660°

Sony: We won't show PS4 until it can demonstrate 'a significant leap'

Sony is not prepared to demonstrate its PlayStation 4 console until the system can demonstrate 'a significant leap' in technology, the group chief executive of SCE has explained.

Andrew House appeared to challenge the emerging view that the next batch of game consoles will not provide a considerable leap in technology.

Read Full Story >>
computerandvideogames.com
4321d ago Replies(10)
NYC_Gamer4321d ago

I believe Sony wants to prove Nintendo wrong by bringing a much more powerful machine to the market that Wii-U

BrutallyBlunt4321d ago

Prove them wrong like they proved the Wii wrong with the Playstation 3 and then the Playstation Move? It's not all about technology, if it were the PC would be taking the lions den of all gaming related sales and software.

The Wii U shows a significant leap over the Wii and that is how it should be judged in the same context.

pixelsword4321d ago (Edited 4321d ago )

Great for Sony; I like that they will try to push the envelope.

My only concern (and I'm watching closely for this for the PS3 and 360) is that the machine is very reliable.

Trebius514321d ago

I doubt Sony would rush to market and release hardware that breaks 40% of the time like a certain other company did...

CommonSense4321d ago (Edited 4321d ago )

you mean Sony in 2000?

love the hypocrisy, btw. never gets old. ;)

as for the article...uh? PC already shows that there is a significant leap. plus, releasing new hardware would push developers to develop for it.

this is just excuse making...and it's super transparent. which means anyone that doesn't have a huge bias can see right through it.

LocutusEstBorg4321d ago

It's already designed. It cannot demonstrate anything more than it already can.

b163o14321d ago

@ CommonSince

That is why I hate PC gamers.

We get it dude, you can upgrade your PC to a graphical beast. PC gamers or I should say "Most" PC gamers seem to think graphics make the game. SMH....

T9004321d ago (Edited 4321d ago )

@b162o1

Stop kidding yourself. If anything its mostly about the games to PC gamers than anything else.

Check out the most played games on Steam, i can assure you they arent the graphical beasts.

Rather the mos tplayed games on Steam are:

Teamfortress 2
Dota 2
CS

http://store.steampowered.c...

PC gamers are still playing World of warcraft, Millions play it, Wow is no graphical beast.

Hell many PC gamers are playing Warcraft 3, which is 10 year old game now. I am personally playing Dota 1, which is a mod for Warcraft 3. Why are we playing these old games? Well thats because of the gameplay.

Coming back to the topic. I think Sony is only fooling their fanbase. Its clear the hardware that is far more powerful than current consoles is already out there. Sony and MS have taken too many losses this gen, which is why both of them want to be profiting of old hardware.

Its natural for console makers to fool their base, they do it because they can. Unfortunately most of the base on this site specially blindly follows whatever Sony has to say, its no secret.

Hence reasons being thrown are only excuses so they can profit of aging hardware.

@pixelsword

How did Sony push the envelope?

They released a console 1 year after MS, yet performance wise the differences are minimal. 1 year is a eternity in technological terms. Simple example is of a CPU or GPU released today definetely outperforms its 1 year old counterpart by atleast 1.5-2x performance.

When the Xbox 360 released it was atleast on par with high end PCs of that time, this is a fact.

When the PS3 released, it was barely equal to midrange PCs of that time.

Check this out:

http://www.anandtech.com/sh...

"Back when Sony announced the specifications of the PlayStation 3, everyone asked if it meant the end of PC gaming. After all Cell looked very strong and NVIDIA's RSX GPU had tremendous power. We asked NVIDIA how long it would take until we saw a GPU faster than the RSX. Their answer: by the time the PS3 ships. So congratulations to NVIDIA for making the PS3 obsolete before it ever shipped, as G80 is truly a beast. "

Sony hardly has been pushing any envelopes.

ShinMaster4321d ago (Edited 4321d ago )

like the difference we saw between PS2 and PS3.

I'm glad Sony isn't rushing the PS4.

decrypt4321d ago (Edited 4321d ago )

"Haven't seen a difference between the PS3 and PC,like the difference we saw between PS2 and PS3 "

Lol.

Multiplats on the PC make current consoles look a gen old, what are you on about?

Hypo much, i bet if Sony today announced PS4 most of you would be cheerleading and would be giving reasons how you are tired of old hardware.

ravinash4320d ago (Edited 4320d ago )

@T900.

Actually, PS3 was delayed from release for about a year due to licencing issues with the BlueRay...so yeah, it was year old tech when it came out.

But I'm more than happy if they hold off as long as possible before releasing the next gen.
1. because I don't have to buy a new console.
2. They are still bring out plenty of great games for this Gen.

While PC games in a lot of cases may have better graphics, their not so great that I'm sitting there thinking I MUST UPGRADE!!!

