Approvals 13/3 ▼
Relientk77 (3) - 3235d ago Cancel
ape007 (1) - 3235d ago Cancel
Nyxus (3) - 3235d ago Cancel
kaiserfranz (2) - 3235d ago Cancel
RashBandicoot (2) - 3235d ago Cancel
Manic2014 (1) - 3235d ago Cancel
loopygames (1) - 3235d ago Cancel
720°

Sony’s Shuhei Yoshida Tries Microsoft’s Halo 5 HoloLens Experience, Calls it “Super Cool”

SCE Worldwide Studios President Shuhei Yoshida is one of the main proponents of new experiences like Virtual Reality, and today he got to try something a bit different at E3: Microsoft’s holographic experience, HoloLens.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3235d ago
Relientk773235d ago

Shuhei Yoshida is the man. A true gamer.

Abriael3235d ago

Indeed, I'm still awed but how he beat that damn guard dog in the cursed defiled dungeon.

Ezz20133235d ago (Edited 3235d ago )

Because He's the goddamn BATMA...uhh i mean Shu.

yewles13235d ago

"Because He's the goddamn BATMA...uhh i mean Shu."

Nah, he's just BatShu insane...

Gazondaily3235d ago

Aww its actually kinda cool when you see stuff like this.

You know you're a nerd when you get excited over this stuff lmao.

SonofGod3235d ago

Had much respect for this man before, now I respect him even more!

Sunny_D3235d ago Show
TRS_Gear3234d ago

You're exactly right. He is a true gamer.

This is why all this stupid fanboyism needs to stop.

All three consoles have so much really cool stuff to offer.

Professor_K3234d ago

o my god lol

the double standard is real

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3234d ago
whitesoxfalife19763235d ago

This awesome he went by the booth to check out halo5 special edition of hololens

SmokingMonkey3235d ago

Aaron Greenberg @aarongreenberg
An honor to meet & host @yosp at our @E3 booth today, fun talking about games w/ him. A true class act!

Reggie thinks VR isn't social enough but hasn't tried it yet.

How easy is it to just say something simple like; It's cool. ?

3235d ago Replies(11)
DragonDDark3234d ago

Reggie only cares about mario

AgentSmithPS43234d ago

Lol I won't buy VR to be social.

PaleMoonDeath3235d ago (Edited 3235d ago )

I like this guy, he has that vibe. But please.. Yoshi, give us some of that Backwards compatibility magic the Xbox One now has, I reckon if we pester them enough about it it'll happen, even if it means doing away with PSNow.

Edit: dislikes eh, got something against being able to play your PS3 games on your PS4? fanboys, I buy machines for playing, not for getting emotionally involved with.

Further Edit: You gusy are seriously attacking having BC on PS4..? shocking, utterly shocking.

xKugo3235d ago

Unlikely and if you're going to pester any about it, start with Andrew House or Kaz. I think they hold slightly more weight than Shu does. Especially Kaz..

mezati993235d ago

dude, it's gonna be impossible to emulate PS3's processor architecture due to how difficult and different it is compared to PS4's

personally, i'll be just happy with a full access to PS1/2 games library on PS4

PaleMoonDeath3235d ago (Edited 3235d ago )

I'd gladly take PS1/PS2 games!

Edit: @ WeAreLegion, woah easy there. Not trying to hurt anyones feelings here, but I want some of that backwards compatability for myself, Sony can probably do it, only thing is it's a behind a pay wall called PlayStation Now, damned streaming service.

I won't be able to reply by the way being my last bubble and all, so all of you Sony folk need to know I only own a PS4, so take off your company loving glasses and realise what MS is doing for the XB1 is utterly amazing, and I want that for myself via PS4. Damned kids on this site I'll tell ya.

@Abriael, I get what you're saying, but surely they have the ability to give us PS1/PS2 BC? I have hundreds.. literally hundreds of PS1 and PS2 games, I'd take that in a heart beat.

JasonKCK3235d ago (Edited 3235d ago )

When are you guys going to stop playing that "impossible to emulate PS3" card? It has nothing to do with emulation and everything to do with money. Impossible to emulate PS3 but works great when streaming behind a paywall. How do they get the PS3 remakes to work on a PS4 so fast?

n4rc3235d ago

@jason

i believe the game is run and streamed from a custom ps3 (essentially) on psnow.

