Approvals 6/3 ▼
Mr Microsoft (2) - 4819d ago Cancel
maskedwarrior (3) - 4819d ago Cancel
kratosgdz (1) - 4819d ago Cancel
100°

SCEA Cutting PSP Go Price To $149.99

A week after discounting its older PSP-3000 models to $129.99, Sony has cut the MSRP for its UMD-less, digital download-focused PSP Go by $50 to $149.99 in North America.

Though major retailers haven't yet updated their listings to reflect the new price, Sony Computer Entertainment America has updated its official PSP site to read, "Now you can enjoy the sleek, totally-digital PSP Go system for $149.99 MSRP and the unsurpassed PSP-3000 system for $129.99 MSRP."

Read Full Story >>
gamasutra.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4819d ago
BoNeSaW234819d ago (Edited 4819d ago )

Dear Sony,
Why are trying to sell Chili in Arizona in July?
Oh, nobody is buying the GO? So you think it's the price that is the problem? Really? (wink) Good Luck!

Neo Nugget4819d ago

Games like Kingdom Hearts aren't even on it.....

<----has a go.

BoNeSaW234819d ago (Edited 4819d ago )

With the NGP on the Horizon the GO is DEAD.
Why would they support a system that couldn't even scratch at the DS or even make a PSP consumer<---ME, lift a eyebrow at it? HUGE mistake on SONY'S part in wasting time and resources in development and advertising when they could have used those resources to elevate their Poratable market into the Next-Gen future product with the NGP?

EDIT: I love the PSP but the GO was a mistake.

Close_Second4819d ago

I prefer the Go its just Sony did not support it on PSN.

Why should I support the NGP? Sony did nothing to support me with the Go.

Shang-Long4819d ago

i want the go. just to play ps1 classics

JoySticksFTW4819d ago (Edited 4819d ago )

One of it's biggest drawbacks was no way to transfer your old UMD titles to the GO.

Sony actually wanted you to rebuy the download version.

It's their call, but you see Blu-ray movies giving you digital version in the same package. Also now what Portal 2 may be doing with adding multiple versions of the game, maybe Sony shouldn't have been so short-sighted.

And this is from someone who buys HD remakes of games. But those give you something different.

If I already own the UMD, I don't want to rebuy essentially same game.

They really should have allowed for free downloads of the titles you own on disk. Or at least heavily discounted.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4819d ago
BoNeSaW234819d ago

HAHAHA! No. GO was DOA. Time for the bargin bin!

Rynx4819d ago

*sigh

You are seriously delusional, retarded or under 16. Hell maybe even all of the above.

Of course you didn't you realize that the PSPGo wasn't selling at a loss. So no matter how much they sold, it was all profit. It's so basic to know this that you have to be one of the three or more things that I mentioned you are, to not know this.

The PSPGo was not new tech, UMD less and smaller, production cost could only have been considerably less (or maybe equal to the 3000). The price point was solely to make profit and they did, doesn't matter whether they sold millions or only a few hundred thousand. It was just another iteration, it's not like they marketed as a entirely different system.

The price was indeed the only issue with the PSPGo because, I say this again, it was NOT new tech. So the masses didn't bite to the price, WHO CARES! Sony did not loose anything out of it.

Go to college, learn something kid!

maruyuki4819d ago

actually the price was the only thing that was the problem

no one was going to buy a 250 system when the 3000 was 150

now that its a 20 dollars difference the 3000 wont even sell anymore

Neo Nugget4819d ago

No, it needs better support from Sony. They can't just sit back with big games like Birth by Sleep not make an appearance on one version of their system.

dragunrising4819d ago

@ Neo Nugget- ditto on that one. I sold my PSP Go because many games never showed up on PSN or were delayed.

The price drop is definitely a good thing. I would buy another...I have a hoard of minis, psone, and psp games, however I'm going to wait till NGP comes out and save for that.

FantasyStar4819d ago

Remember when Sony debuted the PSP Go at $250?

Yeah, I laughed a bit too.

kasasensei4819d ago

"Here, take this price cut for this console we're not supporting anymore."
That's a shame. psp go users were fooled since the beginning....

Raven_Nomad4819d ago

They couldn't give me one of those Epic Fails.

Show all comments (17)
100°

Former Dragon Age lead writer David Gaider pours scorn on EA's AI dreams.

"They want you to believe the devs under them are super stoked to work generative AI into their processes," continued Gaider, "but I assure you what they took as excitement was really a veiled wail of despair not unlike the time that team was informed of their new 'really cool' live service mandate.".

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 23h ago
LordoftheCritics2d ago

Publishers see gaming as another stock market.

isarai2d ago

I think anyone with some common sense knew this, im glad i don't support their games anymore, what a sh!t company.

Psychonaut851d 17h ago

Friends don’t let friends buy EA or Ubisoft.

Chocoburger1d 16h ago

I said this yesterday. AI isn't what we want when it comes to crafting artistry. Alas, these soulless corporate morons don't care about their work, only about cutting corners as much as possible.

120°

Phil Spencer and the Battle for Xbox’s Soul

Has the rapid growth of Xbox made the ship too heavy? Following the closures of Tango Gameworks, Arkane Austin, and Roundhouse, we explore what the future of Xbox could look like.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2d ago
LG_Fox_Brazil2d ago

This ship was never meant to sail, this ship was made from the get go to sink as fast as possible. It almost feels that they want to lower the standards of quality in the industry so that they can fit in

rlow11d 20h ago

I disagree, Xbox from the get go innovated and changed the industry. They did a lot of firsts and standardized a lot of others. It wasn’t till the beginning of the Xbox1 era that things started to go south.

Stevonidas1d 15h ago

Yep, although I’d argue it started going to shit when they tried to hock Kinect on their audience instead of continuing to invest in their studios and IPs. 2001-2010 Xbox was peak gaming, though.

rlow11d 14h ago

@Stevonidas
I agree they never should have focused on it after the 360 era. But you do have to remember they were faked out by the huge volumes of Kinects sold. To quote info on Wikipedia, “Project Natal, It was first released on November 4, 2010, and would go on to sell eight million units in its first 60 days of availability.” So if your Xbox and see these huge sales on a peripheral where are you going to put some money? Criticism in hindsight is worthless…..if only we could all see our future. In other wards they had no way of knowing. Plus they had engagement numbers and a lot of signs pointed to people wanting it.

Their biggest mistake wasn’t the Kinect, but unlike Sony after the PS3 debacle. They didn’t double on down on exclusive good games. The other huge mistake was letting Call of Duty go to Sony.

Hedstrom1d 23h ago

Phil wants Xbox to be as soulless as him!

Tacoboto1d 22h ago (Edited 1d 22h ago )

Xbox has no soul and Phil has no confidence, and it's impossible to say either do when they killed Tango and Arkane Austin.

Everything they've said since has only made them look worse to a point that they're actually less competent than Embracer.

Markdn1d 22h ago (Edited 1d 22h ago )

Whe you release something like the series S and expect it not to hurt your business model, and developers have to have parity with games. Then you know Microsoft don't care. Series s is the final nail that broke developers,

Show all comments (12)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2d ago
XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow3d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1822d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie1d 22h ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow1d 21h ago (Edited 1d 21h ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

1d 17h ago
Hereandthere1d 13h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 13h ago
Notellin1d 18h ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

1d 17h ago
Hereandthere1d 13h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow23h ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere1d 13h ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow23h ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX2d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney18h ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno2d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno2d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

1d 16h ago
fsfsxii1d 18h ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno1d 17h ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)