600°

Microsoft Just Killed Xbox Live Family Packs

Steve: As of August 27th, those of you with Xbox Live Family Pack accounts will have their accounts split into four individual memberships. Instead of getting four accounts for $99 a year, you will now be forced to pay the full price for each individual account. The hits just seem to keep rolling in.

Lovable3912d ago

What's with the amount of Xbone article today? Seriously.

ApolloTheBoss3912d ago

Running from the truth won't make it go away.

Maddens Raiders3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

Speaking of truth....
Is it me or does anyone else notice as of late MS's "news" always seems to be about reversing course, clarifying a statement, changing specs, changing some arcane policy, or easing "restrictions" -- while PS news is usually about games & features, review of games & features, new features, or new games?

darthv723912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

i read that as they are converting the family accounts to gold accounts for the remainder of your subscription time AND adding in another 3mo of service per converted account.

It didnt say anything about paying the difference for that time remaining. Or am i missing something?

shoddy3912d ago

You get what you pay for./S

seriously how can people still bow down to MS greed.

georgeenoob3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

"Running from the truth won't make it go away"

Truth is MS has more/better exclusives and tons more features than Sony and the fanboys on N4G are the ones running away from the truth focusing on things like the size of the power brick or what comes without a Gold subscription. That's why you see so many of these articles, trying to hide the bigger picture by criticizing the X1 with small things.

Oh the irony.

ApolloTheBoss3912d ago

^^^Obvious troll is obvious. Try harder next time.

ABizzel13912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

There's a bunch of misinformation going on so please clarify. We all understand Xbox Live Gold Family Plan is out. Instead of paying $99 for 4 memberships you have to pay $60 for you XBL account.

But does this mean:

EXAMPLE 1: Boomy and his best friends across the country all shared the XBL family plan for $99. Do they now have to purchase their own separate plan for $60 each once the subscription expires.

or

EXAMPLE 2: Boomy and his best friends across the country all shared the XBL family plan for $99. Boomy buys XBL for $60 and puts his account on his friends Xbox One. Everyone can use that same XBLGold since Boomy paid for it.

How I'm reading it is more like Example 2 (or maybe I just don't want it to be Example 1), but that brings up another question. Can you share it with all Xbox on the same ISP, or can you share it with anyone?

Edit

After further reading on IGN it says you can game share with anyone, so I'm guessing so as long as you give your gamertag / account info to your friend they should be able to use your XBL like, kind of like it is now. But I don't want someone playing on my account so hopefully license transfer still works.

Edit 2

Okay so after going to M$ website, you can share with anyone "in your home". If you have multiple profiles on your console everyone can use the same content even if they didn't buy it. If you use another console outside the home and buy a game, it will be playable on your profile, and saved to your home console so your family can still play it on your console.

So these feature is unlimited as long as the gamers are using your console at your home (kind of pointless if everyone wants their own console, and pretty much what anyone does to begin with).

However, when you're on another console you can download your profile and everyone can play with XBL Gold as long as your using your profile.

So this whole service is pretty much a joke. The only benefit is not having kids cartoons as your top recommendation with Netflix.

http://news.xbox.com/2013/0...

WrAiTh Sp3cTr33912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

"Speaking of truth....
Is it me or does anyone else notice as of late MS's "news" always seems to be about reversing course, clarifying a statement, changing specs, changing some arcane policy, or easing "restrictions" -- while PS news is usually about games & features, review of games & features, new features, or new games?"

Nothing about PS really interests me so I haven't been paying attention, especially in this article which has nothing to do with PS.

GribbleGrunger3912d ago

@ABizzel1: You are confusing to different policies. This is for the 360. The one you are speaking of is for the X1. Like I said below, perhaps MS will include the 360 in that X1 offer but as it stands at the moment, every member of your family will need a separate LIVE account for the 360.

