220°

Microsoft Q2: Xbox division revenues down 11%

VG247:Microsoft reported revenue of $21.46 billion for the second quarter, up 3% year-on-year, but its Entertainment and Devices Division was not so successful.

Good_Guy_Jamal4109d ago (Edited 4109d ago )

Really? Which part? The fact that they made a profit or the that they made even more money than the same period last year?
"That said, the division remained PROFITABLE and even IMPROVED PERFORMANCE, with operating income of $596 million, UP from $517 million in the same quarter a year ago."
So tell me, which part of making over half a billion in profit is "not good." Typical of eye-catching article meant to draw hits by leading with the negative. Typical of some to not read the full article and jump on to the Doom Mobile.

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney4109d ago (Edited 4109d ago )

Worst part is they did that with no original AAA content for the last 3 years(alan wake). and Yet their are 63+ kinect exclusives.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

and 21 more announced.

I don't mind MS having success in gaming hope they do the same next gen. Xbox gamers are definitely satisfied and that's is great!

But having the division run by non gamers should be fixed next gen.

http://www.gamespot.com/for...

"This is actually a brilliant idea by microsoft.. now here me out for a second.

The 360 community has no gaming experience because well.. xbox got no gamezzz, so they hire people with the same qualifications, it's brilliant!!

Microsoft does it again"

not my words but funny imo.

You guy can initialize a nuclear on me now.

Urusernamesucks4109d ago

@ShutUpandTakemymoney HERE WE GO AGAIN, the typical sony fanboy going on about lack of AAA titltes Bullshit, man sthu with that, seriously keeep your filthy money.

"snorksnork FUCKING CAsuals sNORK SNORK" thats all you.

superterabyte4109d ago (Edited 4109d ago )

@Urusernamesucks Ok then mate proper big man you are.

I personally am happy to say that I backed the winning horse when I chose which console I chose because for me the games have just been continuously rolling in =D

I have got both killzone's, gran turismo(all gold licenses and 1000 cars), platinumed all the uncharted's and loved the exclusives I get.

My point is instead of disclaiming an opinion without giving reason why not give constructive feedback rather then derogatory language. For example list the game's that you have that aren't "casual" because from somebody looking from an outside perspective towards the xbox i can't see any reason as to own one so tell me a reason.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4109d ago
fermcr4109d ago (Edited 4109d ago )

Had a decrease in revenues but still quite profitable (even more profitable then the year before).

Where is the bad news ? Did you even read or understand the article ?

If it wasn't profitable then it would be bad news. I wish my company had this kind of "bad" news.

UnholyLight4109d ago

People are stupid. Of course the Xbox 360 is not going to sell levels like it did 3 or 4 years ago or wahtever. The market is basically nearing it's saturation level and the people that are buying consoles are buying because they are cheap and aren't concerned about the Next gen.

Informed customers are NOT buying Xbox 360's because they know the next thing is less than a year away. Microsoft did a great job to eke out an extra couple years with Kinect which despite it's shortcoming actually really helped the Xbox's life cycle I believe. It is natural that growth would be down slightly as it is now time to start the next gen transition.

Figure it out people....

aquamala4109d ago

revenue down, but profit up, yes that's the gaming division, here for those that don't even bother reading the report

"That said, the division remained profitable and even improved performance, with operating income of $596 million, up from $517 million in the same quarter a year ago."

nukeitall4109d ago

This is exactly how I thought it would pan out. MS isn't in it for market share anymore as it is pointless. They are in it for the profit taking and that is why there is lowered number of consoles shipped, yet MS profit increased!

At this stage and at the cusp of next generation, MS is investing into their next console.

I would love to have less revenue, but with increased profit. That is any company's dream really.

If you really want to compare this, you have to wait for Sony's and Nintendo's numbers.

doogiebear4109d ago

M$ is trash no matter how much money they siphon out of fools

palaeomerus4109d ago

Sony All Stars Battle Royale
LBP Karting
Jak collection
God of War Collection

AngelicIceDiamond4109d ago (Edited 4109d ago )

So this why u mad? https://www.google.com/url?...

If you don't want to read it it says MS sold 76 million consoles SOLD like, people going into stores and buying it. Not SHIPPED. Shipped doesn't not matter.

