160°

5 Changes, and Gamers will LOVE Xbox One

Hello, and welcome to Feedback Unexpected – a feature in which I, Vlad Pintea, express my personal feelings from a gamer’s perspective on the current state of our beloved industry in a tiny bit more personal fashion. My next topic will be all about Microsoft, and its incredibly controversial next generation console, Xbox One - Vlad Pintea, chief of news and reviews/PC editor for Analog Addiction

Read Full Story >>
analogaddiction.org
mark134uk3966d ago

are ms paying all these blogs to write these silly stories

mark134uk3966d ago

no lol just fed of sieing these why you should buy a xbox threads

SnakeCQC3966d ago

they're saying what ms needs to change about the xb1 for people to actually want one

JokesOnYou3966d ago

Very poorly thought out news piece, I mean his comments on kinect shows he lacks knowledge with even the basic functionality of how the X1 works, kinect isn't going anywhere its built from the ground up with kinect, lol I'm glad it is and there is no just take it out, people who think this just dont want a X1 and should buy a ps4.

Captain_Mushroom3966d ago

Nah man, just throwing my two cents out there. I'm already set on buying the PS4, but the thing is... if there's no competition, Sony might get lazy and start screwing with gamers. Competition is great, so I really want MS to get some love from the audience in order for us gamers to get even more great products from Sony, MS, and Nintendo.

BallsEye3966d ago

I bet no matter what MS will do (even give 50 free games on launch, turn off DMR and give box of chocolates with each xbox) you and your kind will find a new thing to hate on in xbox one.

SnakeCQC3966d ago

it would be nice if ms made those changes but they are just soooo in touch with their consumers first windows 8 and now the xbox 1

MikeMyers3966d ago

1. Online check-in.

Doubtful they will change that. It is needed to make sure people don't take advantage of that 10 family circle.

2. Rights to your games

This can all be tweaked over time by listening to feedback. It's all software based.

3. Kinect.

No, they want a Kinect in every system and I don't blame them. This way itt's not treated as a peripheral and everyone will be on a level playing field. This makes it much easier for game developers to support. It's like asking Nintendo to drop the Wii U Gamepad and make it an option, not going to happen.

4. Live model

They should be pushing more towards the Playstation Plus model, give out freebies and other incentives instead of just having everything behind a paywall.

5. Independent developers

This is a big area that needs to be addressed. They need to work with smaller developers more and make it easier to publish your own games. They are the creative minds out there.

Captain_Mushroom3966d ago

Who's down-voting? That's exactly what MS needs to do.

MikeMyers3966d ago

They down-vote because they can. That's how this place is run. You could say the Xbox One is black and get disagrees. Thankfully Microsoft is making the reputation model for Xbox Live better.

http://kotaku.com/xbox-ones...

This could be a major improvement. You also won't get that swarm mentality you do here. Where people will down-vote everything because they don't like a certain member or a certain system.

rainslacker3966d ago

I disagree that the X1 is black MikeMyers. In fact it is liquid black. There is a clear difference between black and liquid black, and you should be ashamed of yourself for being an Xbox fan and not knowing that difference. Since I am a Sony fan, I don't care what that difference is, but still I disagree with your assertion of the Xbox One's official color.

:)

BTW: Just poking a little fun at the theme of these comments. I agree, the disagrees get out of hand sometimes. I'd prefer people say why they disagree.:)

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3966d ago
Panthers3966d ago

I dont want the Xbox brand to die, but MS seems to want that. Everything about this is a slap in the face to Xbox fans.

CRAIG6673966d ago

1 very positive thing however is, I imagine me and ten friends/family will buy one and one game each,add each other as family members on our live profiles and instantly have 10 games in our collections... tahts like a £450 saving,Sony can't or won't top that...

Gravitic3966d ago

Agreed, its excellent. Xbox all the way. 10 PEOPLE can play that same shared single-player or local multiplayer game ALL at once, its fantastic, will save my household a fortune.

Skynetone3966d ago (Edited 3966d ago )

@CRAIG667

you can make 10 accounts on the Xbox one {one master account} any of the ten accounts can play that game on that console {that's of course they don't lock the game to one account} if you log into that account from a different xbox one you can play it for one hour {you can only save progress if you log into the master account} two people can not be logged in from different Xbox ones at the same time and play multiplayer, two or more people can log into the same console,

to break it down, its a one hour demo from a different xbox one and you cant save progress unless your on the master account

ps+ lets you play every game release for one hour, its the exact same thing, except ms lets you only demo a game that a family member/friend has bought, not every game like ps+

CRAIG6673966d ago

@Skynetone you are wrong-look into it.

