520°

Where’s the cloud power Microsoft advertised for Xbox One?

"Where’s the so praised cloud power? Because it seems that it isn’t helping Xbox One at all."

windblowsagain3710d ago

It has since rained on many parts of the usa and europe, hence the cloud has gone.

ArchangelMike3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

Lol. yeah it seems that the first batch of games that have come out have not used this mysterious 'cloud' technology that Ms keeps harping on about.

Does Microsoft just mean that they've got loads of servers hooked up for multiplayer games? So for example, Titanfall will have much smoother multiplayer connections?

That's one thing, but to tout the cloud as some super computing and processing powerhouse, and then your next-gen games cant even run at 1080p/60FPS means that your just blowing smoke up peoples a$$.

Hatsune-Miku3710d ago

Microsoft cloud service is in the sky

styferion3710d ago

true, and even on the case this "cloud" finally appears less major country most likely won't be able to reap the benefit of it. That's the main point why I don't like XB1 visions, too much focused on local turf they alienate foreign fans and forget the rest of the world

Prime1573710d ago

3x power to each xbox! Duh, apparently that meant dedicated servers at best, right?

LuaMaster3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

"Lol. yeah it seems that the first batch of games that have come out have not used this mysterious 'cloud' technology that Ms keeps harping on about."

Of course not.

It was never anything more than lame damage control to desperately try to keep the rapidly dwindling number of Xbox fans from abandoning the Xbox One.

It's no different than the idiotic claims of a 'miraculous SDK update' that will magically make the wimpy Xbox One hardware put out PS4 level graphics.

There are effectively two different ways the stupid marketing buzzword 'teh cloud' can refer to.

1. Computation done on servers and then the results sent over the Net to your local machine. This is already done for most multiplayer games already.

2. Rendering is done on servers and then streamed to your machine so it may display graphics it wouldn't be able to on its own. This isn't happening because it would mean that the only way you could play games with the high level server rendered graphics would with a constantly on Net connection. Meaning that many people wouldn't be able to play certain games or game companies would need to support two entirely different versions of games. One with graphics streaming and one with crappy Xbox One rendered graphics.

And even if Microsoft tried to do server side graphics rendering for Xbox One games it would immediately raise the question of why the hell are they selling a console for 500 dollars that has graphics hardware so bad it needs to be bypassed by Microsoft servers rendering each game's graphics.

The Xbox One is the worst of both possibilities. Too expensive and wasteful for 500 dollars if Microsoft plans on doing server side rendering. Too weak and poorly designed to be in the same league as the PS4 graphically on its own.

antikbaka3710d ago

some of those servers you can use to save ur game data :3 supa POWA!

Why o why3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

Where’s the cloud power Microsoft advertised for Xbox One?....

at the moment its been blown up the rear ends of its most loyal hopeful fans.

Cell proved itself year on year but there were drawbacks that made developers, not familiar with it, work harder. Obviously sonys 1st and 2nd parties showed and proved what was possible. The cloud still has time but I just see it as a euphemism for dedicated servers....kinda like apple tried to brand 'face time' like it was new almost when it was really just video calling for the rest of the tech world.

Ultimately time will tell but its telling that we hear more of the talk about it from fans and fanboys than we do from Microsoft. Theres been zero proof shown or explanation given so the naysayers feel their cynicism is justified.

nukeitall3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

Cloud power is staring right in your faces!

Respawn went to both MS and Sony for their cloud power needs, and only MS responded. That is why we have Titanfall. Leave it to Sony and you would get flagship games like KillZone: Shadowfall with essentially P2P online gaming with proxy server.

MS delivered Titanfall with 15-30 ms ping to the cloud almost anywhere in the world.

In sort, cloud is massive computing power on demand, made easy with automation and specialized tools. What do you think powers the cloud?

Hint, it is computers!

The power of the cloud enables consistently lag free gaming, and defeats cheaters with lag switchtes and host advantage.

That alone is way more important than any resolution. Nothing more frustrting than that.

Azure to the rescue!

xHeavYx3710d ago

I love nukeitall damage control nonsense. You forgot that it was EA who went behind Respawn's back and made an exclusivity deal, probably thinking that it would be the Xbox beating the PS4 I'm sales (boy, talk about betting on the wrong horse)
But hey, whatever helps you sleep at night

KingDadXVI3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

Yes, TitanFall played more smoothly than any other online game I have ever played period. After they tweaked their settings that thing played smooth as a baby's ass.

