Digital Foundry: Hands-on with Quantum Break

Digital Foundry:

One of the most technically ambitious titles on Xbox One, but what's up with the resolution?

[Dario_DC]

720p 30fps? With frame rate drops? Not good for an exclusive at all. Glad the AA solution hepls it a bit but still...
Maybe they didn't have enough time to work on the Xbox version when they decided to go PC too
.

[FITgamer]

It's still 1080p, effects rendered at 720p. So it's like an internal upscale i guess.

[Overload]

"It's still 1080p, effects rendered at 720p. So it's like an internal upscale i guess."

Sponsored by the Aaron Greenberg school of resolution.

https://mobile.twitter.com/...

The native image seems to be 720p

[FITgamer]

lol I'm not tying to defend it, i'm just going based off what they said in the video. Effects rendered in 720p, but native output is 1080p. It's all confusing to me.

[Overload]

Lol. No problem.

[Christopher]

***Effects rendered in 720p, but native output is 1080p***

Correction there, it's native 720p and is output as 1080p. This is similar to Killzone MP where it wasn't a native 1080p but a software emulated 1080p. So, it is not at all native, the native image is 720p.

The distinction is important when discussing these sort of things.

[Overload]

Christopher is correct, Dark10 who is part of Digital Foundry pretty much said the same thing.

http://m.neogaf.com/showpos...

The native image is 720p.

[butchertroll]

@Christopher

Well, Guerilla used very different technique to achive 1080p in Killzone MP. Nothing was upscaled and that's the whole point and technically MP is 1080p.

http://www.killzone.com/en_...

[343_Guilty_Spark]

Many games do this...

[Christopher]

***Well, Guerilla used very different technique to achive 1080p in Killzone MP. Nothing was upscaled and that's the whole point and technically MP is 1080p. ***

Yes, it is 1080p. But, the huge distinction is that it's not a native 1080p. That's the important distinction.

QB, if software upscaled (even partially in this case, which is the lighting elements), is also 1080p. Just not native.

That was the sole intent of my comment since people don't understand the difference between 'native 1080p' and just '1080p'. And that distinction is important since 'native 1080p' will more often than not result in higher quality and sharper textures with more detail as opposed to software emulated frames. Kind of like how QB has very soft tones in lighting and how KZ MP had blurring effects from frame to frame viewing.

Saying anything about the technical elements of a game does not diminish it as a game, only is an examination of the technical aspects of it. QB still looks good and more than likely will play just as well. The real question is the story and how well the gameplay advances/evolves based on the time stopping powers.

[Kribwalker]

@butchertroll

According to your link

"In Multiplayer mode, however, we use a technique called “temporal reprojection,” which combines pixels and motion vectors from multiple lower-resolution frames to reconstruct a full 1080p image. If native means that every part of the pipeline is 1080p then this technique is not"

[badz149]

@kribwalker

In KZSF MP, there are indeed 1080 progressive horizontal lines all the time thus the notion of 1080p but it's not native 1920X1080p because only 960 vertical lines are rendered in real-time for any given time while the other 960 are still frames from the previous frame. These "screenshot" frames are blended together with real-time frames and generated as current frames all the time. This technique works because player movement are usually slower than the 0.017s time frame between each frame in a 60fps games but blur tend to occur when players moves or spin too quickly due to these blended "screenshot" frames.

It's a trade-off to achieve 60fps, which the game excels at, but it's a technique more taxing than mere upscaling like in Halo 5 but not as intensive as rendering true 1080p 60fps, which is almost impossible on the PS4 with their chosen graphical settings.

Uncharted 4 is the same case but ND chose to render at a 900p and upscale instead.

Back on topic, I don't know where you guys are getting the native res for QB as 1080p because earlier in the video, it says something like "native res is hard to pin down" which means, it's probably not 1080p and most probably dynamic.

[butchertroll]

@Kribwalker

Did you read what i wrote : i said "technically" MP is 1080p. Image is not upscaled. That's the point.

[mcgrottys]

Yeah but those physics, they remind me of that game stranglehold.

I'll be playing it on PC but the xbox one version looks like one of the best games this gen if you disregard the resolution

Also an occasional frame drop to 28 fps isn't going to ruin my experience. The only time I've had a problem with frame rate drops ruining my experience was playing dark souls 1 on PC before the 3rd party patch.

