390°

Microsoft proves Kinect doubters wrong

Jack Turner at Which? Convo: Microsoft’s foray into motion-controlled gaming has not only come with a huge marketing spend, it’s had its fair share of doubters. Kinect may not fit hardcore gamers, but it’s certainly cornered Nintendo’s casual crowd.

Read Full Story >>
conversation.which.co.uk
ubiquitious4921d ago

It's selling well and it is getting amazing reviews

Doubters=pwned

Cevapi884921d ago

id like to see these "amazing" reviews as you put them...seems that a lot of bias is coming from your statement

GeoramA4921d ago (Edited 4921d ago )

You're delusional.

Seek help immediately.

Odin7774921d ago

Maybe it "pwned" the people who doubted it on a financial standpoint. But for people like me who doubted it as a gaming device I don't think I've been pwned by any stretch of the imagination.

Jaces4921d ago (Edited 4921d ago )

I was proved wrong on how well it would work in homes, I believed it wouldn't work and from most reviews I've read it seems to do just fine. The only problem is the amount of space you need which I don't have so I'll be waiting awhile before I pick one up.

But only if they come out with some games for the hardcore audience, otherwise this will be just another wii to me.

EDIT: lol, Kinect fanboys run rampant I see. Sorry if my opinion offends you...wait, nevermind I enjoy the disagrees. Shows you how simple minded fanboys are. :)

nycredude4921d ago

ubiquitous

Care to explain? I don't see how MS proved anything that we didn't know. Not one person said it wouldn't sell. With an ad budget of $500,000,000, you can market pubic hair and it would sell.

Fact is it won't appeal core gamers and is geared towards casual, which is what the doubters said, so they are proving us right.

4Sh0w4921d ago (Edited 4921d ago )

The software definitely proved it works for me, I was actually really impressed. I'm going to let anybody at work who's skeptical come over and try it for themselves, I garuantee 9 out 10 will like it.

@Jaces, its only 6ft, 8ft for two and honestly its not alot, it only makes sense really. In my experience with kinect the workable playing area extends from about 1.5 ft close to the sensor all the way back to 6ft, I mean any less and how would you be able to physically perform the manuevers for gameplay with less space than that?

Jaces4921d ago

No seriously, my living room is tiny. Like the couch is up against the wall and it's about 6ft from the edge of the couch to my t.v.

I'd literally have to be rubbing up against the couch or have to move it completely just to play, not worth the effort really. Either way I still plan on waiting to buy Kinect until some games are shown that will draw my interest.

BulletToothtony4921d ago

problem with those reviews is that they were sent FOR FREE to these website.. they're just considering the "fun" part.. not the price that you have to pay..

if they would've had gone and pay for it themselves i don't think they would be willing to overlook the flaws that fast.. i now that after i realize the lag and short time amount of fun it provides i would return it..

do you think that these reviewers are playing kinect as we speak.. they played it wrote the review after having an hour of fun and bam.. back to the box.. that is why this camera should be a 4 out of 10 not 9 out of 10

Active Reload4920d ago

What retard actually thought it wouldn't sell better than...

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4920d ago
ubiquitious4921d ago

Globe and Mail
CBC
ABC
USA Today
CNET
IGN
Strategy Informer
CVG
GameInformer

All glowing reviews. The media have spoken. KINECT is a success. Now the only thing is whether or not the consumers will buy into it.

trane074921d ago

Do you see where the problem lies?? Out of all those sites you listed. the MAJORITY are non-gaming websites. Those are news outlets.

Whereas the "less than glowing" and average reviews are coming from the websites and magazines who acutally review games for a living.

Every perfect 10/10 review so far has come from a non-gaming website. What does that tell you?

10thnightvolley4921d ago

and for that fact is why it will sell casuals DONT go on gaming site those sites have a much higher reach and hit compared the gaming sites.. and those will sell it. easily..

Anon19744921d ago (Edited 4921d ago )

Apparently your definition of "glowing" reviews and mine differ greatly.

The CBC said "Kinect doesn’t handle precise controls very well," and concluded that Move was a more satisfying experience.

Globe and Mail said "The lag I experienced makes me doubt whether Kinect can be satisfyingly implemented in what one might call a “traditional” games"

IGN gave Kinect a 7, giving them extra points for "potential" but noting that lag was ever present and it was a questionable value at $150.

GameInformer noted that some games "perform sloppily, making you feel like you have no control over the onscreen action."

CNet gave it a 7, saying that Kinect "requires a lot of room to play" and "gets old fast"

CVG started off their "glowing review" with "Kinect is not for you if..."

And on and on. I consider "glowing reviews" nines and tens - not sixes and sevens like Kinect has been seeing from a lot of the gaming press.