As far as the 1080p 60fps goes I assume that you are not a fan of Sony's PSNow then because if MS cannot use its server farms which are ranked the highest in the world for the lowest data loss and error rate and in the top three for size and speed then PSNow will be a still born abomination.

Go get an education in computer and network engineering before you talk like you have any clue as to what the cloud is or is capable of.

UltraNova3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

@nukeitall

Shiiiiiiiiit man the Xbone is aaaaaawesome!

DragonKnight3710d ago

nukeitall doesn't even try anymore. Every time he posts a reply, the only thing to do is just..

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

I mean seriously. The amount of damage control and flat out incorrect information should be its own comedy act.

gaffyh3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

"Where’s the cloud power Microsoft advertised for Xbox One?"

Well, as any sane person expected, it was all BS. I understand the whole dedicated server argument as this is technically possible, but "making games look better with 3x Xbox One power" was total BS.

darthv723710d ago

Cloud is so last year. Its all about the "Polar Vortex" now.

MysticStrummer3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

"cloud is massive computing power on demand"

Good lord. No it isn't. There is zero evidence of this. Even the fastest connection can't deliver data faster than the internal systems of the console can process it by themselves. That goes for both XB1 and PS4, though PS4 is faster.

So far, "cloud" means dedicated servers and remote data storage, which Sony had last generation. When playing an online game, the end result still comes down to the individual's own connection speed to those servers.

mewhy323710d ago

wow that was an awesome article and an awesome comment there archange. If I'd said that I'd been restricted for sure. Well said and bubbles.

Gozer3710d ago

You getting "Well Said" Luamaster is a perfect example of how backwards N4G is. You are completely wrong BTW. The "cloud" so far has been used in Forza 5 and Titanfall for the a.i. This article is a fallacy.

DaGR8JIBRALTAR3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

it's the american way..

reko3709d ago

@gozertroll

are you butthurt?

morganfell3705d ago

Only one company is effectively demonstrating cloud power and that is Sony with the beta of PlayStation Now.

+ Show (18) more repliesLast reply 3705d ago
ITPython3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

Cloud computing power, uh... you mean like what the PS3 did when steaming remotely to the PSP? Nearly a decade ago? Or... umm, PS4 streaming to Vita via remote play? It's the exact same concept, but instead of the 'cloud', it is the PS3 and PS4 doing all the computing and streaming that data onward. Either via LAN Wifi, or over the internet (with LAN Wifi being the better choice due to lower latency and higher bandwidth).

Those work fine and dandy due to the minimal bandwidth required for the low-res screens of the handheld, but when we are talking pure 720p or 1080p, it's a different story. Bottom line is, the internet infrastructure needs to be significantly improved for this to be of any practical use to the everyday consumer. Most people struggle trying to get heavily compressed 720p video streaming without buffering, and that is not even considering latency.

Until everybody is on at least 50-100Mb fiber with 1ms or less of latency, this isn't practical. MS jumped the gun by at least a whole generation on this one.

alexg5873710d ago

Now that you said that i guess thats y sony killed the remote play from your friends console feature( whatever it was called)..ps4 games are just too epic to stream over internet i guess. Would have been a revolutionary feature ..sad

stuna13710d ago

I believe they have "Cloud" power, but it's more like that cloud that hovers over peoples head walking down the street, while everyone else is walking in the sun.

Blaze9293710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

lol despite Forza 5, a launch title using the cloud, Titanfall using the cloud, Xbox LIVE profiles using the cloud, marketplace using the cloud, people still think Microsoft was making up sh--.

It's February, no game has really came out. Titanfall is releasing next month.

What do you all want Microsoft to do, show nothing? If they talked about it today would anyone understand it without a game to show it off/try it with?

Patience is everything. They're preparing to show it off for E3 this year, which Phil Spencer already said awhile ago (but no one looks that info up huh?).

E3 is only 4 months away. That's like saying every feature Sony & Microsoft announced but isn't available yet were straight up lies.

smh, keep hating on Xbox/Microsoft.