Death3912d ago

"The new system "will enable any Xbox Live Gold member on Xbox One to extend many Gold features to others at no additional cost," Whitten wrote. "One Xbox Live Gold account delivering great benefits to everyone in the home."

If you read the announcement it clearifies it. Home Gold is making it so an unlimited amount of accounts can be set up on one box as long as there is a main gold account set up on it. This way your wife and kids can have there own unique accounts on the same box at the normal $59 yearly rate covering all accounts.

It will not cover seperate XboxOne systems though. Each system requires a main account at $59 a year since each system can be logged in at the same time. The old family plan was ideal for multiple Xbox360's in the same household at a reduced rate. For families accessing all 4 accounts (or more under the new plan)on a single Xbox, they will be saving $40 a year. If they were using multiple box's it is going up between $20-$140 a year depending on how many they plan to use at once.

YNWA963912d ago

Apollothetroll, be nice now. If you have no interest in X1, why are you commenting on this article then? Oh yeah, your trolling....

ABizzel13912d ago

@GribbleGrunger

I wasn't discussing the Xbox 360, I specifically meant the XB1 and as @Death said right below you, this new XB Gold Home is a awful replacement for XBL Family Plan. Most of the people bought the family plan because they owned multiple consoles in the household, or they shared the account with 3 other family members so they only had to pay $25 each.

This new XBL Home Gols cost $60 vs. $100 for the family plan, but everyone in the house has to use the same console to get the same benefits that the family plan offered. The problem is I nor many other people want to share my console with multiple people in the house. When I want to play I don't want to wait for Billy, John, Susan, or whoever else to get done to play. The family plan offered all this on 4 different consoles, and I'd rather pay the $40 to keep that functionality.

This also means that those 4 family members who payed for the plan at $25 each, now have to pay $60 each, because M$ wants more money. $100 vs. $240. It's just utterly ridiculous how M$ does something good, and then turn arounds and hits you in the wallet even more.

This is the final nail in the coffin for me. I gave M$ chance after chance to prove to me, the XB1 was worth it. Game-wise they proved it, but M$ is the greediest f@$#ing corporation I've seen, and I would be happy if the Xbox brand died with the XB1, because at least we had a decent ride with the 360.

I will not be buying an XB1 this generation, and it's looking more and more like I'll be a PS4 / Wii U owner, or a single console owner (PS4) if Nintendo doesn't get their stuff together (always have PC).

I'm just done. I'm not about to support someone who wants to nickel and dime you every chance they get. Xbox brand can die a slow painful death, and for all you Xbox supports good luck to you, and I wish you the best with your console.

Virus2013912d ago

Running from what truth?

The truth is;

They are getting rid of it because when the Xbox One comes out, you only need one Gold account ($60) on the console, and you can make unlimited account.

That website (hardcopy.com) tries to spin it and make it seem like everyone will have to pay now because they are getting rid of the Family pack. If you read the email, they'll be offering those people 3months of Xbox Live (which surprisingly end in November).

Death3912d ago

How many PS4's can play online at once with PS+?

ABizzel13912d ago

@Death

http://www.playstationlifes...

The point is M$ greedy @$$e$ are once again taking away something that was beneficial on the Xbox 360 just so they can try to make more money. If you want to offer XBL Home Gold fine, but don't take away the Family plan, because there are families where each child has their own console.

This plan will only let you share on a single console with all profiles loaded to it. If you have multiple console you have to pay $60 per console rather than $100 for up to 4 like the official Xbox websites says.

I'm sick of this give 1+ and take 2- from M$, and I'm just done. I'm not about to support someone who want to nickel and dime the consumers especially after making the 360 the success it was even after events like the RROD, and having a 1st party game drought for since January and not getting a new IP for what 2 years. M$ has turned the Xbox brand completely corporate, and it's no longer about gaming, but how much money they can take from gamers. And they can k!$$ my @$$.

JokesOnYou3912d ago

lol, You see this is what I'm talking about, this site including folks on n4g just automatically turned good news into something bad, something evil.

