830°

Xbox 720 in beta; AMD HD 8000M to power next-gen consoles?

GC: The guy who has leaked the Durango dev kit pics has said that the Xbox 720 or Xbox 3 is officially in the beta stage and he is awaiting his updated dev kit.

Read Full Story >>
gamechup.com
WetN00dle694159d ago

I dont think that both the Ps4 and Xbox 3 will be running the AMD HD 8000M. That slide is just an AD by AMD saying that they are the leading brand for GPU's be it console or PC. But who knows.

DeadlyFire4159d ago

I suspect higher than this though if they use AMD 8000 Mobile GPU it will have to have minimum of around 2 Tflops.

I suspect the aim is between 2.5-3.5 Tflops for PS4/X720.

AMD 7970M GPU runs at 2.1 Tflops so its sucessor in the 8900M series would fit quite nicely I would suspect.

ABizzel14159d ago

I didn't disagree with you although I do.

It makes sense to use the 8000M series simply because they're likely to be more energy efficient than the 7000M series. But the 8000M series isn't likely to be that much of an improvement over the 7000M series besides power consumption.

Mobile GPU's would be ideal for the next consoles simply because of size and mobility. The 7970M is more than enough to handle what next gen consoles need if they want to reach 1080p @ 60fps in 3D.

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney4159d ago

The AMD HD8000M is just a refresh.

Also console are like laptops then? Any gpu with the "M" behind it is nothing to right home about.

wampdog294159d ago

When Sony and MS speak in Tflops, they always use the ENTIRE system, not only the GPU. So, even if you had an inside source that told you Sony wanted 3Tflops out of their next console, it wouldn't simply mean that the GPU was that powerful.

ProjectVulcan4159d ago (Edited 4159d ago )

You suspect a lot :-/

Mobile processors use less power than desktop parts just because they run at a lower voltage and lower clocks typically. They also end up with a bunch of areas disabled for yield and power reasons. They often have more aggressive power management.

If you want a lower TDP part for a console you can take any desktop GPU and very easily reduce its power consumption. RSX in PS3 is nothing but a shrunken desktop (NV47) G70 core with a crippled memory bus and ROPS count. By the time PS3 arrived, even the G71 7900GTX was old hat and the 8800 series were in town.

I don't really see the connection between the 8000M announcement and the next gen consoles. The announcement is due for the new mobile chips, and we are about 4 months away from a new set of desktop GPU models.

If the consoles are already well into development, they'll probably be using similar designs to stuff that already exists.

DA_SHREDDER4159d ago

You tech geeks care so much about graphics in the next gen consoles why even waste your time on them and just game on your gaming pc's you have now? You want better graphics? I just want bigger and more fun games. I don't care if games don't look close to real life or not, they are just video games, you guy have a hobby, then stop speculating and just play them. BTW, even if the next gen is underwhelming to most of you, you're still gonna buy them, so why all the moaning and groaning? If the graphics don't suit you, then just keep playing on your pc's. Sheesh.

ABizzel14159d ago

@DaShreeder

I don't think any "Tech Geek" is concerned about console graphics. Most of us are here because we enjoy gaming, and we're keeping things in a reasonable perspective for people who don't know what to expect from the next gen consoles.

There are all kinds of crazy rumors flying around, and coming from a tech background / know how, we're just trying to keep everything within reason.

sikbeta4158d ago

Please NO! Mobile crap GPUs will not be enough for a real next-gen leap...

4158d ago
Persistantthug4158d ago

Use and bookmark this....they generally track pretty well.

http://www.gpureview.com/sh...

Somebody4158d ago

@DA_SHREDDER

Everyone speculates about everything This is just what people who have great interest ins similar stuff do. They talk about their interest with other people. Sharing. Interacting.

Even if some of the people here don't have consoles but they do have bits of information that others might not have.

8000M - Who are you going to ask? A hardcore console player who never played on the PC or the tech geek whose hands are smeared with thermal paste?

I'm not a console player but I am interested in the use of a Mobile GPU for a next gen console. Who knows if it's true then MS might inadvertently up open a new opportunity for regular laptops to join the gaming sphere (besides of the expensive gaming laptops). I'm interested with a console development because I'm eager to see how how the PC industry will react and evolve to stay competitive. In a way what happens to the consoles, affects the PC as well.