@traumadisaster "Patience is not everything. I would offer "results" is more important."

yeah ok results with what? Words? Clearly, Microsoft's words aren't enough for "gamers" on n4g. So they have to SHOW you all to shut up the speculation. But they can't SHOW something that's not ready...like releasing only 2 minutes of gameplay for The Order 1886

traumadisaster3710d ago

Patience is not everything. I would offer "results" is more important.

MightyNoX3710d ago

LOL people thought the cloud was giving them 4k graphics not an over glorified storage for data. If that's your definition of the cloud, may I introduce you to PS + cloud?

iceman063710d ago

But, see, when you spoke about The Order 1886, you weren't talking of patience. You were on the "why didn't they show more gameplay?" train.
See, I understand that we need to be patient. But, I also understand that what MS is promising (by most accounts from professionals outside of the N4G "pro" pool) seems nigh impossible with current worldwide infrastructure limitations. So, sure I'd like something tangible that isn't just dedicated server stuff that we've had (in one form or another) for years.
That being said, I'll patiently await the E3 show because, contrary to popular belief, I'm not HATING on MS just because I doubt their ability to deliver their complete vision of the cloud in the beginning of this generation.

DragonKnight3710d ago

Blaze, you know very well that people aren't talking about data storage and dedicated servers. Those have been around for far longer than the Xbox brand has been.

Microsoft shouldn't have opened their mouths and tried to market something that isn't ready and won't be for a long time. You can't say "the cloud will make one Xbox One as powerful as 3" and produce literally nothing tangible to back that claim up. When you do, it's called "blowing smoke."

maniacmayhem3710d ago

Well seeing as how the Xbox One JUST CAME OUT what are you people expecting?

I love how the same folks expect MS to show things RIGHT NOW, but defend other companies and allow them to be given time to make their roadmap of features complete.

We have already gotten an article stating that Spencer and the MS team is still behind the cloud and that their next showing has to be impressive.

https://twitter.com/XboxP3/...

How about we wait and see before we start to bash. Because if they do show something impressive you guys know you won't hear the end of it from the Xbox fanboys.

DragonKnight3710d ago

@maniac: Well seeing as how Microsoft were touting the power of the cloud for so damn long, and making it a key marketing campaign for the device, you would think they'd have something to show instead of words now wouldn't you?

DoubleM703710d ago

Phil Spencer twitted it this week. We will have to show you what we are talking about.

http://www.theverge.com/201...

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3710d ago
otherZinc3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

Another author that doesn't know the truth.

He said the the opposition (PS4) has a standard of 1080p 60fps. When the reality is, the PS4 has "No" games running 1080p "native" @ 60fps: online or offline. For Proof: go to Digital Foundry & see the fps drops of Killzone:SF drops in fps into the 30s.

The only AAA next-generation running 1080p "native" @ 60fps without 1 fps dropping during gameplay is Forza Motorsport 5.

For Proof, see Digital Foundry.

Also, if the author would read or conduct an interview of Respawn Entertainment; he would find that those M$ Cloud Servers were critical to the development if TitanFall.

But for the author, why let the truth get in the way of an opinion

sinjonezp3710d ago

Go compare forza from e3 to final release. They cut back many assets to achieve such. As for titanfall. What could the cloud possibly do besides help make better match making, swift lobby times ND smooth online play. Maybe textures loading faster (black ops 2 suffered bad online if your connection was weak, example). Ps4 can play games in 1080p. I think bf4 was the only one that could not. However, your argument for using forza is a slippery slope one. In the broad perspective, if the competition wanted to implement its own server farms to perform cloud computing, then the conversation becomes even more irrelevant than it already is. If you tout features, shouldn't you execute them? That is why no one believes in MS cloud computing resources.

saint_seya3710d ago

U know, hd releases on ps4 could run with resolutions over 1080p.. we are talking of real next gen games. So please dont mention forza, or we could say "god of war 2 runs in 1080p on ps3, amazin graphics, its 1080p"

XabiDaChosenOne3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

Call of Duty and MGS5 on the PS4 says, HELLO!

mediate-this3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

I say that all the time, some guy up above wrote xb1 could not match the ps4 level of graphics, im asking what is ps4 level of graphics? I have both systems, i cant really judge the order because the video they showed was so confusing, it was not a good video.

