500°

Mirror's Edge first week sales U.S. and EU

Mirror's Edge, a totaly new project form Dice. It is a free-running FPS, but if you want to play the game good, you don't play with the guns. Badly for Mirror's Edge, the game didn't sell well. Hit the jump to see the stats.

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
The Killer5632d ago (Edited 5632d ago )

PS3 version sold 29,173 copies 6.40M north America
360 version sold 59,285 copies 13.38M north America

accourding to vgchartz

Rigmaster5632d ago

"accourding to vgchartz"

Oh god...

InMyOpinion5632d ago

I feel sorry for all of them. Save those pennies for better games people.

PoSTedUP5632d ago

i didn't buy it because i had too many games to buy this month and last, they REALLY should of delayed it till Christmas.

oh shoot, 3rd quarter started. *grabs bottle of jamacian Red Stripe*

Foxgod5632d ago

did you really have to mention the install base, only because your so damn frustrated that the 360 sold more ?

InMyOpinion5632d ago

I feel sorry for all the losers who disagree with me for no reason as well. Instead of acting like 5-year olds give some reasons to why I should buy it instead. Because it's 6 hours long and has no multiplayer or replay value? Or is it because of the on-rails trial & error gameplay that gets repetitive after 2 mins? Maybe it's because of the sloppy controls? You tell me!

Milky Joe5632d ago

Or maybe Jenzo, it's because you're not the f*cking authority on how games should be made and they might have actually found it fun to play you f*cking retard!!!

CrazyJ5632d ago

I completely disagree with you. It's the first innovative first person game since Portal. If you think the game play gets repetitive after 2 minutes then show me a game that doesn't. You learn the basic mechanics of a game and repeat and repeat. News flash but that's how games work. You call it a on rails trial & error game but often times there is more than one way to get from point a to point b so how can it be on rails. This game is about being fluid and fast sometimes this requires quite complex movements. You say there's no replay value but there's a time trial mode which one could sink many hours into finding new and faster paths though a level. I wouldn't call the controls sloppy either. It's the most fluid game I've played since Uncharted. Perhaps you were talking about the shooting part of the game but to be honest I don't really know about that since I just prefer to beat up or disarm the baddies. On a side note I just beat the story mode last night. I still have yet to collect all the hidden packages, beat it on hard, and unlock all the time trial maps. I'm not sure how many hours it took me to beat the story mode but it did take me 3 sittings and I did thoroughly enjoy it.

I suspect we'll see concepts from this game in many FPS games in the future.

shovelbum5632d ago

I played through it in a few hours. The controls were done very well but the story was lackluster and it was way too short. I enjoyed it as it was a nice departure from Fallout 3, Gears, and LBP which have been getting lots of use lately but it wasn't something I'd give much replay consideration.

Alcohog5632d ago

"I feel sorry for all of them. Save those pennies for better games people. "

Did you play the game? I thought it was amazing. One of my top games of 2008 easily. If you haven't, you really should try it.

I have a feeling that regardless if you actually played it or not, you will say that you did. :\

Erotic Sheep5632d ago (Edited 5632d ago )

Way to go judging a game on a reviewers opinion. Play it instead of acting like a blind mule, give new IP's a chance. So you're saying most FPS games today aren't repetitive? Silent Hill 2 had lots of backtracking, did that make it a bad game? I don't think so.

And @ Foxgod, whats wrong with showing an install base? Where do you see him frustrated at all? Who gives a flying crap where this game has sold more? Do me a favor and go to the open zone, all you do here is trying to start pointless discussions, it's pretty obvious you're pro X360 and come up with made-up arguments just to bash the PS3 :\

yanikins1115632d ago

i disagreed with you because its good

InMyOpinion5632d ago (Edited 5632d ago )

Then why didn't you say so to begin with? Like I said "Instead of acting like 5-year olds give some reasons to why I should buy it instead" I'm not saying my opinion is fact.

Of course I have played it, if not I wouldn't be judging it. I think I'm about halfway through. Played some levels past Jacknife.

PopEmUp5632d ago

for the 360 owners, since there are more than 2x as much 360 owners buying a game that less than 3 hours. But as a Ps3 owners we think twice before we make a purchase and wait for a better games that worth our money, so I felt sorry for all the 360 owners that brought this game =(

PS3 FTW5632d ago

I was gonna buy it but a few of my friends got it first and they said the single-player only takes about 2 hours to beat! They said you might be able to spend a few more replaying time-trial but it's NOT worth $60. Even XPLAY said the game has a MAX of 8 hours including repeated time-trials.

