390°

Microsoft can outdo Sony with Xbox reveal

ArabicGamers writes:"Is Microsoft serious about games or is it turning the next Xbox into a fully-fledged entertainment machine? Will it have to be constantly connected to the internet to work properly? Can I play my old Xbox 360 games on it? What about used games, will they still work or are they being blocked completely? These are just a few of the questions Microsoft needs to answer during the next Xbox reveal in May. Failure to clarify these points would spell trouble for the platform holder, but Microsoft also has the chance to outshine Sony's PlayStation 4 event from February."

Read Full Story >>
arabicgamers.com
pierce4018d ago

We need to find out an official release date and a price tag. Two very important things that Sony was wrong to leave out.

Godmars2904018d ago

Need to find out what the games are like. For the Xbox: how much will Kinect be made to figure and effect games.

sengoku4018d ago (Edited 4018d ago )

hell i'll be watching to find out..
it's possible but what i find to be of importance might be something totally different than what i'm gonna get.

Knight_Crawler4018d ago

I agree with you GodMars, games will be the deal breaker for me next gen but do you really belive that the 720 and the PS4 will be that much diffrent in terms of graphics?

The 360 and PS3 were pretty much on par this gen when you compare Uncharted and Gears or Alan Wake and Heavy Rain.

nukeitall4018d ago

I think to outdo Sony, MS will need to show more content and substance than specs.

Most people don't care or know what specs are. They are pointless, and we want to know what is in store for the "now" and the future.

I want the next Xbox (or any console for that matter) to be the only thing I need underneath my TV. One box to rule them all!

thechosenone4018d ago (Edited 4018d ago )

well considering it was just a minor showing I would expect MS to match what Sony showed off in NY...but the main event has yet to occur and that'll happen at E3 so will see if MS has enough product to show off by then.

Boody-Bandit4018d ago (Edited 4018d ago )

With Nintendo announcing they will not hold a press conference at E3 I think regardless of what MS does or does not show? The real showdown will be at E3. ALL eyes will be focused on those two (Sony & Microsoft) like never before since it's only them 2 going into details of how they plan on approaching and carrying out the next generation game plan.

I just hope MS keeps the door open for used and rental games. I will get one regardless just for Forza 5 but I am big on renting and reselling my games once they have run their course.

I wonder if MS will go into specific details (show the actual unit, release date and pricing) at the 5/21 event. I think they might show the unit but I would think they would save pricing and release date for E3. Either way May 21st can't get here soon enough. I'm ready for next gen!

KillerBBs4018d ago Show
gdblose4018d ago Show
KillerBBs4018d ago Show
gdblose4018d ago Show
Godmars2904018d ago

" if they dont make my expitation."

Think you meant, "Don't meet my expectations."

And right now my expectations are that with all this talk of social gaming, nevermind the pre-existing trends towards first-person real-time, neither system will be as diverse as the PS1/PS2 were.

4017d ago
4017d ago
sikbeta4017d ago

Lets be honest here... MS has America and UK on the bag at the least... so the biggest Market in the World + the biggest Market in Europe are MS Land...

JeffGUNZ4017d ago

I don't think we are going to see that many games until E3. I am sure MS will show a blockbuster title with the reveal, but like Sony, I think they are going to leave a lot for E3.

GuyThatPlaysGames4017d ago

@Godmars290 I hate to tell you, but I don't see Kinect evolving at all really. The audience for it just isn't there. It's just a gimmick just like PS3's Move.

@nukeitall Why just limit yourself to one system? That comment you made was just close-minded. Why not get both to experience the exclusives and content that both consoles have to offer? Why pick sides?

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 4017d ago
dedicatedtogamers4018d ago

It really doesn't matter. Microsoft has the media on their side. If three years of Kinect isn't enough to get the major gaming publications (IGN, Gamespot, Game Informer, etc) to call Microsoft out on their obvious abandonment of their core fanbase, then it would take several more years of blundering with the NextBox before the media finally takes notice.

This isn't surprising. The media was as quiet as possible on the RRoD issue instead of campaigning for consumers' rights like they should have been. They were dead silent when Microsoft suddenly put an end to their "360 is the #1 JRPG system!" campaign. They were silent again when each and every "hardcore" Kinect game ended up being horrible.

fsfsxii4018d ago

Its really sad, i don't trust IGN or gamespot anymore since the RRoD fiasco.

SpringHeeledJack4018d ago (Edited 4018d ago )

Well said.