[headblackman]

@mcgrottys

spoken like a true gamer. keep making sense sir :-)

[Christopher]

Never let a technical analysis ruin the fun of a game. It's just a technical analysis, not a metric to determine the quality of a game let alone whether or not you would like it.

Hope you enjoy the game, mcgrottys.

[gamer1138]

Looks like it's NX Gamer Vs Digital Foundry. NX says 1080p, DF says 720p

http://nxgamer.com/previews...

[dantesparda]

I guess you didn't watch the video then, what DF says is that while the games native res is 1080p, a lot of its effects like lighting are 720p, giving the game a very soft and 720p like look ultimately, and NX Gamer kind of hints at the same, but like The Infected said, "Global illumination and lighting rendered at 720p, extremely low resolution shadows which also jitter, a lot of shadow pop in, volumetric lighting is rendered at very low resolution, and reflections are a combinations of real time and screen space variance but both are rendered in very low resolution.

Aliasing is good, character models are extremely well done, has a stable frame rate until venturing outside in which the frame rate drops and has some screen tearing. They're using adaptive v-sych."

I personally think the game looks too soft and has too much tearing in those outdoor scenes. Which is a shame, because the game looked a hell of a lot better when first being introduced, now its just looks like a low res, tearing mess to me.

[yewles1]

You weren't paying attention...

"Curiously, the paper also states Xbox One's final output is 1920x1080, and that's where there is some confusion - as we've yet to see evidence of full HD 1080p gameplay in close analysis - barring the title's HUD elements and menus. In every scene tested so far, a native resolution of 720p is the consistent result found in each pixel count test - so while there's every possibility of individual render targets operating at higher resolutions, basic geometry that we're able to measure hands in a 720p result as things stand."

[kstuffs]

I read the EG article and still got confused as to the final resolution of the game. As many people here still think it's 720p when the game is actually outputting 1080p native. This was very clear in the NX article. The effects are 720p because the lighting, visual effects, and destruction in this game is very, very good compared to what I heave seen with existing games.

[yewles1]

Except 720p lighting doesn't trick people into thinking the geometry is 720p as well...

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

[butchertroll]

Dark10x is DF member. He clearly stated that game final render output is 720p :

http://m.neogaf.com/showpos...

[butchertroll]

NX Gamer didn't get any builds for analysis. HE CLEARLY STATED that in video. His analysis is based on some preview videos from month ago and Quantum Break documents which were shown at Siggraph last year.

Anyway, looks like final render output is 720p :

http://m.neogaf.com/showpos...

[StifflerK]

Alan Wake was sub HD , and it was one of my favorite games of last gen.

Heck, The Order and Ryse are sub 1080, but look amazing.

Resolution determines the sharpness of the image, not how good the game is.

[Wallstreet37]

I agree im hope gameplay and funfactor is solid.

[thekhurg]

Correction:

The Order is pixel accurate to 1080p. There is zero upscaling in that game.

[Letthewookiewin]

And The Order is a solid 30fps and never any tearing. No other console game holds a candle to it graphically. Only morons would disagree :)

[n4rc]

Yeah.. So we'll just start letterboxing games to hit 1080p..

You are correct.. But its a trick to avoid a sub-1080 debate.. I don't buy for a single second they choose to do that willingly.

[starchild]

Yes, same pixel density as 1080p (within the letterbox area), but it is rendering a lot less pixels than games that output at native 1920 x 1080 resolution. This reduces rendering demands on the hardware.

[DopeTech]

Yeah but It's running less pixels than a NATIVE 1080p OUTPUT.

They just ran it at 1920x800 then litterboxed the screen to make it look like a NATIVE 1080p screen.

[dkp23]

Ryse was only 720p but he graphics were very impressive. The game itself wasn't though.

[MattE]

#dkp23

900p mate.. Ryse wasn't 720p.. This is the issue with this gen. People are misinformed

[butchertroll]

The Order is not sub1080p.

[Wallstreet37]

Want to see what gamers say in regards to this game. Im very interested in it and hope it ends up fun with solid gameplay. Will be one of tbe first games i pick up for xbone when i get one, if so.

[Bathyj]

It's also the first game I'm going to get and it looks great. I wouldn't let this resolution talk put you off.