I'm sorry but paying $60 for a few hours is dumb. Maybe it should of been a $20 downloadable PSN/XBL game.

I also think one reason for bad sales is that it looks too simple and a 1-trick-pony. Sure there's c a little combat but it's supposedly not well done. I liked the demo but after a few play-throughs It just felt too simple and more like a 2004 tech demo of what nex-gen games would be like.

I would rent it with my BlockBuster "Game Pass" but for somereason the BlockBusters by my hoes said they are NEVER getting the game :( I'm not gonna sign-up for GmaeFly just for Mirror's Edge when I'm already paying for BB Game Pass where I can get the games I want quickly without waiting for days in the mail.

Vip3r5632d ago

I feel sorry for people who actually care about how many disagrees they get. Y'know, acting like a fanboy might have something to do with it.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 5632d ago
chaosatom5632d ago (Edited 5632d ago )

possibly because of lack of replay value.

DavidMacDougall5632d ago

I didn't buy it because EA made it

Aclay5632d ago

I was thinking the same thing. Sadly for most single player games, people ususally end up renting them and not buying them. I'm more of a single player gamer myself and I'll buy a Single Player game if I like it, but Mirrors Edge just didn't scream out to me.

I think that Dead Space was EA's Sleeper Hit this year

IaMs125632d ago

Battlefield Bad Company turned out great from EA lol

meepmoopmeep5632d ago

EA published it. Dice developed it.

i'm still going to get it. i guess mostly for a sequel potential.
i really liked the demo. but yeah,
especially around the holiday season and the other great games out.

TheCagyDies5632d ago (Edited 5632d ago )

The developer DICE stands for

EA Digital Illusions Creative Entertainment AB (EA DICE)

So pretty much, EA was all over the development of this game...

Source
http://www.dice.se/

Dice to EA is Ubisoft Montreal to Ubisoft

MiloGarret5632d ago

DICE is a Swedish developer, (AB stands for aktiebolag), and Swedes kick ass at developing games. Before you disagree, check your facts. You might be surprised by how many awesome games have come from our little country.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5632d ago
shadowghost7525632d ago

this article is bull, they got their figures from vgcharts

Blademask5632d ago

They added a spin to the genre that is great. Its sad that too many people want to play.. hide peek and shoot 1.5 just because it has the same online from the first with a new shoot-the-bots mode.

Gaming is going to suck as long as those who underwhelm succeed due to advertising.

I can only play the same shooter so many times with the same exact cookie cutter online. To think that it means "replay value" for idiots is completely sad.

None of these gamers this generation would have survived the ps2 era. None at all. Everything must have online? People, are you kidding?

Aclay5632d ago

VG Chartz = VG Guesses

I really don't see the point of VG Chartz when they don't post official numbers, I'll wait for Official NPD numbers.

PS3 FTW5632d ago

VG Chartz = Videogame Guess Chartz

Johnny Rotten5632d ago

VG Chartzzz

yes that's chartz with a z.

Show all comments (72)
80°

Battlefield 2042 Mirror's Edge Easter Egg Surfaces in Season 4 Map

It seems that in Season 4, DICE has snuck in a Battlefield 2042 Mirror's Edge Easter egg in the new Flashpoint map.

220°

10 Old Games With Outstanding Graphics

GF365: "There are some games with extraordinary visuals that impress us to this day. Here are old games with outstanding graphics."

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
ShwaaMan454d ago

Bioshock still looks fantastic, one of my all time favorites.

Yui_Suzumiya454d ago

Beyond: Two Souls on PS3 can compete with modern day graphics.

SonyStyled454d ago (Edited 454d ago )

Same as Killzone 2 and 3, uncharted 2 and 3, Infamous 2, Heavy Rain, Resistance 3

jasonismoney454d ago

I wish this was entirely true, but you might want to load up Killzone 2 and Resistance 3 again.

SonyStyled454d ago

@jason I watched some gameplay videos of KZ2 and R3 on my full screen. They are on par or succeed graphically to the first person shooters mentioned in the article that also launched on the seventh generation of consoles. Try the same and see what you think

cthulhucultist454d ago

Killzone 3 was super impressive! I could not believe the graphics back then as I was regularly pausing the game to stand in awe looking at the surroundings! Resistance however did not impress me that much. Heavy rain is also another amazing graphically speaking game. It almost felt next gen

Fist4achin454d ago

I always thought the first 3 Gears of War games looked great and still hold up for today.

