180°

Update: Microsoft Responds to NSA and GCHQ Spying Allegations

Microsoft has responded to the claims that NSA and GCHQ spied on Xbox Live communications, saying it hasn't seen any evidence to support that it happened and it wasn't sanctioned if it did.

A spokesperson told Eurogamer, "We're not aware of any surveillance activity. If it has occurred as reported, it certainly wasn't done with our consent."

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Gazondaily3790d ago (Edited 3790d ago )

"We're not aware of any surveillance activity. If it has occurred as reported, it certainly wasn't done with our consent."

Well there you go. I don't understand why people are naive when it comes to NSA's under-handed tactics, especially in light of the Snowden fiasco. People need to read up on the NSA and CIA and how notorious they are in their dealings.

The NSA operates outside the legal sphere and they'll continue to justify it under the vague umbrella of security and protection. There is very little corporations can really do to combat this. In fact, I imagine there will be a lot of pressure by these security organisations on corporations to comply with their requests in the interest of security.

NYC_Gamer3790d ago

The NSA/CIA are known to spy on people/different countries without anyone having a clue

ZodTheRipper3790d ago

It wouldn't be spying if we'd knew about it :D
I'm just saying that I have become more careful in the last months... if I would be a NSA Agent Microsoft, Apple and a few other big corporations would be my first targets ...and I would make sure that they don't know what I'm doing.

Eonjay3790d ago

I find it difficult to wrap my head around the idea that Microsoft would be unaware. Even if they don't condone it, these are the software guys. Could the NSA be so good that they could allude Microsoft within their own network? Serious question.

Excalibur3790d ago (Edited 3790d ago )

@Eonjay

Beat me to it, are they that good, is your network that vulnerable, are you guys that incompetent or are you flat out lying about knowing?
Again Serious question.

And for those that say they don't care or have nothing to hide just remember what Benjamin Franklin said,

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty."

Gazondaily3790d ago (Edited 3790d ago )

"Could the NSA be so good that they could allude Microsoft within their own network? "

I don't see why not. This is the NSA we are talking about after all. I suspect that the NSA's 'coverage' is far more extensive than a lot of people think.

Remember the movie Enemy of the State featuring Will Smith? I expect that the monitoring is as extensive as the old chap in the movie suggests; if you say the words that are remotely Islamic or even other words that are of interest, just expect your call to be traced. If you are a Muslim or a person of interest, just expect every thing to be monitored.

I'm probably an idiot for shouting Allah u Akbar whilst smashing my c4 laden jeep into enemy tanks on Battlefield 3 but hey, I aint got nothing to hide.

Omg just remembered, I even made a video ages ago when our clan was appropriately called Team Jihad.

[Edit] found the video lol.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

maddskull3790d ago

@septic no need to be racist and you people use Allah Akbar like it is a game for you but you should respect other religions and don't say anything before knowing what it means please even if you didn't mean to harm the Muslims your comment is offensive to us and people like you should know that not all Muslims are terrorists if you ever went to a Muslim country you would see that the people their are civilized and very friendly the minority are terrorists probably the american criminals are more than the Muslim terrorists and you should be aware of what you say please

Gazondaily3790d ago

@madskull

I am a Muslim.

Gh05t3790d ago

Another thing you need to remember is the information is sent outside of Microsoft to your house and back. This is primarily where the NSA gathers it's information. It takes it mid transit and then they can do what they want with it without you or MS knowing the information was gathered. This is how they get away with spying on Americans without a warrent. Now as far as MS servers off of US soil they have been known to hack in and gather information from the inside. Just read about what they did to Google in South America. Google has redundancy backed up in other countries so the NSA just hacks into those databases and steals the backed up info circumventing US laws because it's on foreign terrotory. They also steal the information as it travels to and from the US.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3790d ago
DragonKnight3790d ago

Are you serious? This has PR response written all over it. You're telling me that Microsoft, the first company to jump on board of the PRISM program, and build a backdoor into every windows OS since PRISM began for the NSA to use, and allows the NSA to monitor Skype (which Microsoft also monitors), and hotmail, and has admitted that Kinect WILL be used BY THEM for biometric data gathering for advertisements, DIDN'T know and WEREN'T on board with the NSA using Kinect for their own spying?

