150°

MGS5: A rant about console-exclusive DLC

Playdar have a discussion about the ills of console-exclusive DLC with a focus on Metal Gear Solid 5: Ground Zeroes.

Read Full Story >>
playdar.co.uk
nukeitall3789d ago

I don't get this console exclusive dlc on both consoles. It seems more to generate the most cash for Konami, and to screw consumers!

This is a huge turn-off and I think I will jump on Titanfall first.

CocoWolfie3789d ago (Edited 3789d ago )

itll turn a lot of people off, an that doesnt bode well for sales.. especially with some of the things theyve already done.. :/
but yeah unless you have both consoles, you get screwed over on what could be a great game and its content, sigh

Loadedklip3789d ago

Agree ... this serves absolutely no purpose other than to screw your own fanbase.

Unless you have both consoles and buy two copies of the game ... you cannot have all the content creatwd for the game.

esemce3789d ago

This kind of sh1t makes people wait for the complete GOTY version. I think they do this also knowing that some people will re buy the game.

End of the day we are being made to feel exploited and that's not how you treat your loyal fanbase.

Irishguy953789d ago (Edited 3789d ago )

Lets not act like this is something new in the industry. It's a massive staple of the X360/Ps3 era.

Also Legacy, as usual - it was Xbox fans bragging/moaning about their exclusive content and Sony fans bragging/moaning when it doesn't suit them. Same **** from all fanboys. Xbox One got the better Exclusive content for GZ. That's why N4G is suddenly *****ing over it. However if you check sites without craploads of Xbox fanboys you'll see the same thing whenever Ps gets exclusive content. It just so happens N4G became massively Sony fanboy oriented over the last few years.

It's very simple anyway, if you're gonna defend console exclusive anything(games, features etc) Then you have no right to be pissed about Exclusive content. It's the same ****ing thing. There is now an actual reason as to why someone would pick the X1 version over the Ps4 one. Whereas their wasn't before. Also Sony fans had Nothing but praise for when the Ps4 Exclusive mission was announced. It's just more proof of the constant hypocrisy of fanboys

Edit - http://n4g.com/news/1394330...

Nobody cares that it is an exclusive mission. They only start calling out exclusive missions as a bad thing when X1's content turned out to be much better

Infamous2983789d ago (Edited 3789d ago )

"Also Sony fans had Nothing but praise for when the Ps4 Exclusive mission was announced."

WTF?? we didn't even praise that shitty exclusive DLC, stop bringing sh*t from no where.

Loadedklip3789d ago (Edited 3789d ago )

This is not the same thing.
If ONE system had exclusive content ... then you would be correct. That is the tactic used to have a fanbase of a game choose that one system.

But in this case BOTH Sony and Microsoft are getting exclusive content thus forcing a diehard MGS fan to have to buy two systems and two copies of the game if they want to have all the content available for MGSV.

This screws the fans of the game.

Irishguy953789d ago (Edited 3789d ago )

XD, that is the most retarded logic i've heard in a long time. Die hard MGS fans, if you're really gonna buy a system on the basis of one game, you deserve to have to buy two consoles. Especially if you're gonna buy a system for a ****ing 30 quid Demo of the full game.

Also infamous assassin, nobody have a **** that there was exclusive content. They only cared that the content was bad. However when Xbox gets good content, suddenly exclusive content = bad, no..there is no praise for the Xbox's content that looks good...it's just bad because it's not on PS4. Whoever buys a Ps4 like me, is gonna get the worse version of GZ 'if they buy it'. I'm waiting till the Phantom pain most likely. Maybe....I could use a nice stealth game to go along with Infamous and the Witcher 3.

nukeitall3789d ago

lol!

You even provided cold hard proofs as well. I can't argue with it.

It didn't really bother me if the content is on one platform only, because I get the impression the console manufacturer paid for the content. Something that might not have been done without them.

However, this just seems odd, so I hope this is time exclusivity at work.

Also, they also do sh!t like this now:

http://n4g.com/news/1410094...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3789d ago
andrewsqual3789d ago

The huge turn off for me is simply the entire game as a whole. Just like other Japanese franchises Final Fantasy, Resident Evil, Devil May Cry, this is one to just keep a close eye on for now.