SonyStyled454d ago

They did for their day. I recently played gears judgement with on the 360 and the draw distance was so blurry. The characters up close look great though

JEECE454d ago

Far Cry 2 was awesome. In addition to having demonstrably better physics and AI than later games in the series, it had a lot of design decisions that, criticized at the time, have since been praised in games like BOTW and Dark Souls.

iNcRiMiNaTi454d ago

It might not be super amazing by today's standard but I thought Mgs3 looked really good

JEECE454d ago

In terms of art style it still holds up.

Show all comments (13)
270°

Mirror's Edge achievement designer: "Achievements have been bad for gaming"

Ubisoft Massive lead gameplay designer Fredrik Thylander, previously of DICE where he worked on Battlefield and Mirror's Edge, has spoken out about achievements and trophies, arguing that they "have been bad for gaming."

Machina471d ago (Edited 471d ago )

The achievements in Mirror's Edge opened my eyes to a whole other way of approaching the game. Since some of the toughest and most rewarding ones are basically whole levels turned into time trials with very strict time requirements, they force you to become much better at the game - in a way that difficulty levels just don't - and made me appreciate the mechanics that much more (especially the momentum-based running and platforming).

They actually made the game better for those like me who really enjoyed the game but wanted more of it, basically adding a new level of difficulty that took a long time to master/overcome. It added some extra longevity to a very short game.

He says "it eats resources that could have made the game better". I'm curious what he thinks the time he spent designing the achievements for the game would've been better spent on, because I expect bang for buck-wise achievements are a pretty efficient way of adding value to a game for the people who end up loving it.

shinoff2183471d ago (Edited 471d ago )

I kinda see his point but I also see your point.

I've been trying to remember what games over the years have had their own trophies inside the game before trophies and such were a thing and all I can think of is the star ocean series

Christopher471d ago

I think his point, though not elucidated upon because of Twitter limitations, is not that they can be bad but that they are used improperly to extend gameplay rather than reward actions.

Nebaku470d ago

Harvest Moon: Magical Melody on the GCN did.

In fact it actually built the game around it.

RpgSama470d ago (Edited 470d ago )

I am very OCD about playing games that I can platinum, in that sense I probably avoided playing games that I knew I would be unable to 100% complete.

I do think there are other people like me and also feel there should be an option for you to individually deactivate getting trophies on specific games, just so you play them and they do not go to your account.

-Foxtrot471d ago (Edited 471d ago )

I don't know. I used to think Achievements / Trophies were ruining games at first but then I saw the positive, if you totally love a game then they would offer you replay value by going after the last achievements to 100% the game. It made you explore every last bit of the game to achieve this and sometimes pushed you into areas or scenarios you probably might have missed.

It was a blast to get them on Oblivion / Skyrim, Fallout, Witcher, God of War, Elden Ring etc

Don't get me wrong, I do think there's achievements which are annoying, the ones where you need to find all collectibles which end up being missable AND are like trying to find a needle in a haystack are a kick to the balls, you know the majority of us are just going to use a guide to find them so what's the point.

Kind of a shame Nintendo haven't gotten a full system in place, they are so behind.

jambola470d ago

Nintendo seem to either be ahead of their time by years
or behind by 10 years
no in between

Rimeskeem471d ago

I enjoy having something to go for and feeling accomplished when doing something hard. I just hate it when achievements are based on things you can't really control. Like when something is for MP and the MP is just dead.

MadLad471d ago (Edited 471d ago )

I used to be a hardcore achievement hunter back in the day, but I couldn't care less nowadays. I just want to play games the way I actually want to play them, and don't care to waste my time just to get a little pop-up.

AzubuFrost470d ago

I envy you sir. I just gotta have every single achievement whenever I play a game. On my Steam profile I have an 83% completion rate out of 35 games, and my OCD is telling me to keep upping that percentage higher.

MadLad470d ago

Yeah. Back then, though I'm not sure what my actual completion rate was, I was mainly an Xbox player. I had close to 80k gamer score during the 360 days.

It just doesn't excite me anymore. I have less than 20% completion on my Steam account, though I have a pretty asinine amount of games there at the same time.
But I don't really bother with any of this anymore. If there's an interesting achievement I might aim for it just because I find it fun, but usually I just get that pop-up, say "cool" and continue with the game.

Outlawzz471d ago

Never been a fan of achievements. I just want to play the game however it may present itself to me, there's an overflow of achievements to seek in real life lol

Great for those that enjoy them though, much respect to the platinum hunters, it ain't easy lol

Show all comments (33)