They also ignore the fact ps3 came out 12months later in america and 18months later in Europe and still have come second place this gen. Would it kill them to give a campaign of congrats to the ps3 like they do with xbox for the last 6years.

wquach4017d ago (Edited 4017d ago )

Oh lordy.

It doesn't just stop at those, add in Joystiq (Ludwig Kietzmann), Polygon, and even the non-gaming but gadget-focused sites like Engadget. You should've seen their podcasts nitpicking the PS4 announcement to shreds. Laughed at the entire thing really (the console not being shown was emphasized ad nauseam): http://www.polygon.com/2013...

Engadget also shat their pants when they unveiled the Kinect in that fake promo video of the "possibilities" with the device.

Destructoid (including Jim Sterling) and Penny Arcade have called out Microsoft's trends before, including XBL's descent into an advertisement funland: http://www.penny-arcade.com...

http://www.destructoid.com/...

Ars Technica, I've found, also consistently reports well on both sides. Eurogamer, despite the flack it gets on here for their ratings, reports well with their Digital Foundry team: http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

But yea, we all have our preferences when it comes to gaming publications to read, and even certain authors.

With the PS4, it'll come down to its price and its launch to how the media will portray it, just as it did for the PS3 (remember those doom articles from the lack of games, high price tag, and poor launch? Those impressions echoed for years after).

If MS offers a subsidized, subscription-based pricing that will have the Next Box cheaper than the PS4, I feel like it'll be portrayed much more favorably to the press (they'll likely equate it to just another device you buy with a 2-year contract like your smartphone), even though the total price tag over that 1-2 year span would easily amount to more than paying higher from the start.

All of this is speculation though, so it'll be interesting to see what MS unveils. But the point is, MS knows how to work the media just as much as they know how to advertise their games (they're the best in the video game industry at it). Their conferences and showings have usually been given more slack and promise than what Sony shows.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4017d ago
SpitFireAce854018d ago

You will find out the prices and release dates for
both consoles at E3...

4018d ago Replies(1)
kingmushroom4018d ago (Edited 4018d ago )

@Pierce
Wrong!.it was actually a excellent idea because it creates interest, also if Ms releases price and date all eyes will be on sony for its Ps4 reveal and price.

i doubt we will get any date or price until E3 ( ill be there first hand to find out)

but what can i say fanboy have their own bias opinion.

Jdoki4018d ago

I agree kingmushroom. Keeping quiet on the launch and price is a good move.

If anyone remembers the classic 1995 E3 where Sega went in full of hype having already announced that the Saturn was going to rock the world at $399

And Steve Race of Sony basically took to the stage at their keynote, said something like "$299 bitches", dropped the mic on the floor, punched a Sega fanboy in the face, threw up a gansta sign, and walked off leaving the crowd stunned.

(That last part might not be 100% accurate).

kayoss4018d ago

@jDOKI
Actually that was a true story. I can see that happening.

If Sony reveal everything during the announcement then they pretty much leave themself vulnerable to Microsoft. Smart move by not putting "all their eggs in one basket".

extermin8or4017d ago

plus then sony could go and undercut it or if sony had given us that info in feb, microsoft could have undercut it/released beforehand....

OrbitalBT4017d ago

sony already stated the console is aimed to be affordable in development and for consumers to purchase. it wouldn't make sense for sony to make it expensive at the last minute.

they already stated the amount of total Tflops, cores, and memory architecture the console will have. IF there's anything "price altering" it would be the HDD space they left out, a 500 GB model and a 1 TB model.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4017d ago
Adva4018d ago

Right.....
Because when Wii, wiiu, 3ds, Xbox, 360, Ps1,2,3,psp were revealed for the first time they were all given a release date with price.

imdaboss14018d ago ShowReplies(2)
KwietStorm_BLM4018d ago

So from a business perspective, you know because Sony is in the business of making money, if Microsoft gives a price at their event, which Sony can now counter since they never gave PS4 a price, you're saying that's something they did wrong? Why are so many people treating these reveals like the end all be all of either console's information to be given? Are you really going to ignore E3 like that? Like there isn't several months before these things actually launch?

Blues Cowboy4018d ago (Edited 4018d ago )

I think they'd be mad to announce release date and pricing now. It'd give Sony and even Nintendo chance to undercut them or offer more features.pack-ins, or tweak their marketing campaigns.

They will probably show us what it looks like, though. I don't mind that Sony didn't show the PS4, but it does mean that we don't have something specific to think about when we hear "PlayStation 4," instead we just have a jumble of buzzwords.

