140°

Mattrick departure unrelated to Xbox One woes, analysts say

VG247: "'Don’s been an industry pioneer and a key catalyst to Microsoft’s success in video games. He’s leaving behind a well-crafted and very skilled team of executives that are perfectly capable of carrying the torch,' EEDAR’s vice president of Insights wrote in response to our request for comment."

Abash3951d ago (Edited 3951d ago )

That's very hard to believe given the extreme backlash the Xbox One has gotten since it was revealed. A little over a month ago it seemed like Don Mattrick was all about the future of Xbox and the new console, then out of nowhere he leaves the company so abruptly? MS hasn't even found or appointed the person to take his position yet

CommonSense3951d ago

It hasn't received "extreme backlash." Just a few outspoken idiots throughout that industry that think their opinions matter most.

ErcsYou3951d ago

Im very impressed that a " a few outspoken idiots" could make that much noise. If there was ever a perfect example of "extreme backlash", that was it. RIP Console DRM

LackTrue4K3951d ago

thous "IDIOTS" that your talking about, just made Microsoft change there ideas about DRM!

M-M3951d ago

You don't deserve that username.

Donnieboi3951d ago

@commonsense: your "sense" is far from common.

SilentNegotiator3951d ago (Edited 3951d ago )

It received enough backlash in pre-orders for them to do something.
So much for your "few outspoken idiots" theory.

@Cooguy1212

The worst of the fanboys like to put things like "truth" and "common sense" and such in their usernames.

solidjun53950d ago

@SilentNegotiator
you forgot "Logic."

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3950d ago
jimbobwahey3951d ago

Ballmer initiated a company restructuring on July 1st. That's also the day it's announced that Don Mattrick is leaving Microsoft.

Anybody who claims it's unrelated to Xbox One woes is kidding themselves, Ballmer has booted the guy out and rightfully so.

B-radical3951d ago

Well i do reckon it's not xbox related for the mere fact you cant just go from one company to another and be ceo within the click of fingers even tho zynga is a sinking ship i believe this was in the making for a long time

Kenshin_BATT0USAI3951d ago

Not really, he could have had the offer for awhile before he 'decided' to leave MS.

CrossingEden3951d ago

think about how long it takes to get another job, get interviewed, them looking over your resume, and having that job confirmed, becoming CEO of another company doesn't happen in two day, think realistically here, stop pandering to fantasies

jmc88883951d ago

Actually you are assuming large corporations are run sanely. Case after case showcase corporations are breeding grounds for absolute insane activity.

You are also assuming that Mattrick was the lone reason these policies existed and in the worst cases, STILL EXIST.

He fell on the sword, nothing more. Most of the people involved at the top, especially Ballmer, created the situation they are in. We won't know who pushed the hardest, nor who had the final say, but rest assured the people at the very top had insight and influence and didn't stop the fiasco that just occurred. People need to quit thinking like Microsoft is finding all this out at the same time we are about...Microsoft.

You also assume that Zynga and other corporations aren't pursuing each other behind the scenes on a consistent basis.

He was probably aware of the interest from Zynga for quite some time, and over the MONTHS this fiasco has unfolded, some of which I'm sure haven't occurred yet, led to a situation where he started seriously entertaining the idea.

Ultimately everybody took a route that saves face for both sides as Microsoft didn't 'fire' him, nor needed to publicly admit further mistakes and his credibility and status in his profession amongst his peers is not damaged by him being fired. But everyone still can read between the lines.

This situation has been brewing ALL YEAR. It just came to a head since the reveal (1 1/2 months now). When all the major rumors from the past few months were found to be true. No doubt people at Microsoft were aware of the massive vocal outcry against their as of yet unannounced policies. They feigned ignorance as it was apparently needed to try to sell the console as is. Rubber met road, and Microsoft turned 90 degrees. It isn't 180 until they allow Kinect2 to be disconnected and add an SKU without it.

We still don't know the rest of the back story of just the apparent situation, Xbox One. Some of it includes the overall design choice of the console, nor it's potential problems. Right now, while it may be hard for people to understand, Microsoft knows if it's going to be a messy launch. They know exactly where they are.

They know how their production is. Chip yields. Overheating. Even potential other stuff. The same is true with any company producing anything, including Sony. But the rumors are Sony nailed production. We will see.

But right now, if production problems are undesirable, that too would play negatively upon Mattrick and everybody involved in such decisions. Microsoft knows this. We have glimpses. From the obvious rumors, to the low allotment of launch consoles, which have shown that such low allotment count means something about the process is flawed and/or undeveloped. Either way or both hurts Microsoft and is undesirable when compared to optimal. Plus given their track record, one should be watchful of the QA of their 1st generation consoles.

Make no mistake Microsoft knew about the 360 problems but pushed ahead. Who is to say they won't repeat such actions? Regardless of our wishes they know today where they are likely to stand in a few months.

Now if you want another indictment.... it is that the Xbox One uses a more complex method because of design decisions to make it cheaper. Yep. It's like putting a turbocharger inside a Prius to make up some of the difference between it and a Camaro.

jmc88883951d ago (Edited 3951d ago )

That complexity is what some of the rumors refer to. Problems that have to do with the eSRAM. Which means by going cheap, they screwed themselves. That was a decision. To go cheaper and attempt to make up some of it with a different part. (which coincidentally makes the games tougher to code for as well and all the problems that can create.)

