120°

Microsoft Insider Claims It Should Refocus on PC

IGN - "If the prices on PCs come down further, these [consoles] might be squeezed out."

classic2004094d ago (Edited 4094d ago )

This guy in the article is your typical graphics card lover. LOOL he is so piss that microsoft stop supporting PC.

Sometimes people should understand that PC got something about it that people dislike for gaming.

1, its expensive to get the so call high quality rig

2, PC does not have an organize lord lool. What I am talking is a support of first party games from say a sony or nintendo.

3, Console gamers don't find mmos and strategy titles interesting.

4, PC is not plug and play. obviously

5, True pc gaming is done with a mouse and keyboard, lots of people rather sit in awkward position playing with a controller on a big screen.

6, DRM is too popular

7, PC got quantity in exclusives but the quality suck, check out how many hated their drm money grabber diablo 3 lol.

elhebbo164094d ago

At least PC gamers dont get constantly butt f***ed by microsoft, thats for damn sure. paying to play online? please.

DigitalRaptor4094d ago (Edited 4094d ago )

1. You can get a high quality rig for under $1000 if you're smart. Then when the next generation of hardware-demanding games come out for PC, all you have to do is switch out certain components. It also beats the price of paying $60 a year for online access what Steam/PC apps provides for free.

2. It also doesn't have the restrictions bounded by a console environment.

3. That is opinion. There hasn't been a huge push for either genre because a) the control scheme doesn't suit a gamepad b) the online architecture seems challenging to get right. PC developers have been doing it for years.

4. If you know what you're doing it can be as easy as that, but I guess if you're lazy and/or impatient, sure.

5. You can find the right setup to be able to do that on PC.

6. If rumours are true, DRM on consoles is about to get a lot more popular.

7. Diablo 3 is just one game. The quality in PC exclusives spans back decades. The back catalogue of exclusive games for PC is unrivaled, and that includes classics, not just 'quantity over quality'. There are plenty more on their way, but made by indies.

Either way, if you supplement your PC gaming with Sony or Nintendo consoles (or vice versa) you can't go far wrong. With PC you see the benefit of ultimate choice. If Microsoft had it their way, PC gamers would be paying more and it would be a closed environment on an open platform. See landog's comment below for those benefits.

rainslacker4094d ago (Edited 4094d ago )

Consoles biggest stregth is that it is convienant to use, and doesn't take any sort of tech knowledge to use. Most of your comments were very subjective or entirely inaccurate.

1. A mid-level rig will cost you about the same as say the next gen consoles releasing...maybe a bit more depending on how you want to use it. Long term though you will save money on games and upgrade costs to the next generation, and will likely play all games with better quality right off the bat...with notable exceptions.

2. Can't argue there as there is no first party in regards to PC. If you prefer the console exclusives then that's your only choice to play them. PC does have a lot more exclusives than all systems combined though, and many are AAA. Overall PC has the most support of any game playing machine out there.

3. Very myopic view, and completely subjective.

4. Somewhat true here, but PC's have made great strides in this regard. However despite what digitalRaptor said above, if you aren't tech minded it is not a simple thing and has it's own disadvantages not being a closed system.

5. Quite a few games can be played with a regular controller. 360's controller works with a PC by just plugging it in, and DS controllers work with a driver install. Mouse/KB are preferable though depending on game, and in this regard PC offers more choice. Also I know several people who play their PC's just like they would a console on a TV, and they don't even have high end rigs. This will probably become even more true with Steam pushing their big picture thing.

6. DRM is on consoles as well, or maybe you've missed the whole online pass thing. While I don't put stock in current rumors, there is a possibility it could become very restrictive on the next consoles. PC has the benefit that at least a day after release you can get a DRM free version of the game if your that fussed about it.

7. Trollish comment not worth discrediting.

I'm a Sony fan, and love my PS, but don't deny that the PC has it's strengths over consoles, and all this bickering over which is better(on both sides) really depends on the person, and not the platform.

nukeitall4094d ago

The overall experience of PC doesn't match the console, despite being more powerful and the flexibility.