Legacy2123789d ago

Lol when ps3 and ps4 got console exclusive stuff nothing was said. As soon as xbox gets a raiden dlc "omg console exclusive dlc!!" Both console exclusive dlc seem lame anywayz

ShinMaster3789d ago

And when Xbox gets timed exclusive COD dlc, Xbox fans don't say anything either.

Hypocrites.

XboxFun3789d ago (Edited 3789d ago )

Exactly, this content is meant to please the console owner of choice and to entice others to purchase that console if needed.

I don't understand why this is a problem. It comes off as whiney little children that are upset because the other kids have a shinier new GI Joe to play with than they do.

come_bom3789d ago (Edited 3789d ago )

I have to agree on this one, when ps3 and ps4 exclusive dlc was announced, nobody said a word (or ranted)...

ShinMaster3789d ago

And when Xbox gets timed exclusive COD dlc, Xbox fans don't say anything either.

Let's not be hypocrites.

christocolus3789d ago (Edited 3789d ago )

I really dont get it either. I believe ms paid for the quality of their exclusive content. Sony also paid for theirs. Sony also has ac4 and watchdog exclusive content, while ms has exclusive content for the division..its a win win.

Its funny how fbs are attacking ms now instead of putting pressure on sony to make equally good deals as ms is doing with third party...when this was first announced for ps3 and ps4 fans where happy, then hideo announced content for xbx and i remember some fbs saying it wouldnt be more than a stupid kinect add on but now the details have been made known,same fbs are now ranting and calling hideo kojima evil........the irony.....smh.

sony actually stated that they rather secure exclusive content for brand new franchises than already existing ones but it seems ms would rather secure exclusive content from both new and existing franchises.

Infamous2983789d ago Show
FPSRUSSIA3789d ago

yeah i agree but the PS3/PS4 one sucks compared to the Xbox exclusive Raiden DLC we get Classic Snake and they get Raiden. i am not buying a xbox one just for Raiden

ABizzel13789d ago

@Legacy212

Let's be real, who really cares about replaying a mission from the original MGS with a PSOne graphic Snake. No one complained about it, because no one cared, and the MGS announcement at the PS Event was included in the underwhelm section of that event.

Now you get Raiden jumping around rooftops, shooting helicopters out the air with a rocket launcher, and likely what Kojima had planned for MGS Rising, and you have something to be envious about.

It's understandable why people are complaining, on top of all the other mess Kojiman and company have done.

Gr1mmyshadows3789d ago

i said this same exact this in another post about MGS

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3789d ago
jc485733789d ago (Edited 3789d ago )

Raiden dlc being exclusive makes no sense whatsoever. He appeared on both consoles, but he was more popular on Sony platforms, so what makes him so special on the xboxone? He should appear on both consoles.

NYC_Gamer3789d ago

MS and Sony both paid for exclusive content and i expect that to be the case with many multiplatform titles

timlot3789d ago

In this article resides a man whom's butt hurts.

thegreatmacro3789d ago

That's from a wholly separate incident

Show all comments (31)
140°

The Metal Gear series has sold over 59.8 million copies

300,000 Metal Gear games were sold during the first quarter of 2023, Konami has announced, bringing the total number to 59.8 million.

Read Full Story >>
metalgearinformer.com
FallenAngel1984343d ago

Still waiting on Konami to put the MGS Collection back on digital stores

Nyxus343d ago

I know right? And rerelease the games for current gen systems while they're at it.

just_looken342d ago

Do not worry they will give use those pichincko remakes for top dollar soon.

Metal gear solid 3 in the fox engine looked/ran amazing but was sealed away :(

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Sarcasm343d ago

I know re-makes and stuff have been played to death this generation.

But damn I wouldn't mind an MGS4 remake

gold_drake342d ago

i played it quite recently and it holds up very well

CantThinkOfAUsername342d ago

It does, but a remake will be available on platforms other than PS3.

itsmebryan343d ago

I thought the series would have sold more over all these years and different releases.

Ready4nxtgen343d ago

Yeah I would have thought over 150 Mil. Something.missing here

Nyxus343d ago

Metal Gear isn't that big, and there hasn't been a new release in years. Also MGS2 and 3 are still missing from digital storefronts.

shinoff2183343d ago

5 mgs games in total if I'm not mistaken. 59 60 million seems about right. Mgs is dope to some of us but it would be hard for a lot of regulars to understand

ChasterMies343d ago

I would love to buy MGS4 but it’s still a PS3 exclusive.