B.S.

Microsoft wants to use Kinect for advertising and allowing the NSA to use it for spying allows them a massive government loop hole to do so and get away with it all while acting like they don't condone it. When it's revealed that MS did in fact know, because it's always revealed that they know, they're going to once again say "we didn't have a choice, and we're fighting for your privacy" which is another load of bull.

If Microsoft truly cared about the privacy of their consumers, they'd simply lockout the NSA, sue them, and take the fight to them in court hard. But this is a convenient method for Microsoft to make millions in ad revenue and use the government as a scapegoat.

Honestly, with how many times Microsoft have outright lied straight to everyone's faces, how anyone can blindly accept a "we didn't know about it" from them is either naivety or stupidity. These are the same people that claimed ignorance about the Xbox 360's RROD. Come on now.

Excalibur3790d ago (Edited 3790d ago )

@DragonKnight

"If Microsoft truly cared about the privacy of their consumers, they'd simply lockout the NSA, sue them, and take the fight to them in court hard. But this is a convenient method for Microsoft to make millions in ad revenue and use the government as a scapegoat."

Or even more simply, not ship a Kinect with every system, give people the choice to be spied on by running out and buying the camera as a separate attachment if they wish.

Gazondaily3790d ago

"If Microsoft truly cared about the privacy of their consumers, they'd simply lockout the NSA, sue them, and take the fight to them in court hard. But this is a convenient method for Microsoft to make millions in ad revenue and use the government as a scapegoat. "

Either you're vastly overestimating MS or underestimating exactly who the NSA are. Sue the NSA and enforce a 'simple lockout'? This is the NSA for crying out loud.

Anyway, even if MS are as complicit as you suggest (but for the sake of making millions in ad revenue??) it realistically doesn't a change a thing. No corporation is exempt from the NSA's probing.

DragonKnight3790d ago (Edited 3790d ago )

@Excalibur: Exactly.

@Septic: Firstly, read Excalibur's post. Secondly, you act as though the NSA know Microsoft's software and hardware better than them and can just force their way into it whenever they want to. That's an extreme showing of ignorance and an overstatement of what the NSA is capable of. Microsoft is a software corporation that's been around for decades. You're asking people to believe that a company with that kind of history is suddenly made incompetent by the National Security Agency?

You're asking people to accept the possibility that Microsoft knows less about software they designed than the NSA. So much so that they can't detect someone using it for methods beyond what they designed it for in an environment as controlled as home consoles. Microsoft can detect a modified console in seconds and lock it out automatically, but they can't detect the NSA using Kinect to spy on people and can't lock them out?

Come on now, I know you have to see how illogical that sounds.

**EDIT** The government isn't above being sued. They've been sued before and lost, they can be sued again and even if Microsoft doesn't win, the NSA will still have more than they want exposed to the world.

Volkama3790d ago

Yeah! If Microsoft really cared about the security they would just remove the wi-fi and ethernet connections from the console! They're only in this business cos they want the NSA to see my "concentrating" face while I play Battlefield!

Gazondaily3790d ago

@Dragon

"That's an extreme showing of ignorance and an overstatement of what the NSA is capable of."

Really? Do you work for the NSA? Are you not aware of Snowden's disclosure about how the NSA operates and just how powerful the organisation is? Yet somehow, you think MS being a software company being around for decades makes them invulnerable to NSA's attempts?

So are you suggesting that the MS's online infrastructure is completely hack free? I mean, its not like normal every day hackers can hack into it right?