Skynetone3966d ago

I may be wrong bro but checking out his interview that's the conclusion ive come too

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

SilentGuard3966d ago (Edited 3966d ago )

If you can share a game with ten "family members" how are the publishers saving money by going after used games? Seems to me the money made by attacking used games is far outwieghed by everyone sharing games with ten other people. I like the feature, but if they are doing that then why even bother with restricting used games. Seems kind of pointless

CRAIG6673966d ago

@SilentGuard I can't get my head around it either, I wonder if DLC will be included, I mean Borderlands 2 for instance is great but if you want to further the experience the DLC is great(and massive), is that gonna be shared on the family library or is that somewhere they plan to recoup some revenue... who knows?

rainslacker3966d ago (Edited 3966d ago )

I personally have a feeling that the 10 family/friends sharing feature isn't going to be quite what MS is hyping it up to be, namely due to what everyone has stated about publishers actually wanting that and how it is possibly worse than 2nd hand sales. The game sharing policy was abused on the PS3, which is why it's gone from 5 to 2 systems. I imagine this would be gain even more abuse since it's now being a heavily promoted/mentioned feature.

I could see it as you can share it for an hour or two, so people can try the game, but without restriction? I just can't imagine any publisher would want that.

I'm hoping it is what some people are assuming it is, that would be a tremendous feature, but I'm still skeptical that it will be that cool.

I also don't feel this feature warrants a mandatory 24 hour check-in for those that don't want one...which is what MS is using to justify it from current interviews.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3966d ago
CRAIG6673966d ago

Even if they were to implement any changes it would most likely be months after launch,one change at a time and they would probably not make a big deal out if the changes either...

Honest_gamer3966d ago

didn't know you get 2 free games with live a month that's good, free games are always great, just hope its not all really old games.

ps+ is GREAT wanted far cry 2 a year or so ago was £24 or so but it was free for ps+ at £8 (discounted price for a day) so i got it in the end i was able to get the game i wanted for £8 since then ive downloaded about 30 games a mix of vita (i dont have a vita get but ive been downloading them so when i do i have a back log ;-) ) ps3 and ps1 games, and when ps4 comes out i'll get ps4 games in there to, that's just great even more so that the price hasn't gone up

DragonKnight3966d ago

"didn't know you get 2 free games with live a month that's good, free games are always great, just hope its not all really old games."

Only until November, and really old games.

Honest_gamer3966d ago

aw what, was happy there i thought it was xbox's version of ps+ for xbox one, ah well :'(

CRAIG6673966d ago

Hopefully they see sense to carry that on with durango, although I can't see it happening to be honest...

DragonKnight3966d ago

Yeah, a lot of people thought it was going to be the same but it's not.

Example: Xbox 360 is actually the console that the games will show up on first, until November when the X1 launches. The first two games available are Assassin's Creed 2 and Halo 3. Two old games you can buy cheap if you haven't already beaten them.

PS+ will continue offering free games even with the PS4 and on the PS4 you get Drive Club for free day one if you're a PS+ member. That's the difference despite what the disagrees seem to think.

MikeMyers3966d ago

PSN+ is also known for offering 'really old games' for the PS3. On Vita those games are more enticing. For the PS4 Sony wants to make sure they can offer PS4 gamers something so they will be giving out Drivers Club but not the full game.

Microsoft should be doing more like the Plus model and giving out free stuff because right now they are not committed to doing that in the long term.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3966d ago
SilentGuard3966d ago

the 2 free games a month are only for the 360 and only until the release of the One

Show all comments (42)
50°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv7211h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

purple10133m ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos8m ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

300°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere1d 7h ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN1d 5h ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos1d 2h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN19h ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo21h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies17h ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion1d 7h ago (Edited 1d 7h ago )

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger1d 5h ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Mr Logic15h ago

What a stupid thing to say. The elites give 0 fucks what we say on an obscure website in the comments section.

Crows9014h ago

You can always reach out and give them jobs at your company man. Don't wait

Profchaos1d 7h ago (Edited 1d 7h ago )

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto1d 7h ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos1d 6h ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long1d 3h ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel1d 6h ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos1d 4h ago (Edited 1d 4h ago )

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator1d 5h ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (21)
280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10112d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref11d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde11d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197211d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville11d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218311d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos11d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
isarai12d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref11d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan11d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00711d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197212d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

12d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

12d ago
12d ago
Zeref11d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde11d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197211d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197211d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier11d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto11d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218311d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto11d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
Hofstaderman11d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts11d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts10d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)