240°

Rick Sherlund owns Pachter – ‘Xbox is cool, but Microsoft has not made any Money off this’

Furious Francis from Playeressence talks about Michael Pachter, his inaccuracy as an analyst, and Rick Sherlund's take on Microsoft's income with the Xbox brand.

Read Full Story >>
playeressence.com
iamnsuperman3896d ago (Edited 3896d ago )

What is with the creepy conspiracy theory music....

Also I am not sure what argument you are making in this video. It is the same one point for 10 minutes over and over again. Also when you thought you one upped him by talking about E-shop sales, you completely missed the point. The E-shop did come too late. It should have been around when Sony and Microsoft showed off their stores. That was the point pachter was making. You theory that he is wrong because the store sales are soaring is just mind blowingly stupid. That still doesn't change the fact the store has only come in 2012 and not years ago (when these things were new)

AbortMission3895d ago (Edited 3895d ago )

Dude, playeressence is a Nintendo fanboy website lol that Furious Fanboy clown has been exposed as a fanboy by some guys on YouTube. This is the same guy who claimed Pikmin 3 is a "system seller" and also claimed that 3rd parties are "scared" of Nintendo. They're nothing but extreme pathetic fanboys trying to justify their purchase *cough* Buyers Remorse.

RicardJulianti3895d ago

Right because when Pikmin 3 released it didn't help move Wii U systems.

Try harder.

chadboban3895d ago

So then... what are you exactly? Every time I see you in the comments (I don't follow you around so I could be wrong about this) it's most of the time something negative.

AbortMission3895d ago (Edited 3895d ago )

Right because a measly 20k jump in console sales for a Nintendo game coming out with no competition is such a "system seller" Lol. I love how you fanboys downplay terms like "next gen" and "system seller" just to accommodate for the Wii u's lacking hardware/sales.

And I only comment "negatively" on fanboys.

chadboban3895d ago

"And I only comment "negatively" on fanboys"

Not from what I've read but whatever. I get so sick of these console wars anyway. They make grown ass folks act like damn children over which console is DA BEST. It makes me sick the way some of you behave.

BattleAxe3895d ago

Look out, Francis is on the war path!

Let's just get this out into the open. And just so people are aware, I have decided not to buy a next generation console at all, so I don't have a dog in this fight:

#1. Compared to Xbox Live and the Playstation Network, the E-Shop IS years too late. Both Sony and Microsoft have brand recognition associated with their respective market places and social ecosystems. Meanwhile, nobody outside of hardcore Nintendo fans knows what the E-Shop is, or even what the Miiverse is.

It's clear that when the Xbox One and the PS4 launch, all of the attention this holiday season will be focused towards Microsoft and Sony, but Sony in particular. At the end of the day when you look at worldwide numbers, the PS Vita is selling better than the WiiU based on year to date sales, and the funny thing is how people are talking about how bad the PS Vita is selling.

It's not complicated, the WiiU is in serious trouble, and so lets just hope that Nintendo's upcoming software releases can change the tide. Even if there is a large sales spike in Nintendo's hardware, it will be the hardcore Nintendo fan that buys theses games, and who will ultimately buy the WiiU. I don't believe that the WiiU will attract new gamers on anywhere near the scale of what the PS4 will, or even the Xbox One (unfortunately).

#2. Steve Balmer should have been fired years ago, and it's good to see him announce his departure. Xbox One was a complete public relations disaster, and I'm glad that they are turning back some of their policies that they originally announced around E3. I believe that Don Matrick and Steve Balmer were really holding Microsoft back, and I think there may be a great opportunity for Microsoft to chart a new direction once Blamer has finally left the company.

Personally I don't think Microsoft should leave the gaming industry, but it would make sense for them to drop the Xbox and concentrate on the PC. Recent news of Microsoft hiring a former STEAM executive to take charge in redesigning Games For Windows Live, leads me to believe that Microsoft might actually have something good to offer on the PC at some point in the not so distant future.

This would be great news for PC gamers who want to play Microsoft exclusive games on their PC's, and who knows, maybe they'll adopt a STEAM-like approach to doing business on GFWL, kind of like how EA is trying to copy STEAM's success with Origin. The great thing with Microsoft is that they have all of the assets and resources to put something great together for PC customers.