Besides, most PC owners PCs are a few years old.
Not everyone can keep constantly upgrading their graphics card for the latest games.

As for fooling the fan base...I think most just see it for what it is. A company making business decisions to wait a while before making the large investment in rolling out the next model.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 4320d ago
Ihaa4321d ago

If they want a significant leap at a good price point so they don't fuck themselves over, guess you guys got a few more years of wait.

N4g_null4321d ago

Wow I've seen the specs but I can't believe what he just said! This means they are going to wait on amd to get their price down. Or maybe they are waiting on tessalation to get better?

The leap included a significant leap in perceived polygon count along with a more interactive and effect friendly texturing system in the shader format.

To leap like that again you would need a tessalation engine that is 7x the performance we get on pcs. Deticated chips for shader based lighting.

Yet the ulimate leap would be loaded up hi res model like in zbrush and letting the hardware do all the scaling and mip map like operations.

Sonys only key is to develop or foster the development of chips that do this things. Sony really is dead in the water without new tech but these things take years to make unless you are nvidia and Amdati.

I believe we will get more of the last of us like games from them. I would love them to come up with a real solution yet I will call out hype ware at every turn.

In 3 more years the gtx 680 and 690 will be old gpus maybe we will see a ps4 then?

DarrenLambert4321d ago

I concur. Sony knows that slow and steady wins the race. None of this DVR, augmented reality, we own gaming by 2015, shove kinect down your throat nonsense. They plan, analyze, innovate and always deliver a product that goes above and beyond what is expected!

BrutallyBlunt4321d ago

Like coming out with the format UMD? How has slow and steady helped them in the TV division as of late? How about the portable music device, will it eventually outsell the IPod? Do you think their music store will entually overshadow ITunes too?

Such a vague statement you have there. You mention Kinect being shoved down peoples throat but where is the backing for Move? The Move is more accurate than both the Wii and Kinect but that doesn't matter if nobody supports it.

BitbyDeath4321d ago

LevelHead, why don't you keep a levelHead instead of hating all the time?

IHateYouFanboys4321d ago (Edited 4321d ago )

"None of this DVR, augmented reality"

really? might want to do your research:

Play TV/Torne - a DVR for the PS3: http://www.sony.com.au/prod...

Wonderbook/Eye of Judgement/EyePet etc - Augmented reality: http://www.gameinformer.com...

on topic,this is all just PR talk. they wont talk about the PS4 now because it would kill PS3 sales. rest assured, the final specs for the PS4 are mere months from being nailed down, if they arent already.

if they give Microsoft another 12 month lead, Sony will be out of the console race quicker than Sega after they released the dreamcast. With Windows 8, Surface, SmartGlass, Windows Phone 8, and the new Xbox all going to be intertwined like no devices before them, Sony is going to need to launch alongside them or theyll be left in the dust.

insomnium24321d ago (Edited 4321d ago )

@level

Kinect is indeed shoved down peoples throats. The 0.5 billion marketting campaigne made sure of that. What does Move have to do with this? What does music and TVs have to do with this?

You are not by any chance hating on Sony again just because you have a chance to do so are you...?

kikizoo4321d ago

"Sony is going to need to launch alongside them or theyll be left in the dust."

yeah sure "ihateyoumyself", like this gen, with best games and hardware, you never loose (dust is for gimmicks and inferior consoles)

"It's not all about technology, if it were the PC would be taking the lions den of all gaming related sales and software.
The Wii U shows a significant leap over the Wii and that is how it should be judged in the same context."

no, pc only takes the crown again, after 5,6 years best consoles are on the market, and they don't have best exclusives...

off course technology is important, sony always has best library, so if you want to compete with them, you have to beat them on hardware (and wiiu have to compete with X720, and ps4, not wii)

BrutallyBlunt4319d ago (Edited 4319d ago )

I was simply replying to the existing hate and turning it around on them. Funny how they don't like it when they see it from the other point of view.

@insomnium

Did you buy a Kinect? If not then tell me again how they are shoving it down your throat. I didn't buy one but i'm always interested in how it's progressing. If you pay little attention to the Kinect it wouldn't be so present. I purposely follow it because i'm interested. Instead you feel the need to follow the news about it, to post in articles about it to downplay it. That's the big difference. Which makes sense coming from a guy who says he put me on his ignore list only to keep responding to me. You're such a sad case.

I'm also not hating Sony, nothing could be further from the truth. I enjoy the products i own by them, what i don't like are idiots like you who are totally blinded by them and if people really want to see hate all they need to do is read what you say about Microsoft. I don't say anything that negative because unlike you i am not blinded by loyalty nor a fanboy.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4319d ago
yabhero4321d ago

And I don't think it's goig to happen...
Is see the gap as being ps2 to Xbox like...