[Bathyj]

I didn't think anyone made 720p games anymore. I'm a bit surprised. I don't think that anyone can debate that Xbox is underpowered anymore, not that I ever used it's power as a Mark against it. Thankfully it sounds like the game is still gorgeous so that's what matters, but I hope the framerate doesn't dip too much in outdoor areas if it effects aiming. I'm fine with 30fps but it shouldn't go below that too drastically, especially at 720p.

As for the PC version can they really get it up to 4K60fps so close to launch if it's only 1080p 30fps? Sounds dubious.

[Wallstreet37]

I still go back to my ps3 and play games like Demon Souls so in regards to the resolution it matters in some regards but not on whether i enjoy it or not.

Im very surpeised however on the low resolution. Most of us knew even at 1080p it wouldnt compete with powerhouses like The Order, Infamous and Uncharted 4 but i heard some here make comments it would. With all the 720p res effects and stuff going on in this game it definitely not even a contender for graphics powerhouse anymore.

If gameplay is good and is fun ill still be buying it though. *hit i loved all those low res ps3 games back then.

[iistuii]

"While Quantum Break remains visually impressive - stunning in many areas"
Why do they then worry what the resolution its running at if they clearly state it looks visually stunning, that surely is all that matters..

[Christopher]

Because it's a technical analysis, not a subjective analysis.

You're essentially saying the kid who did bad on the math test shouldn't be taken into consideration considering he does well everywhere else. Well, he's being graded on his math skills in that class, not anything else.

[iistuii]

It looks visually stunning, thats what they said whilst playing it. They have no idea exactly what resolution it is by just looking at the game as thats why they do the analysis on it. People will put the game on & think how great it looks, they will have no idea what resolution its running at without some site doing this analysis for them.

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

Watch this, they have to go through all this just so they can find the resolution as they can't tell exactly by just looking at it, its all fanboy nonsense.

[Christopher]

***It looks visually stunning, thats what they said whilst playing it.***

And they said some other stuff as well. You just want to only listen to one thing, and not the technical specifics. That's your prerogative.

***People will put the game on & think how great it looks, they will have no idea what resolution its running at without some site doing this analysis for them. ***

And that has nothing to do with this technical analysis. For them, it's a puzzle. It's what they do, and they do it for tons of games. So, understanding the technology used and getting the specifics is what they do, as is showing love and appreciation for techniques utilized, as they did in their analysis of QB. The fact they can't figure out the resolution is a puzzle to them, not a damnation of the game itself.

You're in a technical analysis article, not a "how good do you think the game looks" article.

[kstuffs]

Their technical analysis is subpar. They basically don't know what the resolution. What they know is that lighting is done at 720p as exactly told by Remedy. They basically are guessing the final image is 720p based on its softness but the very good AA and post-processing erases the evidence for them to determine the native resolution. All they have to do is show the aliasing edges on a few frames, but the pictures they showed was impossible to determine.

Heck, The Order 1886 was pretty soft and that was 1080p native.

[Christopher]

***They basically are guessing the final image is 720p based on its softness but the very good AA and post-processing erases the evidence for them to determine the native resolution.***

Actually, no, I'm not sure you are reading/hearing correctly. They got the 720p on lighting (just on lighting) from MS' own documents on QB techniques utilized and then saying that because of that and other AA sampling techniques that they can't figure out what the actual resolution is because of the mixed differences between the two.

***but the pictures they showed was impossible to determine. ***

They said the same about other areas of the game as well, they just showed on that was a good example of why they couldn't tell.

***Heck, The Order 1886 was pretty soft and that was 1080p native.***

That annoying cinematic filter really did annoy me with The Order. But, that really has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

[rainslacker]

Because DF is about measuring these things, and they felt it necessary to qualify that the lower resolution didn't mean the game looked bad. That's something they don't typically go to extra effort to do.

It goes to show that art style and presentation can make up for a lot of things when it comes to graphics. The soft look of this game gives it a TV show like appearance, so it works, whereas in other games it may actually make it look like a poor render frame.

[namEuser]

Cant cure screen tearing in 2016 huh? Pathetic and rediculous... no buy, im out....

[n4rc]

Haha.. Was gonna make a joke about ridiculous and spell check but my phone doesn't correct it for whatever reason so I withdraw lol

[DigitalRaptor]

I'm of that persuasion as well.