As for this article, "Microsoft proves Kinect doubters wrong", they did nothing of the sort. Lag is present. Dark skin isn't recognized. Space requirements are restrictive. Price is high for an accessory. Games are too casual. Kinect isn't accurate enough.

These are all the points that "doubters" were concerned about. The launch of Kinect has done nothing but prove these concerns were valid.

finbars754921d ago (Edited 4921d ago )

Glowing reviews??not sure what good reviews are to you but Maybe if MS spent more money on making kinnect work at 100% rather then 70% then maybe the reviews would be glowing but spending millions on adverts doesnt really help the fact that kinnect is a failure tech wise.Maybe in a couple of years they will get it right like nintendo did but for now its meant for casual gammers because they dont really know much about techs for videogames now a days thats why so many people buy things that ride hype trains.The more commercials that are shown the more people are sucked in by the media.I doint feel that Fanboys are in here to bash Kinnect there just in here to voice there opinion on technology that doesnt work when sony move does actually work 1:1 the way it says it does.The downside to move is there isnt much out for it to defend it.In time there will be but Move and Kinnect will need time to showcase what they are about in a year or so.But MS needs to think about the bigger pic and thats putting more money into the tech to get it to work at full capacity.But giving descent reviews for Kinnect just because its different doent justify how badly it actually works.I have played the kinnect at my freinds and it was a let down.Not reconizing my voice or my body language doesnt tell me that kinnect was ready for release yet.

plenty a tool4921d ago (Edited 4921d ago )

quick, why dont you go and write negative review on your shitty smgamers blog site lol

anyway, i am not even 1% impressed by kinetic! jesus, the money that has been wasted by microsoft is staggering. they could've bought 2 or 3 decent studios for that money.

it's shameless the way sony and microsoft have desperately jumped on the motion control band-wagon. i wasted my money on a wii. there is no way i will throw more away on move or kinetic.

and, nxt year, await a glow-in-the-dark dildo from microsoft like sonys....you know it's coming

JokesOnYou4921d ago

Maybe I missed it darkride but I didn't see that statement in the CBC Kinect Review
http://www.cbc.ca/technolog...

-Globe and Mail also said this about kinect: "Microsoft’s Kinect sets new standard for motion control" Also given the fact that kinect functions heavily by way of software and these are launch games, its completely reasonable that future games will only improve upon the lag which doesn't seem to be a major problem even now...some are just bad games.
http://www.theglobeandmail....

-Now just looking at the first couple examples its clear you only cherry pick the articles for negatives but overall although I wouldn't call them "glowing" reviews, they are positive and not just for "potential", they're positive because the games seemed to be fun for the reviewers.

edgeofblade4921d ago (Edited 4921d ago )

Ok people... if you don't like casual games, stick around for games like Child of Eden and the new Steel Battalion. Your core needs will be met. Not right now... but they will be met. For the time being, a large install base is beneficial to everyone because it gives the core game developers a market to go after with experimental core titles.

Patience.

@trane07: What does that tell me? You're an obstructionist, exclusionist asshole, like most of "gamers", who wants to build a wall around your hobby and protect it from ever changing or maturing. You're like those people who hate bands that get popular. You're only special when you're the only one who gets it... a big fish in a small pond. You probably threw a fit when your mother gave birth to your younger sibling.

DemiT4921d ago (Edited 4921d ago )

Not sure what the problem is for that Darkride66.

He seems to be ignoring the fact that Kinect is getting a higher average user score than Move.
http://n4g.com/channel/kine...
http://n4g.com/channel/play...

And I am not sure why Darkride66 is saying stuff like
"Dark skin isn't recognized."

That ^^^ is just dead wrong.
I guess it's time to call Darkride66's lies.
http://n4g.com/news/641283/...
Turns out, the color of your skin makes no difference.

Not sure what his issue is.
He seems to be fond of cherry-picking data to suit his purpose and lying when it suits him.

Can we really believe what this Darkride66 says?
He's been caught lying so often, it's beyond a joke!

Apparently, the guy is nearly 40 years old.
I certainly applaud his passion for gaming, but I think it's about time he stopped being a childish fanboy.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4921d ago
tinybigman4921d ago

it's proven nothing to me because it still has nothing of interest to me. i don't like shovelware never have, never will period.

STiRacer4921d ago

Motion gaming(Kinect, Wii, PS Move) = Shovelware

lowcarb4921d ago (Edited 4921d ago )

"nope
they have not i.e me"

The fact that Kinect is on your mind night and day is victory enough for MS. If this were Sony showcasing this extremely nice hardware you guys would be losing it.

edit: "Blatant MS fanboy is obvious. Of course anyone that even goes online or plays any types of games in general regardless of system would hear about Kinect."