Spotie3235d ago

@Jason:

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

"eight custom console units built into a single rack server."

They're using native hardware, though a bit customized, to stream PS3 games.

At least be educated on subjects before you talk, man.

JasonKCK3235d ago

You guys can use whatever excuse you want but, the bottom lime is the PS4 doesn't have BC because Sony wants to sell it to you. It really is that simple.

Modders have the ability to emulate some PS3 games on a PC for free. But according to you fans, it's impossible for Sony to do. MS managed to get some Xbox games to work on 360 and that had different "architecture".

So my question remains. Why do you guys keep playing that card?

Spotie3235d ago

Yes, Jason, and let's gloss over the hardware it takes to make these emulators that don't even work for every game. Let's ignore that emulation isn't some "just port it over" stuff like you think.

Natively, it's impossible. That's actually the case for both the XB1 and PS4, which is why you download the digital version of the 360 game, rather than reading the disc directly. Such a thing is definitely possible on PS4, but that's not something Sony is currently looking to do.

Sony can't sell backwards compatibility if it isn't backwards compatibility, and PS Now is not that. You want to call it that, because then you can run with the asinine narrative that Sony's trying to charge me for games I already own, but I don't have to pay them a damn thing to play ANY game I already own.

So, really, why do you keep playing THAT card?

_-EDMIX-_3235d ago

@Spotie- agreed and 100% correct.

I don't get the whole "sell you twice". When did they turn off PS3's remotely? When did they FORCE you to buy PS Now? PS Now was not made SOLELY to um..."sell you twice" as it also works on PS3.

Or...are they trying to sell PS3 gamer's "twice" too? lol. I mean...this assumption is baseless and doesn't really make much sense.

BOTH Sony and MS didn't just put native hardware in the PS4 or XONE that was PS3 or 360, as that is not their job. Its nice to see MS do something for fans for free.....but its not a necessity and MS didn't NEED to it. Its very much fan fair and they are doing a great job at it, but I wouldn't just fault them if they didn't as I didn't fault either for not doing it natively as...its not their job to give you free hardware so you can free up shelf space.

For about 70 bucks I can fix that XONE BC issue real quick LOL! I can have the BEST version of that, its a device called the XBOX 360...

uth113234d ago

The PS4 could emulate the PS3 architecture. The question is if it can emulate it in real time, fast enough to be usable. I have my doubts about that.

PS3 is more complex than XB360.

Of course armchair devs think anything is possible and just being held back to sell us stuff :/

JasonKCK3234d ago

"Of course armchair devs think anything is possible and just being held back to sell us stuff"

Because it is. That is the whole point of PSNOW.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3234d ago
WeAreLegion3235d ago

If you can get PS3 games playing on PS4, let Sony's engineers know. And then call NASA for an interview.

3235d ago Replies(2)
Abriael3235d ago

I'd love it, but I'm not sure it's as easy to implement.

The Xbox 360 has a PowerPC architecture that is different from the current architecture of the Xbox One, but not THAT different

The PS3 had a completely unique architecture centered on the cell and the SPUs, and required a lot of optimization to work. I don't think it's easy to emulate on a PC architecture. That's why no one (to my knowledge) is working on a PC emulator.

dcbronco3235d ago (Edited 3235d ago )

I have to disagree about the PowerPC architecture. They are very different. I believe the difference is Windows 10. All of those updates have opened more Windows 10 features. Windows 10 is made with the Server 2012 kernel I believe. Servers talk to lots of different architectures.

I bet the Xbox OS plays a major part too. The design is a virtual machine run on a hypervisor from what I've read. PCs can run many VMs and I believe Xbox One is just running another OS when you go to a 360 game. Microsoft has said One only runs a game OS and a app OS at the same time. But they never said the game OS couldn't change to fit the game you load. I'm sure it can play PC games too. They just aren't letting it right now. But I'm betting they eventually will. Plus, iirc, there is a good amount of the Cell spu design in the 360 cores.

uth113234d ago

No Windows 10 can't simply launch a Virtual PowerPC machine and run 360 games in it.

The PowerPC architecture needs to be emulated on an x86. This is very CPU intensive, so it can't run nearly as fast as a virtual machine under a hypervisor.