The family sharing existed for $99 family members could share multiple xbox live gold accounts on 1 360. The new xbox live policy for sharing means that for each console you can have multiple gold accounts on that 1 360/X1 for only $60.

This is good news XBL just got cheaper for those who purchased the family plan and of course you sony kids just blindly start hating.

sAVAge_bEaST3912d ago

@adorie,

The truth is that M$ does not care about their customer base, will nickle and dime whenever they can,.. and produce the Daily Fail.

rainslacker3912d ago

@Jokes

That's Abizzel's problem though with the new plan. He wants to have the family plan to be able to have multiple consoles available to play in one home. He doesn't want to have to pay a separate live fee for each console in the home. The family plan was more cost effective for him, so now with multiple consoles, he will be spending more.

It's great that MS is allowing unlimited(?) accounts on a single Xbox, but it doesn't pertain to each individual console in the home. There are many multi-console homes out there, and it's perfectly reasonable for him to not like it.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding how the family plan works, but that seems to be his gripe. It's obviously not going to be cheaper for him, and a couple others...so in a sense, a good feature is now a step backwards.

JokesOnYou3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

Correction this is for Xbox One. 360 users will have to use the Gold Members gamertag for access to online. Again its making a big deal out of nothing, you still have access to all Gold services on 360, just not with a separate gamertag for free.

@Rainslacker but you still have access to gold on multiple consoles you own, its just locked to your Gold membership gamertag, so all it means is that for others who live in your house but don't pay for their own Gold subscription they will have to use your gamertag to log in for gold services.

awi59513912d ago

@shoddy

Apparently Sony since they are jealous of that 500 million a month microsoft gets form xbox live. I cant believe no one even cares that sony is charging for online play this gen after all the years of bashing Xbox for it. But if sony does it it's ok? Really, sony fanboys do you know how silly that looks? Screw both consoles im staying pc having too much fun at much cheaper prices with better graphics.

Redempteur3912d ago

They are getting rid of the familly plan , so what ? now every xbox360 owner MUST upgrade to the xbone ?

i mean yes this is good to have one account for a console , especially in the xbone VS ps4 fight that will start in november BUT , what if i want to stay on 360 ??

mewhy323912d ago

What.....micro $ oft trying to milk more money from the sheep? Don't worry thesheep will continue to pay without question and praise the company for making them do it.

thisismyaccount3912d ago

Sony better have tons of information to share with us, bad propaganda is still propaganda. Haven´t read anything PS4 related the past 3 weeks, more or less.

Give me sumtin Sony!

UnHoly_One3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

Just a curiosity question for all of you guys who are blasting MS for this policy like it's the worst thing ever.

Is it even going to affect you?

I'm guessing probably not, so why are you bitching about it??

If you don't currently use the XBL family deal, you have no business being in here bitching about it.

I see quotes like this all over the page: "This is it, I'm done with MS, I'm never buying anything from them again."

Well, I'm guessing that first off, you didn't have a Gold Family pack to begin with, and second, you probably weren't going to ever buy an XB1 anyway.

I just don't get the people that have to come into every Xbox article and bitch about something that doesn't concern them.

kreate3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

@unholy

Of course it concerns gamers. These ridiculous policies and restrictions slash nickle and diming affects all of us. So it turns ppl off from getting a xbone. So of course ppl will complain.

Doesn't matter what the product is. I'm just mentioning the xbone cuz ms and the xbone is the issue at hand.

If ms make everything simple and consumer friendly, I highly doubt ppl will complain and moan.

Death3912d ago

@abizzel

So PS+ users can share their console with unlimited accounts and only pay for one. If you want to have multiple PS4's in your household, each system needs to have a paid PS+ account to play online.

Live users can share their console with unlimited accounts and only pay for one. If you want to have multiple Xbox's in your household, each system needs to have a paid Live account to play online.

