530°

PS4 Rumour: Sony Files Patent For Dynamic Content Switching Between Architecturally Distinct GPUs

Sony has filed a patent which is called “Dynamic Context Switching Between architecturally Distinct GPUs”.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
bicfitness4161d ago

This is encouraging as it reinforces the idea that they will be going with power next gen. We don't need another Wii U.

Karooo4161d ago (Edited 4161d ago )

Power consumption is vital, you can't use a desktop GPU all the time even for random OS services, if they have a low power GPU to complement it they can save power and use the high power GPU only for games.

NewMonday4161d ago

this could mean the OS is fully on in another window.

sikbeta4161d ago

@bicfitness

Eh... was obvious from the start, Sony and MS go for the Power, N play with other cards...

O-T

Didn't understand a bit going by the title alone... anyone in the know can explain this mumbo-jumbo-tech related patent for me please :P

Hatsune-Miku4161d ago (Edited 4161d ago )

I love it how sony ponys are using a rumor to bash unfairly wii u.

Lets assume this is true. You go ahead buy a 500 dollar system with 70 dollar games, that only EA can develop for.

""devilhacker"& quot;

The wii u is rubbish. I can't wait for the Ps4. The Ps4 will be very powerful and improve upon gaming as we know it on consoles.I would gladly pay for quality and more power for my consoles. Its a hobby of mine so I don't want to pay for outdated tech seen in the wii u that came out 10 years ago and later at the beginning of this gen. Nes fanatics are silly and excuses bad decisions made by Nintendo then talk about things like power and graphics doesn't matter. It wouldn't matter to people who are fanatics and to mainly support their fav company.

I'd gladly buy a ps4 for 500quid as long as its powerful and future proof Plus people have things called jobs where we get money and buy what we can afford. The wii u is already outdated before release,lol.

Buying a Wii u is like buying a xbox 360 for twice the price with worse games

bicfitness4161d ago

@ sik. I don't think that it was. Reports were conflicting for a while and many indicated that it would go with a low all on chip solution, which would peg it as very similar to the Wii U (though stronger, surely).

This news is encouraging if its not just patent protecting and will actually be used.

pixelsword4161d ago

Sounds like going back and forth between games of different gens for some reason to me.

ABizzel14161d ago (Edited 4161d ago )

@sik

Basically it means Sony's will likely have 2 GPU's in their PS4. Now the fact that they're "different architecture" means they're unlikely to be running XFire or SLI (although the patent could of been produced because Sony found a way to make the 2 GPUS work together).

1st GPU will have a lower power consumption which would likely put it as a weaker GPU. My guess is that GPU is actually the rumored AMD A10-APU, which uses a HD 7660. It's capable of running anything the PS360 has come up with thus far and at better framerates, plus it has a solid Quad-Core CPU built into it, it's small, and it has a low power draw (perfect for consoles). So when you're doing anything outside of playing PS4 games then the APU will likely be the only thing running the console to save energy, lower heat, and other GREEN benefits.

The 2nd GPU is likely a more powerful GPU to run those PS4 games in 1080p @ 60fps in 3D that Sony wants. This is possibly the most determining factor of what the PS4 will be capable of (that and RAM, and if the GPU's can do Xfire or not). Here are the GPU's they would likely go with:

7870 or 7950: If they want the PS3 to be comparable to High-End PC's then either of these cards will do. Their 1080p @ 60fps in 3D goal will be reached, and it will allow for some 4K gaming in the form of PSN titles, PS3 HD remakes @ 60fps, and even some PS4 games. If Sony wants Ultra graphics settings using DX11 then these cards are a must.

7970M / 7850 / 6970: These cards are in a similar position as the ones above, with the exception being they're better suited for playing games at High settings instead of Ultra. But everything else applies.

There are a group of other cards that will work, but from there on down the "next-gen" factor starts to dwindle when compared to current PC gaming.

