GamingWorm Says:
Nvidia G-Sync technology monitors which enable gamers to get rid off stutters , lags and tearing. How is that possible. As you know if V-Sync is off it may causes screen tearing several times as you can see in following picture.
Big Format Gaming Displays have been custom-designed to deliver the ultimate 65” 4K 120Hz G-SYNC HDR PC gaming experience, for enthusiasts that demand the absolute best.
If you think a 65" 4KTV with a 120hz panel and Gsync will cost less than 1800? A 27" 4K monitor with Gsync costs almost $1000 lol.
I would be shocked if this cost under $3000
It'll cost crap tons, a panel that big with hdr and a high refresh rate? G-sync too? Nope, that's going to be over $2000 here. I predict 3000, then a little on top for attaching "gamer" to the title.
G-Sync makes complete sense on consumer televisions. "face of sarcasm" HDMI is already coming with a display sync technology this year. So G-Sync is already dead. Buying NVIDIA proprietary tech is a fools errand.
G-sync is the superior technology but free sync is cheaper to integrate, nvidia are just being dicks for not supporting it. I think the struggle between the two will continue for a couple more years.
What is G-Sync and why is it so expensive?
What does it offer that makes me want to spend 3times the money a decent 4k TV costs?
Serious questions.
it matches the refresh rate of the TV to the framerate of what you are displaying, making for an overall much smoother experience even in unlocked framerates and removing screen tearing
G-sync has extra hardware added as well while free sync can be done with the current hdmi specifications. Personally I'm hedging my bets on free sync winning out over G-sync because it's cheaper and slowly catching up to the performance of G-sync.
If you're looking for Best G-Sync Gaming Monitor (1080p, 2K, 4K, HDR) then this is the right place to decide, we worked hard to get you the best results and saving your later regrets.
I got the Asus PG279Q ROG and it's great at upscaling!! Got it on sale for way cheaper
Gsync monitors are just too damn expensive. I bought the Samsung QLED 32" 1440p monitor this year with 1ms response time and paid substantially less because of the lack of gsync.
Nvidia really needs to chill on the licensing. Thankfully I haven't played anything that struggles on my system yet, but hopefully pricing comes down to more reasonable levels at some point...
This article is so bad it doesn't even know the basic tech specs of the monitors. PG279Q is rated at 4ms G2G, not 1ms. And it absolutely does not have a scaler.
Resolutions under it's native resolution will look much blurrier so 1080p on this monitor will look MUCH worse than 1080p on a 1080p monitor. But 1440p will look beautiful.
"thrust
You get what you pay for tho like pretty much everything!
G sync is amazing"
Problem is it offers little to nothing over FreeSynce. I have a Acer Predator x34 as my daily monitor on my main system and a VIOTEK GN34C on my secondary system both are extremely similar in specs both 1440p@100hz and curved Ultrawide the Acer is Gsynce and Viotek is Freesynce and I cant really tell any differance going from one to the other espically to justify the extra 500$ the Acer cost over the other.
Yes but you wouldn't get the refresh rate you would with a monitor, or the response time. I think some of the better gaming TV's are about ~14ms of input latency whereas these gaming monitors are as low as 1ms of input latency.
I doubt it would have g-sync and the input would lag in comparison to a good monitor.
I don't think you would notice the 4k with a tv that small. Someone correct me if Im wrong though.
NVIDIA announced G-SYNC HDR at CES 2017. The first two 4K 144Hz monitors from Asus and Acer will be available in Q2 2017, and they will feature virtually non-existent additional input latency unlike TVs while gaming in HDR.
4k 144hz with HDR and almost NO additional input lag? Yes. Please. This may be the only upgrade paired with the GPU for this year. I want 4k 60FPS or higher in 2017.
It's a shame there is no single-graphics card on market that can support a stable 4k60fps. Vega is shaping up to be that GPU that can hit 4k60fps but they're still showing very little of what it really is and price/release. Nvidia is still pumping out Pascal GPU's to people trying to achieve 4K gaming.
These are packing some incredible technology and the price isn't too crazy. I'm probably going to sell my current Gsync monitor and get one of these. Although I might just wait for a nice 34" 21:9 G-Sync HDR monitor. I'll have to think about it, but these are definitely impressive.
Well. Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for the chance to play 1080/60 with a new Pc.
Kind Regards rich people, have fun!
i dont think 1080p/60 is really expensive. u drop few settings and u can get 1080p/60 fairly cheap.