Imalwaysright3234d ago

PS3 and the 360 have powerPC architecture.

cell9893235d ago (Edited 3235d ago )

I rather have them spent those resources and energy on new IPs than being able to play Uncharted 2 on ps4. There's already enough games to play on ps4 as it is, do you really need to dig that ps3 catalog? It's good enough that if you have a ps3 you get plenty with psplus how much more gaming can you handle? And it's only gonna get more busy with the holiday releases. Your backlog of games will have you playing Bioshock 2 till summer 2016

Machiavellian3234d ago

What exactly does creating new IPs have anything to do with adding new features to the PS4. Its not like the two comflict with each other as one would be internal OS developers and the other would be gaming studios. Just because you might feel that the current games on the console is enough, I am sure there are a lot of PS3 gamers who still would like to play their games they invested money on and remove another device under the TV.

james0901623234d ago

Honestly, how much would you really use bc?

Pogmathoin3234d ago

They do have BC. It's called PsNow.... $4.99 per half hour for a $2 game at Gamestop. It's awesome.... Check it out.

sereal_killer3234d ago (Edited 3234d ago )

They can only do this via streaming. so they can perhaps recognize you have bought a game and make the psNOW edition free for you.

The cant actually do this like XBOX1 did it because the ps3 cell architecture is soo different that its is basicly impossible to emulate it in any good way on the ps4 unlike the xbox one with is pretty similar to the 360. even tho they also use a downlaod version. i do think the conversion can be automated pretty easily from 360 to One .

So no i dont think sony will do this atleast not like the xbox one, our only hope is free streaming version of the game.

FBNS3234d ago

I belive we can have both. Backwards compatibility only matters on the ps4. Psnow allows backwards compatibility with vastly different hardware power and architecture regardless of platform. People seem to always leave that out.

medman3234d ago (Edited 3234d ago )

@twiggy
What would be even better than Sony wasting their time trying to emulate backwards compatibility, is to give gamers the option of streaming their backroster of games linked through their playstation id's on psnow. Simple solution, no extra work required, and it's something Sony could do in the future.

Personally, I still own my ps3 and 360, but never really even think of playing my old games... I've got a pretty significant backlog of current gen games to get through as it is.

Professor_K3234d ago

Not shocking ps fanbase will bend down to any decision theyr dictators make, hypocrisy at its finest

bradleejones3234d ago

Sony invested like a bizillion dollars on buying gaikai and turning that into psnow. They have to recoup that somewhere. I doubt they will be doing BC this gen. Unfortunately. I still play the ps3 a ton.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 3234d ago
Show all comments (79)
60°

Building Final Fantasy XVI with Producer Naoki Yoshida | AIAS Game Maker's Notebook Podcast

Shuhei Yoshida chats with FINAL FANTASY XVI Producer Naoki Yoshida.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community105d ago
360°

PS5 Exec Doesn't Want To See Gaming's Future Dominated By Live-Service Games: "Boring"

PlayStation boss Shuehei Yoshida wants the gaming industry to continue to chase its creative dreams.

Read Full Story >>
gamespot.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community363d ago
Obscure_Observer363d ago

"Got that one right, Shu!"

Kind of ironic when Sony is focused on GaaS like never before.

Flakegriffin363d ago (Edited 363d ago )

Companies evolve overtime. Sony has implemented themselves in the single player space relatively well. Now they can expand further by doing more all while still giving us single player experiences. Obviously Shu is speaking on GaaS games being the main dominance of the gaming space and if that’s the future then that indeed sucks.

You can have that mindset all while still creating some GaaS titles.

InUrFoxHole363d ago

They have 10 in the works right now.

Crows90362d ago

Absolutely! Man all the freaking gaas games theyve been releasing...wait. Not a single one.

sinspirit362d ago

Did you read? It says "dominated". That word means something.

RedDevils362d ago

They don't want to be Blockbuster, too stubborn to adapt with time.

tagzskie362d ago

kinda ironic when it comes to xbox you xboys can even defeat einstein in explation why its good, when it comes to ps you guys became dumb and dumber..