Patriots_Pride4321d ago

So Sony wants to prove to Nintendo that they can release a beast of a console that would make the Wii U look inferior and price it at $599.99

I dont think that worked out well with the PS3 vs the Wii and I think Ninty would love for Sony to repeat history.

gatormatt804321d ago

Where did it say they were pricing the PS4 at $599???

"The right time to talk about new advances in hardware is when you can demonstrate a significant leap on the current experience, and something that is going to be attractive."

I believe what Sony is trying to say is show a significant leap at an affordable price.

BitbyDeath4321d ago

PS3 is profiting just fine and has been the best selling console for the past few years now.

Why do you think it is not working out for them?

Patriots_Pride4321d ago (Edited 4321d ago )

@Gatormatt - powerful cutting edge Technology is not cheap and Sony has proven that they do not hold back on any ot there hardware look at the Vita or Bravia tv's those things are beast.

BItby -Yes Sony is profiting but they also lost a large amount of potential customers from the Wii U and 360.

BitbyDeath4321d ago

Yea, but they did get other benefits out of having a higher price tag such as Blu-ray being in every box, winning over HD-DVD.

The only hardware component that may have been a bad investment would be Cell, and i guess we will have to wait and see what processor the PS4 uses to determine that.

gatormatt804321d ago

Patriots_Pride, yes technology isn't cheap, but, Sony is talking in terms of a significant leap from the PS3, not the PC or anything else mind you.

Lou Ferrigno4321d ago (Edited 4321d ago )

HAHA lolz @ Patriots_pride .. your a very ignorant soul man.. you start off with assumption based off of apsolutely NO knowledge whatsoever .. thats a good laugh ..

..is that your "prophecy" your sticking with?..
cuz its pretty lame.. and yes,i'm bashing your post because it was blindly ignorant and you needed to know that is all. ..good day sir :)-

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4321d ago
joab7774321d ago

What does this even mean? Don't they create the tech? I feel reassured that they are gonna make a huge leap forward but how long do we have to wait? Is he saying that it won't happen until a very powerful machine can be sold for under $500? Or r they waiting to release the next blue ray?

showtimefolks4321d ago

i believe them i just don't understand what's the hurry in getting to a ps4 or xbox720? if specs are only gonna have minor upgrades graphics/performance wise than what's the hurry?

i rather them be the last one out but atleast be good for next 8-10 years than needing another system after 4-5 years like xbox360 but stretching it out like MS has done

let's see what wii-u delivers than i would like sony and MS to be 50% more powerful than wii-u so we will actually be talking about something significant

but this is the internet age, invisible fanboys wars and when fanboys demand next gen console they are heard loud and clear

sak5004321d ago

LOL @common sense

Well said +bubbs

I suffered 2 broken ps2 and 2 broken 360 so why do people always highlight 360's issues?

Well significant leap would probably mean 240fps @ 2160p right since they said ps3 would be 120fps/1080. /jk

Anyway I hope next gen would be at least as big a jump as PS3 was on Ps2 and 360 was on Xbox.

insomnium24321d ago (Edited 4321d ago )

They said PS3 would SUPPORT 120fps/1080p iirc. Give me a link that says otherwise or you are just trolling with that remark.

Saying it WILL DO 120fps/1080p is in a totally different ballpark than the actual claim of SUPPORTING 120fps/1080p. But I guess none of this matters. If people WANT to hate they will hate no matter what.

OH and btw the leap between PS2--> PS3 is bigger that xbox--> X360. Just FYI.

Imalwaysright4321d ago

Maybe because the 360 is without any doubt the most unreliable product ever made? How much was it? Oh yeah 47% of 360 bricking on people, nearly HALF of them sold!

metroid324321d ago (Edited 4321d ago )

Yes but it will be in say 2015 thats when you can show a significant leap and guess what Nintendo could use a 6 core version of the CPU and stick it in a WiiU 2.0 just so they can have all games run at ultra settings ect in 1080p/60fps its not hard as Nintendo have a machine that can do 1080p/60fps on most games with High settings,so no biggie to be honest just allowing Nintendo to get most gamers on their machine,and by the time PS4 hits weather it be 2013 or 2015 a WiiU 2.0 that does ultra setting effects in 1080p/60fps can easily be on shelves because thats all a more powerful console can do anyway the same games as WiiU just at higher settings END OF.

The 360 did a 2 console design the Elite and the standard the Elite did a better resolution ect Sony are trying to buy time so tech gets better and they can be this wow factor,but i don't see it i mean gamers would have been playing WiiU games at 1080p/60fps with better AA ect,a significant leap from here would be way too expensive until 2014/2015 and then guess what its too late and your Sony gamers will not wait that long when you can play starcraft and Zelda on WiiU SORRY SONY. EPIC FAIL ??

DARK WITNESS4321d ago

"The 360 did a 2 console design the Elite and the standard the Elite did a better resolution"

where did you get that info from?