It depends if you are playing on a monitor or tv. If is tv PC gaming yes a beefier GPU with at least 4GB of VRAM is required to enjoy Native 1080p/60 frames per second. In contrast a 15in to 25in monitor is already capable of Native 1080p/60 frames per second. My current gaming PC if it were hook to a monitor not HDTV set, I would be playing all my games at 1080p native 60 frames per second.1
Haha. This is why 4k isn't mainstream yet. Don't get me wrong, these are nice and I hope people enjoy them. But, to me (again my personal opinion), I can't justify paying that price for a monitor especially when it cost more than my 60in 4k TV.
It is good now that PC monitors can now do HDR and if your have a beast of a rig then I'm sure you will be in heaven. I know I would be but I'll just stick with my console. Have fun guys.
I am trying to get a second job now so I can save on this an another Titan X Pascal and this monitor! I already have a 4K HDR Samsung KS8000 that can already do this at 120p. When I played Gears of War 4 on it those frames look butter smooth!
The KS8000 (which is an amazing TV for 2016 standards) doesn't actually have native 120Hz, it's interpolated, which is a very different thing. It only adds the dreaded "soap opera effect" which isn't really useful for gaming.
You can find out more in this review http://www.rtings.com/tv/re...
Look really smooth to me. I had it on game mode with no auto motion. You can clearly see in Gears of War 4.
While TV panel itself can display at 120hz, HDMI 2.0 can't handle it at 4k. At least if you don't want to use 4:2:0, dropping color data. Auto motion plus adds over 100ms of delay as well.
I have the ks8500 myself, it's the best tv for gaming I could find. You just have to use the right settings.
Ashunderfire86---i was doing two jobs a few months ago and i'm telling you it's not easy well it depends on what type of work you are doing if it's restaurant with a lot of physical work then prepare your self lol. 20+hrs a day it gives me nightmares just thinking about it but any way dont kill yourself over it. and yes go go for the monitor TV are mostly inaccurate in many things when compared to a monitor so you are not losing anything maybe a smaller size but that's not a big problem
That's not native 120hz though, I have the same TV, it's native 60hz even at 1080p unfortunately.
The KS8000 has nothing on these monitors, man. This is some next level shit.
OLED is next Level shit. These Monitors need to have that technology instead with both HDR and Dolby Vision along with 144FPS! Shit that cost you $2000 or more lol! Wow. LCD is still great, but OLED is king! And for the guy who said Sony 850 is better than KS8000 need to check himself 😂 lol RTing website it is the best TV for gaming, and KS8000 is on bar with KS9000 and KS95000, which is just overkill.
@Ashunderfire86 - yeah I just bought the LG 55E6P OLED 4K. I am hooking it up tonight, but I know I will be blown away.
Gears of War runs at 60fps not 120. Anything above 60hz on a TV is just a marketing gimmick and only useful for the smooth motion effect which gives me a headache.
Yes I understand the whole gimmick but the Fraps give me something higher than 60fps I was using 1440p settings on a 4K TV, and lower somethings to reach that 100fps to 120fps Mark. Gears of War 4 has a lot of advance PC options on it! It is quite state of the art! It look super fast with smooth frames didn't see any ghosting an crazy input lag. Yes I turn on Game Mode, and the PC version doesn't have HDR yet.
For gaming the extra frames can be nice. For TV the only thing it can help is sports. Everything else makes it just look weird. I hate the Soap Opera Effect.
I talk about my experiences yet I get 7 disagrees if people claiming that I am all wrong lol! According to the built in Fraps on Gears 4 I was above 60 frames from 100fps in places to 120fps. The numbers don't lie.
A fairly high price for them, but if they're as good as described it will be worth it. Though I'm still happy with my Ultrawide montior!
The holy grail, for me at least, will be a 34" ultrawide gsync monitor with HDR. I can't wait for when those hit.
I had a Ultrawide that I tested for a few weeks, loved that thing. Mad Max was so beautiful on that wide screen.
What about the 100000000000000000000000000000 000k .00000000005ms G-SYNC+ with 1fps screen
Could you even see the difference that 8K could provide on a measley 30" screen?
@Dasteru - I seriously hope you wouldn't put your face 18" from a 30" screen. Unless you plan on using bottletop glasses the rest of your life :P
I would say I sit about 3 feet away from my computer monitor.
I cannot wait to see the reviews on these suckers. If they can help with my screen tearing on my lower end PCs, Im sold!
Wouldn't mind getting hold of a few of these
Somebody knows a good monitor at least 24" but with sound included ? want to use it for gaming PC and my PS4.
That Asus PG278Q will go well with my red and black CM Storm Trooper case. Which has it's own ROG badge from the motherboard I bought. I have been eye balling that piece of candy since they revealed it. I will have one. :)