90°

Ubisoft wants Tom Clancy's The Division to be "potentially limitless", but there is an endgame

OXM:A quick update on Tom Clancy's The Division, that opulently raggedy always-online shooter with the fancy holographic bracelet. Ubisoft Massive's Ryan Bernard has suggested that the Xbox One and PS4-bound title will keep fans busy long after the storyline (which we're still mostly in the dark about) has rolled to a stop, thanks to a steady diet of dynamic events.

dirigiblebill3888d ago

What does "potentially limitless" translate to in $$$?

MWong3888d ago (Edited 3888d ago )

Agreed, I can see a lot of DLC on this game. I think we might also see an expansion or 2 for the game also. I can't wait to see new game play footage and some more details, but I loved what we saw at E3 more than AC4 & WD.

JsonHenry3888d ago

I was thinking more along the lines of open world with randomly generated quests kinda like the old Elder Scrolls games.

MizTv3888d ago

I was thinking the same thing
Maybe add new city's like Boston or DC in the future
But so far I like what I see

ATi_Elite3887d ago

potentially limitless = "We want to MILK it to DEATH"

3888d ago
medman3887d ago

This game is going to be the end of my social life.

80°

Exclusive Q&A: “Tom Clancy’s: The Division: Hunted” Author Thomas Parrott

from paulsemel.com: In this exclusive Q&A, the author of the new technothriller based on "Tom Clancy's: The Division" discusses how it ties to the games while also bringing its own story to a close.

Read Full Story >>
paulsemel.com
rpad77d ago

did you edit out the parts where the author repeated everything you asked?

50°

Ubisoft's The Division series just had 80% slashed off its price on Steam

If you're looking to try out an exciting, team-based shoot 'em up, The Division is currently on sale on Steam!

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
170°

Stop Forcing Multiplayer Into Single Player Games

TIM WHITE WRITES: "Multiplayer or single player? Developers, you can do both, just not willy-nilly."

Read Full Story >>
growngaming.com
Flawlessmic384d ago

I am in absolute agreement with the OP 👌

shinoff2183383d ago

I hate when I see single player games and see people begging for multi-player. Jeez guys it don't need to be on every game. Latest one I seen was atomic heart.

-Foxtrot383d ago

Multiplayer or even co-op

If it was always a single player game then that's how it is

Inverno383d ago

It's a trend that never really went away. For me multiplayer in a primarily SP focused game was an excuse for DLC. Then there's the mentality gamers had that adding multiplayer makes a game worth the price, otherwise it should be half price for half a game. A way of thinking devs reassured when they started adding multiplayer to their sequels. We see the same with multiplayer focused games getting SP in their sequels.

Flawlessmic383d ago

Tbh multilayer now is a way to add live service and mtx elements, very rarely does it come of well.

What single players game used to be in a lot of cases now require 3 other people for keeping to really enjoy it and I hate having to rely on others to get the maximum from a game.

Sp should be sp, if devs want to add a separate multi mode then that's fine with me, the legends addition to ghost of tshushima was fricking sick but totally separate to the main game. Sick of co op too.

Hofstaderman383d ago

I remember when certain single player games had them as included optional modes that was played on the couch. Had brilliant times with Syphon Filter and Golden Eye. Me and my bro used to used to fight over who would play as Gabe even though it was technically just a skin. Good times.

Dagexon382d ago

I didn't notice your comment before I added mine.
But good times indeed

Show all comments (15)