Know about it and following news on it are kind of different. I've heard of many things PS3 yet I don't follow any news on it (thank goodness) because it doesn't appeal to me. The fact that some of you claim to know more about Kinect than a purchaser is a win for MS and you know it.

Mystickay864921d ago

Blatant MS fanboy is obvious. Of course anyone that even goes online or plays any types of games in general regardless of system would hear about Kinect.

thenickel4921d ago

You guys are taking this crap way to far. STFU already tired of hearing your fights!

WhitePolish4920d ago (Edited 4920d ago )

Kinect sucks
Move sucks
your life sucks too

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4920d ago
KiLLUMiNATi_894921d ago (Edited 4921d ago )

No matter what MS does, they still be hated. Like I don't understand humans theses days. We all know kinect ain't perfect but god damn let it breath and let's see what they will do with it in the future.

Reviews weren't that bad at all but weren't good and that's what I'd expected. The haters out there wanted to fail badly (idk y). In what I see I don't think That's happening.

Parapraxis4921d ago (Edited 4921d ago )

This may be helpful for some as it's the most comprehensive round-up of the different hardware scores:

Kinect:
http://features.metacritic....

Move:
http://features.metacritic....

So yeah, Move hardware (thus far) has scored better than Kinect.

(I await the disagrees of these facts...bingo!)

strickers4920d ago

Most importantly it's the proper tech and gaming sites that have the biggest gap in favour of Move.

Jaces4921d ago (Edited 4921d ago )

Scored better sure, but it's what the people like not how metacritic scores a piece of hardware.

xAlmostPro4921d ago

me neither.. ive still seen no proof that it works in a flawless manner.

Most reviews ive read have all had different issues, on top of that the only sites ive seen give it good reviews are 360 based websites and websites known for biased and cheap reviews.

I've also not seen one interesting game yet, i mean you get the 1st type that contains things such as hitting balls etc. which has been cloned for the types of 'tennis' etc. then the dance games.. that are being cloned.. dance central..micheal jackson.. both the same game in different skins.. then star wars which is completely on rails.. then a clone of that which is the same but with harry potter characters lol..

The only thing that has impressed me from all the reviews i've read, are that the voice commands work great, and when using the kinect for video chat it actually follows you so your always in picture which is pretty badass.. basically it works pretty god damn well for everything but gaming..

im still not sold

colombiankilla014920d ago

whith $5,000,000,000 I can make a lot of people eat shit!!!

SonyPS3604920d ago

You aren't their target audience. Point irrelevant.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4920d ago
All_4_One4921d ago

Massive hype met with average to decent reception hardly proves anything to me.

units4921d ago

kinect has been getting reception than sony move

Fishy Fingers4921d ago (Edited 4921d ago )

Hardware wise, both have been pretty successful in reviews and whatnot, but both have pretty terrible software offerings currently. The only exceptions tend to be health/fitness/dance type games or the occasional mini-game bundle. As of now, the Wii is still the motion control to own, purely because of it's games.

Or PS3/360 and a pad.

Hades13374921d ago

Kinect average score on N4G - 7.8
Move average - 7.4

Gamefan124921d ago

as though we haven't seen bias reviews and scores not counted into the average

alphakennybody4921d ago (Edited 4921d ago )

@ hades
thats because half the reviews weren't scored, just like ff13 on 360 which is undoubtedly inferior to ps3 yet had a highscore on meta.

finnhima4921d ago (Edited 4921d ago )

Kinect average score. high accoring to non gaming websites
newyorktimes, msnbc, newyorkdailynews, time, etc...

Kinect average score. MIXED to AVERAGE according to GAMING and tech websites. Ign, joystiq, attackofthefanboy, co-optimus, pcworld, endgadget,wolverton. Not a 9 or 10 in sight. 8's at the highest, but an 8 isn't a "breakaway revolution into the future of gaming" like MS touted.

The scores between the sites are wholly differential from each other. And some of those news outlets didn't even review the playstation move. What does that say to you?? That plays a HUGE difference. And by huge I mean 500 million dollar huge.

tinybigman4921d ago (Edited 4921d ago )

there are 65 reviews for kinect(majority of them without an actual score), how many are there for move on n4g and i bet each and everyone has a number behind the review whether good or bad?

Croash4921d ago

Maybe you didn't realize, but whenever there is a Move game review with the "PlayStation Move" tag, the review counts even for the Move page.

So basically, reviews for The Fight : Lights Out are influencing Move's score on N4G, and the same applies for Kinect which has its score influenced by games reviews like Fighters Uncaged's.

The scores shown for Move and Kinect on N4G aren't only those given to the hardware...

Hades13374921d ago

I didn't, thanks for the info.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4921d ago
SonyPS3604920d ago (Edited 4920d ago )

The reception was above average and its sales are rocketing.

