1000°

Welcoming Haven Studios to the PlayStation Studios family

Montreal-based studio’s first new IP for PlayStation is a AAA multiplayer experience.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
GaboonViper779d ago

Very nice, look forward to see what they are cooking up.

Terry_B779d ago

Mass market Shit. This acquisition was a mistake.

arkard779d ago (Edited 779d ago )

Mass market pays the bills. And we literally know next to nothing about the game.

BehindTheRows779d ago

I'm sure you know that better than Sony...

779d ago
NotoriousWhiz779d ago

^ I dislike when people ask pointed questions with no basis for the question.

Vengeance1138779d ago

You expect hyper niche, obscure studio games to sell millions?? You must be brand new to gaming, welcome!

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 779d ago
z2g779d ago

Sony prepping for live service games. Same reason they bought Bungie.

neutralgamer1992779d ago

I think we should wait and see before passing judgement. Sony this generation wants to focus on MP along with single player. They have the IP's just need the right developers

We could see Bungie take over killzone of socom and really do justice to the IP'

arkard

You are right sir one hit AAA MP game can cover for multiple single player games. Sony wants their live service success like other big publishers and this way they can continue revenue each month while they can let their legacy studios keep making AAA Blockbusters

Last few Sony games have gotten 88/89 out of 100 and I see trolls making fun of that. I guess every game has to be 9.5/10. It's mindset like this that has closed down mid size publishers like THQ and midway to name a few. Right now gaming is either AAA or indie while there is definitely room for AA games

Nyxus779d ago

I hope the next studio they buy will be single player focused.

Nyxus779d ago

Well the upside is that if studios like Bungie and this one focus on multiplayer, the existing studios like Santa Monica, Insomniac and Naughty Dog can keep focusing on single player.

RaidenBlack779d ago

@Nyxus
Sony is also partnering with Deviation Games and Firewalk Studios to publish new multiplayer titles.
But the things is current studios are also shifting focus towards multiplayer/live-service projects.
Rumors are both Sucker Punch and Naughty Dog are focusing on a multiplayer/live-service game next. (Although ND seems to have 2 projects in development, but still) [And happy to proven the Sucker Punch rumor, wrong]
Pretty sure Cory Barlog's next project won't be live service one but who knows.

-Foxtrot779d ago

Literally was just going to say that

Like...come on Sony, first Bungie now this, they are both studios which are developing live service shit

Yes, I know, we haven't seen anything from this studio yet but live service/multiplayer is what it says on the tin, you know how it's probably going to go.

Vengeance1138779d ago

Like it or not Fortnite and Apex Legends make more money than any other game out there. Live Service prints money IF its done well. This is a very smart move for Sony to invest in live service.

-Foxtrot779d ago

“ very smart move for Sony to invest in live service”

Sure…until they become greedy

Vengeance1138779d ago

@foxtrot

Is Fortnite greedy? Apex Legends? I'd say so and yet, still the top games ever made and aren't going away anytime soon.

jznrpg779d ago (Edited 779d ago )

Well , many loved Socom and Warhawk and stuff like that so it makes sense as those were live service games and they were successful . It’s not like they never made these games they mostly took a break during PS4 .
There is room for both and I don’t mind them buying some companies for live service as it will help fund single player even if A lot of us won’t play the live service stuff .

Sony knows single player is what got them to where they are . They have expanded a lot and maybe some these studios who are making live service stuff work on single player someday too as they grow . who knows? it’s not out of the question .
Either way there is room for some live service stuff as long as it isn’t the focus as whole . They didn’t have live service studios and they bought a few lately so it seems like the focus but overall the majority of studios make single player games .

RauLeCreuset779d ago

@Foxtrot

Do you honestly not see the irony of raging at AAA single player game developers because some elements of a story weren't to your liking, only to later fly into a panic over Sony's direction because a couple of new acquisitions might maybe potentially release live service games?

What about your fandom would encourage a publisher to take a risk on a AAA single player experience instead of going for the easy live service money?

SurgicalMenace779d ago

@Foxtrot

The great thing about it all, greedy or not, you're not obligated to support it. It's awesome when the choice remains intact; imagine them forcing you to support.

TheTony316779d ago (Edited 779d ago )

Just because their first project is a multiplayer game doesn't mean that they won't make SP games in the future.

"Obviously we will always carry on making these single-player narrative-based games such as Ghost of Tsushima, The Last of Us, and Horizon Forbidden West," Hulst emphasises.