ABizzel14158d ago

@skibeta

You don't know what you're talking about. A 7970M sits between an HD 7850 and HD 7870.

To put it simply, it's more than powerful enough to achieve Sony's goal of 1080p @ 60fps in 3D with DX11 on either High or Ultra PC settings depending on the game.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 4158d ago
Zhipp4159d ago

The 8000 series hasn't even launched yet, has it? What are the chances a console that's believed to be releasing next year would use such modern hardware?

Muffins12234159d ago

well,if it came with the console,it would cost more than 700...

hellvaguy4159d ago

When the 360 was released it had a tri-core processor. All pcs then were dual-core. They are able to be ahead of the technology curve at release by way of being subsidized (selling console at a loss first few years).

Unlike nintendo where they need to have a day 1 profit on thier consoles.

Nicolee4159d ago (Edited 4159d ago )

this is first time that nintendo selling wiiu at loss man.

Gamer19824158d ago

8000 series has launched already.

CrimsonSquall4158d ago

@hellvaguy, don't be mistaken, MS still followed the sell for profit approach on the launch of the 360

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4158d ago
Bigpappy4159d ago

Which ever GPU M$ uses for the next Xbox, with be custom made and exclusive. M$ has learn from the first Xbox, that they have to own all the components in order to control the price and profit.

Cueil4158d ago

The Xbox 360 GPU is based on the same tech as the X1300 (a step down if I'm not mistaken). Microsoft owns the rights to the specific model... it's obviously not a desktop version, but it was based off of a desktop version that got released around the same time as the 360. Oct of 2005 if I'm not mistaken...

Crazyglues4159d ago (Edited 4159d ago )

either way this is bad news for Nvidia if it's true because it would seem they wont' be in either console...

that wouldn't be a good move for Nvidia since the lost of console sales would mean a huge lost of money for the company in the future..

.____........___...____
.____||......||.......____||
||.........___||.......____||

iggsta3o54159d ago

@DA_SHREDDER Its not all about graphics "we tech geeks" have had to put up with your shit console ports for years, at this point we could care less about graphics. What we want to make sure is that consoles have the power to guarantee a push in current gaming innovation ie. better AI, larger world, greater population density, and complex Physics, all these things take power. So shut your mouth sit back, and only open your mouth when your given permission to speak. Were tired of your kind holding back the evolution of gaming.

MasterCornholio4158d ago (Edited 4158d ago )

Exactly my thoughts. While I personally believe that the most important aspect of a game is gameplay, powerful hardware allows developers to enhance gameplay by creating games with great Ai, physics, huge open worlds etc. Seriously could we play games like Read Dead Redemption, Dishonored, Dead Space, Mass Effect, Call of Duty, Batman Arkham City, God of War 3 etc on an NES? We couldn't because the Super Nintendo would be too weak to handle these sorts of fantastic games. A very good example of this is the amount of multi platform games that skipped the Wii due to how weak the hardware is.

In conclusion, having fantastic gameplay is vital to a good game however graphics can dramatically enhance said gameplay in many different ways.

Anyone who fails to see how powerful hardware can enhance gameplay isn't a gamer in my opinion instead to me they are the ludites who are holding this industry back and thus don't deserve to play fantastic games.

Motorola RAZR i

DarthJay4158d ago (Edited 4158d ago )

@wetnoodle More people need to be like you and start calling it the Xbox 3... or anything but the Xbox 720. The name Xbox 720 makes me cringe. The absolute dumbest thing I've ever heard and it makes no sense whatsoever. So thank you for not being that guy.

FanboyPunisher4157d ago

LMAO moblie GPU in a console?

TRASH!

Steam HTCP will be the end of shoddy consoles I'm telling you.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4157d ago
Npugz74159d ago

I hope they use them in the Next Gen Consoles.

wishingW3L4159d ago (Edited 4159d ago )

Yeah. MS will put a $600 GPU on their next console. And what about everything else? RAM, CPU, motherboard, case, power-supply....

Man these writers are so clueless. lol

Smurf14159d ago

Mobile GPU. Read the M part.

Hingle_Mcringleberry4159d ago

Do you believe when they order 1 million GPU's they get charged the same price you do when you buy a single one? Man, these readers are so clueless. Lol.

