210°

Which Free PlayStation Plus Games Don’t Suck

From the PlanetPlaystation.com featured editorial:

"Last month, Sony pushed forward a new initiative for its PlayStation Plus ($49.99 a year per member) subscribers by offering not one, not two, but twelve free games for download on its service. And these aren’t just some second-rate picks (well not all of them at least). In fact, most of them are exquisitely popular games, including entries in the Infamous, Ratchet and Clank and LittleBigPlanet series. That said, some of you may not quite be sold on the dozen of games being offered for no charge right now. So, with that, we’ve got a handy little guide to talk about them, and let you know which ones are recommended, and which ones to skip. So here we go!"

Read Full Story >>
planetplaystation.com
LaurenKB1234292d ago

I wish Microsoft would do something like this with XBL Gold...

InTheZoneAC4292d ago

nope, I'm glad people that pay for live continue to get ripped off

maybe if MS did something like this they'd charge an additional $100 a year for it.

ziggurcat4292d ago

it's called the $99 xbox - which locks you into a 2-year contract with LIVE where you end up paying close to $200 for those 2 years.

darthv724292d ago (Edited 4292d ago )

seems to be a bit of a contradiction.

Considering that in order for the games to remain free you have to be a paid member.

What is surprising is the thinking process for Plus member really believing that the two services are actually different. truth be told that once you become a paid member you really cant put yourself back into that perspective of the free members anymore.

Really only the free members can proclaim being able to game online for free. Any Plus member out there that touts that as a feature are now lying to themselves because they are paying for services and extended features and the ability to play game as well as online games they get for the price of the membership. Each and every day whether you use it or not. It's the same for live.

It may as well be a pay to play model like MS. At least MS has been up front about their model from the beginning since the original xbox. They have been adding to it ever since.

It would honestly not surprise me if sony started taking away from their initial free model and changing what they took to be part of the plus model. The thing about being a paying member of something is the feeling of being better served than those who arent members. More perks and incentives as a way to differentiate between the paying and the nonpaying.

Honestly, would anyone really have signed up for PSN if it was a paid membership model when it first started? Simple answer is no because it lacked so many things to make it worth it.

Now with plus it is worth being a paid member. Its just that paid members are such hypocrites in how they view live and dont realize they themselves are now stuck at either continuing their paid membership or risk losing all the free stuff.

gaffyh4292d ago

@darth -

1. The main part of PSN is still free, this is an addition to it. You don't NEED it to play online, which is the case for XBL.

2. After one year, you are very unlikely to be playing the same game, and most likely you will have completed and deleted the game from your HDD within 3 months.

dantesparda4291d ago

@darthv72

Wow! just wow! you're logic and figuring here is just, im sorry to say, retarded.

darthv724291d ago

you prove my point perfectly. Here, let me expand on your comment.

"The main part of PSN is still free" only those who arent Plus members can really make that statement. It isnt like you can turn off your plus membership for a day just to play online. You paid for it and the time ticks by if you use it or not.

"this is an addition to it." Until it becomes a requirement which in some cases it is getting there.

"You don't NEED it to play online" This is where you are wrong. If the 'free' game has multiplayer then YES you do need it to not only continue the free play of the game but to ALSO play that game online.

"which is the case for XBL" There never was any question of the practice of XBL. It has been this way from the beginning. It would be different if it started off free and became a pay to play model but think back. Gold never existed. There was only 1 model and it was the pay to play.

MS didnt have to create a free silver model but they did. Sony HAD to start off free because of their lack of structure to require gamers to pay to play online. Slowly they have been changing their model to be more like live. Thing is, they cover it up with their incentives program.

Im not against that by any means. I just wish these people would be honest with themselves and see it for what it is. You are now a paying member to sony and sony will continue to improve their service like MS has done with theirs.

"2. After one year, you are very unlikely to be playing the same game, and most likely you will have completed and deleted the game from your HDD within 3 months."

This is a very general statement to which there is no basis. Maybe for you, you would delete the old games after beating them but there are many who would do better to keeping them and knowing they would be able to play them anytime they feel like it. So long as their membership was up to date.

MS has given away free games. And the beauty of it is....they really are free. You can continue to play them even after you choose to go silver. You would obviously lose out on the multiplayer portion of the game but being able to play the single player side is better than not being able to play the game at all like what happens if you let Plus lapse.

I just find it funny how people will criticize those who pay for live and yet dont realize sony is adopting the same idea. When they said online would be free they really backed themselves into a corner. Because now they know gamers will hold them to that. So they had to try and figure out a way to get people to pay while at the same time create the fine print they hope gamers wouldnt see.

The core of PSN may be free to those who don't pay, but everything else from new features and services to 'free' games are being geared towards the paid members and will continue to do so as long as you keep paying.

Bottom line is, once you are hooked it becomes that much more harder to simply walk away from it.

darthv724291d ago

yeah, that's a real mature comeback.