Listen I do what others fail to do on this site and that is give credit when credit is due. If Sony does something impressive I commend them like I have been doing. I like both Sony and MS and their consoles. I don't get u people and your hate over a stupid video game machine. Seriously N4G grow the hell up its just a machine.

mcstorm4109d ago

@AngelicIceDiamon well said. I do find it funny how people in the tech world fight over who has the best product. I am a Big gamer and Own 2 360s 2 ps3s a WiiU a 3DS and a PSV. I get them all because there are games on all there consoles I want to play.

I also Own a Surface RT and when I got that everyone came out and slated me because I did not get an Ipad its just the way people are now every has something better than you or they have a point to prove if they don't like what you have.

kneon4109d ago

@AngelicIceDiamond

Not this stupid shipped vs. sold argument again. Manufacturers do not track when each piece of consumer electronics is sold to the end customer. As far as they are concerned it's sold as soon as a retailer or distributor buys it.

But if you want to play that silly game it still makes no difference. Retailers try not to keep months of stock on hand. So anything shipped to retailers tends to sell within a few weeks. So the difference between shipped and sold is negligible.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4109d ago
mwjw6964109d ago (Edited 4109d ago )

@StrongMan STFU troll, go back under your bridge... all you ever do is bitch about MS. What they do rape your family that you never had FOREVER ALONE?

TheRealHeisenberg4109d ago

Show me on the doll where MS touched you. Sony, Nintendo and MS all touched me in the same spots, my heart and my wallet...they all only care about my wallet though.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4109d ago
GribbleGrunger4110d ago (Edited 4110d ago )

It's almost like Sony in reverse. Sony lose money from divisions NOT related to their games division and Microsoft lose money from their games division but not their other divisions. Which company is likely to support the hardcore gamer next gen? I think that extra, but slower memory is likely to be used for Windows 8 and Kinect, while Sony's faster, but less ram will be leveraged to offer 1080p games at 60fps. Of course both will offer some of the other, but this I think is going to be the main battle ground.

Good_Guy_Jamal4109d ago (Edited 4109d ago )

Losing money? What are you talking about? Did you read the article? They made a profit. PROFIT. Over half a billion worth!
Were you so eager to compare MICROSOFT negatively to SONY that you neglected to read the darn article you are commenting on?
Edit: honestly people, what's there to disagree with? The Xbox division made a profit of $596 million, thats $79 million more than they made last year during the same period. How am I wrong?

Munky4109d ago

The majority of users on this site are straight up stupid, don't even try to understand or comprehend the madness.

KrisButtar4109d ago

"Microsoft’s Xbox business is part of the Entertainment and Devices Division, which reported an 11% year-on-year decrease in revenues from $4.24 billion to $3.77 billion. Although Xbox isn’t the only business stream in the division, Microsoft made it clear the console was to blame"

I didn't disagree but they made less year to year not more.

Good_Guy_Jamal4109d ago

Are you being sarcastic? Because if you read the article you'd know they didn't lose any money and in fact made more profit than last year.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills! Do you people not know the difference between revenue and profit?
Profit is the stuff you get after you've subtracted the costs and expenses from your revenue.
More profit = a good thing.
More revenue is only great if it is accompanied by less costs and expenses.
In this case less revenue but far less costs = more profit. Which is good.
I swear I've stepped into the twilight zone. People so desperate for negative Microsoft news.

BattleAxe4109d ago (Edited 4109d ago )

@ Good_Guy_Jamal

You are a fool, here are some quotes from the article, since you like to talk about reading articles...

Quote #1

"Microsoft’s Xbox business is part of the Entertainment and Devices Division, which reported an 11% year-on-year decrease in revenues from $4.24 billion to $3.77 billion."

Quote #2

“Xbox 360 platform revenue decreased $1.1 billion or 29%, due mainly to lower volumes of consoles sold and lower video game revenue"

Quote #3

"5.9 million Xbox 360 consoles shipped during the quarter, down from 8.2 million in the same quarter of FY 2012."

Boy oh boy, Microsoft sure is doing great in the console business :/

http://www.forbes.com/sites...

http://www.forbes.com/sites...

http://www.forbes.com/sites...

MikeMyers4109d ago

GribbleGrunger:
"I think that extra, but slower memory is likely to be used for Windows 8 and Kinect, while Sony's faster, but less ram will be leveraged to offer 1080p games at 60fps."

Really? Based on what exactly, rumors? Do people ever grow tired from those who constantly have a negative tone towards one company but always put a positive spin on the other? I really wish people could just enjoy the games they have without this endless need to put one company above the other.