FinalFantasyFanatic362d ago

How so? They're only after one or two good GaaS games, they're throwing crap at the wall until something sticks, alot of those games in development are going to languish and die shortly after release. They're still predominately focused on their core strategy of great single player games (look at the previous interview where they admit they cancel alot of games).

Bathyj362d ago

God why do Xbox gamers always love the thought of PlayStation being as crappy as Xbox.?

DarXyde362d ago

"Like never before" regarding GaaS is like saying "PS3 is a console that launched with HDD space like never before": it's a very low bar to clear because there isn't much precedent.

I happen to agree with Shu here. I don't think being a GaaS title is a scarlet letter, but I can't think of any live service games that have been great at launch either. Naughty Dog is looking likely break that trend. I'd say two love service titles at a time is the sweet spot. I suspect people can only deal with a limited number of live service games contemporaneously.

TheCaptainKuchiki362d ago (Edited 362d ago )

Lmaooo
People always criticize Sony because 90% of their exclusives are single player games. People say they are too expensive because of low replay value.
And you wanna pretend like Sony is focusing on Gaas? Their biggest games aren't Gaas unlike MICROSOFT.

ModsDoBetter362d ago (Edited 362d ago )

How are Sony focused on GaaS?

They own Bungie and have Destiny but the majority of their titles are far from GaaS.

Why, if you are such a die hard Xbot, do you rush to comment on Sony related articles?

1Victor362d ago

@obscure
Are you ok now we was worried about your mental health state when you disappeared for almost a week from bashing PlayStation articles.
Is the word DENIED still triggering you?

I haven’t read the article as my spam blocker always red flags that site and I don’t t want to risk it so a general comment it is 🤦🏿
We all know live services game and quality rarely goes together but some of them are fun to play

derek362d ago (Edited 362d ago )

@Obscure, Sony is starting from a place of zero which requires a big initial investment to establish themselves in the live services market.

Vengeance1138362d ago

It's very much the opposite, Shu said this damn well knowing Sony is going hard on GaaS. This is Shu confirming that Single player games won't be effected at all despite them going into Live service.

Extermin8or3_362d ago

Except they aren't really- they have what may be a live service game from Haven studios and firewalk studios, they have another from a second party dev and an fps game with multiplayer focus by deviation games, they counted Gt7 as a live service game but really it's not much different to how recent GT titles were treated, they have the last of us factions, a Horizon multiplayer game in production at guerilla alongside horizon 3, a new ip from Bungie. The rest of their studios seem to be hard at work on traditional singleplayer games that may also have a multiplayer mode or may not. So their live service titles are mostly in development from either new teams setup at existing studios or from acquisitions they have made which really just replace the capabilities they once had through Sony Online Entertainment until they sold it half a decade ago. Only I'd argue their new capabilities in this space would appear to be better and have higher quality talent than it did back then.

Sonic1881360d ago

And what is Xbox focused on? Redfall is so bad, it's worse than Forspoken 😂😂😂

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 360d ago
S2Killinit363d ago

Thank god for actual gamers in the industry.

neutralgamer1992363d ago

Shu I agree but right now Sony themselves are working on more than 5 live service games

Redemption-64363d ago

He never said they were not working on any. He said, he doesn't want to see Gaming's Future dominated by live-Service Games. Sony currently has 25 games in development. 10 being live service games, with the other mostly likely being single player games and that is honestly a very good balance

neutralgamer1992363d ago

I agree I just hope their live service games are not simple money grabs and try to do some good interesting things

-Foxtrot363d ago

"and that is honestly a very good balance"

The issue is, whether people want to admit it or not because it's Sony, but once a company gets a taste of that money GaaS games make the chances of them going money crazy becomes super higher

I know what you'll probably say

"bu bu but Sony wouldn't do that"

NO COMPANY is immune, even the best can fall and I really don't want to see that happen here.

The fact people will completely blow that off and pretend it's not even a possibility is worrying to me because that's how we end up shits creek.

They might be fine...they might go too far but at the moment I don't think it's a bad thing at all to be sceptical with the shit this industry has gone through in the past 10 years alone.

FinalFantasyFanatic362d ago (Edited 362d ago )

The thing is most of those 10 games won't even be viable, out of the 10 that actually get released, probably only 1 or 2 will make the big bucks worth continuing support. I think Sony even knows that, look at all the other GaaS games that release and die shortly after. Personally I'm okay with that because I don't want the market dominated with these games.