Thanks for contributing.

gaffyh4291d ago

Well once you've played a game, you can delete it. It is still linked to your account, so you can download it whenever you want again. Also, so far, I don't think there has been a game for PS Plus that has multiplayer online that would keep you going for a long time i.e. MW-like.

I get what you are saying, but the simple fact is, you don't need to pay for PS Plus if you don't want, and the online is free. Once you've bought a subscription, then of course you've paid in advance, but there is a world of difference between XBLG and PS+. One you need to have to play online, one you don't.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4291d ago
brettyd4292d ago

I really don't understand what you're paying for with xbox live, MS nickel and dimes you for EVERYTHING on that service. I only had it so i could play with friends. Its ridiculous that people pay for things that should be free and are free on other services (psn)

Raf1k14292d ago

Your reason for paying for it is pretty much everyone's reason too. You paid for it because you had to in order to play with your friends. Everyone basically has to pay for it to play online. They don't really have a choice unless they don't want online play.

If MS ever gave the option to play online with a silver account subscription numbers would plummet.

Godmars2904292d ago (Edited 4292d ago )

PS+ is a frequent user rewards program.

XBL...requires you to pay for online access for online game features, network communication and some media features other services allow for free.

Edit:
Sadly I do have to add that PS+ also makes digital over physical games - something I'm actually against - more appealing.

ALLWRONG4291d ago

Don't you have to pay for PSN+ and when you stop paying don't they take the games away?

That's what I thought

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4291d ago
UltimaEnder4292d ago

That's a solid mix of quality titles, impressive Sony!

iamnsuperman4292d ago (Edited 4292d ago )

Saints row 2 made me buy Saints row 3. Good series.

Is it really good advice not to get a free game???

edit: also great selection of games. I have been kept busy

LaurenKB1234292d ago

There are free games worth skipping (check out the Android app store for countless examples)... but in this case I think the author it talking more about time than "cost"....

LOGICWINS4292d ago

Not all free games are worth downloading. I got Flow and Dead Nation for free and after playing them for a couple minutes I quickly deleted them to make room for Saints Row 2/Infamous 2...games that I can actually enjoy.

It's like an average guy winning a years supply of red lipstick. Yes, its free, but its useless.

NastyLeftHook04292d ago

in your opinion, in my opinion they are some of the best games ever made.

LOGICWINS4292d ago

I'm very happy for you.

FunAndGun4292d ago

well logically you could sell or trade that lipstick. maybe your mother or female friend would appreciate that lipstick. maybe you might even like the lipstick if you wear it longer then a couple minutes...i don't know.

logically speaking of course.

guitar_nerd_234292d ago

I've been enjoying Infamous 2, it's a good idea because I wouldn't have bought that because I thought the first one was ok but not great.

Now I might buy number 3 if there is going to be one.

TheRealHeisenberg4292d ago

I got it for the same reason. I actually liked Infamous 1 more than Infamous 2. Will also get part 3 if there is one.

aquamala4292d ago

Saints row 2 doesn't age well at all, did people think it was a good looking game when it was released?

Raf1k14292d ago

Downloaded it and played it for a bit. It's really not a very good looking game at all and I didn't enjoy playing it much either. Saints Row 3 is a big improvement IMO gameplay wise as well as visually.

Show all comments (33)
70°

The Worst Guns in Video Games

These are the worst guns in video games. Unlike weapons that are useful and practical, these only take up space in your inventory.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
270°

Worst Games to 100% Complete

Being a completionist can be fun, but some games are more like chores than fun. Here are the worst games to 100% complete.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
Knushwood Butt482d ago

The Yakuza Games

Haha, yeah, currently over 100 hours into Yakuza 0. Considering going for 100% and well on the way but may not get there. Cat Fights are a real chore.

blackblades482d ago

I use to be a trophy hunter, was getting around 20 to 30 platinums a year. Had a saying of Play-Beat-Platinum, play and enjoy the game like there wasn't no trophies, beat it and at least get 50% then look at them and see if I'll platinum and platinum it. I think death star was a pain, the servers was ending so i had to rush and play that for awhile none stop. NGs2 was hard because of that online trophy but easy if you had the partner that can do it for you while you grab the enemy attention. Grinding idk, death was grinding last one I had to grind for platinum literally 1 trophy needed was dungeon travler or something vita gave up on it. After that I stop trophy hunting get like a 1 platinum a year or 0.

Knushwood Butt482d ago

Yeah, if I enjoy a game I usually go for the platinum unless there are some unreasonable trophies in there.

For Yakuza 0 I've invested too much time in it to give up just yet and most of the content is good fun, apart from Cat Fighting which is broken and dull after a couple of fights.

DarXyde481d ago

Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 was literally the last platinum I got on PS3. After that, I went into PS4 kinda deflated and getting them where it felt appropriate.