Previously, Microsoft offered a family share plan that gave you 4 Live subscriptions for $99. It didn't matter if all 4 were on the same console or on different consoles.

Previously, Sony didn't charge for online play. Now they are going to charge $50 per PS4 if you want to play online.

I'm not sure I'd label either as greedy since they are businesses. Sony having the same policy now as Microsoft would put the whole "greed" thing on a level playing field.

nukeitall3912d ago

@rainslacker:

If he/she truly wants to use multiple consoles, then one account can sign in on many consoles.

Now, if you want multiple consoles and multiple accounts without paying, you have to add a step. On the other consoles (other than the main one), sign in on the account that has XBL Gold, then sign in with the account you want to use.

Bam! Problem solved and you saved money over the family plan!

evilhasitsway3912d ago

@adorie

that ms sucks and all ms fans wallets are just getting raped bad ms doesn't know how to treat there customers plain and simple. I started on the first xbox it was a good system to have I also had ps2 but when it came to 360 and ps3 the only big thing between them is the games ps3 just had more games that's the trueth, now with ps4 and x1 ps4 is winning hands down. sony has had a plan and they have stuck to it. ms has changed everything since thy reveal it. that shows me ms doesn't even know what they want. that's the truth.

3912d ago
The_Con-Sept3912d ago

Xbox one is so unstable that it might have been what caused the electricity to fluctuate in black mesa New Mexico!

Gaming1013912d ago

It's simple, consoles aren't as profitable as Msoft would like them to be, so they need to creatively come up with new revenue streams, and if that means restricting things that used to save consumers money like family packs, then too F'n bad consumers, you need to pay. This is what gave birth to the used games debacle - it was another way to increase the revenue stream.

Fanboys can't seem to get it out of their head that Msoft doesn't give a crap about them, they care about one thing - improving investor relations, which means increasing profits. It's the North American way of doing business (mostly US). Don't think you're anything other than a revenue stream to a faceless corporation.

rainslacker3911d ago

@nuke or joke

OK, I get that, based on this and other comments. I guess my only remaining question is this.

Will Xbox Live allow two people who are on the same primary account(ie, the primary and a secondary) both sign in at the same time from different consoles?

I bring this up because there was an article yesterday about GFWL not kicking you off Xbox Live if you logged into both with the same account. It seems the primary would always be the master account that all subsequent accounts would log in through.

I understand the workaround, and if it's possible for two people to be logged in at the same time from different consoles, I will concur that this workaround would actually benefit people who have the family plan now and want to go that extra step...at least monetarily.

BTW, I'm not trying to stir anything up. I'm genuinely curious since I don't use XBLive now and am interested if MS is trying to make more positive moves for the benefit of the consumer.

+ Show (30) more repliesLast reply 3911d ago
Enigma_20993912d ago

It's a reprieve from the Wii U bashing, I guess.

Kingthrash3603912d ago

no need to wiiu bash....who bashes the wiiu?
Nintendo is doing a great job of it themselves by not putting out games fast enough. most of wiiu system sellers are coming out next year and the next gen will be in full swing by then....it them not taking advantage of this head start they've had. it them not having a conference at e3. its them not bringing something new to the table.....its all on them....

Me-Time3911d ago

People really need to stop quoting the first comment (not you) just to be noticed. It looks like the first 100 comments is in reply to the first one. Get a life, you're crap (for lack of a better word).

Enigma_20993911d ago

You folks make me proud to call myself a gamer...[/sarcasm]

NeutralXP3912d ago

Stop trolling and if you don't like it don't comment everybody is sick of hearing PS4 news this isn't a only PS4 site FFS

Blackdeath_6633912d ago

no its just that less people are interested in the XBone so naturally less people will look up XBone news thus less people will submit XBone news and the opposite is true for ps4

Jyndal3912d ago

Of course it's not a PS4 site only.
There's also PC.
Anything else is just filler.

tuglu_pati3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

You'll be hearing a lot Xbox related news from now on and I'm pretty sure that after Camescom they will start advertising the X1 like crazy.