JEECE343d ago

Although there are notable exceptions (GTA, certain first-party Nintendo games, Gran Turismo), as a rule games didn't sell as much in earlier generations as they have in the past few generations. So a lot of PS1-PS2 era titles that are viewed as seminal games didn't actually sell all that much by today's standards (yes, despite the large install bases of those systems lol). I remember a similar surprised reaction happening a few months ago when Square announced the total overall sales of Final Fantasy VII.

Deathdeliverer343d ago

Some of the best fun you can have online was the first metal gear online and to a lesser, but still fun to an extent, MGO2. The magazine, CQC, stealth, and tactical play Vs real players is just a blast. Not to mention playing Snake vs everyone? Amazing. The game will never be the same without Hideo, but Konami can definitely update what’s already there and take my money.

ceyoga342d ago

You wouldn't be talking about the OG MGO that was included with MGS3:S would you? It's rare running into another former player. Those were some of the best memories of any online game I had.

Deathdeliverer342d ago

Yes my man!! That seems like the BEST game that nobody played! Tranquilizer pistol, drag the body to a corner and lay a girly mag right by their head so they wake up and instantly get caught by the mag. You could get real toxic if you wanted at that point, but man that game was incredible! The only thing annoying was that damn Konami ID

P_Bomb343d ago

Did my part!

“You’re pretty good” 🫡

Show all comments (20)
220°

Kojima looks back on Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes on its 9th anniversary

Hideo Kojima: "After the launch, many people seemed to expect GZ to be a full game."

Read Full Story >>
metalgearinformer.com
-Foxtrot401d ago

People would have gotten “your intention” if you stated it from the beginning but people didn’t want smaller episode like MGS games.

He should have just focused on MGSV and work Ground Zeroes into that game instead

I_am_Batman401d ago

I don't remember there being confusion over Ground Zeroes being a full game. But then again I was just starting to catch up on the MGS series as a whole at that point so I might've not paid enough attention or simply have forgotten that there was confusion about it. I bet the whole Moby Dick Studios thing didn't help the casual observer understand what the hell was going on though.

I only got both MGSV games when Phantom Pain was already out and I kinda agree that it probably would've sucked if I had to wait one and a half years to pay The Phantom Pain after Ground Zeroes.

jambola401d ago

I'm sorry what now?
Who expected that?
If it was meant to be episodic or an experiment for that, the price should / would have reflected that

MadLad401d ago (Edited 401d ago )

To be fair, there really wasn't enough content to actually justify even the smaller price tag. It was still half the cost of a full game, yet a 20th of the content.

I can't stand these paid glorified demos.

CrimsonWing69401d ago

Honestly, it was basically similar to the FF15 Duscae demo. My theory is he was taking too damn long to make a game and Konami was like, “Sell what you got!” It just has kind of a scummy corporate “let’s sell this demo for half the price of a full game,” feel to it.

That’s just my take on it. I love Kojima and I love the MGS series, but this and 5 were the biggest let downs, ever. Clearly unfinished work forced out because, in Konami’s defense, Kojima was going over budget and taking forever on the project.

MIDGETonSTILTS17401d ago

Lol, I loved Ground Zeroes, but releasing that level at $40 during a dryspell for games at the onset of the new gen was an obvious cash grab.

I handed over my money happily, but plenty of non-diehard fans were understandably letdown by the scale of what $40 bought them.

Chocoburger401d ago

The price was originally $40 for the physical PS4 and XBO versions, but due to controversy it dropped down to $30 before launch. And as much as I love GZ, and even bought it twice, I do agree that $30 was too much. It should have launched at $20.

https://kotaku.com/konami-c...

staticall401d ago

I don't know how about anyone else. But i've bought it for $20 1 week after release (or $15, don't remember the exact exchange rate) and spent 24 hours beating every mission and getting all the steam achievements. I was 100% aware what the game was about beforehand though and i did enjoy every second of it. I knew it was a work in progress and it was probably the best and less restrictive game i've played in a long time (and controls were just perfect).