S2Killinit778d ago

Were you not one of the people that absolutely hated a single player game because of story decisions? Now you are the guardian of single player games because they went and bought a multiplayer focused developer…

On another note, this trend of buying studios is terrible. It points to the industry moving toward streaming services. We can all thank the gamepasses of the world for this.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 778d ago
ABizzel1779d ago

We'll see. They're enhancing their multiplayer-focused experiences because a successful ongoing multiplayer game is a significantly larger and more consistent source of income compared to a single-player game. So these acquisitions are as important if not more as it keeps their current devs focused on making great single player.

I assume they'll have a couple of other notable acquisitions this year, and will partake in the publisher wars a bit later when they have their business goals on target (getting PS5 production improved, game roadmaps locked down for 2023 and beyond, launch PSVR2, and get pre-production PS5 slim and PS5 Pro done). All of which should be locked down sometime this year.

1Victor779d ago

I don’t t care my trigger is itching for a good online multiplayer like Warhawk and Starhawk my hawk withdrawal is driving crazier than LOGICWINS comments 😩.
If Sony buying more “live services” studios means I can get a amazing iconic game like those above they can take my wallet now

Jin_Sakai779d ago (Edited 779d ago )

“I hope the next studio they buy will be single player focused.“

Doesn’t really matter to me. I like variety. Sony already has many great single player games and more coming down the pipeline.

Nyxus779d ago

But they already acquired several multiplayer studios now. How many are people going to play? Don't they usually play the same game for a long time? That's different for single player games, there is more room for them in general since you finish them and move on to the next one.

Jin_Sakai779d ago

“But they already acquired several multiplayer studios now. How many are people going to play?“

Not every multiplayer game will be a hit so having many choices will be better and give a higher chance of one becoming a popular new franchise.

PS-Gamer-1986779d ago (Edited 779d ago )

@Jin_Sakai

This! I dislike live service games as much as the next guy, but i agree there have been many failed live service games for the ones that became successful.

If they land a smash hit and it also help fund great single player games, i'm ok with it, as long as their whole focus doesn't shift to making this kind of games.

TheTony316779d ago

Just because their first project is a multiplayer title doesn't mean that they won't make SP games in the future.

smashman98779d ago

Sonys single player is rock solid tho. They consistently put out the best single player games every year.

UncertainCategory779d ago (Edited 779d ago )

Acquisitions fill gaps. Sony has single player on lock, they make some of the best story based single player games in the business. Their multiplayer and live service offerings though are not at the same level. Most if not all of the highest played PSN+ online games are not first party.

Makes sense they would make acquisitions that improve their competitiveness in areas where they are currently weak, rather than reinforce areas they already have dominance in. This is a smart acquisition for them.

FinalFantasyFanatic778d ago

I don't even play many online multiplayer games (I only play one or two games on/off, I can go weeks without playing one), most of my multiplayer games are couch multiplayer, and there's not many of those games these days.

I appreciate single player games more, alot of multiplayer games don't hold my attention, or they get shutdown after a short period (Titanfall 2, I wish I had more time with that game).

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 778d ago
JEECE779d ago

Hmm, buying a studio so early is an odd move for Sony. They must have been impressed with the initial work they have seen from Haven, and wanted to lock them down.

Christopher779d ago

I'm thinking that it's also much harder to get funding for new studios with the way the market is today and the volatility of studios as the industry is moving very fast with acquisitions lately. This might have a lot more to do with funding than general interest.

Bladesfist779d ago

Even if you fund a new studio you need experienced devs so you're probably going to poach talent from somewhere. Zero to hero is super rare in AAA game development.

FinalFantasyFanatic778d ago

@Bladesfist,

I was actually trying to find out what this studio has done before (they seem to have some experienced devs from other studios), they've put out nothing yet, but looking at the talents there, they've had people working on a wide variety of games. So I'm not sure what kind of game to expect from them.

Ozzy2407779d ago

Jade Raymond got a good background in Games coming from Ubisoft she wes the Producer of a few of the Assassins Creed games, Farcry , Sims

Imortus_san779d ago

They only buy extra cheap studios.

SullysCigar779d ago

Sure, there's some truth to that. Cheap doesn't equal bad.

They sure seem to buy wise and for a specific purpose, rather than for impact/headlines.

Insomniac looks more like a steal every time Phil sticks his hand in his boss's wallet.

779d ago
Chevalier779d ago

Insomniacs was 'cheap' yet their Spiderman game literally outsells every single Xbox studios games what's your point?! Bet you Insomniacs has their 2nd 20+ million selling game before Xbox studios even has 1.