I say ditch the hardware (Xbox One) and concentrate on the PC, especially since PCs are the way of the future, and eventually we'll all be playing Playstation on the Playstation Client for PC at some point in the next 10 years anyway. I think that once Iwata finally gets the boot (and deservedly so), we'll all be playing Nintendo games on a Nintendo Client for PC, or maybe on Steam and Android devices. Nintendo is missing a massive market of consumers by keeping their games on Nintendo hardware only, and shareholders aren't stupid, they'll demand that Nintendo adapt to the new realities that todays technology offers, otherwise Nintendo will fizzle out into the dustbin of history.

The Wii was a fad, and they will never make another home console that will sell up around 100 million like the Wii has done. Soccer moms, senior citizens, baby boomers and casual gamers will not be buying the WiiU as they might have done with the Wii. Those people are playing on their smart phones, tablets, facebook and the Wiis that they bought 4 or 5 years ago. It's time to change the business strategy, and Francis, I know that you know that way deep down inside, you know I'm right.

Theyellowflash303895d ago

All of that rambling and you proved nothing BattleAxe, if PSN and Xbox Live were so profitable, why isn't Microsoft and Sony making any money in their gaming divisons?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3895d ago
Belking3896d ago

This Rick guy is delusional if he thinks MS hasn't made any money off the xbox brand. XBL alone takes in over 1 billion a year...lol Xbox360 was making profits years ago.This stuff is hilarious.

Biggest3896d ago

You may not have a full grasp on the way business works. Profit on each device sold does not equate to overall profit. Xbox may be "making money" as we speak, but Xbox has a lot of loss to cover before it becomes actual profit.

http://www.neowin.net/news/...

http://www.tannerhelland.co...

http://www.destructoid.com/...

OC_MurphysLaw3896d ago

The problem is the Xbox has traditionally been lumped into The "entertainment and devices" division which includes much more than just Xbox. The loses in that division can be attributed to other things like Zune, Windows Phone (so far) Surface RT, and the like.

MS will be interesting to watch in the coming year though as they phase out Ballmer and whoever the new chief is steps up.

iamnsuperman3896d ago (Edited 3896d ago )

@Dlacy13g

That is completely true and it would be interesting to see how Microsoft reacts to this as that division needs a shake up. The question is what do they get rid of and what do they focus on. Tablets (despite the losses) and Mobiles are probably to important to pass up especially when Microsoft and consumers are moving towards a unified OS system but the xbox penetrates the home space (they need to see if that is still important now). Some people have said they should focus on a software future than a hardware future. It is going to be interesting what the new boss does.

Belking3896d ago (Edited 3896d ago )

Dude, I know how business works. Every division in ms has lost money. This doesn't mean they aren't making profits. Xbox division makes money off games,xbl, and additional stuff. Why you think sony has come aboard the online charge model....lol Xbox division does well. Believe that. Now sony on the the other hand is another story. It's pretty obvious they aren't doing as well. They didn't even start profiting on ps3 til 2011. Those profits were totally wiped out by ps4 development. That's why they had to sell off building assets to help with the cost and stay afloat.

Dude, you are misinformed. xbox division is profitable.

http://news.teamxbox.com/xb...

And that was way back in 2009...holla!

Mikeyy3896d ago

@Dlacy13g

Wow, just wow. Its funny how people have ragged on the ps3 for "not making any money". While ignoring the fact that the PlayStation brand is also in an entertainment division that had numerous products of varying performance. Then they turn around and use that same defense for the Xbox brand. MS doesn't have anywhere near the amount of products in its entertainment division then Sony has...

Manic20143896d ago

They Did to better for the 1st quarter this year: http://www.vgchartz.com/art...

OC_MurphysLaw3896d ago

@Mikkey yes the playstation line of products is part of the Sony Consumer and Products division... Both companies hide other devices and costs with in these divisions. That is why when people start trying to quote financials I question their sources. If you drill down on either company you can find specifically how certain hardware has done but far too often financial quotes are for the divisions as a whole and not the products and specific services they offered.

Muerte24943895d ago

Then why propose a sell of specific part of that division if that's the only part that's profitable? I mean, why would investors single out Xbox Division only?

Don't know this ultimately doesn't matter. Xbox One will launch with a pretty good launch lineup. I guess this is why they aren't dropping the price. Kinect needs to be a success given all the R&D money that went into it.

n4rc3895d ago

Your right... But the value of the Xbox brand I believe is a marketing tool.. It draws people to other Microsoft services and gets their name into the minds of young future customers..

