3 without taking part in the wonderful MP experience it has to offer.

4. Your a PC Gamer which means your $1000 rig is online and downloading something 24/7/365 anyway.

5. For laptop PC Gamers, unless you live on Mars, scratch that cause Mars has Internet too, unless you live on Neptune then Cellular Broadband or WiFi is available.

6. My personal favorite to stop the madness....we all know a Crack will be available. I haven't seen a DRM yet that wasn't bypassed.

So take it from a real PC gamer this is really no big deal to most of us unless a drunk driver hits a pole but then you have no electricity anyway and that SLi of CFx set-up is gonna suck your UPS dry in in 2 minutes unless your second parallel connection piggy backs Wirelessly off of a companies hardened T1 line and use an Optima battery like me....you can cut my electricity and cut my Internet but I'm still gaming online for about 8 hours (or until said companies IT guy figures it out).

That's real PC Gamer shite right there! Enjoy!

MHenderson5076d ago

Hm... Well, there are a lot of different types of gamers who want a lot of different types of things when they play games. Also, there are a lot of circumstances where you could want to play your game (i.e. you just moved and your cable person hasn't shown up, you want to take your laptop to a friend's house who doesn't have wifi, etc.). Aside from that, internet connections vary from place to place, so a lot of people may not have a guaranteed connection all the time. I don't want to imply that you didn't read the article, but the main point isn't even about whether you'll be online all the time or not, it's about the consequences of having to have that connection.

Either way, thanks for commenting anyway. :D

Redempteur5076d ago

is this sarcasm ???

If not you're in the wrong ..

The rage consist in the way that you can't play even "on the go" or if you have connexion issues . last time the only game with that problem were MMOs and that was understandable due to their natures as permanent universes. IN diablo 3 case , the problem is that their architecture ( to fight cheating and piracy ) is client -server based and you can't play if you can't get your character from Bliz servers .

Nothing about your 1000$ pc you're talking about .. ..nor crack since your character isn't on your computer ..this isn't the shoddy work of ubisoft DRM

ATi_Elite5076d ago (Edited 5076d ago )

Bottom line for the Nay sayers and those who have no clue.......

Just read point number 6. Every game has been Cracked! so whatever corny scenarios you clowns dream up there is a way to still play your games. Blizzard, Steam, Ubisoft, hell I can even run OSX on my PC and play the Mac version of Steam games and PC versions so there are ways around everything.

But if you wanna Cry, whine, and troll for whatever reason then go ahead and be a corporate whipping boy but for me i can play every game i ever bought on or offline just fine and if i wanna play Diablo 3 OFFLINE i'm sure there will be a way to do that too.

It only takes a little brains....but then again that's the problem with some of you as your totally unable to think outside the box and are better off just playing on consoles!!!!!

Please donate your PC's to someone else and go buy a console!!!

Redempteur5075d ago (Edited 5075d ago )

this isn't about a crack Since your character And progress ISN'T on your computer ..

Have fun with your game were ou can't save nor can't trade . AND NO ths isn't like the offline version of Starcraft 2 . Totally different system

BeastlyRig5076d ago

I don't think most game are like this. Mostly Ubisoft games I think.

MHenderson5076d ago

Yeah, mostly Ubisoft does this. Diablo III also has this, so hopefully it doesn't spread any more than that.

GamePodunk5076d ago

StarCraft II had always-online DRM as well.

Technically there was an option to play it offline, but ironically you had to be online to turn that option on.

ATi_Elite5076d ago

There is a way to play SC2 offline without ever being online.

also people play pirated versions of WoW and SC2 online all day long. I do not condone this behavior but all DRM can be bypassed.

I personally crack every game i buy cause i play on private servers anyway plus i pay for the game and not your crappy DRM!

some PC Gamers need to grow up! if they can't bypass DRM then go back to playing on consoles!

tdrules5076d ago

To the people crying about always online for Diablo III opt out of the beta k thx

blackhammer5076d ago (Edited 5076d ago )

There is still no reason to not give players options to make Single-player ONLY options (when it comes to Diablo III)

And Ubisoft... one could barf a little in their mouth speaking that name.

madjedi5075d ago (Edited 5075d ago )

How lovely the my internet is always stable, never goes down so your overacting over nothing narrow minded viewpoint.

Well geniuses not everyone else in the world has constant internet connection on every device, why don't you idiots save the attitude till 10-20 yrs from now when internet access is cheap blazingly, fast and always rock solid.

Not every lives in a surburb or metropolitan area, or has the spare finances to pay monthly cable bill, plus they paid their $60 if they want to play in offline mode why would it bother you so much.

If your going to get it regardless fine, but don't be an ass to people who this does present a problem to.

90-99% of my diablo 1&2 time was offline, never saw the thrill of joining some random idiots game just to walk into a portal surrounded by mobs several lvls above what i can kill. Or to get attacked and die because the host wants to pvp, when i want to kill mobs.