Read this highlight from the article:
"That said, the division remained profitable and even improved performance, with operating income of $596 million, up from $517 million in the same quarter a year ago."

Even though Microsoft has sold less units they are making more money off of that hardware because the cost are lower to make them. They haven't had a significant price drop for awhile now. They make money off of other things like Kinect too. So tell me where all these losses are?

http://www.gamesindustry.bi...

"Sony's PlayStation business suffered a decline in both sales and operating income for the second quarter of FY12.

For the quarter ending September 30 2012, the company's game division reported revenues of ¥148.2 billion ($1.85/£1.15b/€1.43b), down 14 per cent year-on-year from ¥176 billion on a constant currency basis. Operating income also declined year-on-year, from ¥3 billion to ¥2.3 billion ($29m/£17m/€22m).

Sony attributes the decline to falling sales right across its hardware line: the PlayStation 2 and PlayStation 3 sold a combined total of 3.5 million units during the quarter, a significant drop from the 4.9 million units sold in the same quarter last year; the PS Vita and the PSP sold a combined total of 1.6 million, a slight year-on-year decrease from 1.7 million units.

However, the PlayStation business reported gains in software sales: PlayStation 3 and PlayStation 2 games sold 41.4 million units in the quarter, up from 40.2 million last year; PS Vita and PSP games sold 8.7 million units, up from 8.2 million."

Neither Microsoft or Sony are losing money. Just because revenue is down doesn't mean they are losing money.

RTheRebel4109d ago

dont care for xbox like my ps3 better but,
just ignore the drones here
gribble is part of the church of sony
xbox bad news hurray WOOHOO
sony bad news they hate sony conspiracy theories lol

Anon19744109d ago

You`re not going crazy, Jamal. In fact, you`re bang on. It`s about profit, not revenue. 360`s sales dropped almost 30%, revenue was down and they still made more money than the same quarter last year. That`s fantastic in my books. It`s to be expected that revenue and sales will fall during the tail end of the console`s life, but what matters is how much money is being made.

That`s what will determine the future of the brand at the end of the day because we`re talking about a business here. They aren`t running a charity for gamers. It`s about making money. Frankly, I`m amazed that profit was up considering falling sales, falling revenue and a 25% increase in R&D spending related most likely to the next Xbox. If MS can continue to cash in on the 360 there`s a greater chance that they`ll make back the money spent on the 360 initially and then it all becomes worthwhile.

I`ve been critical of the 360`s fluctuating sales and revenue in the past, prior to Kinect`s release, but towards the end of the lifecycle we expect these to drop. The fact that profit is still strong is a good thing. I don`t know how any gamer could argue otherwise.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4109d ago
Silly gameAr4109d ago

Don't say MS has lost any amount of money or hasn't turned a profit Gribble. We all know MS doesn't lose money, they only make it.

GribbleGrunger4109d ago (Edited 4109d ago )

What part of the headline and what part of my post are you people not reading? Did I say that Microsoft haven't made a profit or did I say that their gaming division is losing money? Let me just check that I'm not living in some sort of twilight zone here:

'Sony lose money from divisions NOT related to their games division and Microsoft lose money from their games division but not their other divisions.'

mmmmm... It appears that I am talking about their games division and not Microsoft as a whole. That'd probably because of this:

'Microsoft Q2: Xbox division revenues down 11%'

The headline I was responding to. Which part would you like me to change in order for it to be palatable but not accurate? I said that Sony was losing money on their other divisions but not on their games division, but it was the other way around for Microsoft (at the moment and going from this headline and the official report).

It amazes me how Sony losing money in other divisions automatically gets translated into their games division is losing money, but when Microsoft's profits are down on their games division people want to remind you that they made a profit overall. Jesus, how stacked do you people want this table?

Sony will carry on supporting their games division because that's what makes them the most money, while Microsoft will offer what makes them the most profit through their next gen machine... Windows, Kinect and other multimedia stuff. It's not a dig, it's just how I see it.

Yes, Microsoft made an overall profit, but their revenue was down from their games division. I'm just considering the possible ramifications of this and perhaps the reason their next gen console is rumoured to have more memory dedicated to the OS.

Death4109d ago

Hey Gribble,

If you think Microsoft isn't happy with the performance of the Xbox, check out what Sony is dealing with as far as the Playstation brand is doing: http://www.sony.net/SonyInf...