I genuinely HATED that platinum, but it was a personal challenge I took upon myself. It was a lot of "get 1,000 kills with [insert weapon]" and it got to be a bit tedious. Master Ninja really pissed me off, but the WORST which you alluded to was that bloody Gold trophy for missions that you needed to do online because the AI was useless and got wrecked in moments. I jumped on the game a bit late so I struggled with finding a partner for at least 1.5 months. After that, I burned out hard with trophy hunting. I still came back for games I really enjoyed (Bloodborne, Dark Souls III, Nier: Automata, and a few others that escape me) and low hanging fruit that was just a bit time consuming and I didn't want to buy new games at the time (Final Fantasy XV). Total, it becomes clear where I taper off since I've only plat'ed 33 games since there inception of trophies which really isn't much.

Screw Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 lol. That game was pure nightmare fuel.

blackblades482d ago

I say never force getting a platinum, its not worth the trouble definitely if it costing you to waste time on chore like grind. Those brainless design trophies.

hotnickles482d ago

Dead rising was the worst one I’ve ever tried. I haven’t tried it with the modern console “rest mode” but the 360 didn’t have that.

Duke19482d ago (Edited 482d ago )

Was GTa4 the on where you had to collect a shit ton of pigeons around the map and there was no help in finding them?

roadkillers481d ago

Yep. I’d say GTASA was more difficult since there were so many collectibles

Profchaos481d ago

The saving grace was that there was only on average 50 collectables with the two exceptions being graffiti and oysters from memory horseshoes and photos were capped at 50 each.

But for me it was all the other grind that was way more painful in SA like the car export lists which even with guides took way longer than collecting stuff

iivGHOST481d ago

There was a guide book that came out with the game that had all the pigeons in it. I actually still have it

Chocoburger481d ago

One of the more recent games I got a Platinum in was Killzone: Mercenary for Vita. What a crap game, that requires so much terrible grinding.

Awful game, awful experience.

outsider1624481d ago

Oh man..wish i could get a vita. I've been trying to get a preowned too(in my country) but no luck.

CantThinkOfAUsername481d ago

I can vouch for Just Cause 2. It was the reason I quit achievement hunting. 86 hours in, the game bugged on me during one of the last side quests (it failed no matter what I did) and my save file got corrupted. Wiped it off my drive and never looked back.

SonyStyled481d ago

I downloaded the ‘complete edition’ or whatever it was called for $2 about 7yrs ago in hopes of trophy hunting it for a platinum. It always sounded fun and I would like to commit time to it but not enough for a platinum trophy

Show all comments (37)
190°

Ten best games from the 2000s you may have missed

The 2000s was a great decade for a lot of brilliant video games. Here are the ten best games of the 2000s that you may not have played.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
isarai491d ago

You know usually when someone says "you may have missed" it's games that were lesser known, hidden gems, underrated games. These are all super high profile games that sold extremely well.

FPS_D3TH490d ago (Edited 490d ago )

You know the 2000s is 20 years ago too? Maybe, just maybe this wasn’t an article targeted to 30+ gamers? Still says at the very beginning of the title “THE BEST GAMES you may have missed”. Regardless of how well they sold there’s tons of gamers who haven’t touched these older well known games lol.

Welshy490d ago (Edited 490d ago )

It's games you "may have missed", insinuating you were around and gaming in the 2000's and were there to miss them. If it was aimed at everyone else then they missed literally everything, not just the top games.

The original commenter is right, this is a badly written article at best pointless at worst.

Crows90490d ago

Besides only being able to miss it if you were around during that time..if your point stands then this is a horrible list. Tons of better games people may have missed

XxINFERNUSxX490d ago

I would like the original max payne remade in a new engine with ray tracing. 😊

FPS_D3TH490d ago

Remedy games already working on that and I’m so stoked for it

XxINFERNUSxX490d ago

Oh yeah thanks for reminding me I totally forgot they were doing it. Also what the hell happened to Kingpin: Reloaded? On Steam coming soon and nohting from the dev.

MadLad490d ago

Yeah, I was just going to say. It's interesting seeing them back behind the series. Max Payne 3 was amazing, but then Rockstar just sat on the IP.
Well, they sit on virtually anything that isn't GTA and Red Dead now.

porkChop490d ago

What is this list? These are all hugely popular games. I was expecting games like Dark Messiah of Might & Magic, Advent Rising, Arx Fatalis, etc.

FPS_D3TH490d ago

the title didn’t say lesser known titles from the 2000s. This is 20 years ago now lol. Big assumption this list was made for older gamers.

Dirty_Lemons489d ago

That makes me feel so old.

Inverno490d ago

I've only played 3 on that list. Part of me feels bad about how little I used all the consoles I've owned as a kid. One bright side is, there's over 30 years of games to experience for the first time.

Show all comments (15)