Not impressed. Imagine if Uncharted 4 had glaring screen tearing. I don't think a game in that series has had screen-tearing since the very first one, and those games were doing more impressive feats of gameplay for their time, whilst pushing some of the most impressive visuals at the 720p baseline for that generation.

[OpenGL]

Pretty disappointing but the resolution will not make or break this game.

[DigitalRaptor]

You're right - there have been quite a few successful low resolution X1 games.

Resolution might not make or break, but extremely noticeable performance issues, repetitive and one-dimensional gameplay, and bland story might.
--------

@ Moldy

You're right - now that game's on PC there's a lot more people able to get the game which means that there is naturally more interest. Doesn't surprise me though, since it's an action/shooter, so of course it's going to attract attention.

Still fail to see how that is relevant to this comment section. Do you want to discuss the game, perhaps? Perhaps challenge what I said about it? Or what Digital Foundry said about it?

[freshslicepizza]

over 160 comments, looks like this game has attracted a ton of attention.

[DashArrivals]

Totally correct.

If this game gets lots of great reviews then I'll get it for PC. I just have to upgrade my best PC to Windows 10 which I'm seriously dreading lmao.

My laptop can stay Windows 7.

[Eidolon]

It looks pretty good to me(I'm still impressed, graphically, by some 360/PS3 games I didn't experience last gen from a technical standpoint), but I still don't think it deserves all the graphical hype that it had.

[hiawa23]

Can't wait to get my hands on this game. I am sure they made the best game hardware would allow, so as my tastes go, I should love this game, the game is what it is. Looks great, turning out to be about what I expected. Preordered digital copy for X1. I am one of these gamers who just enjoy the games, I don't really care about the pixels and all that, just have good gaming experience. When I turn the key in my car all I care is the car starts, I really don't care how the gas gets from the tank to the engine. Same for games, this game will be fine.

[iistuii]

Good for you. I hope its a great game too...

[Fishy Fingers]

Some short comings for sure but still a great looking game on the XB1. But I'll be buying it on PC anyhoo..

[Computersaysno]

Seems I can tell rather a lot from Youtube videos.

[Mkai28]

Hey digital foundry, wait until the game has been officially released.

[Phunkydiabetic1]

Uh, review copies have been sent out. They are playing a final copy of the game. It is done. Nothing will change. The 720p Xbox One dynasty lives on.

[Eidolon]

Yeah! Day 1 patch will double the resolution!

[MasterCornholio]

I'm sure the game will be just fine.

:)

[Mkai28]

That's the problem isn't it, all these sites seem to rate a game based on the tech behind it and not the actual story and gameplay.. Digital Foundry just seems like they want to slander a game even before it's released.. I'll tell you, it easy to sit back and judge on something that you haven't made..

[MasterCornholio]

Well a technical analysis isn't exactly a review of a game. Its really just something for us geeks in the gaming industry. Even though a game can contain some technical flaws it can still end up being fantastic.

Take Bloodborne as an example. The game itself is fantastic but it does have some technical flaws. However said flaws were so minor that it didn't turn the game into a bad one.

I don't mind technical analysis from digital foundary. They usually tell me how well a game runs on my platform of choice. That's something that I appreciate because it allows me to make a better decision when buying a game.

[rainslacker]

I like DF for these exclusive analysis. It's about the only time I actually pay attention to them, because comparisons are boring. The reason I like them for exclusive analysis is because they go into great detail on what's being done, and it helps give an idea of just what the system is capable of.

[iceman06]

The REAL problem is that people (on both sides of the console war) confuse technical analysis with review. DF doesn't "slander" a game before it comes out. They analyze them to see what kind of technical wizardry is being used to achieve what we see. That's it. There's no mention of story or mechanics, because that's NOT what they do. That's what reviews are for.
Having said that, some people just like the inside scoop on tech info. Others like to use it as fanboy armor and ammo. Either way, none of this can really be seen as DF's fault. They just provide the information. What's done with that is up to the community.

[Phunkydiabetic1]

Oh give up your fanboy damage control man. This copy is final. They arent slandering anything, they are doing a technical analysis of the game. I guess they could lie and say it is a native 1080p game running with no frame drops to make you fanboys happy?