There is no difference between the two machines in terms of resolution. the only difference is the HD storage.

I have had both an arcade and an elite and there is no difference when you play games on them.

NobodyImportant4321d ago

"as Nintendo have a machine that can do 1080p/60fps on most games with High settings"

What are you talking about?

Currently ALL Nintendo first party games that have been demoed are running at 720p. And ALL of them except Mario Bros Wii U run at 30fps.
Wii Fit U has no AA!
Pikmin 3 ran at 720p 30fps at E3. Nintendo say they'll "get it up to" 60fps by the time it launches, but that is a long way from doubling the resolution up to 1080p.

The Wii U is going to be another 720p console.
Nothing wrong with that.
It will improve upon what we have with the PS3 and 360, just don't expect 1080p on your big budget games. You might get it with a couple of simple indy titles, sidescrollers etc, but COD, Assassin's Creed, Mass Effect aren't going to run 1080p.

So when the PS4, 720 launch gamers won't have been used to playing in 1080p60. They'll still have been playing 720p.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 4319d ago
TopDudeMan4321d ago

The future of where my money will most likely be going.

remanutd554321d ago

Motorstorm as ps4 launch title = sold

SonyStyled4321d ago

i think evolution studios is outta ideas with motorstorm settings. but if they were to make a new motorstorm i would like to see a motorstorm global festival title, consisting of settings from all 4 games =sold!

remanutd554321d ago

thats what i want to, Motorstorm world festival , i would love to see island, desert, arctic and even water levels, i mean imagine racing on moving boats? that would be so awesome!!!

Wizziokid4321d ago

I'm a fan of this tactic, I don't see a point in starting a new generation of consoles unless there is a significant leap.
If MS follow this idea or not is another story, if they don't and Sony do decide to hold off it could hurt them.

With games like The Last of Us and Beyond: two souls coming out it shows that the PS3 still does have some life yet and these games make me content to wait a little longer for some amazing new tech.

Now on The Wii U on the other hand, well like MS (I think) said they are kind of in a Generation of there own so I don't mind them bringing out the new console, I will be purchasing one myself (queue hate).

ravinash4320d ago

It's this part of the life cycle is where Sony investment will start to pay off.
Towards the end of the cycle it gets harder and harder to squeeze the last little bit of power out of the processor.
So while the Cell is harder to program for, there is more there so that when the 1st party companies get to work with and push it that little bit further.

Only downside of that was being harder, the 3rd parties couldn't quite keep the same standard as the easier processors.

Show all comments (171)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies14d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken14d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga14d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken14d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6414d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long14d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197214d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic14d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 14d ago
DivineHand12514d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91314d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer14d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91313d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit13d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 13d ago
Christopher14d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6913d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit13d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher14d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken14d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197214d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic14d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2314d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218314d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder14d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts14d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)
80°

Sony May Soon Let You Decide How Much NPCs Talk In Games

Sony has patented to add multiple dialogue modes to let players switch between how many conversations with NPCs they want in the game.

blackblades20d ago

Sony is like the only ones outta the 3 that has atuff like like this pop up changing thing in ways.

just_looken20d ago

Sony in the past has always been first at bat with new ideas/tech but in the end never fully use it or just toss it away.

blackblades20d ago

I think they did use some but yeah most usually never happened but at least they thought about it. Sony seeks things like this and other, Nintendo seek different ways of playing going by there different controler designs and console designs.

just_looken20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

some of the other stuff sony want's/owns never used
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://www.eurogamer.net/s...
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03...
https://decrypt.co/114754/s...

monitor/adjust game difficultly as you play
https://www.techradar.com/g...

Sony nfts
https://www.theblock.co/pos...

Pay ai to play the game for you
https://thebusinessofesport...

Oh all the above last 12 months

I just imagine a evil scientist with test subjects when it comes down to sony recent patent reports.

Kaii20d ago

Will we get dialogue options that won't spoil puzzles in a matter of seconds? :p

280°

Judge rules in PlayStation's favour in $500m patent infringement lawsuit

Genuine Enabling Technology was seeking damages, claiming the tech allowing PlayStation consoles and controllers to communicate infringes its rights.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
S2Killinit22d ago

Big victory for Sony. And a long time coming.

DarXyde22d ago (Edited 22d ago )

Crazy to think the savings from this lawsuit allows them to develop one AAA game.

Make it Bloodborne 2, please and thank you.

22d ago
Profchaos22d ago

Sounds like patent trolling they tried the same thing against Nintendo with the same pattern.

Motion and control input traversing over higher and lower frequencies seperate from each other allowing the controller to do both

Pyrofire9522d ago

Patents suck. Most of them are complete garbage.

Knightofelemia22d ago

So to recoup the money Genuine is going to take on Nintendo or Microsoft next. I hate patent lawyers they are some of the worst bottom feeders out there.

Show all comments (13)