It's just silly. You've admitted to being on a MS rampage a lot of the times but I just don't see why you try to leverage your agenda here.

And you know what, I'm not even saying that MS were definitely not complicit. I'm just saying that, if the NSA wanted to, they would get that info straight away. And you're saying government organisations get sued. THAT is supremely naive because organisations like the CIA still exist after decades of downright immoral activity. Read up on the CIA (formerly the OSS).

All I'm saying is, is this, MS, like other companies, and this includes Sony, are not free from the NSA and other security organisations.

DragonKnight3790d ago (Edited 3790d ago )

@Volkama: Your response makes only you laugh. The issue is the Kinect. No Kinect equals no biometric spying. How is the NSA going to use the fact that you're playing a game at that moment to any useful advantage? If you're going to be sarcastic, at least be smart.

@Septic: I know who the NSA are, I also know that nothing is hackproof. However you don't seem to appreciate how controlled the console environment is. For example, the PSN "hack" wasn't actually a hack. Someone logged on with credentials that didn't belong to them and were found out. You're asking people to believe Microsoft can pinpoint a hacked console, but can't pinpoint a piggyback signal within their own Kinect device. That is either an immense overstatement of what the NSA is capable of, or a massive indictment against Microsoft's competence to keep their own controlled environment under their control.

"It's just silly. You've admitted to being on a MS rampage a lot of the times but I just don't see why you try to leverage your agenda here."

This statement is irrelevant to the discussion. You can attempt to discredit me because I don't think Microsoft are good for gaming, and their actions support that opinion, but you can't discredit common sense. The NSA using Kinect to spy works to Microsoft's advantage, not to their disadvantage. Microsoft has flat out lied before, or are you going to try and deny that too? If you do, I have evidence to disprove your denial ready and waiting.

I never said "sue them out of existence." I don't know where you got that idea from. I said that if Microsoft truly were all about their consumer's privacy, they'd wage a very public legal battle against the NSA, because they can. But why do so when what the NSA is doing benefits them so much?

You overestimate what the NSA can legally do. Don't misunderstand a lack of action against them as permission to continue to do whatever they want to. The American government rules based on fear, not on law. Sony is a Japanese company, the NSA can't encroach on Sony without the permission of the Japanese government and would be in a far worse position if it was found out that they tried to pull the same tactics with Sony as they are with MS.

All you've succeeded with here is to state that you believe Microsoft to be grossly incompetent with their own systems, and yet I'm the one with the anti-Microsoft agenda.

creatchee3790d ago

Wow... Do you guys really think that the NSA are a bunch of bumbling fools hunched over a computer in D.C.? Wake up. It's 2013 and the best hackers in the world aren't in their parent's basement - they're contracted by government agencies.

Gazondaily3790d ago

@dragon

"I never said "sue them out of existence." I don't know where you got that idea from."

And I don't know where you got THAT from. Where did I say the NSA could be sued out of existence?

"You overestimate what the NSA can legally do. "

Who is saying what NSA is doing is legal at all? Look at the Snowden leaks and just how extensive the NSA's probing was. How much of that was legal??

"Sony is a Japanese company, the NSA can't encroach on Sony without the permission of the Japanese government"

Again, you're being supremely naive. Like I said before in my FIRST POST:

"The NSA operates outside the legal sphere"

Seriously, did you not follow the Snowden fiasco? How much of what he leaked struck you as being legal?

"All you've succeeded with hear is to state that you believe Microsoft to be grossly incompetent with their own systems, and yet I'm the one with the anti-Microsoft agenda"

You're making assumptions here. I'm not just singling out MS, I'm singling out every corporation out there. You however, seem to think Microsoft are solely to blame here and that Sony's jurisdiction somehow exempts them from the NSA's probing.

DragonKnight3790d ago (Edited 3790d ago )

@creatchee: It's funny how you actually believe that. The best hackers in the world don't work for the government, they work for corporations whose systems they've hacked before. Corporations pay better than the government.