Bf4 is by far the most demanding next gen game graphically, ps4 is 900p, so that right there tells me ps4 is not locking native 1080p60fps.

DigitalRaptor3710d ago

If Sony wanted to concentrate on last generation visuals and engine technology to define their new hardware, their first party would've already have released a decent handful of last-generation quality games in this very aspect.

Forza 5 doesn't justify next-gen - and that's why it's able to run at 1080/60.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3710d ago
assdan3710d ago

Yeah lol. I think it's clear that they were lying the whole time though. I thought it was so funny that some people actually believed it was going to be 3 times stronger with the clouds.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3705d ago
Gazondaily3710d ago

Phil Spencer said that they'll be showing something more concere soon enough.

Still, they made a big hoopla about it and haven't really delivered anything apart from the Cloud operating at its basic level as dedicated server support (which to me is the most important thing anyway).

Charybdis3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

Phil basicly recognised (in a tweet) that they need to show the benefits instead of talking about it, because who would believe Microsoft in their word anyway. So it seems they aren't ready to showcase any substantial benefits yet.

Except for the benefits of dedicated servers which certain region such as Australie can't benefit from untill Microsoft finish construction of their servers in that region.

Same question goes for ps now were is it now well they are working on (the software and local hardware needed) in order to bring it to the consumer market.

princejb1343710d ago

I'm starting to think the cloud they kept advertising is imaginary. Just an advertising gimmick.
The difference between the cloud and ps now though is that we have seen how ps now works. We haven't seen anything on this cloud.

Charybdis3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

In the titanfall beta the advantage of dedicated servers has already been shown when looking at ms (except for regions with no local servers). I know its kinda obvious to point out dedicated servers are preferred in on-line gaming, only in microsoft/azure case these servers will scale to demand and will be essentially free to use/implement.

It might be more interesting and believable, that there are possible cloud advantages, to look into other cloud projects where Microsoft is not involved such as project flare.

- http://www.ign.com/articles...
- http://jp.square-enix.com/f...

kingdip903710d ago

You would think that from a marketing standpoint you would think that if you are going to harp about a technology that will define your system that you would make sure the capabilities are both shown and made clear from near release.

Now the perception is that the xbox one is not as capable a machine as was hoped and that stigma may stick now that we are 3 months in with nothing cloud based to show even if they prove themselves further down the line.

infectedaztec3710d ago

This is the problem with sites on N4G, 60% are made by uninformed fanboys who want to get their biased point across - some might try to hide the bias but for others its shameless. Another 30% are just uninformed gamers. I would class this article in this category. While the xb1 is struggling to get 1080p for alot of its games, its not struggling to get 720p. Maybe 10% of the stories on this site are reliable fact based news and that mainly because they're just twitter links.

Septic pointed out instantly, as I could have too, that Spencer has addressed the cloud issue very recently. Check out his twitter page and you'll see you didn't need to write the article

ArchangelMike3710d ago

@indected

"uninformed fanboys" is right. But it is M$ who have left us uninformed about the 'cloud'.

Since you seemed to be more infomrmed on the subject, please enlighten us on what this 'cloud' is, and how it has been used in any games or applications so far?

FYI Phil Spencer did not "address the issue", he basically said "wait and see".

Sony on the other hand have already shown what their 'cloud' aka Gaikai aka Playsation Now, can do. They've shown it working and put it in consumers hands.

It seems like you're the one that needs to acknowledge that you are indeed an "uninformed fanboy" when it comes to accepting blind promises from Microsoft!

traumadisaster3710d ago

I think the article should have been written because this cloudgate lie is anti consumer. We are all on that team and need to support the customers being told the truth. Remember KZ?

infectedaztec3710d ago

@Mike
Spencer did address the issue ("wait and see" is not a correct quote btw - a perfect example of the pathetic standards on this site):
http://gamingbolt.com/phil-...

I would be a fanboy of xbox (though I have good time for the ps3....haven't played the ps4 yet). There was no need to bring Sony into this, completely off topic.

BTW I have no faith in Sony's cloud. I was looking to get PS Plus last week and wanted to check what games came with it. It took an age for their page to load. Having 50mb broadband I was not impressed with their dial-up like website. If they can't host something as light as their site right I really don't have alot of faith in their cloud.....