If anything they should try for the 7800 series and if they can the AMD Steamroller A-12 APU. The 7800 series would be the most powerful cards they can get and by the end of 2013 they should be able to get them at a very reasonable price. 7850's are selling for around $160 right now, and 7870's are going for around $230. By launch next year they should be getting them for $130 (7850) and $180 (7870) thanks to the launch of the 8000 series and competitive price drops. The A-12 APU should be a nice leap over the A-10 as well offering better performance for games, and possibly lower power consumption as well. We'll see come CES. By then a decision must be made.

kneon4161d ago

If you read the patent then you will see that it is unlikely that this is for the PS4. This is for a tablet, phone, laptop or handheld gaming device, though I expect it's unlikely to be the last one.

Ju4160d ago (Edited 4160d ago )

This has nothing to do with power consumption, even if possible in this configuration.

But what's much more interesting that this allows a "multi gpu" setup in a non-coherent setup using a "virtual" intermediate language (e.g. virtual or abstract shader language) which is compiled "on the fly" to the architecture underneath. It doesn't even specify what GPU is used. Theoretically it could run one shader "binary" and (re)compile for both AMD and NVidia (or what ever).

What that also allows them to do in the long run is to support (past?) and future machines with the same graphics language.

BTW: This could even go so far and run on a PS3 I imagine.

DeadlyFire4160d ago (Edited 4160d ago )

So CPU 301 may be a Cell processor? What? Okay I guess I know that PS3 games will be possible on the PS4 now if that maybe is more than a maybe. :P CPU 101 is likely main CPU or is it? Its possible a 2nd generation Cell design could exist along side their setup to function as PS3 support + extra muscle if needed?

GPU 103, 104, and GPU 303,304 = what? Possibly the same GPUs. Its an interesting puzzle. Does the new GPU combo emulate PS3 GPU alongside possible cell in CPU 301 or are they separate GPUs? I assume Platform 300 series would mean PS3 emulation. Wording this in a similar fashion to Microsoft's patent. Basically 300's perform as a PS3 would. 100's perform as a PS4 would. Microsoft does the same kinda thing, but in their own way. :P

Microsoft filled a similar patent awhile ago talking of CPU 302, CPU 304 with GPU 306, 308. Also with CPU 307, and GPU 309 mentioned. Ah here ya go. Lets compare! http://www.tomshardware.com...

It mentioned communication fabric. Which just so happens to be ARM powered support system that AMD is throwing in all their new chips in the future.

Timing of the filings revealing few months later make me believe Sony might be heading to early 2014 launch.

Looks like both plan on utilizing 2 GPUs or say GPGPU + APU? or say modern high end GPU with last generation GPU?

Its a puzzle on the power of said pieces of the puzzle and how they will function exactly. E3 we will see it all.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4160d ago
LOL_WUT4161d ago

@ bicfitness

"This is encouraging as it reinforces the idea that they will be going with power next gen. We don't need another Wii U."

Interesting ;)

4161d ago Replies(2)
GraveLord4161d ago

This seems to be less about power, and more about multi-tasking.

Blackdeath_6634160d ago

thats what i thought at first. i hope this is th case because multitasking was the ps3's weakest points. however i don't think it is about multitasking because that has to do with the RAM not the GPU's.

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney4161d ago (Edited 4161d ago )

@bicfitness

"Sony: We won't show PS4 until it can demonstrate 'a significant leap'"

http://n4g.com/news/1021333...

akaakaaka4160d ago (Edited 4160d ago )

Pc gamers, nintendo fanboys and cheap gamers
"Sony can't afford another hi end console"
"Ps4 will only have a small upgrade" lolzz

Ps4 will amaze anyoane and pc gamers stop hating and get exited because it only means pc games will also step up..

zeddy4160d ago

sounds good but i hope they dont make it too complicated for the devs. took 3rd party devs at least 3 years to master.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4160d ago
portal_24161d ago

I am so ready for next-gen.

TemplarDante4161d ago

APU (cpu+gpu)+GPU= 1TF+2.5TF = Samaritan demo+

Cue on my PS Orbis :)

Mac is OK4161d ago

The rumor was that the PS4 had a A8-3850 APU (with an integrated HD 6550D), and a HD 7670 for a discrete GPU.

Reference: http://www.ign.com/articles...