If they would have been more concerned perhaps with...gaming...instead of overall NSA Kinect2 + casual nothings of tv, specific NFL.com fantasy football, and other tertiary aspects perhaps they have a better product.

But what they did is make the console more difficult to produce, increase the potential for reliability concerns, make it harder for devs to code for (though not as much as a PS3), all so it could supposedly be cheaper. But any problems could erase the cost advantages. It's picking up pennies in front of a steamroller type stupid decisions. It may cost them more to implement the 'cheaper' solution, and in the process they gave their competitor a power advantage and got nothing positive from going 'cheaper'.

Hell we don't even know what their internals said of Sony. No doubt they had people trying to make a judgement of when and what Sony was going to put out. Reports of them being caught off guard show this to be possible. Them being behind is another example.

So someone was most likely wrong about what Sony was doing. Or someone thought it wasn't going to be a major difference. Someone in the position to be held accountable had to believe it.

Someone might have come up with the eSRAM idea late in the process. There's many areas, even multiple areas where mistakes were most likely made. At this point they can go through the process and make decisions on that. But it's quite a telling story of WHY they should.

Because now in effect they have a less powerful, harder to produce, harder to code for, potentially late, potentially unreliable, potentially down clocked beyond the original specs, yet also the more expensive console with all the fiasco's and missteps that they've corrected or remain stubborn on. Each of these problems require multiple mess-ups from multiple people, over a course of time.

Now we'll have to see how this all plays out, but as we sit today, Microsoft is well aware of things we'll only find out at or around the console launch. Basically what we've seen is that the people that came up with the ideas, implemented them, and put them into production have been reviewed, and changes are being made. That should not give anyone confidence about the Xbox One.

Maybe they pull it together, launch on time, at full power, with no major reliability issues (RRoD, disc scratch, etc), and in quantities that can remain competitive to Sony.

But every piece of data shows quite the opposite, and again, the data is there for Microsoft to know it....as well as you.

3951d ago Replies(1)
fermcr3951d ago (Edited 3951d ago )

Yep, Mattrick departure is absolutely not related to X1 woes !!! /s

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3950d ago
Ashlen3951d ago (Edited 3951d ago )

Just give me a sec to wash off my eyeballs they rolled out of my head onto the floor.

PopRocks3593951d ago

Ahahahahaha BS.

Of course it's related to all the PR trouble around Xbox One. What else could it be? They opted to focus on aspects of the console that no one cared about, restrict content and features on the console and royally screwed their reputation as a result. SOMEONE has to pay for that; just as one Mr. Orth did not too long ago.

Relientk773951d ago

yea right

well I think its directly related

3951d ago
Show all comments (40)
260°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv7223h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle10h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic18818h ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio7h ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Lightning772h ago

What he said was facts. How he plays games is no concern of you. Don't get too mad about it.

Cacabunga10h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

shinoff21839h ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga8h ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

itsmebryan4h ago

@shin
Well keep it simple Sony 's operating income is down 26% and Microsoft's is up 32%. No MS spin there, just facts. 😉
Cheers

romulus233h ago

Odd that a company that touts you dont need the hardware to play is already touting another console in the works.

darthv722h ago

They are not reliant on the HW but still want to maintain a presence (no matter how small) is a good thing. It shows commitment to the craft. It reminds me of SNK and how they made games for their own hardware (Neo Geo) while also making them for others because they knew there was a market to do so. They knew they would sell more to others but also sell to their own niche fan base.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2h ago
purple10112h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos12h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

DOMination-2h ago

In the last two years they've started exiting the consumer market altogether. All of the newest Surface products are business models only. They can't seem to work out what they want to do with it.

XBManiac11h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple10111h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic9h ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

MrDead2h ago

The only growth MS will get out of the console industry is if it supports it's rivals platforms. Xbox is a pointless machine now. I can see them on a big push for live next, and they won't give up on trying to buy Steam.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2h ago
Show all comments (35)
300°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere1d 20h ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN1d 17h ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos1d 15h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN1d 8h ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo1d 10h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies1d 6h ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion1d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger1d 17h ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Mr Logic1d 3h ago

What a stupid thing to say. The elites give 0 fucks what we say on an obscure website in the comments section.

Crows901d 3h ago

You can always reach out and give them jobs at your company man. Don't wait

blacktiger24m ago

You own nothing snd be happy. I'm sure you heard that

Profchaos1d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto1d 19h ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos1d 19h ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long1d 16h ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel1d 18h ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos1d 16h ago (Edited 1d 16h ago )

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator1d 17h ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (23)
280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10113d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref12d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde12d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197212d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville12d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218311d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos11d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
isarai12d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref12d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan12d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00711d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197212d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

12d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

12d ago
12d ago
Zeref12d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde12d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197212d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier12d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto12d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218311d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto11d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
Hofstaderman12d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts12d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts11d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)