The experience I'm talking about is ease of use, and "almost" instant access (for PS3 owners, you might get stuck with a lengthy install and patch process).

No drivers to install, very little software conflict and standardized hardware. It takes out all the thinking behind PC.

DeadlyFire4094d ago

7, PC got quantity in exclusives but the quality suck, check out how many hated their drm money grabber diablo 3 lol.

You know its kinda funny Diablo 3 sold 12 million anyway in 2012. http://www.pcgamesn.com/dia...

6. DRM popular? Sure its out there in many variations, but do you actually look at how its implemented. You terming DRM as popular shows ignorance towards this subject as well.

5. A controller is a controller. All have thier preferences. Some prefer motion, VR, Key+Mouse, gamepad, but its up to the gamer. Its funny PC offers all of the above as an option or well its in the works as having all of the above. A console you are locked to whatever controller you are provided.

4. This statement is just ignorant. PC is all plug and play. Even if you bought a gaming computer from a retail store and throw in a graphics card. Its as simple as that.

3. This in itself is funny. I wouldn't say they don't find them interesting. Why? because noone has ever really pushed them on a console because of the limitations of the hardware. We are finally getting to a decent point with the hardware we can start seeing this. Even as I say this PS2 had a few MMOs that still are kicking. PS3 has one or two in the pipeline.

2. First party no, but exclusive indie party games yes. Cheaper to develop on PC than any console. So many start ups start this way. Like CD Projekt RED, and 4A games for example. Small teams built Witcher, and Metro. The right amount of success and we see X360 get a port of these titles. Now Publisher has full respect for both developers and next games are coming to at least 3 platforms(PC, PS, XB) :)

1. PC doesn't come cheap? Really? You can buy a customized PC from ibuypower at Wal-Mart.com for $710 with a monitor. More RAM, and more GPU power than both X360 and PS4 combined. If you ever want to see a bigger resolution or better framerate just tweak it every 4-5 years.

Wanna compare that price? X360 at launch $300/400 + XBL say times 8 years at $50. = $700/800 for X360 over its lifetime if it didn't have a red ring problem which is another $100. so if you did its $800/900 bucks in the end.

So if you add a AMD 7870 in that same Wal-mart.com IbuypowerPC computer that's customizable you = $870 with all the components. OS, 8GB RAM, GPU, CPU, Monitor and so on. So when you consider buying a X720 at launch for $300/400 + XBL(Now $60 a year fee) for say another 8 years. = $780/$880 in the end. Considering rumors specs of 1.2, and 1.8 Tflops with AMD 7870 in custom system you would have 2.5 Tflops + possibly swinging into a cheap game thanks to the digital sales services like STEAM and so on. :)

jmc88884094d ago

1. Not really. You could of bought an i7 920 in 2008-2009 for $269-299 and it's CPU is better than in the next gen consoles despite half the cores, and you can up that by easily overclocking it on air upwards of 50 percent. On top of this you could of say then upgraded the graphics card in 2012 for $339-399 and had something with 2.45 TFlops in the GTX 670 as opposed to wait another year and half for something with 1.2 TFlops or 1.8 TFlops to come out. (or waited for this years 700 series to come out and have something close to 4 TFlops for $399).

Thus in other words it's not expensive for a good rig much more powerful than a PS4/720 years earlier than they release in terms of GPU and CPU. Meanwhile if you WANT an even wider gap, say 11-15 TFlops versus 1.2 or 1.8 (that might be 12x stronger than a next gen 720) you could buy dual GTX 690's last year or dual GTX 790's this year.

Thus it's important to realize a cheap mid range PC already throttles next gen consoles while uber rigs that most people can't afford can literally be 12x an Xbox 720 or 8x a PS4.

2. True they don't have a centralized 1st party dev, BUT, they have more combined exclusives than Sony/MS/Nintendo put out combined. Thus you do get great PC exclusives from big games to smaller dev games. Games like a strike suit zero or FTL or Star Citizen. Games like Crysis originally came out on PC and only later ported to 360, etc.