[DigitalRaptor]

Rightttttt. "slander"... So you think it's Digital Foundry's fault that Remedy decided to output aspects of the game in a last-gen resolution as part of their rendering pipeline, focus more on effects than image quality, convince people that it's actually a native 1080p resolution, and that the game also has noticable screen tearing? This is a technical analysis, not a review. Digital Foundry isn't exactly there to cover up technical information and make you feel better just because you'd rather see them talk about story and gameplay (both of which look bland and hopefully - but probably not - there is a saving grace in there somewhere).

Wait for the Eurogamer review, if you want to see their opinions about that. The story could end up being impactful, and gameplay could be less one-dimensional in the end, but we have to wait for final reviews for that. This is not a review.

[Pullmywaffle]

Not gonna lie, i mainly preordered for the free PC version. My PC dwarfs any console out, but it's in a different room. So being able to play it in two different rooms is convenient. Can't wait to crank this baby up on PC.

[DashArrivals]

I may get it for PC, but I'll only have average specs. I don't have a beast PC. I wonder what the game will look like on maxed out settings.

[Gwynbleidd]

The game looks awesome and they use elegant ways to make it look that good on Xbox One. End of story. Why all the negativity?

I don't see a reason for complaints.

I think we should wait for the more important review answers:
Is the game fun to play??!

[DivineAssault]

Whatever.. If its a good game, it wont matter.. Although i love great graphics, issues are always somewhere, hopefully not everywhere.. I dont have xb1 but i want a reason to get it.. This game looks cool to me so why are people complaining? The system can only do so much.

[captainexplosion]

This game was supposed to be revolutionary. Graphics for this game matter more than other games. I don't really mind the 720P but the 30fps with screen tearing is unforgivable. Still looks like a fun rental, but I do no think it has a chance of being revolutionary.

[WelkinCole]

Eh, just let it be. I am sure the game will be great. It won't matter much to me as I will be playing it on low settings on my laptop.

[Plagasx]

Thank god this is coming to PC.

[Tzuno]

The game looks amazing for 720p, oh if X1 would have been more powerful, i hope it comes to PC in the future, anyway this game is hold back by X1 limits and even a PC port could not match a first full PC release in therms of performance and image quality.

[bleedsoe9mm]

this website, these stories and these comments is exactly why your getting a xb1.5 and ps4.5 , i hope your happy .

[Liqu1d]

PS4.5 isn't happening. And don't bother linking me anonymous rumours, I've seen them.

[bleedsoe9mm]

patrick klepek is one of the only true reporters left working the video games industry and has broken lots of big stories in the past . if he put his name on it he has more than one reliable source , its happening .

[XMarkstheSpot]

Man some of you are really sad. Everyone thought the game looked amazing leading up to this. Now that someone spoon fed you the specs its apparently not good enough. LOL. Just play the game, if its good its good, if not it wont be. But judging it without playing or seeing twitch vids etc is so stupid. Especially with everyone liking the looks of the game from what was shown all ready.

[iistuii]

Well said. My point exactly. I have said over & over that a typical person puts a game in his disk & starts to play it there is absolutely no way they can tell what resolution it's running at by just looking at the tv without some site telling them. You have people on this site who one min say how amazing it looks, get told the resolution & now are saying its crap, give me a break..

[ValkyriaFlightKing]

Looks good

[Destiny1080]

720p and screen tearing

[PistolsAtDawn]

You seriously need to watch the video/read the article.

[PistolsAtDawn]

So considering that DF and everyone else that has gotten their hands on this game so far have nothing but praise for it...seems like Pixel counters are just painting themselves into a corner on this one.

DF exists to tell us what res/fps games run at and over all they have nothing but outstanding praise for the game...they admit they don't KNOW what the res is because of the effects/rendering techniques that are being used, and they have openly said that if it's 720p that the techniques have rendered the 1080p vs 720p difference obsolete. More importantly they say that with very few exceptions the game runs solid and flawless...and that the game is one of the most ambitious games this gen...so why all the focus on a number? It's like certain people heard the keyword 720p and latched on for dear life without bothering to get the bigger picture...which is why I say pixel counters have painted themselves into a corner.

There's two outcomes now:
1) The game IS in fact 720p, yet due to rendering techniques is STILL one of the most visually impressive games this gen, and done so well that even DF says the issues of being 720p vs 1080p are obsolete...meaning res doesn't really matter

...or...