@Septic: "And I don't know where you got THAT from. Where did I say the NSA could be sued out of existence?"

I got it from this: "THAT is supremely naive because organisations like the CIA still exist after decades of downright immoral activity."

Given the context of that comment in response to mine, the logical assumption to make is that you assumed a "sue out of existence" paradigm.

"Who is saying what NSA is doing is legal at all? Look at the Snowden leaks and just how extensive the NSA's probing was. How much of that was legal??"

Justified by Obama publicly, challenged by no one legally. We agree that it was illegal, but you're acting as though there is nothing that can be done to stop it and there is. Especially in a closed environment.

"Again, you're being supremely naive. Like I said before in my FIRST POST:"

And you obviously haven't paid attention to the Snowden leaks either. The NSA perform illegal acts in their own country, but they've also attempted at gaining foreign partnership with PRISM as well. You're acting as though the NSA is beyond consequence on a global scale. That shows true naivety. Just because they get away with what they do in the U.S. out of complicit acts or due to fear, doesn't mean that that flies with the rest of the world. You're asking people to believe that Obama will allow international incidents to occur with his support of blanket privacy violations all over the world.

I have seen that PRISM means the NSA will not be held accountable for spying on non-U.S. citizens without justification or a warrant, but you are sounding as though the NSA is untouchable and infallible in their machinations and that's simply not true.

"You're making assumptions here. I'm not just singling out MS, I'm singling out every corporation out there. You however, seem to think Microsoft are solely to blame here and that Sony's jurisdiction somehow exempts them from the NSA's probing."

Pardon me but, of the two of us, who brought up Sony? That's right, it was you. This article, and this discussion, is about Microsoft and Microsoft only. When you provide proof that the NSA is using the Playstation Camera in the PS4 to spy on everyone, feel free to write up an article about it on your site and have a discussion about Sony then. Until then, this is about Microsoft so any discussion involving Sony or anyone else is off topic. But of course, it is impossible to conceive of anyone taking issue with Microsoft unless they are a Sony fanboy right?

Gazondaily3790d ago

"Given the context of that comment in response to mine, the logical assumption to make is that you assumed a "sue out of existence" paradigm. "

Er..no, not at all.

"You're acting as though the NSA is beyond consequence on a global scale. That shows true naivety. "

Tell me, what has been the consequence of the Snowden Leaks? What sanctions were placed on the NSA?

"You're asking people to believe that Obama will allow international incidents to occur with his support of blanket privacy violations all over the world. "

HOW?? How am I asking anyone to believe that? Obama hasn't even properly acknowledged the extent of what's happening in his country let alone the world!

"Pardon me but, of the two of us, who brought up Sony? That's right, it was you"

Yes it was me and stop trying to accuse me of trying to derail the topic when all I said was the following:

"All I'm saying is, is this, MS, like other companies, and this includes Sony, are not free from the NSA and other security organisations."

You do this all the time. Make mountain out of molehills and your whole argument is based on this cyclical logic. You're so stubborn that I just can't have a productive discussion with you at all. This is why it's hard to take anything you say seriously.

MS are evil, Kinect is a primarily a spying device, NSA act illegally but only in the US. MS are completely complicit with the NSA. The NSA does not have the ability to access information unless Microsoft provides them with it. Microsoft not suing the NSA is conclusive proof that Kinect is a spying device.

Seriously, I'm just going to go back and forth with you. You need to learn how the world really works.

DragonKnight3790d ago

"Tell me..."

You're mistaking inaction for permission or legal right. Just because no one has YET to act, doesn't mean they never will, aren't making plans to do so, or that the NSA is incapable of facing consequences.

"HOW??..."

You're the one that stated that foreign companies aren't above NSA encroachments are you not? We know Obama supports PRISM so you must be saying that Obama supports international incidents that could happen due to PRISM right?

"Yes it was me..."