IRetrouk4159d ago

Dont forget they will order them in tens of millions and will most likely get a massive discount

mwjw6964159d ago

Discount yes. But most likely only a 30% discount tops. AMD still has to make a nice profit, or why even sell them at all.

Sp1d3ynut4159d ago

mwjw696, you obviously have no clue how big business works. You think Wal-mart only gets a "30% discount" from vendors, on the items you buy? They pay mere pennies on the dollar for many items, based on sheer volume. Without Wal-mart, Target, Amazon, etc. , most of the items we purchase would be ridiculously expensive, because the mfr had no guaranteed way of knowing how many units they would sell to recoup mfg costs, tooling, etc. The guaranteed purchase contracts give them a pricepoint to work off of, and reason to go ahead with mass production...which reduces cost AND retail pricing.

BitbyDeath4159d ago (Edited 4159d ago )

It's far greater than 30%.
Remember Sony put a $1000+ blu-ray player into the PS3 which cost $600 and that's obviously excluding the cost of the GPU, CPU, RAM etc

Blu-ray players are far cheaper now so that cost of putting it into the next machine will be severely reduced.

Sony/MS can easily put in all the latest parts and still market it for around $400.

rainslacker4159d ago

Don't forget that those $600 video cards didn't pay $600 for the graphics chip alone either. It also includes R&D for designing the card, packaging, marketing, Memory and IC costs, company overhead, along with all the other stuff that goes into making the card itself. I don't know what the breakdown is, but it's likely less than $200 per GPU chip. However no you aren't likely to see such an expensive part in the system unless they received a massive discount. It is possible given the amount ordered that AMD would give one since it means they would make a profit quicker. They still aren't likely to sell it for less than what it costs them to make, however.

nukeitall4159d ago

Well, from the first Xbox 360, MS made sure to own the design for the chip, which means they are allowed to manufacture them at any plant of their choosing.

Also, a huge cost up front (or loss) isn't unknown, but it sure ain't $600. The chip itself doesn't cost $600 not even close.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4159d ago
aquamala4159d ago

it's a mobile GPU, which is far less powerful than Desktop GPUs because it needs to use less power and generate less heat to be usable on laptops.

tee_bag2424159d ago (Edited 4159d ago )

Well a 7970m's desktop equivalent is the somewhere between the 7850 and the pricier 7870.
That's not too shabby at all!

konnerbllb4159d ago (Edited 4159d ago )

The xbox360 gpu consumer equivalent cost around 600 at launch. Look it up

Of course MS never pays retail.

Cueil4158d ago

You're not to far off... but the Xbox 360 uses some slightly lower variant that the X1300 uses... if I'm not mistaken... it's really hard to remember all the info from 7 years ago... has it really been 7 years?

Qrphe4158d ago

Please

The base GPU for the Xenos was worth around $500 in 2004/5 while the Pentium III GPU in the original Xbox was worth around $600 in 2000 (I'm not even adjusting for inflation).

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4158d ago
jmac534159d ago

I am sure they will use something that generates less heat after the red ring debacle.

greenpowerz4159d ago (Edited 4159d ago )

They already have. STFU sheesh

BTW please don't reply with a collection of barely sound unfounded info from wikki quoting blog quality data methods and polling from sources that are or were trying to blow up the problem for the most hits(IRetrouk).

When PS2 had it's issue no one expressed worry about later PS2's and PS3. LOL

silkrevolver4159d ago

He's simply stating for future use.

We all know the 360's current chipset is sound and not Red-Ring inducing.

Simmer down.

koston36474159d ago

@greenpowerz if that comment wasn't overly and unnecessarily defensive idk what is...he doesn't have to "STFU"

jmac534158d ago

Well my "data" was that I had 5 red ringed consoles before I got a slim, which has been working great. I was merely stating that Microsoft is definetly going to put more heat-resistant parts in the next machine. Please untwist your panties.