They didn't enter the space to make billions.. They already do that.. its a promotional tool imo

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3895d ago
porkChop3896d ago

The Xbox brand as a whole has yet to make Microsoft money. They're still trying to recoup their losses from over the years, losses that are in the billions.

MonkeyNinja3896d ago

1 billion a year minus ads, money-hats to devs for timed-exclusivity deals, shady deals with the media, paying for celebs at conferences...

What he's trying to say is that compared to Microsoft's other divisions, the XBox brand barely turns a profit, so Microsoft would be better off handing it over to a company like Samsung. I agree.

RicardJulianti3896d ago

Here's the thing though.....MS may have been turning a yearly profit back in 2009...and possibly even SINCE 2009...

BUT, they have not posted a net profit for the lifetime of the 360...or the Xbox brand in general even with games, XBL and so forth. That's what Rick Sherlund is getting at when he says they haven't made money.

They may have spent less than they earned YoY, but LTD is a disaster. I wouldn't be surprised if losses are close to $10bn honestly.

AAWELLS093895d ago

It's funny how you criticise Pachter yet you're doing the same exact thing.

RicardJulianti3895d ago

@aawells07

It's funny that I'm not the creator of the video. I simply posted it here.

3-4-53896d ago

By making money I think he is referring to profit.

They overspend hundreds of millions of dollars.

They spent about 200-400 million on this connect BS and they will NEVER recoup that money from JUST kinect products.

That isn't a smart way to do business.

The thing with xbox is, it's good, it's solid, but considering who Microsoft is, it should be a whole lot better as a brand.

I love my 360, but there have only been a few games that really impressed me this gen.

Everything that is missing from the xbox 360 can be found on the PS3/Wii or handhelds.

360 is great for sports games & FPS, which I like, but there aren't many good RPG's, or action adventure games or 2D/3D platformers, or random various genres we haven't even thought of yet.

It all feels watered down compared to the games I played on the OG Xbox.

We didn't get anything even close to Crimson Skies this generation.

Nobody has topped that game or eve come close yet in terms of online multiplayer fun and it's addictiveness.

80% of the games on xbox 360 are souless and shouldn't have been made or should have been made much differently.

Once again, 360 is solid, I've had great memories and experiences on it, currently running through Borderlands 2 for the first time and liking it, but it's not enough.

All the game types from SNES/GBA/PS1/N64 era were abandoned or changed so drastically that they aren't even fun any more.

PS4 seems to be going back to the drawing bored and realises " Hey, we've been forgetting these 15 genres that people love "

n4rc3895d ago

People need to realize one thing....

All these analyst and youtube economists all want to talk about what's bad for bUsiness and how shortsighted ms is..

They are one of the most profitable companies in the world and have been for what? 30 years now? these people claiming to be experts couldnt hold a candle to microsoft in terms of success..

Its absolutely ridiculous.. When your company rakes in 10+ billion a year.. Then you can talk about how little microsoft undetstands about business

kewlkat0073895d ago

Microsoft has been making money off Xbox division over the last 5 years but they are still in the RED as a whole because of other factors.

Counting RROD, devices like Zune, Surface and the "initial brand investments" has kept them in the Red.

I think, those device are all in the Entertainment Division.

Eddie201013895d ago

This guy is not very accurate on what he is saying but as far as Microsoft making money from the Xbox division he partially correct.

Microsoft has made profit on sales of the system and games but they have never actually recouped the initial R and D investments in the division which were in the billions and were probably written off long ago by Microsoft but in the end was still money used to build the business and money they never got back.

assdan3895d ago

Have you heard of the XBOX? That thing was a MASSIVE money pit. And the profits of the 360 still hasn't made up for it.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3895d ago
No_Limit3896d ago

Can't believe I am saying this but Pachter is right on this one.

Eddie201013895d ago (Edited 3895d ago )

Nintendo is still making money and for the most part since the Wii, have been. Just there profits have went down a considerable amount. does not mean they should get out of the hardware business.

Xsilver3895d ago

its called 3ds thats whooping ass

WrAiTh Sp3cTr33896d ago

Pacther is right. Another thing I'm just now realizing is that he was right about PSN charging for online gaming.