TemplarDante4161d ago

You're talking the Alpha kit from January.
The second kit was A10 APU solution only. The January 2013 kit is highly modified A10 Jaguar cores, maybe two APUs with two packs of four Jaguar Cores at 1.6ghz per core. HD6770 and a 2TF 8series GPU.
The future is nearly upon us :)

Mac is OK4161d ago

If they're now using a A10 they're probably using the A10-5800K, which has a 7660D.
I just hope the discrete GPU in the final version is better than a HD7670.

WiigotU4161d ago

So the article states could be. If thre going to release a new system without any issues wouldn't they need to already know so that they can make sure the system is stable and has no issues?

madjedi4160d ago (Edited 4160d ago )

Yeah just like the wiiu was stable day 1 and isn't suffering from a piss poorly optimismed os still, or other issues.

jjf4161d ago (Edited 4161d ago )

It's interesting in that clearly sony arn't relying on off the shelf components, sony clearly could'nt patent something AMD designed in the first place.

TemplarDante4161d ago

Its AMD using Sonys patent here..
There seems to be patent sharing between Sony, Microsoft, IBM and AMD ...
Remember the secret Sony-microsoft meetings..?
And the weird domain registrations..

Ju4160d ago (Edited 4160d ago )

The key is "different architectures". That's not what AMD (or any other vendor) does, because all SLI/X-Fire solutions require the same gpu on all end points. Sony's patent does not.

This is a layer above the metal. Like a VM for shaders.

joeorc4160d ago (Edited 4160d ago )

" That's not what AMD (or any other vendor) does, because all SLI/X-Fire solutions require the same gpu on all end points. Sony's patent does not. "

Slow down there. you may want to take a look at this:

AMD adds ARM processor as it looks beyond x86
AMD adds the Cortex-A5 processor with TrustZone technology to boost security on x86 chips

By Agam Shah
June 13, 2012

Advanced Micro Devices on Wednesday said it will integrate an ARM processor with upcoming x86 chips, marrying two rival architectures and ending more than a year of speculation around AMD's plans to use ARM technology.

Starting next year, AMD chips will integrate ARM's Cortex-A5 processor with TrustZone security technology. ARM processors are used in most of the smartphones and tablets that ship today, and TrustZone is found in all its Cortex-A processors.

TrustZone is a set of instructions that help secure mobile devices, mobile payments and streamed content. Netflix streams to some mobile devices are protected using TrustZone. AMD has signed a license with ARM for the Cortex-A5 processor, it said.

The integration of an ARM processor is one of the first big steps from AMD in a plan to overhaul its chip design strategy. Under a new management team, AMD said in February it would change its design methodology to allow the integration of third-party intellectual property, such as that from ARM.

AMD competes with Intel in the x86 processor market, where it has long struggled to significantly increase its market share. Intel and AMD both have virtually no presence in the tablet market, which is dominated by ARM. Rumors about AMD's plans to sign an ARM license have spread as growth in the PC market slowed and AMD plotted its next steps.

http://www.computerworld.co...

DO you think this is just for security alone?
Nvidia is doing the same with the Tegra a core set aside for Security. but also to reduce power.

aS AN EXAMPLE IN THE CASE OF THE PS3

the PS3's 8th core SPE was used in that process.
IT WAS DISABLED FOR GAMES AND DEVELOPER'S but not for the PS3 to use. That is why the developer's cannot see it or access it it was used for security only. Hacker's had to mimic that SPE core to Map memory and make a virtual copy of that SPE. they could not access it because it was closed off to outside sources. To this day the PS3 is still a 9 core processor. with the 8th spe disabled for everything but security.

EXAMPLE:

Sony expected to use IBM architecture in PlayStation 3
Bruce Gain

3/22/2002 10:21 AM EST

Additionally, the PS3, as well as other applications that will use the Cell, will take advantage of the CPU's "self healing" capability. "Self-healing computers will be programmed not to go down," Doherty said. "Bus and processor areas are automatically corrected using a new meshed era redundancy technology.

http://www.eetimes.com/elec... http://www.eetimes.com/elec...

NOTICE THAT WAS BACK IN 2002 , the SPE security core was a development that not only Sony was working on as you can see with Nvidia, AMD and IBM, TOSHIBA AND SONY!This use is not just for security, but also to be able to reduce process leak, and to lower requirement's in Heat dissipation.

Ju4159d ago

^^ That's totally unrelated and has absolutely nothing to do with Sony's patent.