There was no reason to bring Sony into the discussion, you only did so to try and remove any blame on Microsoft. Today, at this very moment, there is literal proof that the Kinect is used to spy. Microsoft themselves have stated they will use the Kinect to collect biometric data for advertising, explain to everyone how this couldn't be a symbiotic relationship where both the NSA and Microsoft get exactly what each of them want?

"You do this all the time...."

The only thing you consider a productive discussion is the individual you are discussing with agreeing with your point, and disregarding their's. My entire point, which I made in my very first comment, is that of course Microsoft is going to feign ignorance of this. They've done it before and they will continue to do so until irrefutable proof of their involvement is brought to light.

My point was always that the NSA using Kinect to spy works to Microsoft's advantage because they themselves want to use it for biometric data mining for advertisers. You've done nothing to refute that statement except to try and make everyone believe that the NSA is just doing this on their own and that Microsoft are so incompetent at their jobs that they didn't know it.

I've already provided you with examples of how Microsoft can detect hacks, modified consoles, and the like and you still want people to believe that Microsoft are just stupid, and couldn't possibly know that the NSA were doing this. Your loophole to any counter argument is that even if they did know, they can't stop it. You don't provide any reason why except to say "because it's the NSA".

The entirety of your argument is "The NSA are all-powerful, they can do things without people knowing about it, so Microsoft is off the hook."

This completely disregards every step of Microsoft's involvement with PRISM, ignores the fact that if the NSA were so technically superior then they wouldn't need the assistance of Microsoft to spy on people via Windows or Skype, and whittles Microsoft's experience and technical knowledge over decades to that of an amateur programmer.

Do I acknowledge that the NSA act illegally? Of course I do, I never stated otherwise. Do I acknowledge that the NSA are good at their job? Again, of course I do. But we're talking about a controlled environment here. Microsoft knows literally everything about what goes on with their console's systems because they designed every aspect of it. To believe that they wouldn't see a foreign piece of data within their closed system, even though they routinely ban instances of that very thing, is to either make the statement that Microsoft are grossly incompetent, complicit in what the NSA is doing, or that the NSA is the most technically superior organization on the entire planet and has been since their inception.

Volkama3790d ago

@Dragonknight, my example is just as reasonable as your "they should remove kinect" theory.

You're saying they should limit the design and capability of the console to prevent the NSA from taking advantage of it. Removing network capability would do that same thing.

Your posts are very tedious in all, you could learn a thing or two from the other raving fanboy zealots on this site. All the extra words don't make your arguments any more valid or reasonable.

DragonKnight3790d ago (Edited 3790d ago )

@Volkama: Your argument is ridiculous. First of all, Excalibur made the statement about removing Kinect, not me. Secondly, this statement...

"You're saying they should limit the design and capability of the console to prevent the NSA from taking advantage of it."

Is hilariously erroneous. There's nothing that the Kinect is doing that can't be done with the controller, so removing the Kinect won't impede the console in any way.

Removing wi-fi will have the desired effect as you say, but that actually WILL impede the console due to removing half of every gaming experience and the bulk of all the console's features. Given that the NSA is specifically using the camera for spying, it stands to reason that removing the camera will immensely impact their results thanks to the fact that it provides more comprehensive data than simply spying on text based messages.

Your hyperbole does nothing to further the discussion, or ingratiate your point on anyone, and you really only posted it because you have a high opinion of your own sense of sarcastic humour that no one else shares.

**EDIT** @XboxFun: So MS don't lie and have never been involved with PRISM eh? Ok, do you want evidence that disproves that assumption? Oh, you already know that they lie and were involved with PRISM, but they wouldn't lie AGAIN right? You do understand that every bit of information you say exists never shows that Microsoft HAVEN'T taken part in privacy violations for years right? But all of a sudden they don't know what's going on. Yeah ok. Hey, you want to be complicit in what Microsoft does, don't blame me when it gets worse.