Volkama3710d ago

I want to see more from the cloud, and I do believe we'll see more at least in the form of large-scale hosted AI (looking at you Halo, give me a flagship showcase war!)

But even if it never materialises and all we get is dedicated servers... those are a good thing. After witnessing my monstrous PC jerking around a COD: Ghosts map I simply never want to touch peer to peer again, and the One has a pretty huge advantage in that area.

DoubleM703710d ago

You still got disagrees....LOL Hilarious!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3710d ago
corvusmd3710d ago

Odd article...considering Titanfall is about to release, and the game makers have REPEATEDLY stated how important the cloud has been and that the game could not exist without it. Seems like this would mean this OPINION piece is either just denial or ignorance. It's weird how often people want to dismiss the cloud as nothing....then have absolutely no idea what they are talking about.

pyramidshead3710d ago

haha, great reply. Not to mention he hasn't replied.

Hellsvacancy3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

"the game could not exist without it" that's rubbish, how come games like Battlefield 4 exist? there's so much more going on in BF4 with SIXTY FOUR players running around blowing everything up

Titanfall can easily be done without this cloud bs, how come it's on the 360? does the 360 have the powah of the cloud aswel?

And you have the cheek to say "people have absolutely no idea what they are talking about"

brich2333710d ago

I believe the ai are controlled by the cloud. So I guess the 360 will have some extent of cloud power.

MasterCornholio3710d ago

@brich233
"I believe the ai are controlled by the cloud."

Have you seen how stupid and useless the AI is? I watched a video from Angry Joe where he stood in front of a bot and the bot did nothing.

jessupj3710d ago

Knocked that one way out of the park, Hell :)

Volkama3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

Yes, the 360 version uses the cloud as well. This was confirmed when the game was initially showcased at E3.

And yes, dedicated servers are possible outside of Azure. But Titanfall's beta offered a far more stable and reliable environment than BF4 even now.

No, Titanfall's AI are not impressive, and do not showcase anything to separate Cloud Compute from a simple dedicated server hosting the game.

Still, to anyone that likes playing latency-sensitive online games the 'cloud' is awesome, even in it's basic 'dedicated server' capacity. Having fast, well-located* servers available all the time is great.

*Unless you live around Australia :)

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3710d ago
mcstorm3710d ago

I do wonder if things would of been different if we still had the original vision of the xbox one as all xbox one's would of been connected to the internet and we may of seen something different from the cloud side where Microsoft are hard at work changing bits at the moment to take the connected xbox ones out of there vision for the xbox one.

I will be interesting to see if Microsoft bring this up at E3 this year.

SoulSercher6203710d ago

If this cloud is so powerful why did Turn 10 have to cut content just to get Forza 5 running at 1080p 60fps?

Sorry I have yet to see anything great about this marketing ploy called the "cloud."

Blaze9293710d ago

what exact content was cut from forza 5? Just wondering...

InTheLab3710d ago

They didn't cut content for hardware constraints. They did it to sell to fans of Forza a few weeks after launch.

Why o why3710d ago

Bait and switch mate. The Fallon version was blatantly different from the retail copy. Please feel free to do that normal deflect to Sony thing you do...you know you want to

ArchangelMike3710d ago

@corvusmd

"...the game could not exist without the cloud..."

Is that why it can only run 6vs6 players, and cannot render at 1080p/60pfs?

Is that how powerful the cloud is?

kainslayer3710d ago

how come titanfail also comes for x360 and pc which both if i remember correctly dont take advantage of the smokescreen in fron of you (cloud) xbone will never reach the dream m$oft hype machine went for...sorry to burst your buble sell the one buy a pc (keep the controller)

kayoss3710d ago

In all honesty. If the cloud is that powerful why the hell do we need an Xbox one? Can we just use the xbox 360 and use the power of the cloud to make the Xbox 360 go Super Saiyin 3??

reko3709d ago

@corvusmd

makers said that? post a link then?