I quote this directly from the link above just in case you have trouble comprehending:

Here’s the official description of the patent: ”Graphics processing in a computer graphics apparatus having architecturally dissimilar first and second graphics processing units (GPU) is disclosed. Graphics input is produced in a format having an architecture-neutral display list. One or more instructions in the architecture neutral display list are translated into GPU instructions in an architecture specific format for an active GPU of the first and second GPU.”

Here is the link to the patent: http://appft.uspto.gov/neta...

joeorc4159d ago (Edited 4159d ago )

^^ That's totally unrelated and has absolutely nothing to do with Sony's patent.

I quote this directly from the link above just in case you have trouble comprehending:

Here’s the official description of the patent: ”Graphics processing in a computer graphics apparatus having architecturally dissimilar first and second graphics processing units (GPU) is disclosed. Graphics input is produced in a format having an architecture-neutral display list. One or more instructions in the architecture neutral display list are translated into GPU instructions in an architecture specific format for an active GPU of the first and second GPU.”

what do you think the freaking Cell processor is?

IT HAS EVERY THING TO DO WITH THE PATENT! why ? because Sony was one of the first companies to design this type of system along with IBM, and Toshiba. do you really think it had nothing to do with it? really?

you did not look at the entire doc did you?
because if you did and you really did understand what you read you would know that yes they are in fact 100% related to this patent, hell there is a ref. to the Cell for pete sake right off the bat!
just read and look at the entire doc:

example

Other References:
Cell Broadband Engine Architecture, copyright International Business Machines Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment Incorporated, Toshiba Corporation Aug. 8, 2005 which may be downloaded at http://cell.scei.co.jp/.

http://www.freepatentsonlin...

you do know its a CPU/GPU hybrid chip right?

the PPE is a Power PC risc, with the SPE's being a processor element that has on board system memory.

i mean as an example on how this works is right in the body of the doc:

The CPU 301 may include one or more processing cores. By way of example and without limitation, the CPU 301 may be a parallel processor module, such as a Cell Processor. An example of a Cell Processor architecture is described in detail, e.g., in Cell Broadband Engine Architecture, copyright International Business Machines Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment Incorporated, Toshiba Corporation Aug. 8, 2005 a copy of which may be downloaded at http://cell.scei.co.jp/, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

The CPU 301 may be configured to run software applications and optionally an operating system. The software applications may include graphics processing software 303 portions of which may be stored in the memory 302 and loaded into registers of the CPU 301 and/or GPU Context Controller 305 for execution.

notice this: "CPU 301 and/or GPU Context Controller 305 for execution."

what does it say right in the very first part in the DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS?

This is accomplished using an architecture-neutral display list instruction set in software, and having a specialized piece of hardware (the “GPU Context Controller”) sit between the GPUs that translates the architecture-neutral instruction set into the architecture-specific instruction set of the given GPU:"

notice once again what they were talking about:

"This is accomplished using an architecture-neutral display list instruction set in software, and having a specialized piece of hardware (the “GPU Context Controller”) sit between the GPUs that translates the architecture-neutral instruction set into the architecture-specific instruction set of the given GPU:"

why do you think the Cell was made the way it was?

Show all comments (73)
120°

Why Xbox believes it must cut costs and close studios

Companies, particularly public companies like Microsoft, need to grow.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
gold_drake4h ago

i mean its pretty simple, they spent close to 30 billion in acquiring activision, they thought they'd make it bk no problem, and that didnt happen.

its just shit that because of MS's miscalculation alot of people lost their jobs.

Jingsing52m ago

This is exactly what many people said would happen including the CMA and FTC. Lies lies and more lies and they allowed a $69 billion buy out to happen.

gold_drake44m ago

oh yeh it was 70 billion. that was my bad haha even worse.

thesoftware73042m ago(Edited 37m ago)

gold,

You can't be serious, right?

Do you think that MS thought they would make 80bill in a year & Half? They haven't even released titles under MS yet, lol.

But in fact, that A/B revenue is already paying off, look at the last earnings call. That $80 billion is long-term money, my guy, no sane person/company would think they would make that back in any short-term situation, it's a long-term investment.