KwietStorm_BLM3895d ago

Anybody could have assumed Sony would charge for PSN. In fact, a lot of people did. XBL subscribers year in and year out have told not just Microsoft, but the industry, that they are fine with it. So now Sony is using a similar model. The only reason they didn't do it sooner is because the gamers never would have accepted it in the middle of the generation. But look at the reception now. PS4 can do no wrong, and because PS+ is such a great service, it can be overlooked. Pachter just made an educated guess, that's all.

WrAiTh Sp3cTr33895d ago

They way I'm interpreting your comment is that Sony added model because they seen how good they were doing with PS+. That's fine, but Pacther predicting this long before PS+ was thought about. I personally would have never thought Sony would go that route and I'm still surprised.

iceman063895d ago

I agree. Seeing as though it was an "untapped" source of revenue when Xbox was released and, as you said, gamers didn't seem to have an issue with it...it was a pretty easy guess. Sony, just like MS, need as much revenue as possible. They didn't have a lot of non-traditional revenue sources outside of Home. Thus, they had to do something to generate revenue. They put out the PS+ service and it seems to be gaining a lot of steam heading into the next generation. It only makes sense to wrap the multiplayer into the service that way you can generate revenue and still trump the competition by offering a little something for the troubles. That being said, I hate that they have to do that...but I understand fully that these businesses aren't charities and have to make money some way.

KwietStorm_BLM3895d ago

No that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying paying to play online on PS4 has pretty much been accepted by the gamers themselves, because of a combination of PS+ being so good, PS4 being so widely appreciated this early, and just not having issue with it. The reasons Sony went with it, besides the obvious constant revenue stream, is because of the necessity for an upgraded infrastructure, in compliance with many of the new features coming with the system and network. If Sony made boatloads of money off PS3, then MAYBE they wouldn't look at it as a necessary source of revenue, but I'm sure the income will be a large help regardless.

As far as Pachter goes, yea regular gamers were saying the same thing before PS+ too, because Sony's financial problems were persistent for a good while, and everyone already knew XBL was a good source of revenue for Microsoft, so it didn't take a crystal ball or an insider to presume things would change. It's not like he KNEW this would happen. He makes a lot of educated guess. Some turn out to be true, some make him look like he has not a clue what he's talking about.

OC_MurphysLaw3896d ago

lol... this guy is funny. Full of sh*t mind you but he is funny to listen to in a creepy way.

Show all comments (59)
240°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv7220h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle7h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic18815h ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio4h ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Lightning772m ago

What he said was facts. How he plays games is no concern of you. Don't get too mad about it.

Cacabunga7h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

shinoff21836h ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga5h ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

itsmebryan1h ago

@shin
Well keep it simple Sony 's operating income is down 26% and Microsoft's is up 32%. No MS spin there, just facts. 😉
Cheers

romulus2312m ago

Odd that a company that touts you dont need the hardware to play is already touting another console in the works.

darthv720m ago

They are not reliant on the HW but still want to maintain a presence (no matter how small) is a good thing. It shows commitment to the craft. It reminds me of SNK and how they made games for their own hardware (Neo Geo) while also making them for others because they knew there was a market to do so. They knew they would sell more to others but also sell to their own niche fan base.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 0m ago
purple10110h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos9h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

XBManiac8h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple1018h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic6h ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

Show all comments (30)
300°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere1d 17h ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN1d 14h ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos1d 12h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN1d 5h ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo1d 7h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies1d 3h ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion1d 17h ago (Edited 1d 16h ago )

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger1d 14h ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Mr Logic1d 1h ago

What a stupid thing to say. The elites give 0 fucks what we say on an obscure website in the comments section.

Crows901d ago

You can always reach out and give them jobs at your company man. Don't wait

Profchaos1d 17h ago (Edited 1d 16h ago )

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto1d 16h ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos1d 16h ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long1d 13h ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel1d 15h ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos1d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator1d 14h ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (21)
280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10112d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref12d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde12d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197212d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville12d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218311d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos11d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
isarai12d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref12d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan12d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00711d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197212d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

12d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

12d ago
12d ago
Zeref12d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde12d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197212d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier12d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto12d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218311d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto11d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
Hofstaderman12d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts12d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts11d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)