I'd say that you and the haters were proven wrong. Your opinion doesn't factor into it if you want to talk about the success of the the product.

gigaware4921d ago

People that actually own Kinect don't get what some media and fanboys are talking about. I play it and all I can do is laugh at the media and fanboys that are doubting and giving negative opinions.

saint_john_paul_ii4921d ago (Edited 4921d ago )

30fps camera (lag), casual fitness games,lack of hardcore games.

thats why its getting negative opinions by core gamers. its wii all over again.

Hades13374921d ago

Yeah cause I bet you bought one...

maniacmayhem4921d ago

Funny thing is Wii was a success and it killed the competition with the hardcore systems 360 and PS3.

So when it comes to the $$$ core gamers lose out.

10thnightvolley4921d ago

soooo wii all over again ... ppl, fannies n4g huggies can hate and complain singing reviews from heaven to earth down the hell.. for all i care this is not a game this is a tech that is bigger than just some stupid waggie device.. and wii was the same... but guess what its pwned all other competition and this will pwn harder

SonyPS3604920d ago

It's Wii all over again?

Did I stumble into a Move comments section?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4920d ago
Shazz4921d ago

you never got back to me about posting your setup ? i bet you dont even have kinect

Dante1124921d ago

Just the guy's impressions of Kinect and why it's the best for casuals.

xg-ei8ht4921d ago

Kinect has 500mill just for advertising.

If it isn't getting attention, then wtf.

But i know where the money went it's ok.

Oprah
Ellen
Jimmy fallon

check.

moparful994921d ago

dont forget matt damon and that shameless boys and girls club tie in....

cereal_killa4921d ago

Wasn't it Mark Walberg?

http://n4g.com/news/639408/...

Also dont forget to add Justin Bieber to that list

Show all comments (102)
280°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv721d 4h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle15h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic188112h ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio12h ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Lightning777h ago

What he said was facts. How he plays games is no concern of you. Don't get too mad about it.

Cacabunga15h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

darthv721h ago

to you it may seem like the minority... but your bubble is shrinking because more and more are following suit. convenience is a hell of a drug and its also why physical sales only amount to 30% of overall game sales. times are changing, you either get with them or you get left behind.

shinoff218314h ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga13h ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

itsmebryan9h ago

@shin
Well keep it simple Sony 's operating income is down 26% and Microsoft's is up 32%. No MS spin there, just facts. 😉
Cheers

S2Killinit1h ago

MS is after diminishing consoles as a medium. They want to destroy this market because they couldnt win. MS’s vision is to dissolve console gaming.

romulus237h ago

Odd that a company that touts you dont need the hardware to play is already touting another console in the works.

darthv727h ago

They are not reliant on the HW but still want to maintain a presence (no matter how small) is a good thing. It shows commitment to the craft. It reminds me of SNK and how they made games for their own hardware (Neo Geo) while also making them for others because they knew there was a market to do so. They knew they would sell more to others but also sell to their own niche fan base.

TheEroica1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

Perfectly reasonable post down voted by insecure corporation friendly folk.... But not gamers. Real gamer want accessibility and ease of acquisition for all.... Company shills are the only ones still telling us that hardware locking people from games is good for us.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1h ago
purple10117h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos17h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

DOMination-7h ago

In the last two years they've started exiting the consumer market altogether. All of the newest Surface products are business models only. They can't seem to work out what they want to do with it.

XBManiac16h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad16h ago(Edited 16h ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple10116h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos15h ago(Edited 15h ago)

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic14h ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

MrDead7h ago

The only growth MS will get out of the console industry is if it supports it's rivals platforms. Xbox is a pointless machine now. I can see them on a big push for live next, and they won't give up on trying to buy Steam.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 7h ago
Show all comments (39)
300°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere2d ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN1d 22h ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos1d 20h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN1d 13h ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo1d 14h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies1d 10h ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger1d 22h ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Mr Logic1d 8h ago

What a stupid thing to say. The elites give 0 fucks what we say on an obscure website in the comments section.

Crows901d 8h ago

You can always reach out and give them jobs at your company man. Don't wait

blacktiger5h ago

You own nothing snd be happy. I'm sure you heard that

Profchaos2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto2d ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos2d ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long1d 21h ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel1d 23h ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos1d 21h ago (Edited 1d 21h ago )

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator1d 22h ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (23)
280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10113d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref12d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde12d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197212d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville12d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218312d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos12d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 12d ago
isarai13d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref12d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan12d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00711d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197213d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

13d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

12d ago
12d ago
Zeref12d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde12d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197212d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier12d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto12d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218312d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto12d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 12d ago
Hofstaderman12d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts12d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts11d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)