60°

Report: Inside Ubisoft's Project Renaissance, a Cancelled Minecraft-Like Voxel Game

In recent years, Ubisoft has canceled several games, one of them being a project code-named Renaissance.

200°

FTC drops case against Microsoft’s Activision Blizzard deal

The FTC has officially dropped its case against Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
slate9138d ago

The sweet smell of tax dollars burning

Killa7838d ago

From the unemployment this deal caused, no doubt.

Obscure_Observer38d ago

"The sweet smell of tax dollars burning"

They never stood a chance. It was a lost cause from the start. And yet, still, they´d decided to go ahead and double down on their bs to bleed the taxpayer even more.

dveio38d ago

The IRS demands 29bn USD in not paid taxes from Microsoft.

If we're talking bleeding.

1Victor38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

@slate: “ The sweet smell of tax dollars burning “

The smell of political donations endorsements under the table.
There I fixed it it for you
We all knew Microsoft plan of “10 years of all systems publishing “ and some of its supporters happy that after all the games would be “exclusive to Xbox “ now that things have changed and Microsoft got humbled by the lost of money from CoD going down from OVER A BILLI🤑N to
MILLI😩NS the sales failing of games that would released on PlayStation and be forced by INVESTORS asking for their M🤑NEY to grow faster than the next 10 years it is obvious that it would be a waste of money to continue this litigation.
Edit:@obscured: “ They never stood a chance. It was a lost cause from the start “

Same as your grievance stages.
Have you passed the bargaining stage yet ? Or are you still on the anger stage 🤣

slate9138d ago

I knew my singe bipartisan sentence would bring out the crazies. Thanks for the wall

Astrokis38d ago

Not sure if I’m disturbed or entertained but either way I hope you are alright

OtterX38d ago

I think they're convinced now that MS won't (and can't) withhold releases from conpeting platforms. MS on the street corner now like, "Who wants a taste?!"

PhillyDonJawn38d ago

I wont be too sure of that. Gotta wait and see till after these deals expire

OtterX38d ago

That's how it always starts, "I'll just work this street corner for a short while until I get caught up on my bills..."

Tacoboto38d ago

Oh yeah, they're totally gonna make Xbox exclusives again, with the hardware they're totally committed to selling and making available lol

raWfodog38d ago

As far as I'm aware, the only 'deal' that was discussed was for Call of Duty. Xbox had no obligation to make any of their other games multiplatform. They did that of their own accord.

OtterX37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

**btw, I'm talking about street food vendors, just in case there's any confusion!

https://external-content.du...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 37d ago
Lightning7738d ago (Edited 38d ago )

I've seen videos and talk a online speculating MS long game. Some think that MS multiplat move is use to appease the FTC so they can buy more and is somehow a move that could get Sony to open up their platform. In other words them going third party and letting their games go everywhere. MS possible scheme and ulterior motives, speculated by Jeff Grubb is that putting Xbox store on PS via regulation Which would hurt PS buissness very badly because that 30% cut would be even less or not a cut at all. MS buys more because they're "playing nice" by opening up its platform to Epic store and steam which would force Apple and Sony to open up their ecosystem to other stores like MS.

If that's the case that'll mean as I said before, PS fans buying Cod on PS via MS store would give 100% maybe even 90% of the money being pocketed by MS while Sony's store front wanes when it comes to third party because guess what? MS is buying more third party and preying off the extreme ignorance of the FTC. Manipulation of the FTC and MS overtaking the PS store and customers

My thing is this. I know it's a opinion and speculation but why does Sony have to open up its store or force them to go multiplat? If they still believe in selling their freakin console then let them do it. If they want to provide the best games and the best content for its fans then let them do it!? Why because the competition is trash at selling games and consoles for 14 years now Sony has to change? MS using the ignorance of the FTC to overtake gaming as we know it?

Again it's just talk and opinion but man this seems very, very possible imo.

dveio38d ago

Well, at the time, I actually did think the FTC and CMA did a poor job in court. But also the judge.

Having said that - it is what it is.

If 75bn mergers in any industry ain't a threshold to deny them, then I don't know what is.

As far as your thoughts about other 3rd parties getting taken over in the future go:

I think publisher buyouts are off the list now. I think it would be reeeeally difficult for MS to win another trial try taking over any other publisher.

But smaller studios ... maybe.

However, right now I can't see studios out there advocating for a buyout from Microsoft.

That isn't to say an announcement of such couldn't drop on Monday already. Because we today know that Microsoft had approached a plethora of other studios in 2018 to 2021, such as IOI, CD Project, etc.

We'll see. And we can't do anything about it. It's up to trade commissions and then probably courts to decide.

Lightning7738d ago (Edited 38d ago )

"I think publisher buyouts are off the list now. I think it would be reeeeally difficult for MS to win another trial try taking over any other publisher."