Teflon02779d ago

Not too odd for them. Mm was almost this situation if I remember correctly. They went to Nintendo, MS and Sony about funding and publishing LittleBIGPlanet. Sony was on board and unless I remember wrong, it was only a few months after it dropped that Sony acquired them and that was their first title I think. I honestly don't remember it well. But I feel it was almost the same

SonyStyled779d ago

Based off my memory Media Molecule was purchased after LBP2 released in 2010/11. Founded by former Lionhead Studios devs

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 778d ago
sparky77779d ago

Smart to buy them now when they are dirt cheap, hopefully their game is a success.

779d ago
SoulWarrior779d ago

Just hope Jim and Herman don't forget it's the excellent array of SP games that's brought them huge success since 2010 onwards, and don't focus too much on MP/live service type games.

Christopher779d ago (Edited 779d ago )

Two MP-related buys and people completely forget all the SP studios they invested in, including their biggest performer this generation, Insomniac. Haven't gamers been asking for a more diverse line-up of games from Sony? Adding more MP doesn't remove SP.

dumahim779d ago

That worked out so well for Gran Turismo.

779d ago
Christopher779d ago

@dumahim: I don't get your comment in response to me. Did having GT7 somehow end other SP games? My comment was only about having another studio do an MP game doesn't mean SP games aren't still happening. Nothing about the quality of said games.

generic-user-name779d ago

Sony's biggest criticism of their exclusive line up is that they're lacking in the MP department. Bungie doesn't really even cover that because they'll be remaining multiplat but Haven might be a start.

Eonjay779d ago

They can do both. Their single player studios aren't going to disappear. We already know of two huge SP games coming from Insomica alone. This year, we got HFW from Gurillea and were getting GOW from SSM. Since PS5 launch we have gotten Demon Souls, Spiderman MM, Rachet and Clank... No one's Single Player Output has been clos to Sony's. Now they want to add multiplayer to their lineup. They can do both. Why are we trying to shoehorn them into one area?

thesoftware730779d ago

They have 10 coming, I will guess that will be there focus for a while.

Eonjay779d ago

From what we know is already in their pipeline it looks like they are focusing on both single and multiplayer.

779d ago
TheTony316779d ago

"Obviously we will always carry on making these single-player narrative-based games such as Ghost of Tsushima, The Last of Us, and Horizon Forbidden West," Hulst emphasises.

relax.

Charlieboy333778d ago

"Obviously we will always carry on making these single-player narrative-based games such as Ghost of Tsushima, The Last of Us, and Horizon Forbidden West," Hulst emphasises. - from this article https://n4g.com/news/247169...

FinalFantasyFanatic778d ago

If we don't get enough SP games and too many MP/live service games, I might bail on Sony and just stick with PC/Switch, but I really hope they don't swing to extremes like that.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 778d ago
Show all comments (134)
170°

EA says largest Battlefield team yet is building ‘another tremendous live service’

Electronic Arts CEO Andrew Wilson stated in a recent EA Earnings Call, that the next Battlefield "it is going to be another tremendous live service.”

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
-Foxtrot1d 6h ago

Another? ANOTHER?

Is he honestly trying to make out like the last Battlefield was a huge success, not just as a game but as a live service game? I'm sure these guys live in their own echo chambers, they are so far removed from reality or they just like talking out of their arse trying to rewrite history.

Also why say such a tone deaf statement when you know the state of live service games at the minute and how many gamers feel about them. Bigging up the next BF game as live service does not give me any excitement or hype.

LordoftheCritics1d 3h ago

''is building ‘another tremendous LIE service’''

/Fixed

just_looken3h ago

This is nothing too new
https://www.eurogamer.net/e...

They had plans of a universe of live service games

Also these studios made 2042 there is no new massive team its the same team
https://www.eurogamer.net/t...

Well same team minus the seattle boys that were canned
https://gamerant.com/ea-bat...

This is all again same news different year but it seems very few remember what happened before covid.

RaidenBlack1d 5h ago

Just make another Battlefield 2 ... or BadCompany 3 ... EA

XiNatsuDragnel1d 4h ago

Bad company 3 instead of live service bs

Relientk771d 4h ago

And already lost interest

Pass

Show all comments (14)
290°

Phil Spencer trends on Twitter amid calls for him to resign

Phil Spencer and Microsoft have come under fire following the closure of multiple Bethesda-owned studios including Tango Gameworks.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
gold_drake8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

wow haha.

i dont think he will resign. or will be kicked off.

if hes still here after everything in the past, this wont affect him unfortunately.

