140°

Is downloadable content necessary?

Is downloadable content necessary? As each console generation passes, DLC becomes more and more prevalent. Is it because technology is advancing or Publishers see an opportunity to cash in on blind customers? I say it’s a mixture of both. With consoles these days, it is very easy to receive content from developers/publishers without even leaving your house. At the same time, many customers will purchase anything that is thrown their way.

Read Full Story >>
thextremepulse.com
PopRocks3594360d ago

Not entirely; not for all games. But it can be extremely beneficial to both publishers and to consumers if done properly.

slayorofgods4360d ago (Edited 4360d ago )

Paid DLC is turning into a cr@pfest. Whatever happen to true expansion packs that are made to make games better. Now developers want people to pay out for very little extra work on their end.

Note, this isn't true for every paid dlc, but it is starting to trend.

PopRocks3594360d ago

Then you simply don't buy it. That's my philosophy. The less money they make off of it, the less inclined they are to continue doing business that way.

Vitalogy4360d ago (Edited 4360d ago )

@PopRocks359 Yea I act like that too but unfortunately there will always be lots of people buying them hence the devs keep doing this. The saddest part is the fact that a bunch of games are being made "incomplete" because of DLC's, I mean, they make the game and they shorten it or something and make the DLC and launch it a few days later after the game or even the same day, this isn't how DLC's should work. They're are becoming too greedy over the digital era thing IMO.

colonel1794360d ago

It is not necessary. It is great when the DLC expands the game without having to make a sequel for it. The problem is that publishers are using it to rip off gamers. What happened to the times where you had to complete the game to unlock new skins or new stages?

Also, the reason that they are cashing in on gamers is that the are making the DLC even before the game releases... so why not include it in the final game? Especially when the content is lame like new colors or something that we used to get in past games by unlocking them, cheats, or passwords.

DLC is getting way out of control. What started as a good idea, ended up being abused by developers and publishers to charge for everything and give gamers incomplete games. They don't care anymore if a game releases with bugs and/ or mistakes because they can just "patch" it later. They don't care to include only half of the characters just to sell them later.

And what is a slap to the face for the gamers is that they get screwed over when they release the "complete" edition (the one that was supposed to be released originally) later on.

SeekDev4360d ago (Edited 4360d ago )

It's fine if the developers had an idea for DLC, and coded some of the necessary structure for it to work into the main game, then began coding the DLC after release. But I generally disagree with DLC when it takes away from the game experience, as in DLC weapons in a multiplayer game, or story-centric episodes that are very beneficial to the main story.

Basically, I agree with you.

Nerdmaster4360d ago

That's the problem right there. People say that good DLC are those that expand the game, that are meaningful, that seem like expansion packs... But they don't want DLC that relates to the story, saying that it should be in the main game. How can a DLC be all the things you want if you don't want it to relate to the story?

I saw it happen to Alan Wake. I played the game, finished it, and it felt like an acceptable ending, horror movie-like. And then they released a DLC that continued the story. And people got angry saying that it was the real ending that should be in the main game, and that it was an example of bad DLC. It was a good DLC, that expanded the game, had a reason to exist story-wise, and people still complained.

SeekDev4359d ago

If it relates to the story, simply make another game. A "sidequest" that relates to the story is ok, because the original story line is not affected in anyway, but if the DLC is required to experience the original story in full, then it is unacceptable DLC.

CyberCam4360d ago

Great post colonel179, I agree with you 100%! This topic among other glaring issue with consoles, is the reason why I'm skipping the next generation of console & sticking with PC gaming.

The good news about PC gaming is that some devs allow the community to mod their game, so the lasting appeal is much greater than that of consoles.

I'm specifically looking a ArmA2, GTA4 & Skyrim those games have a ton of mods and can even have completely different experiences, so the dev's dlc are insignificant!

mananimal4360d ago

No its not neccessary, due to the inherit fallen nature of humans, it has become a tool for abuse by the INDUSTRY.

TheModernKamikaze4360d ago

It is if it can expand gameplay and story. For costumes not much.

Nerdmaster4360d ago

In the beginning, I tought the DLC idea was great. Sadly, I can't remember a single DLC that was worth the price. In fact, I can't remember a single DLC that was that good, paid or free. The Portal 2 ones seem great, for those who like multiplayer and making stages. It's not my case, so...

Nerdmaster4360d ago

Oops, when posting another message above, I remembered about Alan Wake's first DLC. It was good. Didn't remember it because I played the PC version and the DLC came with the game. Well, now I remember one single good DLC.

Ducky4359d ago

I've found Rockstar to make a lot of worthwhile DLC.
Bethesda as well.
BC2:Vietnam wasn't all that bad either.

Show all comments (16)
70°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv7211h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

purple10143m ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos18m ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

140°

Sony Patents To Prevent You From In-Game Harassment By Reading Your Emotions

A new patent recently published by Sony wants to gather biometric data of gamers to track whether one is being harassed using AI tools.

Profchaos1d ago (Edited 1d ago )

I hope this is one of those patents that never comes to fruition.

I already dislike the fact you can pay a significant amount for a online service buy associated games and content on said service and get banned from that service over potentially a misunderstanding the bans are already handed out for flimsy reasons

I'd rather see money invested in a ban that simply removes the offensive players ability to communicate with unknown players allow them to continue party chats with friends but not with Joe blow on cod.

exputers20h ago

Agreed. Blizzard recently banned a college Overwatch 2 player who's dependent for saying "shit." Pretty harsh.

Profchaos5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

How rediculas really. You can't say a word that's allowed in most PG films and prime time TV but the game is based around killing the enemy team using guns, explosives etc.

It's just backwards.

just_looken7h ago

What your talking about is called block list

In 2006 a spaceship dropped of the playstation 3/xbox 360 i say that that generation was the last great gen with game functions/tech that has yet to comeback

Anyhow the playstation 3 if you block listed a id they could not talk to you in chatroom with either text or voice. But that was pre mind fucked 2018 when people were more human than sheep.

But hey gta 6 is coming out billion dollar budget without a single player custom character creator and without singeplayer coop off/online something saints row 1-3 had on the xbox 360.

z2g17h ago

Take my social security and bank account numbers too! Here’s a picture of my wife and our address.

phoenixwing16h ago

Cmon where's the pictures of your children. Don't hold out on them.

H917h ago

At this rate I feel Sony will eventually sell a room to play games in it where they can monitor your every breath

jambola13h ago

I genuinely get a bit worried sometimes when a friend says something that could be offensive In a party
Because I have no trouble believing some bans would happen when in a private party for saying something wrong

SegaSaturn66915h ago

I want them to censor erotic content by measuring my groin temperature so i dont get too distracted while playing black ops 2.

Popsicle15h ago

Terrible idea. Not only do I not consent to providing my biometric data, the potential for mishandling biometric data is almost a certainty. Positive stress and negative stress can produce similar changes in biometrics. Interpreting the precise emotion a person is feeling is not only invasive but could be easily misconstrued. I hope this never comes to fruition.

Show all comments (14)
300°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere1d 8h ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN1d 5h ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos1d 2h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN20h ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo21h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies17h ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion1d 7h ago (Edited 1d 7h ago )

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger1d 5h ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Mr Logic15h ago

What a stupid thing to say. The elites give 0 fucks what we say on an obscure website in the comments section.

Crows9015h ago

You can always reach out and give them jobs at your company man. Don't wait

Profchaos1d 7h ago (Edited 1d 7h ago )

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto1d 7h ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos1d 6h ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long1d 3h ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel1d 6h ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos1d 4h ago (Edited 1d 4h ago )

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator1d 5h ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (21)