3-4-54018d ago

The thing is though, Sony has had months of positive support now building to E3 and it's release date.

There will be less time to gain suppport for Microsoft.....They are a known name outside of gaming in the US so it shouldn't be too hard as long as they keep the controller 95% the same and introduce actual good games people want to play..

COD + Halo 5 can't be their only "good" reveals

punisher994018d ago

Nope. You are wrong. That was way too early for Sony to start talking about prices and solid release dates. That would have given microsoft too much leverage.

princejb1344018d ago

hardware is one thing but MS needs software something sony has always provided
hardware doesn't play itself after all

Mounce4017d ago

No, it means that if Microsoft show the price first in their 'May teaser', then Sony can CRUSH them if it's too high by showing the console itself, MORE games, a price tag for PS4 and more features that weren't shown.

Microsoft CAN Outdo Sony....maybe.....but the chance of it? Slim.

extermin8or4017d ago

more than likely they'll about match each other- i think the next xbox will have similar video/sharing features, which is probably something sony anticipated hence the february reveal of that stuff that way they can't be accused of copying :P

showtimefolks4017d ago

pierce

i will bet you anything that MS also won't announce a release date or price tag, also i don't think MS will show the actual box

for all the hate sony gotten for not showing the box or price, those things will get more attention at E3 from media.

sony showed games
MS needs to show games and not gears,halo,fable,forza something else

I really don't think both systems will be very different specs wise so games will be the deciding factor for many gamers

chaos-lockheart4017d ago

Words don't mean anything, actions do.

Gaming_Guru4017d ago

At: pierce

Why was Sony wrong for not telling people about the price tag and official release date at the beginning of 2013 if they could just easily tell everyone at E3?

All Sony did was tell people that the PS4 is real, here is a taste of what it can do, and what it will do, just about what an announcement should be like.

BABY-JEDI4017d ago

Need to find out how many apps & tv channels available, & how much is the monthly subscription will be for these services & all other hidden costs. Oh yeah, & the GAMES...

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 4017d ago
sherimae24134018d ago

i want to see what the next gen consoles will look like and their price tags ^_^

Snookies124018d ago

Yeah, I'm quite interested in seeing what they'll look like as well... The price tag not so much, because I'm not looking forward to paying it lol.

kayoss4018d ago

Are you planning to steal it? If you're not going to pay for it, then how are you going to get it?
Anyways, When i first bought my PS3 (60gb) model i thought it was expensive at first but now that I think about it. It was well worth the price given what came with the PS3. I hope its the same true story with the PS4.
I cant say the same for the xbox 360. I thought it was cheap, until i bought the wifi adapter and HD dvd (i though HD dvd would win, damn was i wrong). It ended costing me more then the PS3. I will hold off on getting the nextbox until I see what they have to offer. But PS4 will be day one for me.

sway_z4018d ago (Edited 4018d ago )

I sold my Xbox 360 slim for £160 with 2 whack games, 1 controller on Amazon. Sold the other controller and all 25 games separately.

I made approx £350, which should totally lessen the cost of my PS4.

I still have my PS3 (ain't goin nowhere) and have The Last of Us, GTAV and Beyond to keep me going until PS4 drops!!!

The 360 is dropping to £99 @E3 so I guess I sold at the right time!!

*Price I pay for Shoes/Clothing etc...the PS4 will probably be an absolute bargain!! lol

Anzil4018d ago

WHOOOO CARES WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

extermin8or4017d ago

Correct i mean put it out of immediate view if you want- it needs to play your games not look amazing- that said how many sony products don't look pretty damn pretty and expensive anyway? :p even when they use cheap materials thay have a habit of making their products look good-credit where credit is due. PS3 wasn't best looking device but it could've been worse and the slim versions have all looked nice, vita looks really pretty :)

BABY-JEDI4017d ago

If it was a big pink day-glo box with furry attachments, I think you might cry!
Me, I think this would be quite butch LoL

Anzil4017d ago

@ BABY-JEDI hahahaha prolly a lil but people are making it out to be a bad thing! Sony will show it at e3 after microsoft shows theres on the 21st. Microsoft will show it cause there listening to what people said about sonys but could be a downfall because sony makes their products look really nice (except the OG ps3) and it will steal from microsoft!! I want ps4 the most but people are dumb to think microsoft doesn't have shit up there sleeves!!!ps got a hot pink controller pal and im straight as a nail hahahah

kickerz4017d ago

i think $500 will be a reasonable price. compared to some smart phones these days which cost alot more.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4017d ago
IRetrouk4018d ago

I just want some solid details, bring the games and my money will follow

refocusedman4018d ago

Of course they can outdo sonys reveal, they've had too 3 months to prepare. Its not about some silly reveal its abt product implementation whenvthe systems are released.