Qrphe4158d ago

But the PS2 DIDN'T have this exact type of issue.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4158d ago
andibandit4158d ago

@jmac53

thats the dumbest thing i've heard in 2012.
How about it's cheaper for the consumer and better for the environment and gives a greener image of the 720?.

im sure your reason is somewhere at number 500 on the priority list, along with "PS4 will have more memory so they can have run cross Game Chat"

JsonHenry4159d ago

Console gamers will more than likely be happy with one of these parts in their machine. It is a respectable part in terms of power. (for a console)

Show all comments (88)
280°

Nintendo says Switch 2 will be officially announced before the end of March 2025

This is Furukawa, President of Nintendo. We will make an announcement about the successor to Nintendo Switch within this fiscal year. It will have been over nine years since we announced the existence of Nintendo Switch back in March 2015. We will be holding a Nintendo Direct this June regarding the Nintendo Switch software lineup for the latter half of 2024, but please be aware that there will be no mention of the Nintendo Switch successor during that presentation.

Profchaos3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

I'm excited for a switch 2 however I don't feel it will be coming this year as per the tweet in they are commuting to a reveal in this Japanese financial year in 2025.

Realistically we will get one last holiday season to focus on the switch because it would be madness for Nintendo to go into the holidays where the switch always performs well when they have announced a switch 2.

I'm thinking we see a announcement late Jan 25 personally with a release between March and June depending on when the software is ready and how strong the holday sales were if they need to boost those figures for the next earnings call or not

gold_drake3d ago

yea agreed. they'll probably match it with the new pkmn game they announced

VenomUK3d ago

So it begins!

Where one contender pulls out of the game, another comes back bigger and stronger.

Nintendo Switch 2 - let the games begin.

Cacabunga2d ago

A new Splatoon launch title for sure.. hoping they change the recipe and make it open world.

I think it’ll come out Q1 25. Let’s wait and see

H93d ago

There's a event in June for games on the switch and they said there won't be a switch 2 announcement so no way they will announce the console after june and still release it in the same year

Eonjay3d ago

So, I think they will shoot for another FYQ4 release (like with the first Switch) but I am confused by the headline:

'[...] Switch 2 will be officially ANNOUNCED before the end of March 2025' This implies that the Switch 2 isn't coming out till maybe holiday 2025 or maybe even 2026. I think they will be better served by NOT releasing when GTA 6 launches (unless there is some shocking reveal that it will run on Switch 2). Release early 2025.

Neonridr3d ago

I'd say it'll be released before March 2025 tbh.

notachance3d ago

Holiday announcement with summer launch

thesoftware7303d ago

It should be an interesting year; Sony, Nintendo, and MS all have new Hardware to show.

Show all comments (28)
470°

PS5 Pro specs leak video taken down by Sony

Sony is taking actions as video by Moore’s Law is Dead, has been issued with a copyright claim.

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
andy8523d ago

And people say it's all fake because Sony haven't said anything 😂 conveniently forget the PS4 Pro was only announced 2 months before release.

BeHunted23d ago

It's fake. There's no factual evidence other than his own made up specs.

Hereandthere23d ago

What were the specks Sony was afraid of showing?

Shikoku23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

Digital foundry put a video out saying what he leaked was exactly what they also knew about the PS5 PRO. So no it's not just stuff he made up

Babadook723d ago (Edited 23d ago )

If it’s fake what copyright does MLID infringe upon?

😂

andy8523d ago

Aye because they'd go to the effort of copyright claiming it if it didn't exist 🙃😂 you'd have to be a special kind to be thinking its not a thing by now

Cacabunga23d ago

They need to reveal it with uncharted killzone or a heavy hitter like this

Ironmike23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

U mean the specs that we'll established digital foundry which said these are the actual specs published a video on 2 weeks ago I mean they are only one of most trusted sites for tech information but they just made up a video for the sake of it

Christopher22d ago

I would love for it all to be fake, but lots of people are saying they've seen/heard the same thing. But, man, we 100% don't need mid-gen upgrades when we're failing hard to optimize current hardware.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 22d ago
Seraphim22d ago (Edited 22d ago )

if I recall Sony lowered sales expectations for PS5 earlier this year. if that is the case we won't hear anything about a Pro until next year or shortly before/when it's dropping. After all, if the Pro was dropping this year/fiscal year they wouldn't have lowered expectations.

As for squashing rumors. Yeah, shit like this prevents potential buyers from adopting now, just like slim rumors in the past. It only makes sense to keep things under wraps from a business perspective. Despite living in a technological age of unfettered access to information we don't need to know whats going on behind closed doors be that at Sony, Nintendo, MS, or amongst any development studios. When the steak is done we shall feast.

