190°

What does John Riccitiello's resignation mean for Nintendo?

With a new leader at the helm, we could see the tides turn toward working with Nintendo instead of against it. Leadership at EA realizes the direction the company took with many of its products is wrong, so efforts will be made to get the company back on track. This means patching up SimCity so gamers are satisfied, releasing less half-finished content like Dead Space 3 and Dragon Age II, and ideally, focusing on bringing games to a the hungry audience that is Wii U owners.

Read Full Story >>
wiiudaily.com
R_aVe_N4056d ago

I highly doubt you will see many games on the Wii U from EA for now. The user base right now is real iffy.

guitarded774056d ago

You could tell Nintendo and EA had/have a very bad relationship. Install base will determine if the relationship improves.

HebrewHammer4056d ago (Edited 4056d ago )

Never count a player out! I remember back in 2006 and 2007 when we PlayStation fans had to put up with all that anti-Sony, tomato throwing crap. But look at us now. Turns out we've got a faster selling device than Xbox, which is pretty substantial given it's year of a head start.

Then again, the WiiU is in a vastly different situation today...

Jek_Porkins4056d ago

That is a bit redundant don't you think? I mean developers support new consoles all the time, EA just thinks Nintendo fans wont buy third party games, which isn't the case.

Nintendo fans just don't buy BAD third party games, which does mean a lot of EA's offerings aren't going to be bought by Nintendo fans.

EA pulled the same crap with Sony and with Sega and the Dreamcast before that. I don't think it'd be hard or risky for them to slap a port out the door for the Wii U. Hopefully whoever takes over see the Wii U as a viable option and decides to work with Nintendo a bit more.

I think Sim City on Wii U would have made total sense.

R_aVe_N4056d ago

Nintendo fans hardly ever buy anything but Nintendo made products at least on consoles. It is a different case with handhelds. Wii U is not a viable option for anybody but Nintendo right now because they are the only ones that are going to make any money off of it. Slapping a port over with such a small user base does not work. Not to mention you have to add extra feature for the Wii U game pad which at this time is not worth the extra effort due to user base (as of now).

Baka-akaB4055d ago (Edited 4055d ago )

Nintendo only fans dont buy better third party games than their counterparts .

They can fail on it as easily than on other consoles , just like they can succeed . The rest is a matter of goodwill obviously from publishers and user base focus .

Some people , like myself , only buy a nintendo consoles for a set of exclusives and first party nintendo games . That's how some of us behaved for at least 3 generations of Nintendo home consoles , even when given a few stellar exclusives .

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney4055d ago (Edited 4055d ago )

"What does John Riccitiello's resignation mean for Nintendo?"

More ram?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4055d ago
fossilfern4056d ago

Nothing. Regardless how terrible EA are Riccitiello at least tried getting some new IPs out the door like Dragon Age, Dead Space and Mirrors edge but he has to answer to investors and try and meet their demands/wishes.

Whoever they get in next will just be the same, its the share holders who need to be changed.

CouldHaveYelledUiiW4055d ago

So True,

So many people forget about the shareholders power.

A well deserved "Well Said"

ogwilson4056d ago

Hopefully EA stops acting like arses and end the personal grudge over Nintendo. It's stupid that they pulled support for wii u just because nintendo didn't want origin. They need to realize that their huge status as a publisher does not mean other companies will submit to their every wish.

Ulf4056d ago (Edited 4056d ago )

Riccitiello was trying to make up for his erroneous support of the Wii lately, by basically stating "we're not going there again" with the Wii U. The other casual platforms also played a heavy role in EA's downturn, and now EA is smartly turning away from them.

His leaving means nothing, because he learned his lesson, with regards to trying to support the hardcore on Nintendo platforms. Riccitiello was one of the few early supporters -- and he changed his mind after several failed, yet quality attempts.. like DS: Extraction, which was a great Wii game, which of course only a couple Wii gamers bought.

N4g_null4056d ago

If extraction was so good then why didn't you buy it? Out of 40 wii games that is not in my collection.

EA has crytek with a working engine and could even source out that engine to Nintendo if they wanted. The new need for speed, even a sim city port would have been cool.

It is a good bet that having origin on the wiiu would have hurt EAs relation with gamers. EA truely wasted this time on the wiiu. Many people would have bought a better madden and FIFA yet now they may just let EA sell or give up that license. 2k is better at it anyway.

Bring ports out means you need better value or a better game on a next gen system. I believe we may finally see the cod series die as killzone could offer a better online experience now since it does not suffer from bad framerates any more. It's going to be guitar hero all over again.

For example I bought razors edge because it has been mostly fixed. Yet now EA would have to go up against the likes of smash bros, wii fit u, galaxy, Mario kart and other million sellers from nintendo.

It seems EA was trying to go for a dreamcast effect yet only ended hurting them selves. Nintendos games where at their weakest during the Ngc. They at their strongest with the wii. EA has to understand one thing the real hardcore remember the 3DO.