3. Untrue. Some haven't experienced them, and would if they were exposed to them. Others like them, but since consoles don't do them, they don't play them. Others indeed don't. But still others do and that's one reason they keep a PC. It's not just that, the case can be made for many other things like FPS in that you can use mouse or keyboard, or 360 controller for PC, or hybrid of 360 controller and mouse. When it comes to RPG's you usually have mods that allow all sorts of new stuff. Take Skyrim, all the free mission contents people made, to new spells, farting mods, raining meteors down from the sky, XXX sex mods, new UI, all sorts of stuff. Basically on PC you get all the genres possible on a console + more. So only on a PC are all genres possible.

4. Depends on what you mean. If you mean game wise it can be better even. Steam is very easy. Buy, download, double click the game name/icon in steam. That's pretty simple. You can also sometimes preload games so you don't have to wait in a stupid line at midnight. If you want to switch games you don't need to get up and take the disc out, find the cover, etc, etc. You just close the game and open a different one.

5. Again not really. You have ultimate flexibility in gaming. You can game with keyboard and mouse (which can be wireless) or 360 controller or hybrid 360 controller and mouse. Not to mention flight sticks, wheels, etc. Now you will get throttled in most FPS if you use a controller, but it also makes you better so when you play on a console you thrash people pretty hard. But besides first person shooters, a controller isn't a disadvantage. Also you don't need to game on a small screen, all GPU's have HDMI outs, which means, any HDTV can be used as a monitor just like a console uses it. I use a 40 inch Dynex 1080p/60 that I got a couple years ago for $399. My keyboard, mouse, and 360 controller are all wireless and am currently typing this relaxed back in my recliner. (not to mention actually use the HD capabilities of 1080p gaming and not 588-604p gaming with a few 720p games sprinkled in)

jmc88884094d ago

6. Console DRM is there too. You have EA passes. While it's more prevalent on PC's, many devs have backtracked like Ubisoft. Meanwhile it seems consoles might be going forward with theirs...potentially. An always on connection or RFID chip on discs or cloud gaming could easily be viewed correctly as another form of DRM. So this point is up in the air.

7. Well for every Diablo 3 there's FTL or Strike Suit Zero, or Chivalry: Medieval Warfare, or Natural Selection 2, or Sins of a Solar Empire, Endless Space, or dozens of others. So your opinion of the quality sucking is more off of simply not knowing or experiencing the games.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4094d ago
-Mezzo-4095d ago

What consoles are dying again?

*FacePalm*

ATi_Elite4094d ago

I like Microsoft not being in the PC Gaming arena and when they decide to come back it will be Too Late cause by then the Steambox will have us playing PC Games minus a Microsoft OS!

MS has been CRAP ever since Bill Gates stepped down. No innovation at all and that lack of innovation is why Valve and not MS is the PC Champion.

Next console Gen is the Last Gen and after the Xbox720 dies MS/Sony will just publish or license games to run through PSN+/XboxLive on any device.

Proof of the consoles Death is that tablet/slates will be more powerful than the X720/PS4 6 months after these new consoles release.

Plus they are already making Hybrid all in one/slate PC's (Google Sony Vaio tap 20)

*Side note* Notice the Sony Vaio Tap 20 in the Windows 8 commercial with the little girl art student? Joachim Kempin is right, there really isn't any secrets in the console business and their darn sure isn't any competition Between Sony and MS as they are big business partners.

Sony makes the PC's that bring out the best of Microsoft's software!

classic2004094d ago (Edited 4094d ago )

come on you really think consoles will die, this world revolve around competition. If microsoft and sony decided to merge, someone out of nowhere will come and spot an opportunity.

Their will be PC but their will always be phones, tablets, tv, console. All will be like a computer but they will all have different benefits and lets face it steam box is not a PC because valve will have certain restriction on it.

One of these restriction will be no origin lol, Unless some strong contract between Ea and valve and I dont see that happening. Cars will be similar to computers in the future but that does not mean it will replace a tablet, phone, desktop or a living room hub (console)

DeadlyFire4094d ago (Edited 4094d ago )

I see Microsoft tapping into Windows 8 to gridlock Valve in some ways. Which could mean they are looking to support gaming on PC again.