2) The game is ANY OTHER RESOLUTION (even perhaps the native 1080p that was confirmed by others and mentioned by remedy) with just global illumination/particle effects etc rendered at 720p. If that is the case...and 720p is so different...why couldn't anyone tell before? And why did no one look at those HOURS of direct feed videos before and say..."wait that's not 1080p, I can tell instantly because 720p and 1080p is a massive difference" ...why are even DF scared to try and nail down a solid resolution? ...and why is it just now that an article has been written that there is a massive uproar about it? Either Res makes a huge difference or it doesn't...so why did DF have to write an article (stating they don't know what the res is) in order for people to start talking about it?

Not good news for pixel counters...not good news at all. No matter what res it is, it's one of the best looking games this gen...pixel counters better hope it's 1080p or all their ammo is gone.

With the information available...from all the different sources, I wouldn't be surprised if it was native 1080p (or even a dynamic res up to 1080p) with effects rendered at 720p...it makes the most sense at this point, and would explain why DF can't nail down the res...and why the only number they can nail down is in the menu (when there are no effects) and 720p when they are looking at something with effects being rendered.

[magus]

Game looks interesting hopefully it delivers.

Off topic: Started a new show need some feedback please.

Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/cha...

Thanks

[Khronikos]

Just kill the Xbone now. The thing is not ready for this gen or any gen. It's a shitshow of a system.

[PistolsAtDawn]

The fact that you got ANY agrees for this statement shows this site is filled with a large group of people that aren't even gamers at all

...why would anyone ever wish for a gaming option to disappear just cause they aren't interested in the option? As an owner of all the consoles and a PC, it's actually even my preferred gaming outlet of choice this gen...you should give it a shot before blindly hating it.

...if it's that bad...what are you even here then? And how do you have so many bubbles trolling like that?

[WiiU-Dude]

Like I've said, more tricks may be needed to coax the ole XB1 to greatnes, but studios are doing it and Remedy has proven to be unorthodox and still ROCKS!! I have no fear XB1 Quantum Break will be awesome, yes the PC version will be awesomer, but I don't care. XB1 is the 1 I will be getting!!! Loved what was done with Tom Clancy The Division to make it rock as well as the mighty PS4! Thank you developers!!
Btw, I own both but pull for the underdog because I want competition!!

[81BX]

Game looks good. Gonna give it a try

[Rookie_Monster]

Looks great, Day One!

[MagicBeanz]

Anyone looking for the best visual experience will be playing on PC anyways.

[Slanty]

Pc version it is then!

[Artemidorus]

My comment has been branded trolling for telling the truth.

Xbox fanboys are in the dark, you had the DX12, WIN 10, had the CPU pushed up slightly. The system is weak and it's time for a new console.

When you finally leave 720p and screen tearing you will look back and make yourself wonder why you didn't try something else.

[FPS_D3TH]

As a huge Max Payne fan and a huge fan of Remedys I'm a little jelly to be missing out on this game. Hope it's a cool adventure of a game. It's the story that looks the most interesting though IMO. The gameplay isn't something I feel I'm missing out on. Would like to be proven wrong but it doesn't look too innovative. Just a different spin on bullet time combined with some hard drugs lol.

[thelaughingwiseman]

I know it is random but I can't believe the protagonist has a twin in real life. They've both have had roles in different movies. Crazy :D

[Eidolon]

I was shocked to find out that Iceman(X-Men movies) and Jinks(Warehouse 13) were not the same person and that they were twins.

[jokerisalive]

Lets see what the final verdict is on the rez before anyone else here gets a heart attack. Personally I would say it sounds like 1080p native or dynamic with 720p effects. Game still looks amazing and I am getting it day one regardless. Amazing how many haters and insecure snobs out here that try to devalue anything that doesnt fit their needs or agenda. Get a life people or a new hobby for that matter.

[MCTJim]

Pre-order cancelled....NOT. I'm still getting it and a confused and befuddled DF cant figure it out. I don't care, its a must have for me.

[meche334]

It's not out yet. Still room for improvement in the day one patch

[bleedsoe9mm]

its 1080p how much more do you want it to improve

[meche334]

Chill. The games not even out. This stuff can be settled in the day 1 patch

[corroios]

A patch cant solve the lack of power. They arent the first doing this on a first party game.

Remedy is well know for strange resolutions. The same happend with Alan Wake on the 360.

Just watch the video before coming to the rescue.