EA would have been rewarded with great efforts on the wiiu but they wanted to play politics. If n4g goers are to be believed the wii owners don't know about the horrible mass effect problem. EA believed fans and over looked the dusty wii statements and though ports with no effort was going provide profit when these very same people already bought this game.

The fact is cod only sold because its game play framerate offered more action. Many pc gamers converted over. But wait cod isn't even made by EA that is the the home of the moh games and the battlefield next gen games that no one is hyping.

Beggars can not be choosy and with out sports the sin franchises, and crytek they would be irrilivant.

Could this be the first victim of the crash?

Ulf4055d ago

"If extraction was so good then why didn't you buy it? Out of 40 wii games that is not in my collection. "

?

I own DS: Extraction. Where did I claim that I didn't? Or.. are you just making some stuff up?

N4g_null4055d ago

Well good for you but most of the industry believes that games sucks. Thank you for supporting a bad game. It doesn't matter that you have the game what matters is supporting the idea that others should do the same when it was beyond inferior to even the weakest FPS. You know gamers use to spread the word about good games not this BS about support so we can get good games.

Isn't that one of the problems with the industry? We are really supporting some bad games.

Yodagamer4056d ago (Edited 4056d ago )

These "quality attempts" were not what people on wii wanted, look at resident evil 4 it sold a million copies (it was a port). What ea gave wii owners where games that were either crappy ports or versions nobody wanted ala rail shooters (it didn't even sell alot on ps3, like alot of wii "hardcore game" ports) . I bought extraction, but i would have preferred a tps horror game.

Ulf4055d ago (Edited 4055d ago )

An on-rails Horror game was all the Wii could handle. 64 MB of main memory, remember?

A TPS game requires a TON more, because it has freedom of movement -- unless you have a zillion loading screens... like RE 4 Wii. RE 4 Wii was fun, but it wasn't on par with DS:E for visual quality.

I don't see how you can claim that RE4 was a success, when it sold around 1M copies across 100M consoles, and a significant number of those sales were re-purchases from RE fans who wanted the best edition, or people who had nothing else to choose from, at the dawn of the system.

The thing that made RE4 worth making for the Wii was that is WAS a port -- i.e. it was cheap for them to bring it, because it was cheap to bring over. If RE4 Wii had sold 1M copies, as a new title, it would have been a *horrible* flop for CAPCOM, just like DS:E was for EA.

1M units == fail, not success, unless you are a port, or a cheap indie title.

Yodagamer4055d ago (Edited 4055d ago )

It was a very early title so those 100 million consoles were not around at the time it sold a million copies so that is a success for capcom and with a smaller Dev cost a million copies is enough for a profit on wii

N4g_null4055d ago

Cod moh conduit metroid prime which actually was freeroaming all did fine.

What is funny about this game was they could have remixed it into a res evil like area based game. There are tons of ways to preload a map on the fly... I mean gta did that even on the ps2....

To go on red steel 2 up its visuals also.

Yet base your argument on shader tech and having to rework the assets. Which ammounts to laziness. It exposes the crutch that they rely on graphics rather than game play too much.

Back in the day we got ports of arcade games that really where not possible on consoles on the Nes. Also it is pretty easy to bump the polygon count down and remap all animations to the new asset.

If your game can not be fun with subpar graphics then it might not be fun with them. There is no excuse for subpar if you want to keep working in this field.

Godmars2904056d ago

As or more curious if they'll become less or more pro-Xbox.

Show all comments (31)
210°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv7217h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle4h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic18811h ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio1h ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Cacabunga3h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

shinoff21832h ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga1h ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

purple1016h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos5h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

XBManiac5h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple1014h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic2h ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

Show all comments (21)
140°

Why Monopolies In Gaming Must Not Be Allowed

As of right now, there are no monopolies in the games industry, and for the sake of the medium as a whole, they never should either.

thorstein15h ago

Shouldn't be allowed in any field.

Inverno11h ago

And yet the biggest tech companies in America are essentially that. They buy up all the small comps only to kill them off and steal what they have, and if they can't buy em they bleed them to death.

jwillj2k410h ago

Eventually they’ll realize the value is with the employee not the company. Buying an IP means nothing if the people who contributed are let go. They’ll get it one day.

MrCrimson10h ago

tech is different because they buy threats and then kill them. Twitter bought Vine and did nothing with it. Despite people seemingly liking it. Could've had tiktok a decade before bytedance. go figure.

Zenzuu11h ago

Monopolies shouldn't be allowed regardless. Not just for gaming.

MrCrimson10h ago

They buy IPs not talent. That's why these buyouts never work and the IPs die. Right now it's too expensive to develop games - but I expect that to shift maybe as AI tools can make it easier. The best games have been indie games for awhile as big developers fuck their ips to death with "games as a service" -

70°

The INDIE Live Expo 2024 event is to feature over 100 game titles

INDIE Live Expo, Japan’s premiere online digital showcase series , will debut never-before-seen games & content updates across more than 100 titles on May 25th.