90°

Do Video Games REALLY Need Leading Men?

With games on current generation consoles blurring the lines between Hollywood-style epic narratives and conventional gameplay, the voice actors behind the lead characters in our favorite games can be crucial to the overall experience.

Even with the video game industry enjoying consistent growth while the movie industries try to re-invent themselves, the actors so crucial to the success of these games still don’t get the type of love Hollywood actors get.

There are obvious reasons voice actors for the most part aren’t elevated to mainstream celebrity status. On one hand, it’s understandable average players don’t associate the voice of their favorite character with the voice actor, given the fact that, unlike a movie, they’re not actually staring at the actor’s face for two hours. Of course, the “acting” isn’t the main entertaining aspect of a game; the gameplay is.

The question is, how important are these voice actors to the overall experience of a game?

Read Full Story >>
jacehallshow.com
Tired4568d ago

I like Nolan North, the guy is truly talented...his dubbing credits etc show just how versatile he is.

However more often than not he seems to just use his default voice. Maybe it's because he is now so famous..he doesn't have to work so hard.

But hearing the same voice in a different setting kind of ruins the experience a little for me.

He's a voice actor...he should be using different voices...the man has proved he can do it...so why doesn't he?

Do studio's think having the same voice as a popular franchise will give their own work more gravitas? It puts me off.

The same can be said for Claudia Black...love her work...was really excited to hear her in some games but that quickly became...oh it's Claudia again...i wonder if she's going to change her delivery in this game or is her character in this game just 'Claudia black'...again. In games at least she seems to have checked her acting skills at the door.

Voice actors should be more versatile than movie actors, movie actors can get away with using their own voices because there is so much more to their performance. Voice actors have to be 10 times better. And sadly that's not the case at the moment.

The main problem with video game dialogue is that actors are rarely together when recording takes place. 90% of acting is re-acting. They have nothing to react to. So it always sounds disjointed.

One actor might think a line is written angrily and react to that anger and shout his next line, but if the lead up line is delivered in a non-plussed way then that angry reaction is totally out of context.

DragonKnight4566d ago

Now, I may be misunderstanding you, but you do know that as the same character for 3 games, Nolan North CAN'T change his voice while as Drake right? It would be stupid and wrong. People tend to gravitate to what they are familiar with and use what works. Why put something pretty guaranteed to be a success at risk just because you want to hear a different voice?

AlienFodder4566d ago (Edited 4566d ago )

I think what he means is that Nolan North should have used a different kind of voice for the various characters that he's played so far. For example, Nathan Drake sounds exactly the same as Desmond Miles in Assassin's Creed and the Prince of Persia in the 2008 version of the series and that, for some people, can prevent a full immersion into the game.

That being said, I tend to agree but for some reason I no longer see Nathan Drake in my head whenever I hear Desmond Miles. Took me a while to get there but it's no longer an issue.

DragonKnight4566d ago

See, now I didn't even know he did the voice of Desmond Miles. But then again, it could be just because Desmond is so not a focus of the AC games that you don't even notice. Didn't know he did the voice of the Prince either. I tend not to care too much about little things like that and rather focus on the actual gameplay and stuff. I'm not a critic, nor a game tester, so why should I care about little nuances between games like why Nolan North didn't make his voice deeper or sound stupid?

Pikajew4568d ago

Men and woman are equal so it doesn't matter what gender the lead is.

ATi_Elite4568d ago

You gotta have a main character:

Man, Woman, Mutant, Alien, Droid, etc...

110°

MultiVersus Joker Trailer With Mark Hamill

Here is a look at the new Joker Trailer. Warner Bros. Games today released a new MultiVersus trailer revealing the first look at gameplay for The Joker, who will join the roster as a playable character when the upcoming free-to-play platform fighter videogame launches on May 28th.

80°

Batman Arkham City in 2024 – How Well Does It Hold Up?

GB: "With this feature, we take a look back at the incredible Batman: Arkham City with the aim of analyzing it from the perspective of a 2024 release."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
500°

Spider-Man 2 Metacritic review score means Marvel still hasn’t beaten DC

Reviews are finally out for Marvel's Spider-Man 2, and the game's Metacritic review score means Marvel still hasn't toppled DC.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
CrashMania210d ago (Edited 210d ago )

The Arkham games are largely excellent, a shame they are being followed up by that god awful looking suicide squad game.

RaidenBlack210d ago

All 4 Arkham games are just amazing...
With the Gotham Knights turning out sub par, hope the Suicide Squad fails as well... So that both Rocksteady and WB Montreal goes back to creating good single player DC games ...
A batman beyond game maybe?

anal_vegan_moans210d ago

Having the game fail would make it harder for them to get funding for their next game, please don't wish this on them. They already delayed the game a whole year after backlash, so we still have to wait and see how it will turn out.

GhostScholar209d ago

I think asylum and origins were great. City was good. Knight was horrible.

210d ago
Ezio2048210d ago

You can't expect a game to match 96-94 meta apple for apple. Different era and different gen. No need to diminish either game's achievement. Arkham City and Spiderman 2 are both amazing sequels that improved upon their already incredible first parts.

Tacoboto210d ago

To back that up, there are major websites that adjusted their review scales.

IGN used to have a 100 point system; now it's a 10 point system. I remember GameSpot back in 2004 was razed for giving Halo 2 a 9.4 when IGN gave it like a 9.7 or 9.8

darthv72210d ago

Arkham Asylum was great, but when City came out... wow what a total overhaul that was. Nothing has had that type of night/day difference in scope and scale since.

SM2 is looking to be a great game in itself. Definitely an upgrade over the previous entries. Just from the opening battle with sandman, it gives me god of war 2 vibes with how that one opened with the battle with colossus of rhodes. That is still one of my favorite sequels of all time.

Zeke68210d ago

Thanks for the spoiler how the game starts loser...

darthv72210d ago

Zeke... you've had plenty of time to play god of war 2.

GaboonViper210d ago

And right on cue, here comes the downplaying of Insomniacs masterpiece, not gonna work, this game is gonna be beast in success.

BehindTheRows210d ago

From the same folks who gave it a 10/10 no less.

Aloymetal210d ago

'' here comes the downplaying of Insomniacs masterpiece''
You know that train is never late.

isarai210d ago

Oh look, another trash article from Videogamer

Show all comments (48)