StrongMan4018d ago (Edited 4018d ago )

In my opinion the only way MS can compete with the PS4 is to finally stop charging for free features. There are tons of ads on XBL which generates billions of dollars yet they still charge their customers for free features.

And to those uneducated people that say that you pay MS to use their servers, go put in COD in your Xbox and play online and it will say "signing into ACTIVISION servers" not MS servers. This disproves that lie. Youtube has a far bigger server farm than MS for XBL yet they don't charge me to use Youtube because those ads on Youtube more than pays for everything. But MS charges people to use Youtube on Xbox. So now some of you are going to tell me that MS charges for Youtube because it's on MS's servers?

Anyway, that's what I think will give MS a chance in competing with Sony. After that they will have to bring the games. Not just the same 3 games but new core IPs. Then they have to show that they won't abandon the hardcore like they did with the 360. Go to any forum on any site and you will see that MANY Xbox fans have expressed disappointment in MS abandoning them for the casuals. MS has a long road ahead of them if they want to outdo Sony.

@MasterCornholio

They are not happy to pay. If they want to play the online portion of their games they paid $60 for then they HAVE to pay MS to do so. MS locks out half of all games on Xbox unless you pay them. If they want to access their Netflix account that they already pay $8 a month for then they HAVE to pay MS to do so. Just like companies have to pay MS to plaster they ads on XBL. Don't let them fool you. They don't pay because they want to they pay because they have to pay to play online with friends.

MasterCornholio4018d ago

What's even more pathetic is when Microsoft hiked the price of Gold instead of losing subscribers they gained more. Anyways as long as Xbox users are happy paying for free features then Microsoft will continue to charge them.

Motorola RAZR i

Blackdeath_6634018d ago

yes but i will never pay for the privilege of using my own internet connection to play games i already paid full price for which is the reason i will never buy an xbox. i just borrow my friends one when i feel the need to play xbox but that hasn't happened much if im honest

Mustang300C20124018d ago (Edited 4018d ago )

Dumbest advice I have ever heard. Company finds revenue and succes with consumers who buy Live and have done so for the last 12 years and finds revenue in ad sales which generates additional billions in revenue for the same company. So because we make billions here we should no longer charge and make billions here.

W
T
F

What company would would even think of cutting off something that is a success. These are a reason you don't run a business and being a armchair analyst on a website that most gamers don't even know about makes. You sound even more of an idiot.

Jek_Porkins4018d ago

They just use that argument because it's one of the few they have left. If you are a gamer, you realize it's a hobby, and Microsoft is synonymous with a quality online service, no matter what the competition does, people will always look to Microsoft and what they are doing. That isn't to say the competitions online is terrible, but people just associate quality online with Xbox Live.

Microsoft's Xbox Live grew 15% and makes a billion a year, which has helped them not enable Online Passes, gets their users a ton of content and early DLC, Demo's ect..

If you don't want Live, go with the competition, but paying for Xbox Live every year isn't a reason not to get an Xbox in my opinion, it's like $4 a month, you can always find deals on it, which is what I do. I'm a gamer, it's my hobby, hobby's can be expensive, but let me say my hair cut every month costs more than a full year of Xbox Live.

yesmynameissumo4018d ago

I really hate the "$4 a month" bullshit. Is it billed $4 a month? Why is a month by month subscription $15? XBL is the perfect reason to NOT game on Xbox. I'm not going to get frisked for my wallet every time I press power.

Darrius Cole4018d ago (Edited 4018d ago )

Microsoft is going to change when the market forces it to change. As long as people are paying for Xbox live, Microsoft will charge for Xbox Live. It would be stupid for Microsoft to voluntary stop charging for Xbox Live when all of the evidence says that their customers will pay for it. Microsoft rarely does stupid things.

While we are on the topic of what's stupid, paying for something that the competition gives you for free is stupid.

There is no way that Microsoft would pay for something that they could get for free somewhere else. Microsoft rarely does stupid things.

Eventually the marketplace will catch up to Xbox Live and realize that there is no point in paying for Xbox live because it can get the same service for free elsewhere. That is probably what StrongMan is referring to.