Let's play silly then. If MS's reason for laying off staff and closing studios was due(which it really was not) to the A/B deal, tell me what Sony's reason was for past studio closures, the recent 900-person layoffs, closing Sony London, shutting down Dreams, and closing Japan Studio? Zipper? Psygnosis? cuts at all their internal studios.

Keep in mind, you are claiming MS's reason is because of the A/B deal; please explain Sony's reason.

Hofstaderman33m ago

You actually still defending them? Sheesh.....

gold_drake31m ago

this is not a sony vs MS debate. dont make it something it isnt.

and of course not, but im pretty sure they thought they'd make more money after the deal. they didnt, and closed off some studios.

its pretty insane to think there is any other reason for the closure of studios in this case.

romulus2324m ago(Edited 24m ago)

(It really was) due to the Activision Blizzard deal and the loss of physical sales due to gamepass. You keep bringing up Sony in all your posts about this, stop deflecting and trying to change the topic, this is about MS and what they are doing.

anast53m ago

They are going to use AI for a large portion of the game development process. Upper management need bonuses and the shareholders need more money. So, people will lose their jobs.

Skuletor43m ago

Maybe they were already using AI to make business decisions, which would explain why they closed Hi-Fi Rush's studio, then said they need more games like Hi-Fi Rush not long after that announcement.

Crows9012m ago(Edited 11m ago)

They shouldn't have bought any studios. Some is okay...but they went on a shopping spree...stupid

100°

Former Dragon Age lead writer David Gaider pours scorn on EA's AI dreams.

"They want you to believe the devs under them are super stoked to work generative AI into their processes," continued Gaider, "but I assure you what they took as excitement was really a veiled wail of despair not unlike the time that team was informed of their new 'really cool' live service mandate.".

LordoftheCritics2d ago

Publishers see gaming as another stock market.

isarai2d ago

I think anyone with some common sense knew this, im glad i don't support their games anymore, what a sh!t company.

Psychonaut852d ago

Friends don’t let friends buy EA or Ubisoft.

Chocoburger2d ago

I said this yesterday. AI isn't what we want when it comes to crafting artistry. Alas, these soulless corporate morons don't care about their work, only about cutting corners as much as possible.

120°

Phil Spencer and the Battle for Xbox’s Soul

Has the rapid growth of Xbox made the ship too heavy? Following the closures of Tango Gameworks, Arkane Austin, and Roundhouse, we explore what the future of Xbox could look like.

LG_Fox_Brazil2d ago

This ship was never meant to sail, this ship was made from the get go to sink as fast as possible. It almost feels that they want to lower the standards of quality in the industry so that they can fit in

rlow12d ago

I disagree, Xbox from the get go innovated and changed the industry. They did a lot of firsts and standardized a lot of others. It wasn’t till the beginning of the Xbox1 era that things started to go south.

Stevonidas2d ago

Yep, although I’d argue it started going to shit when they tried to hock Kinect on their audience instead of continuing to invest in their studios and IPs. 2001-2010 Xbox was peak gaming, though.

rlow11d 23h ago

@Stevonidas
I agree they never should have focused on it after the 360 era. But you do have to remember they were faked out by the huge volumes of Kinects sold. To quote info on Wikipedia, “Project Natal, It was first released on November 4, 2010, and would go on to sell eight million units in its first 60 days of availability.” So if your Xbox and see these huge sales on a peripheral where are you going to put some money? Criticism in hindsight is worthless…..if only we could all see our future. In other wards they had no way of knowing. Plus they had engagement numbers and a lot of signs pointed to people wanting it.

Their biggest mistake wasn’t the Kinect, but unlike Sony after the PS3 debacle. They didn’t double on down on exclusive good games. The other huge mistake was letting Call of Duty go to Sony.

Hedstrom2d ago

Phil wants Xbox to be as soulless as him!

Tacoboto2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Xbox has no soul and Phil has no confidence, and it's impossible to say either do when they killed Tango and Arkane Austin.

Everything they've said since has only made them look worse to a point that they're actually less competent than Embracer.

Markdn2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Whe you release something like the series S and expect it not to hurt your business model, and developers have to have parity with games. Then you know Microsoft don't care. Series s is the final nail that broke developers,

Show all comments (12)