3912d ago
dedicatedtogamers3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

Is this really "news"? I thought that Microsoft killed the family plan to put everyone under one Gold account? At least, that's the way it is on Xbox One, to my knowledge.

Maybe it's a way to get people to upgrade from 360 to X1? I dunno. Someone please clarify.

ABizzel13912d ago

http://news.xbox.com/2013/0...

By all means correct if I'm reading it wrong, but basically they canceled the family share plan (4 different consoles et XBL Gold for $100) and replaced it with XBL Home Gold (1 console everyone shares content on for $60).

So for families with 1 console it's a benefit because every account on that one console now has XBL Gold, instead of having to pay $60 per gamertag. Also each gamertag can share all the content, but has their own settings. For example, you have kids that watch a bunch of disney cartoons on Netflix, well those videos won't be recommended to you when you sign in to netflix on your gamertag. Also if you buy Gear of War off the store from your gamertag, as long as your kids are playing on the one console everyone can play that copy of Gears of War and even get online.

However, for families that purchase multiple consoles for say dad, and their 2 - 3 kids, you're f@$#ed, because now you have to stick to buying 1 console and sharing everything (that 500GB HDD is going to get full) or pay $60 for each console in the house.

That's what I got from the Xbox site.

Now if you sign in with your profile on a friends house say out of town. If that friend doesn't have XBL Gold it's okay since your account does, so you both can log in with your own gamertags and play online. And if you buy a game on your friends console while using your gamertag, your console back at home will automatically download the game to your home console for when you return. However, as soon as you activate your account back at your home, your friend loses XBL Gold functionality.

So basically they dumped family plan, for no reason, and added a replacement that doesn't help multi-Xbox owners, and want you to pay more money.

JokesOnYou3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

@ABizzel1, NO you were making sense until this part:

"However, for families that purchase multiple consoles for say dad, and their 2 - 3 kids, you're f@$#ed, because now you have to stick to buying 1 console and sharing everything (that 500GB HDD is going to get full) or pay $60 for each console in the house."

"So how it works is, on your console, anybody else on the console, whether it's a babysitter that's come over or a friend or your family, can participate in all the experiences like they're on Gold," Xbox chief product officer Marc Whitten told Polygon. "It's with their gamertag so they're not on your gamertag, you don't even have to be there, they're not messing up your gamerscore or your storage or your queues or anything like that. It's their full account experience, but it really gets to take full advantage of many of the Gold features."

"If you login to your gamertag on another Xbox One (for example, at a friend's house or a second console in your house) all of your digital content travels with you, but is only available while you're logged in. Once you sign out, whatever you downloaded is still on that console but will need to be purchased by other users."

"If this sounds familiar, that's because it is. This is how the Xbox 360 handled digital content licenses, providing multiple gamertags access to content on a home console while reverting to "demo" status for Xbox Live Arcade games when logged out at a friend's house. "The way that the home console works is the same way it works for your content," Whitten said. "You play any of your digital content that you downloaded on that home console and we wanted that experience to extend not just around the benefits of the digital system but also what's going on with your [Xbox Live Gold] membership."
http://www.polygon.com/2013...

-So what I gathered from reading this is that when you buy a console one Gamertag(whoever pays the $60 online fee) will be setup as the primary member but you can have UNLIMITED Gamertags created on that same console and those specific gamertags on THAT CONSOLE have full access to all Gold membership services where each of those individual gamertags have full but separate access to Gold services.

The difference is gamertag who paid the $60 can use his gold membership/gamertag on ANY 2nd, 3rd, console he may own including ANYWHERE ON ANY FRIENDS CONSOLE. I mean this is really, really awesome but I do see why only the gamertag who paid $60 can play on any console because if not that would mean you could potentially make 1000 gamertags based on your 1 console ownership/Gold subscription, then give them out to 1000 people to have access to all your games anywhere. This way they keep it locked to 1 console except for whoever pays $60 for Gold membership.