I'd actually rather the resources go on to making some more top-tier JRPGs, I feel like we don't get enough of those in the last couple of gens.

neutralgamer1992362d ago

Final Fantasy

But keep in mind when those games fail many of the studios are shut and there are layoffs

NotoriousWhiz362d ago

I don't want a Gaas game. I just want a new socom. A strong multi-player title with no purchases beyond the initial purchase.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 362d ago
-Foxtrot363d ago

Yeah exactly what I was thinking

Not 1

Not a cheeky 2

But freaking 5

Like it’s not even a “we’ll try doing one and see how it goes”

__SteakDeck__363d ago

@-Foxtrot What do you have against live service games. I’m not a fan of live service games, but multiplayer games can be done right just look at Titanfall before EA killed it. As long as PS’s core studios keep making single player games, everything should be fine.

Redemption-64363d ago

Sony said they have 25 games in development. 10 being live service games, with the other mostly likely being single player games. They have more single player games in development

-Foxtrot363d ago

@__SteakDeck__

Urm....that they are a cancer in this industry

That the majority of them fail and the developers have then wasted years on them rather than other things.

They turn developers and publishers into thirsty little money grabbers where that big money is still not enough for them.

I could go on, defending GaaS games is not a hill to die on man, it's really not

"done right just look at Titanfall before EA killed it"

Titanfall 2 was not really a GaaS type of game compared to what we are getting now so that's a really bad example.

__SteakDeck__363d ago

@-Foxtrot Yeah it seems like you just have a hatred for multiplayer games. I’m not the biggest fan of multiplayer games, but like I said they can be done well. Also Titanfall 1 had no single player it was multiplayer only and it’s now a dead game, but it was still good. So yes that is a good example.

FinalFantasyFanatic362d ago

@_SteakDeck_,
I'm still salty about Titanfall 2, it was one of the only multi-player games I actually liked.

NotoriousWhiz362d ago

Multi-player games don't have to be Gaas games. Look at Mario Kart, Splatoon. Nintendo's games most likely don't have Gaas because they're behind the times, but this is one area where it's better to be behind the times.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 362d ago
blackblades362d ago

And? They still have single player games. Domination would completely ruled with live services which Sony should know to still do single player. On a side note they should also do a few 1st party smaller games like indie or AA. By the way is indie a single A game.

Philaroni362d ago (Edited 362d ago )

To be fair, so has many other companies aka Ubisoft for example and many of them they decided to end development on. Just because something is in the works does not mean it will release if they do not feel it will pan out. ATM all of the GaaS we know of from Sony are The Last of Us Factions, and some kind of Horizon (Monster Hunter like) game. Also keep in mind, they do own Bungie, and Destiny and there new project be it Destiny 3 and there new IP will likely be that. So just that on its own is near half of what we can best assume.

Main issue with GaaS now days is that its very over saturated. Keep in mind as well Battel Royal games are GaaS by nature also, hell CoD is GaaS. Halo Infinity, ditto. Really now days unless something is an honest to god single player game only the GaaS term gets over used.

Not sure if many played it (I loved it) Gun's Up was a GaaS for a long while, it was going to shut down till some youtubers gave it a bit of new life for another half of year. We know Sony Mobile is working on things and it not shock me if some of this stuff is targeted to the mobile market.

Right now Sony's biggest weakness I'd say is MP games. With that Firewalk studio from lots of vets they just acquired its quite likely there game will have GaaS stuff as part of it, that is still years down the line. I think everyone needs to chill out some and just wait and see what comes. We have not really got a real honest GaaS from Sony before this or even last gen really... At least as we know them now days. Such a broad term now.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 362d ago
Show all comments (61)
170°

The face of PlayStation: Shuhei Yoshida on the joy and future of video games

He’s been at PlayStation since the beginning, and seen the games industry transform beyond recognition. He talks unlikely successes, AI, and gaming’s future.

Read Full Story >>
theguardian.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community368d ago
Workshyskiver368d ago

A titan and a legend of the industry.

autoglope368d ago (Edited 368d ago )

Shue is great. .. He even mentioned Miazaki and Ueda,..

victorMaje368d ago

What a Legend. I salute you.

Show all comments (6)