What I suspect is that Microsoft is going to change the service somehow in attempts to add value to XBL so that its customers do indeed get something that they can't get anywhere else for free. That is probably what all this "TV Tuner" and "always online" business is about, Microsoft trying to add value to Xbox Live, in effort to justify it.

GamerGT4018d ago

If this "TV tuner" deal is true and some type of overlay system is displayed, I'm curious if that would need an internet connection to work. And if that's a feature you need to pay through Xbox Live to unlock.

Hicken4017d ago

"Company finds revenue" by doing something that, honestly speaking, they shouldn't be doing. But because they're Microsoft, people are perfectly willing to give them a pass?

Sure, it was acceptable at first, as they were the only ones on the market with any kind of competent online. Now, though? Sorry, but there's NO excuse for charging people to use applications or services that are free LITERALLY EVERYWHERE else.

I don't give a damn about them being profitable. I give a damn about me. As a consumer, I don't want to pay for these things, and according to other players in the market, I SHOULDN'T.

Jek, are you for real? Not wanting an extra bill so I can completely play my games isn't a reason not to get an Xbox? According to who? You? Let's see this $4 bill of yours. Oh, wait; they don't charge you $4 a month.

By the way, gaming being a hobby is no excuse. Even hobbyists don't want to pay more than they HAVE to.

Your excuses are getting weaker and weaker.

extermin8or4017d ago

@jek well seeign as all evidence is pointing towards it becoming $10 a month, and the guy that gave that info out, has been right about everything else so far- including the reveal date BEFORE microsoft were even admitting the thing existed lol so he's pretty trustworty...

Imalwaysright4017d ago

@ jek porkins I am a gamer but I'm not a "drug addict". I know what is best for me as a consumer and paying for something that is free in all the other gaming platforms is just idiotic. I would feel like a moron if I did that. What I don't understand, is that you acknowledge that paying for live is a negative thing and 1 second later you start defending a business practice that only benefits MS.

"Microsoft's Xbox Live grew 15% and makes a billion a year, which has helped them not enable Online Passes ,gets their users a ton of content and early DLC, Demo's ect.."

I hope you're joking! Live IS an online pass. All the other online services have demos and unless its an exclusive DLC, all the other services sooner or later will make it available to all their costumers.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4017d ago
creeping judas4018d ago (Edited 4018d ago )

Wow, I never realized I can't access Youtube or Netflix in anyother way other than thru my Xbox. Crap now according to Strong, that is the only way I can access these features. No longer am I able to access these sites thru my PC, my tablet, or even thru my SmartTV because I have a XBL account. Damn you MS and XBL account!!

Also now, a small tile with an add running on it, and add that doesnt even have sound until you highlight it, is considered plastering the UI with advertising?

kayoss4018d ago

Well Strong have a point, If xbox 360 is the one system that Microsoft want their consumer to access other media then why charge for them when they can access it free somewhere else. Microsoft want the consumers to use their xbox 360 to access these apps, but yet they are charging them to do so. Isnt that contradictory? Yes Live is bringing in truck loads of money for microsoft but the problem is that some user are having is that if Sony and Nintendo can allow their fans to use the internet for free why cant microsoft? Now with PSN+ you have the excuse to pay for it and its an option for all consumers to buy PSN+. If they dont they still can access all those apps and play online without charge. In addition lots of incentive games to play as long as your a member.
If Live offer those then no one would be complaining, but they dont.

Show all comments (121)
200°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv7216h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle3h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic188119m ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio3m ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Cacabunga2h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

shinoff21831h ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga39m ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

purple1015h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos4h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

XBManiac4h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple1013h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic1h ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

Show all comments (21)
300°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere1d 12h ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN1d 10h ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos1d 7h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN1d ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo1d 2h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies22h ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion1d 12h ago (Edited 1d 12h ago )

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger1d 10h ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Mr Logic20h ago

What a stupid thing to say. The elites give 0 fucks what we say on an obscure website in the comments section.

Crows9019h ago

You can always reach out and give them jobs at your company man. Don't wait

Profchaos1d 12h ago (Edited 1d 12h ago )

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto1d 11h ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos1d 11h ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long1d 8h ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel1d 10h ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos1d 9h ago (Edited 1d 9h ago )

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator1d 10h ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (21)
280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10112d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref12d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde11d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197211d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville11d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218311d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos11d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
isarai12d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref12d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan12d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00711d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197212d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

12d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

12d ago
12d ago
Zeref12d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde11d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197211d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197211d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier11d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto11d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218311d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto11d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
Hofstaderman12d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts11d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts10d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)