3912d ago
JokesOnYou3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

Edit, On my above post the 2nd to last sentence should have said:

"then give them out to 1000 people to have access to your GOLD membership anywhere, without paying."

-Yeah edonus, I mean this is a sweet deal, everybody in you household(has access to your console) is set up with full Gold service....and you can use your gold membership on any console anywhere.

btw I'm not going to ever share my gamertag....but think about this basicly you and a brother or trusted friend could both buy an X1, only 1 of you buy a Gold membership, buy all digital games and if you share gamertags essentially only 1 of you needs to buy any game and you both can play it(at seperate times) even if he lives on the other coast. lol, just like you can do now except more conveniently if you don't live together.

rainslacker3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

@Jokes

So to clarify, because honestly this stuff is getting confusing...

If you set up a primary console...say the living room, and all the households members are registered as users on that console, they can then play all the same content on another console?

If so how does that prevent anyone from just setting up all their friends under their account and those friends being able to log on anywhere?

It seems to me, that with this plan, only one person, whether the primary or secondary, could be logged in at one time. If that's the case, how could two people play different consoles at one time and both be logged in?

I guess to put it simply, is it possible for both the primary and secondary accounts to be able to log in at the same time? If so then this is a great plan. If not, then it's not really a solution to anything that Abizzel is talking about.

Maybe I'm just missing something since I'm not too familiar with the XBox Live service...but that appears to be ABizzel's issue here beside the actual monetary loss he thinks he'll incur.

MasterCornholio3912d ago

"Maybe it's a way to get people to upgrade from 360 to X1?"

That makes sense. Microsoft downgrades a service on the Xbox 360 to give people an incentive to upgrade. Sounds despicable but knowing Microsoft it could be true.

Motorola RAZR i

JokesOnYou3912d ago

"It seems to me, that with this plan, only one person, whether the primary or secondary, could be logged in at one time. If that's the case, how could two people play different consoles at one time and both be logged in?"

Rainslacker

"Microsoft's spokesperson confirmed that won't be the case. "Gold features will stay active on your home Xbox One console even if you roam and login to use your Gold features elsewhere," the spokesperson said".
http://kotaku.com/xbox-one-...

"On Xbox One if you are an Xbox Live Gold member, you will be able to go to a friend’s house and play co-op multiplayer– even if your friend is not a Gold subscriber. Once you log in with your Xbox Live Gold account, everyone using that console can access multiplayer and entertainment apps for as long as you are logged in."
http://news.xbox.com/2013/0...

-So again the Gold membership can be used by the home console owner whoever paid $60 for the Gold membership ANYWHERE ON ANY CONSOLE, the other gamertags created for family members on that console only have access to gold services(online) on that 1 home console.

devwan3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

@Jokes

"-So again the Gold membership can be used by the home console owner whoever paid $60 for the Gold membership ANYWHERE ON ANY CONSOLE, the other gamertags created for family members on that console only have access to gold services(online) on that 1 home console."

OK, you keep clarifying that, but how about this, because this is the part I can't see clarified quite as clearly:

You have gold on your home machine and the master account. You set up an account for your little brother on the same machine, he can now have the same benefits on that machine.

Now you go to your friend's house, he doesn't have live so you sign in there and play online.

At home, your little brother wants to play online on his account. Is this possible at the same time? From what you said I think it is. If so, it seems you can happily run a maximum of two accounts through one live payment if you own 2 xbox ones, as only one secondary account can possibly play on your main machine while you sign in to another. If this is the case, you'd need just 2 live payments to happily run 4 machines in one home - and for someone with 4 machines under the family plan they're now paying just $20 more at $120 instead of $100, so it's not a massive difference. Of course, that all depends on the possibility of a secondary account being allowed to use live functionality if the main account is signed into a non-primary xbox one machine.

nukeitall3912d ago

@devwan:

"Of course, that all depends on the possibility of a secondary account being allowed to use live functionality if the main account is signed into a non-primary xbox one machine."