JackBNimble22d ago

By the time games are actually made to take advantage of the pro spec's the ps6 will be released or close to it.

jznrpg23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

Just announce it already! I want to preorder one asap. But in reality they don’t want to lessen PS5 sales until Pro is ready to launch so I understand the business part of it. September is probably when they announce it with an early November launch like the PS4 Pro

Ironmike23d ago

Pro won't lessen sales sames ps4 pro never and the ps4 pro was more relevant at the time cos move to 4k this not needed

RaidenBlack23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

Yea, my brother got his PS4 (coz of a good deal) after the PS4 Pro's release.

darthv7223d ago

^^same here. I got a base 4 for only $100 off a guy who bought the Pro. then a few months later I found a guy on craigslist selling a pro for $100 because it was left behind by his former roommate who moved out. That was the beginning of my obsession to buy up the different variants of the PS4 that were released.

As of now I am really only missing the 500m one and the gold slim but otherwise I have pretty much all the other retail ones. https://consolevariations.c...

crazyCoconuts22d ago

Anyone with 4K that appreciates 60fps is gonna disagree about it not being needed.
DLSS is a god send for Nvidia, and there's been nothing like it for AMD...yet ...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 22d ago
DeadlyFire23d ago

They will announce it around E3 timeframe about May-June whenever they do a showcase for the year.

neutralgamer199223d ago

Just announce it this thing will sell well

Ironmike23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

I don't think it will pll still haven't seen the potential of ps5 yet

Cacabunga22d ago

agreed, but it might sell if they announce some 1st party games to lead the way. if people see the difference with the base version they can move on. for my sake I am still gaming mainly on PS4 (still not finished with RDR2 due to lack of gaming time). I have a huge backlog on PS5 I am hoping to get into.

mark3214uk23d ago

why? game makers havnt even come close to maxing out current spec yet, were getting al lthese new TFlops and game maker are making crappy remakes not worthy of the ps3

Minute Man 72123d ago

The guts of the 5 and X are 5 years old

fr0sty22d ago

People keep saying that, yet we still have games running at near HD resolutions, 30fps, and ray tracing features turned off.

PRIMORDUS23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

I would take that video and upload a torrent of it, fuck that copyright bullshit. If your going to do something that has a chance of being taken down, make a torrent first share it. Then Sony or any other company is helpless and you can laugh in their faces, taunting them to try to take it down 🤣

LoveSpuds23d ago

With kind of analysis and advice, you could be a lawyer for Trump!🤣

tronyx1223d ago

As much as the PS4 Pro didn't represent a major % in the playerbase, announcing a 'better' model will hinder sales from the 'base' model. They are right, business-wise.

Show all comments (36)
170°

XDefiant misses launch window, Ubi says a new release date will be announced after stress test

XDefiant was originally supposed to be out in summer 2023, but following a seemingly-successful beta test in April of that year, it was bumped to October 2023, and then delayed again to an unspecified future date. In its February 2024 financial report, Ubisoft slated XDefiant for launch in the fourth quarter of its 2023-24 fiscal year, which ended March 31.

A week before that date arrived, rumors surfaced that the game would be delayed yet again, and a few days later Ubisoft made it official.

"The game has always been community-first, with player feedback as a top priority," the development team said in the update. "While we hoped to go live by the end of March, there are still some improvements that we need to test before that."

Ubisoft said it's "finishing preparations" for a server stress test that will run for 12 hours on PC, PlayStation 5, and Xbox Series X|S. "After this short test, we expected to be able to lock a launch date and start sharing more about exciting content XDefiant has to offer in the future!"

just_looken38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

The previous news was from the team/rumors this is ubisoft themselves now saying the game is delayed again no new date set but they will have a stress test on a date that has not been set.

So the game is delayed to _____ TBD
Network stress test at ____ TBD

Ubisoft we make games whenever for whoever we just do not care

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurec...

X-2337d ago

I'm just going to be honest here and say what people seem to not want to, XDefiant success is going to be short-lived and it's because it's a game that's going to be under Ubisoft's umbrella. The development team can be absolute rockstars, but with Ubisoft steering the ship it's not going to go anywhere.

Profchaos37d ago

It could be a truely amazing game (it won't be) but with Ubisoft it will be monitized within a inch of its life.

smolinsk37d ago

The game is dead move on. It's the same with the Finals. These short period hype games doesn't last.

Show all comments (7)