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3709d ago
TheOmniGamer3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

"While the competition has managed to obtain the standard of 1080p and 60 FPS"... Are you kidding me, hardly any games maintain this standard on PS4 and if they do, they hardly ever maintain 60 FPS, it drops consistently.to 30 - 50 FPS (e.g. Killzone, Ghosts, BF4, Tomb Raider, etc)

PS4 standards is 1080p 30 FPS, while XB1 seems to be 720/900p 30 FPS.

mhunterjr3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

Yeah this is true, the only exclusive game that maintains that 1080p/60fps on ps4 is Resogun (to my knowledge). The only Xbox 1 exclusive to do it is Forza.

Still, ps4 multiplats have thus far, performed much better than the xbox counterparts.

I don't believe the cloud can be very useful for graphical processes, but even if it could, it would mean MS providing and developers using, an engine capable of taking advantage of the capability (like project flare). I just don't see multiplatform developers taking the time to specialize the xb1 versions in this way, especially when the ps4 is the sales leader. Only 1st party games would.

TheTowelBoy3710d ago

I don't know why people are disagreeing with you, it's true. Both platforms will have good games, I don't see why all these graphic discussions even exist. Yeah it's less powerful and more expensive but who cares, any informed consumer will buy the better product for themselves. And as far as GAMING goes, it's all perspective. Who has better games?

NovusTerminus3710d ago (Edited 3710d ago )

Hanging out with Milo in the smoke and mirrors.

I am skeptical of this Cloud, mostly because the devs say how great it is, but we never get any examples of what it does per se. When new rendering, computing, or tech developers talk and give us all the info they can... They act like a kid in a candy store. We knew The Order 1886 was using Soft Body Mesh very fast. We knew allot about the PS4, we knew the PS3 was tough to code for due to multithreading on the Cell being harder to calibrate.

What do we know about this Cloud? NOTHING, all the devs say is it's vital to this game and that game, but give no comments to back up how it is better. It helped Titanfall? For what 720p? If this Cloud is so powerful, could it not have gotten higher?

I hope MS can show it soon, and I hope it is good. But until they showcase it very well, I do not believe it has any credibility towards the systems games.

Show all comments (140)
260°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv721d ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle11h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic18818h ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio8h ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Lightning773h ago

What he said was facts. How he plays games is no concern of you. Don't get too mad about it.

Cacabunga11h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

shinoff218310h ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga9h ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

itsmebryan5h ago

@shin
Well keep it simple Sony 's operating income is down 26% and Microsoft's is up 32%. No MS spin there, just facts. 😉
Cheers

romulus233h ago

Odd that a company that touts you dont need the hardware to play is already touting another console in the works.

darthv723h ago

They are not reliant on the HW but still want to maintain a presence (no matter how small) is a good thing. It shows commitment to the craft. It reminds me of SNK and how they made games for their own hardware (Neo Geo) while also making them for others because they knew there was a market to do so. They knew they would sell more to others but also sell to their own niche fan base.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3h ago
purple10113h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos13h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

DOMination-3h ago

In the last two years they've started exiting the consumer market altogether. All of the newest Surface products are business models only. They can't seem to work out what they want to do with it.

XBManiac12h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad12h ago(Edited 12h ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple10112h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic10h ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

MrDead3h ago

The only growth MS will get out of the console industry is if it supports it's rivals platforms. Xbox is a pointless machine now. I can see them on a big push for live next, and they won't give up on trying to buy Steam.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3h ago
Show all comments (35)
300°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere1d 21h ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN1d 18h ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos1d 16h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN1d 9h ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo1d 10h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies1d 6h ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion1d 20h ago (Edited 1d 20h ago )

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger1d 18h ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Mr Logic1d 4h ago

What a stupid thing to say. The elites give 0 fucks what we say on an obscure website in the comments section.

Crows901d 4h ago

You can always reach out and give them jobs at your company man. Don't wait

blacktiger1h ago

You own nothing snd be happy. I'm sure you heard that

Profchaos1d 20h ago (Edited 1d 20h ago )

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto1d 20h ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos1d 20h ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long1d 17h ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel1d 19h ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos1d 17h ago (Edited 1d 17h ago )

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator1d 18h ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (23)
280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10113d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref12d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde12d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197212d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville12d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218311d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos11d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
isarai12d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref12d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan12d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00711d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197212d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

12d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

12d ago
12d ago
Zeref12d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde12d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197212d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier12d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto12d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218311d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto11d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
Hofstaderman12d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts12d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts11d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)