Sony's last fiscal year showed a loss in the Consumer Products and Services division of 2,083 million dollars. This is where the Game division is held. In all fairness, CPS is a very big division. but statements like "The decrease in the game business reflects lower sales of PlayStation®3 hardware due to a
strategic price reduction and lower sales of PlayStation®2 due to platform migration." isn't exactly a ringing endorsement.

The current fiscal year has the Game division losing 45 million for the first quarter and making 29 million in quarter 2. For the mathmatically impaired, that is a loss of 16 million for the first half of fiscal 2012.

So you are aware, both companies are using the revenue to fund new product development. As sales decrease the need for new product increases. They use existing revenue for R&D and to cover initial manufacturing costs. This is common for each console life cycle. Don't get too caught up in the sales and profit hype. It's controlled to a very large degree and not an indication of a consoles overall health or viability as a marketable product.

What should matter to most of us is the games we can play at the end of the day.

aquamala4109d ago

read the article, revenue is down but profit is actually up. 596 million this year, $517 million last year. you even get any agrees for getting basic facts wrong just showing what kind of people are on this site lol.

GribbleGrunger4109d ago

Ok ... Ok, I did say 'losing money' in the wrong context there. I know that 'revenue down' isn't exactly the same. Oh well, that'll teach me for paraphrasing and cutting corners. I stand by what I said though in terms of what it could mean for next gen.

InMyOpinion4109d ago

Do Sony pay you for posting on every single Xbox related story, or are you just that loyal?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4109d ago
NYC_Gamer4109d ago

MS still made profit in the division though

KrisButtar4109d ago

"Although Xbox isn’t the only business stream in the division, Microsoft made it clear the console was to blame."

Mircosoft blaming their game console for not having bigger profits

BanBrother4109d ago

Haha. "Stupid xbox (hits it), why aren't you making us any money?"

I suppose the fact they still made a profit'is good.... but coming from a 360 owner I feel neglected, as they are using a butt-load of money to start new IP's......for Kinect, instead of the ones I'd like. I have a Kinect, which I bought for the youngins', but I have no particular interest in it. Untill I hear profit=more new IP's, I could not'give a rats ass.

Show all comments (58)
260°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv7223h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle10h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic18817h ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio7h ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Lightning772h ago

What he said was facts. How he plays games is no concern of you. Don't get too mad about it.

Cacabunga10h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

shinoff21839h ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga8h ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

itsmebryan4h ago

@shin
Well keep it simple Sony 's operating income is down 26% and Microsoft's is up 32%. No MS spin there, just facts. 😉
Cheers

romulus233h ago

Odd that a company that touts you dont need the hardware to play is already touting another console in the works.

darthv722h ago

They are not reliant on the HW but still want to maintain a presence (no matter how small) is a good thing. It shows commitment to the craft. It reminds me of SNK and how they made games for their own hardware (Neo Geo) while also making them for others because they knew there was a market to do so. They knew they would sell more to others but also sell to their own niche fan base.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2h ago
purple10112h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos12h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

DOMination-2h ago

In the last two years they've started exiting the consumer market altogether. All of the newest Surface products are business models only. They can't seem to work out what they want to do with it.

XBManiac11h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple10111h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic9h ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

MrDead2h ago

The only growth MS will get out of the console industry is if it supports it's rivals platforms. Xbox is a pointless machine now. I can see them on a big push for live next, and they won't give up on trying to buy Steam.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2h ago
Show all comments (35)
300°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere1d 20h ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN1d 17h ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos1d 15h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN1d 8h ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo1d 9h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies1d 5h ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion1d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger1d 17h ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Mr Logic1d 3h ago

What a stupid thing to say. The elites give 0 fucks what we say on an obscure website in the comments section.

Crows901d 3h ago

You can always reach out and give them jobs at your company man. Don't wait

blacktiger19m ago

You own nothing snd be happy. I'm sure you heard that

Profchaos1d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto1d 19h ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos1d 19h ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long1d 16h ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel1d 18h ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos1d 16h ago (Edited 1d 16h ago )

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator1d 17h ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (23)
280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10113d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref12d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde12d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197212d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville12d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218311d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos11d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
isarai12d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref12d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan12d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00711d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197212d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

12d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

12d ago
12d ago
Zeref12d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde12d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197212d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier12d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto12d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218311d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto11d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
Hofstaderman12d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts12d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts11d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)