Even previous MGS games didn't gave me that much freedom as Ground Zeroes did.
Love stealth? Got you covered.
Want to speedrun? Here's the timer.
Wanna kill everyone? No problem, grab that AK then and let's party.
Wanna cause chaos? Just tell Pequod where to land.
Love to drive? Then go ahead.
Miss Raiden? Then play as him.

I wish they would continue MGSV, finish remaining chapters and add more missions as DLCs, there was SO many options... A poor man still can dream...

Show all comments (15)
370°

Metal Gear Solid V Is The Greatest Stealth Game Ever Made

Hideo Kojima was dealing with a hostile publisher who was pulling his team’s game apart at the seams in order to launch in some form of finished state, and it’s still downright masterful. Everything about it is mechanically focused and aesthetically nuanced, and not a single thing feels out of place or without purpose. Big Boss moves about each environment with a pace that provides the perfect cadence to use all manner of gadgets in whatever ways you like.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Mobis-New-Nest573d ago

You are incorrect and I will be taking this time to correct you. The Legend of Zelda Wind Waker Forsaken Fortress is stealth that no game has yet to match. Having Link, crawl, sneak and hide under a barrel is innovative stealth that Metal Gear Solid, Splinter Cell, Thief and Tenchu wish they had achieved. I rest my case.

ChubbyBlade573d ago

Cardboard box beats barrel

573d ago
got_dam573d ago

Lol I see what you did there.

fr0sty573d ago

So tired of opinion pieces... I come here for hot news, not hot takes.

-Foxtrot572d ago

Shit Metal Gear Solid game though

It's boring, empty, repetitive

Great mechanics and gameplay but it's just so dull....

573d ago
Chard573d ago

I played it long after the hype had settled, and I had a blast with it. Strip away the disappointment over what it could have been, and you're still left with a great game

porkChop573d ago

The gameplay loop was phenomenal, no question. From a gameplay standpoint it's an incredible stealth game.

porkChop573d ago

"Hideo Kojima was dealing with a hostile publisher who was pulling his team’s game apart at the seams in order to launch in some form of finished state, and it’s still downright masterful."

Let's not pretend Kojima was entirely innocent there. The game was 5+ years into development, way over budget, and wasn't even halfway done. That's why Chapter 2 is so unfinished and Chapter 3 was scrapped entirely. He was wasting time micromanaging and second-guessing everything his team was doing, and little to no progress was being made. The same thing happened with MGS: Rising. That's why the game got rebooted as MGR: Revengeance and was handed off to Platinum. That's the only way the game was going to get finished. And yet after wasting millions on a scrapped game, MGR only went on to sell a little over 1 million units. It was a failure no matter how you look at it.

That's why Kojima was "locked away" in his office for the final 6 months of development of MGSV. So the team could actually piece together and finish the game. Was Konami just supposed to let Kojima spend more than a decade with infinite funds to make one game? Kojima isn't Rockstar, his games don't sell 170+ million units. At some point the game has to come out.

I get that Konami are a garbage company but they aren't solely responsible for what happened with Kojima. As much as I love his games and will always be a fan, MGSV was almost entirely Kojima's fault and I'm tired of people pretending that it wasn't.

MIDGETonSTILTS17573d ago

Sounds like mismanagement by Konami.

generic-user-name573d ago

Can you prove any of what you're claiming? Because I've seen Kojima build a studio and release a AAA game in 3 years with Death Stranding. All I'm seeing here are the same conspiracy theories that people like to believe to confirm their biases towards certain people, same with Neil Druckmann. For instance, MGSV may have been in development for a while but you leave out that he was also having the FOX Engine developed alongside it, an engine so good that MGSV ran at 60fps on a PS4.

He's gone on record disputing that he ever goes over budget on very rarely has to delay his titles.

"He was wasting time micromanaging and second-guessing everything his team was doing, and little to no progress was being made."

Where did you get this from?

572d ago
Workshyskiver573d ago

Best gameplay of the series hand down, its not even close. Worst story in the series hand down, its not even close.

Ezio2048573d ago

But that ending though with amazing music. The Man who sold the world.

1Victor573d ago

I can’t say it’s the best or the worse to me I stopped playing metal gear at the end of 4 the official end of the snakes saga and the best in my book was 3 snake eater excellent gameplay and excellent story telling giving us the reason for big boss to go and create his own country before the metal gear saga on the 4-8 bits consoles.

Show all comments (66)