That's the thing MS is ticking all the boxes by not have anything be exclusive so the CMA/FTC see that they're doing "fair practice" in games and content distribution. Which technically greenlits more aquisions or it makes it easier for acquisitions because MS is a mega publisher now.

"However, right now I can't see studios out there advocating for a buyout from Microsoft."

Hopefully not but them going multiplat could entice Studios to join MS because nothing is not longer exclusive which means more money for them, studio and teams.

We can't do nothing about it but Sony can. They can block xbox games on their console (lose that 30% cut) but Sony won't do that because that's money that will be lost and Sony runs a buissness. That's the only way to hurt or slow down Xbox.

I'm probably over thinking it as I do these things but it's something we shouldn't just ignore and be weary of MS motives here. I'm keeping an eye on them.

Rancegamerx38d ago

The idea that Microsoft is manipulating the FTC and forcing Sony to open its platform is silly and has no evidence to back it up. Microsoft’s multiplatform approach is 100% due to past failures and its laughable position in the gaming industry. Their best attempt was a fluke and a lie, brought on by Sony’s missteps and a poorly made machine that broke down too often.

Sony would never allow themselves to be "forced" to do anything; they control their platform and storefront perfectly fine without the need or desire to add an unnecessary Microsoft storefront. Even if, by some flaw on Sony’s part, Microsoft were able to introduce its store on PlayStation, Sony would adapt rather than collapse. Digital storefront competition already exists (Steam, Epic Games Store, Xbox Store), and PlayStation’s business won’t suddenly "wane."

Also, regulators like the FTC don’t operate on ignorance—they actively assess market behavior to prevent monopolies. Microsoft isn’t secretly overtaking gaming with some ultimate scheme. The industry might be changing or shifting (for the worse, in my opinion), but Sony will continue evolving based on market trends, not because of alleged schemes.

Gaming isn’t about one company "playing nice" or another being "forced" to change—it’s about making money with games, something Microsoft has yet to achieve in 25+ years.

Lightning7738d ago

"The idea that Microsoft is manipulating the FTC and forcing Sony to open its platform is silly and has no evidence to back it up."

That's why I said it was all speculation that's what Jeff Grubb opinion. I made that clear several times. You know what's funny? When Jim was in court ppl got mad at the FTC for protecting Jim Ryan instead of the consumer. Maybe he was right to worry about his business. Now look Releasing Xbox games on PS keeps MS studio an a float. Now Xbox games are all over PS now. Maybe Jim was onto something.

MS is still competing with Sony just in a very different way. The FTC back down mainly means they can buy more and MS next steps can proceed. We'll have to see what happens in the future but I wouldn't be so sure on your stance.

InUrFoxHole38d ago

@Lightning77
MS putting games everywhere is the most consumer friendly thing I've seen a game company do.

dveio38d ago

@InUrFox

What does "putting everywhere" actually mean?

This book has so many pages.

• Xbox was dying in revenue
• Regulators put a 10 year deal on CoD
• Microsoft had to give away the streaming
• Spencer himself only offered 3 yrs initially

And most importantly

• Again, Xbox was dying in revenue

Xbox have the benefit of their actual financial situation giving regulators and courts the impression they release games everywhere, what they actually do.

But for reasons they can't be proven guilty of anything in court.

I'm not judging, it's just what it is.

IF the Series generation would have developed differently and was much more successful, I don't hesitate any second to believe in what Spencer had originally planned to do:

• Make everything Xbox exclusive
• We today know that Spencer had also approached Sega, From Software, CD Project, Nintendo, and even Valve was on their list of buyouts.

MS are playing a card here everyone knows why they are doing it.

Putting Doom "everywhere", which even was it already before it got bought, ain't a MS thing.

It would had hurt them in many ways if they'd put it exclusively to Xbox.

But, no matter what - it is what it is.

Xbox bought themselves back into the game. And I think many people just don't have very fond feelings towards this behaviour, wether on corporate nor private levels.

Let's see how they'll run with it.

In 2030, but most importantly after regulations will have expired we will learn better.

Reaper22_38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Seemed like a lost cause anyway. Microsoft gambled and it paid off big time. That's what you call a big boss move. Sony played a huge part in the success of that acquisition.

wesnytsfs38d ago

Bout time. Pointless from the start.

Show all comments (26)
100°

16 Ubisoft Titles Can Now Be Purchased on The Xbox PC Store

In a very intriguing and interesting move, 16 Ubisoft titles can now be purchased on the Xbox PC Store. Of course, this is a first as Ubisoft PC titles have never been purchasable on the Xbox PC Store previously.

Read Full Story >>
clouddosage.com
jznrpg46d ago

Servers are going to be bogged down by that 1 guy who will use this.

SimpleDad46d ago

Ahhh, the good old... Xbox PC store?
Who tf uses that?

Tacoboto45d ago

Kind of weird without them being updated to Xbox Play Anywhere purchases

MrDead45d ago

I uninstalled it as I was sick of the ads popping up on my login screen.