That is exactly how it works confirmed by MS.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3912d ago
adorie3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

Only on N4G, can you get hit with a shit ton of disagrees for asking a simple question.

I've got to hand it to some of these people here. Darwin awards should be expanded.

MasterCornholio3912d ago

Its for the 360......

Motorola RAZR i

CRAIG6673912d ago

you only need ONE live account per household on x1.

seedaripper19733912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

Do Microsoft have any feet left???

Belking3912d ago

It's the norm around here. If's MS they always focus on the negative.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3911d ago
cl19833912d ago

I have to question there being no mention of the source of this image.

Queasy3912d ago

It's legit. I got the same email.

cl19833912d ago

I was just taken back that the story didn't list some type of source.

guitarded773912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

It's legit, but yeah... you're right. It's irresponsible for a site not to list a source. Journalism 101. That's how misinformation and lawsuits happen.

On topic: MS just hasn't learned yet. People don't want features taken away. They don't want value stripped. They want every penny they can get from Live users, so they take away the family plan which makes it cheaper for families/groups to have XBOX Live.

Neoninja3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

Didn't they say though that if you have gold on one account all other accounts can use it on the xbox?

http://news.xbox.com/2013/0...

GribbleGrunger3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

So basically MS have give something to a none existent userbase by offering a one account solution to the X1 owners, and then shaft a userbase of 40+ million 360 owners ... Why does there always have to be a catch?

@green: Am I understanding it incorrectly? You used to be able to buy a family pack that gave you LIVE for $99 but that's been dropped. Doesn't this mean that every member of your family will need to pay full price for LIVE?

They're making you pay more ... no?

The catch is that they offered the X1 deal first to make you feel all nice and rosy and then they do this to a userbase of 40 million+.

GribbleGrunger3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

What's your take on it then? Are you happy that people can no longer pay $99 a year for a family pack, so they have to pay much more? Clearly it's no coincidence that MS announce the one account solution for the X1 and then make 360 owners pay more. Can't you see the connection? Can't you see that MS are using 360 owners to help foot the bill for their X1`offer?

No_Limit3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

there is no catch Gribble,

It is a migration to a one account system and existence members account within the Family plan will be compensated.

every single one of the family secondary accounts are being converted to their individual Gold account for free until the expiration date. In addition, each account gets 3 extra months for free. The original master account after 8/27 is the account that gets all the just announced 'Home Gold' and its sharing features. Yes, the sharing of one Gold account on a single console also applies to the X360 in addition to the XB1.

Christ!, am I the only one that read the entire article to get the full details instead of coming up with conclusion based on the headline article?

r2oB3912d ago

@ No_Limit

It states in the article that sharing one Gold account for multiple users on one console is for the Xbox One, it does not mention that feature for the 360.

The catch is that after they convert everyone each former member of the Family Pack will receive their own Gold account; but what will happen when that subscription ends? Each member will have to renew @ $60/Gold account in order to have XBL gold on the 360 (as opposed to $99 for 4 Gold accounts).

This is good news for Xbox One owners with multiple users on one console, but bad news for Xbox 360 owners with multiple users on one console.

Between this news, and the lack of exclusive titles coming to the 360... it seems that Microsoft has little to no regard for their current 360 userbase. Once again Microsoft is putting all their focus on the next console, and slowing abandoning the current console.

Geezus3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

ehh the family pack was expensive anyway im glad theyre fazing it out... they should go with the xbox one plan for all devices tho just for continuity and im more than sure that 40 mill+ werent on the family gold sharing plan they were the minority for sure tour kinda over exaggerating
edit: they made family gold plan out unavailable like 2 month ago

GribbleGrunger3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

edit: I responded to your post before you completely re-wrote it.