RhinoGamer887h ago

He and his cronies have a sweet deal. Even if they are fired, stock options and parachutes will mean they never need to work again. Cronyism at its worst.

neutralgamer19925h ago(Edited 5h ago)

I think his days are numbered TBH. Spending 80 million of all acquisitions yet can’t even compete with others it’s insane

This also proves gamepass isn’t as profitable as Xbox fanboys make it out to be

RaidenBlack5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

That huge Acti-Blizz acquisition wasn't worth it ... They should've stopped at Zenimax and instead focused "rescuing" individual studios like Crystal Dynamics, Eidos Montreal, Crytek, Volition or Gearbox etc (much better than trying to devour the whole of one of the largest gaming publisher)
IMHO, with no $70 Billion deficit, these studio closures would not have happened ...

7h agoReplies(1)
7h agoReplies(1)
Show all comments (33)
290°

Xbox Has Had More Studio Closures Than First Party Game Releases So Far In 2024

Twisted Voxel writes: "We've almost reached the end of the 1st half of 2024, and Xbox has had more studio closures than first party game releases in the year so far."

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
1d 1h ago
KicksnSnares20h ago(Edited 20h ago)

Hellblade 2, Indiana Jones, Avowed, Towerborne, and Call of Duty are still to be released this year. Marcus Fenix collection to be added to the list with the Xbox showcase, hopefully.

anast17h ago

Those are all coming to PS5 too.

Tech512h ago

"Xbox Has Had More Studio Closures Than First Party Game Releases So Far In 2024"

they kept the IPs though. they'll be making them under the MS brand i'm guessing. like minecraft all those years ago.

solideagle16h ago(Edited 16h ago)

the keyword is so Far...

on topic: Ouch!

Hedstrom14h ago

Kinda missing the forest for all the trees statement!

shinoff218314h ago(Edited 14h ago)

Bet all those don't make it though this year

romulus2314h ago(Edited 14h ago)

If we're going to talk in "still to be's" there still could be more studio closures from Microsoft this year as well.

DOMination-10h ago

How much confidence do people have in these games being good though? I hope they will be (especially Avowed) but from what we know of them so far, it's hardly a guarantee, is it?

And even if they do turn out to be good, how much of that will be down to Xbox and its leadership? Most of these games were either sequels to games made before being acquired or started development before being acquired.

And just a note on Hellblade II - it is out in two weeks and unless I'm missing something, I don't see much in the way of previews or advertising from Microsoft. Not ideal for a niche game that looks like it probably cost a lot of money to make. It genuinely feels like another game being sent out to die and then have the studio shut down.

Elda9h ago(Edited 9h ago)

To me...Avowed graphics look cheap, the game looks generic as well as boring.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 9h ago
anast17h ago

Popcorn is good. Anyone want some?

anast13h ago

I wouldn't mind a caramel and cinnamon mix actually.

dumahim13h ago

That does sound good. I have trouble just finding caramel corn.

anast8h ago

I find it interesting that people have to resort to praising how they were randomly born in a certain location to say they're not weird. But, I'm not sure this kind of stupidity can be generalized over an entire group of people, at least, I'm being optimistic here.

Eonjay17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

Sony doesn't have to bother fighting the next Microsoft acquisition. The massive layoff by themselves should be enough to get the next big buy blocked.

Hofstaderman15h ago

Vindicates Jim Ryan. Don't know who didnt see this coming except those frothing pro acquisition fanboys who are not commenting here for some reason....

Tacoboto14h ago

What did happen to Obscure?

Tody_ZA14h ago

Obscure is working on his thesis on how to spin this.

Elda14h ago

Exactly. Where is the mayor & spokesperson of XB?

badz14913h ago

Obsecure where are you? Don't tell us Phil fired you too

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 13h ago
MatrixxGT12h ago

Let’s not pretend Sony is setting the world on fire with its first party either….it’s been crickets from them as well. In fact they even said not to expect any at all this year.
MS is a dumpster fire and Sony isn’t fighting anymore and it shows. I fail to see how this is a good thing.

Skuletor7h ago

Wasn't it no new existing IP entries? That would still leave room for new IPs, maybe we'll see one or more of those this year.

Sonic188112h ago

I was actually thinking about that. You beat me to it

MrDead16h ago

So if MS hadn't spent $80 billion consolidating the industry just think of all the games and jobs that would have saved.

MS is a drain on gaming and have been nothing but a negative.

MrCrimson15h ago

not exactly like the studios were putting out good games anyway. Industry needs to restart from the ground up; if games like battlebit or manor lords can be made by teams with 10 people - then there's something fundamentally wrong with having 500 man teams put out glitchy overmonetized crap.

shinoff218314h ago

Interesting. Prey was a good game, evil within was dope, and hi fi was the best Xbox game that Xbox has had in so many years. That's according to the base.

romulus2313h ago

HiFi Rush was a really good game actually so that's hardly the reason for shutting down Tango.

Show all comments (53)