KillerWolverine Writes: During this console generation, it’s hard to find a first-person shooter/horror game. There are more than enough of normal shooters that take you for the same ride but, as a shooter fan, I kind of want something more. And F.E.A.R. delivers that. The games combine two of my favorite genres and keeps me on the edge of my seat the entire play-through. And F.E.A.R. 3 continues that atmosphere while still keeping familiar shooter elements.
DualShockers Writes "F.E.A.R. 3 (or F.3.A.R. if you’re a marketing executive) isn’t a great singleplayer game. It’s fine, competent even, but Day One Studios had an unenviable task in trying to wrap up Monolith’s F.E.A.R. series. With two timelines and two highly different styles of horror attempted in its wake, F.E.A.R. 3, well, it tries its best."
F.E.A.R. 3 wasn't even really a horror game when it came to the campaign. It was a good action game, but lost just about all of its horror roots along the way.
There have plenty of great horror games, but others haven't been so lucky as to stick around. They deserve to get a new lease on life.
That was probably the first time ever that I saw Castlevania in a list of horror games.
ps: Be warned, you have to click a lot to see every game in the list. I stopped after the 4th time.
What is divergent co-op and how could more games benefit from it?
Nobody's playing this game and is actually a ton of fun...
would be an 8.5 if the multiplayer actually worked. And the OP is rediculous. out of the four MP modes, two of them have to be unlocked via PSN or XBL. Another hand of control at the expense of a full product and ownership, thanks! Will be returning this game soon.
and why didn't they advertise their game better? it has no buzz whatsoever
Dont know why every1 thinks this game is good its an ok FPS and yes the online is quite good but for a FEAR game it sucks, i already traded it in for the MUCH better Shadow of the Damned..