Valve entering console market with its own version of Linux based games could spring them forward to launch an OS of their own at some point based on their version of Linux. Which in turn could take away some of Window's shares of the market if Valve starts shifting exclusive games vs. Windows. Since Microsoft doesn't really try to brand any game as Windows exclusive. That is long long term. Although it could happen faster than we think since Linux is fairly simple.

Whole Modular computing idea could be a slow build towards what I have projected above. As it would take time before their modular designs would have enough power to be recognized as a decent idea. No company really tries to sell computers with its OS on them with gaming support like Valve could do.

I doubt Sony/Microsoft will ever merge their consoles. Sony and Microsoft will stand separate and compete with each other until one is defeated then someone else will compete. Which if you look at the market now. We have new android consoles stepping up, Valve, AppleTV(sometime soon), and possibly other competitors reaching out.

jmc88884094d ago

Actually there wasn't a whole lot of innovation with Bill Gates either, he's a moron and a fascist.

What he did do is use his family wealth to start a business that bought up the rights to two little know IBM inventions, DOS and Windows, and was able to turn those into something that sold.

So I'll say he can rebrand things, or turn someone elses innovation into something that sells. But really Microsoft just copy something others are doing, and find a way to do it in a way that garners sales.

Though just about half of his OS'es failed miserably. Win 3.1 good, 95 good, 98 sucked, 98SE good, ME sucked, XP good, Vista sucked, Win 7 good, Win 8 aka wannabe apple phone OS for single taskers SUCKS (oh and DX11.1 is locked into it). Windows 8 is not going to make it. It's not the future, just because it's 'new'. Sometimes new stuff isn't a progression, but a regression. That's what Windows 8 is. A functional regression with a pretty young looking face. Also now that they've raised the upgrade price from $39.99 to $169-199 the suckers have been already hoodwinked and everyone else will stay away.

I genuinely feel bad for the poor shmucks that buy a PC only to have it come loaded with Win 8 (and no Win 7 compatibility mode isn't the same thing). Just another valid reason to build your own PC, though many PC makers are giving the option to install Win 7 instead.

If you read any recent interviews fascist Bill Gates loves the direction of MS and their new products.

I don't think consoles will die, but I can understand your argument there. It might happen, but I'd think there might be another generation after that. Then between now and then there is stuff that can alter things like holographic gaming. Kind of hard to do that with an ipad. ipads and the like are more like handhelds competitors then direct console competitors.

miyamoto4094d ago (Edited 4094d ago )

Now we know why Windows PC gamers hate consoles, right M$?

M$ tried to bring all the Windows PC gamers, frag heads, developers and publishers to consoles to support their agenda of stopping Sony....and PC gamers paid the price.

Seriously if M$ only nurtured the Windows PC gaming, like stopping piracy, great gaming OS,... PC gamers, developers could be flourishing on PC.

4094d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (25)
220°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv7218h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle5h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic18812h ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio2h ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Cacabunga4h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

shinoff21833h ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga2h ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

purple1017h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos7h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

XBManiac6h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple1015h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic4h ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

Show all comments (21)
300°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere1d 14h ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN1d 12h ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos1d 9h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN1d 2h ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo1d 4h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies1d ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion1d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger1d 12h ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Mr Logic22h ago

What a stupid thing to say. The elites give 0 fucks what we say on an obscure website in the comments section.

Crows9021h ago

You can always reach out and give them jobs at your company man. Don't wait

Profchaos1d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto1d 14h ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos1d 13h ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long1d 10h ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel1d 13h ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos1d 11h ago (Edited 1d 11h ago )

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator1d 12h ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (21)
280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10112d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref12d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde12d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197212d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville11d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218311d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos11d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
isarai12d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref12d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan12d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00711d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197212d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

12d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

12d ago
12d ago
Zeref12d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde12d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197212d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier11d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto12d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218311d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto11d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
Hofstaderman12d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts12d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts11d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)