I'm not sure you've quite understood what's going on here. The X1 has a one account solution. This enables you to share an account with your family on the X1. This will mean MS can't make as much money from LIVE on the X1. What they've done is removed the family plan from the 360 so that you have to pay more for your family members to play online, thus using 360 owners to foot the bill for the X1 one account solution.

@No_Limit: That's only for a limited time. Then people with a family of 5 will have to pay $300 a year!

And yes, I did read it all. It's just that I can see the bigger picture.

GribbleGrunger3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

Ok, so I'll concede that 'perhaps' MS may apply the new X1 policy to 360s too, but as it stands at the moment, they are two separate policies. I will gladly eat humble pie if I'm wrong and MS clarify this.

deadfrag3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

Yes every member will have to have a diferent account and pay for it,the only catch is that M$ will disolve the family accounts and give 3 months free for every member in that family account.Give with one and take with two!!

slimeybrainboy3912d ago

Arent they swapping it for something else anyway?

http://uk.ign.com/articles/...

PopRocks3593912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

Whoa, whoa, whoa... wasn't it stated for both PS4 and Xbox One that if you get the subscriptions for one account you basically have them for all accounts on the console? Or is my information inaccurate?

@DarkBlood

That's why I'd assume a feature like this would be totally pointless anyway. If you have a single subscription, you don't need to spend an extra $39 four three additional accounts that already get the perks!

DarkBlood3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

i believe you are correct, i dont know if it was for both consoles though but i do remeber reading something to that effect

3-4-53912d ago

for PS4 i thought it was true, guess not for XB1.

The family pack is for multiple consoles right ?

or why would anybody pay twice to have internet on one system.

Didn't know these existed but it sounds like they are trying to "Push", people to buy the new XB1 and abandon the Xbox 360.

Hmmm. Could go either way with this, but I still think there is more with this we don't know or they aren't telling us.

Virus2013912d ago

It's like that for the Xbox One as well. THat's why they are getting rid of the family plan and offering those people 3months of Xbox live (up to November). Then when they get their Xbox One consoles, they can transfer those account from the 360 to the X1 and they'll be free.

Halochampian3912d ago

Exactly.

Other sites are focusing on the Home Gold feature.

N4G focuses on getting rid of features for this better one.

Shows you the state of mind of this site.

ABizzel13912d ago

That's the problem Home Gold isn't better unless your family only buys 1 console to being with.

Everything in Home Gold you can do now on 360, simply by transferring the license of the game to the account you want (you can only do it twice I believe).

Home Gold just let's everyone who comes over to visit log in their account on your Xbox One and use your XBL Gold. Compared to the family plan offering Gold for up to 4 different consoles.

Show all comments (167)
220°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv7218h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle5h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic18812h ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio2h ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Cacabunga4h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

shinoff21833h ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga2h ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

purple1017h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos6h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

XBManiac6h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple1015h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic3h ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

Show all comments (21)
300°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere1d 14h ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN1d 12h ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos1d 9h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN1d 2h ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo1d 4h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies1d ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion1d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger1d 12h ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Mr Logic22h ago

What a stupid thing to say. The elites give 0 fucks what we say on an obscure website in the comments section.

Crows9021h ago

You can always reach out and give them jobs at your company man. Don't wait

Profchaos1d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto1d 13h ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos1d 13h ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long1d 10h ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel1d 12h ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos1d 11h ago (Edited 1d 11h ago )

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator1d 12h ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (21)
280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10112d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref12d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde12d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197212d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville11d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218311d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos11d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
isarai12d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref12d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan12d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00711d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197212d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

12d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

12d ago
12d ago
Zeref12d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde12d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197212d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier11d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto11d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218311d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto11d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
Hofstaderman12d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts12d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts11d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)