@Volkama: You seem to share the same idea on what a conversation is that Septic does, that being that your point of view is the only one worth consideration and any other is nonsense. So yes, I am incapable of having that kind of conversation. It would be ridiculous of you to expect anyone to engage in that kind of discourse. All you're interested in is brushing off any criticism of Microsoft and lumping them in the "too incompetent to notice the NSA using their own closed system to spy on everyone" category. If you want to be naive and ignorant, that's your choice, but don't expect everyone else to be the same.

XboxFun3790d ago

Guys, guys, don't even try reasoning with Dragon, he is so set on his narrow minded view that MS is only around to sell your information to the government that he won't see anything different. No matter how many articles and links provided of MS (plus Google) taking the government to court over these same privacy issues.

No matter what is provided online and shown, it's all either a lie or some "PR" (as he loves to always say) stunt. Nothing can be shown or done to convince him otherwise. Why even bother when the blind can't see?

Dragon definitely knows the inner workings of both the NSA and MS that is why only he can provide actual proof and dismiss the numerous articles that say other wise. This is why Dragon is in such a high position of the government inner workings and provides us forum posters of what is really going on behind the iron curtain of the USA and it's NSA.

Of course per usual Dragon fashion if you attempt to even counter his insane conspiracy theories he'll accuse you of either 1. de-railing a topic, 2.just hurl sarcastic insults or 3. claim he doesn't have to acknowledge anything.

The perfect excuse and deflection to not listen to anything anyone else has to say.

Volkama3790d ago (Edited 3790d ago )

You post that and then conclude that I have a high opinion of myself. Oh sweet irony.

Nothing I say will further the discussion, since you are not actually capable of having one.

Kinect imagery and data is more valuable than text/voice comms and online activity? I can hold a controller while I attempt Insanity Plyometrics and Cardio?

Tis you that is ridiculous, and your eloquent choice of words does not mask it.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 3790d ago
Drekken3790d ago

Microsoft defender until you die. Keep fighting the fight. MS worked with NSA until the world found out. All of a sudden they have no idea. I don't buy it.

Lord Anubis3790d ago (Edited 3790d ago )

"Microsoft helped the NSA get around its encryption systems so the agency could more easily spy on users of its services, "
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/t...

http://www.theguardian.com/...

to believe microsoft was unaware; Naive is the right word.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3790d ago
KingDadXVI3790d ago

I am still amazed that people find this shocking. Governments have been spying on people forever. It is just a whole lot easier with the internet.

Personally I am more worried about douche bags stealing my ID and corporate giants like Google tracking my every step on the internet so they can target frigging ads at me. I do have google ads turned off but they can still pretty much follow my every step and sell that information to anyone that will pay.

I guess what I am saying is that it is a given that every company out there that provides online services is targeted by the NSA and other agencies. I really don't care if the government knows what brand of underwear I buy because they are not going to use that information to try to sell me their underwear. Google on the other hand will sell that info to anyone who wants to pay for it and then I get assaulted with Haines ads.

Get used to it people. This is out of the hands of Sony, MS, Apple, etc. If your government wants to spy on your online activity they will and there is nothing that these companies can do to stop them. If you want it to stop you need to pressure your government. It very likely will just lead to them trying to hide it even more but the only other option is to join the tinfoil hat people in their cave cooking supper over an open fire.

nosferatuzodd3790d ago

lo every rumor that fanboys says aren't true about Microsoft are coming to light wow where have i hear this before

Eonjay3790d ago

Well the crazy part is that people were worried about Kinect and spying (which is a legit concern) but it turns out they were spying well before hand. No I am not surprised.

IcicleTrepan3790d ago

Or you could stop being a knob and realize that this is a computer industry-wide problem and a government problem and not a 'microsoft problem'

Eonjay3790d ago (Edited 3790d ago )

Well to be honest, this goes far beyond the Xbox. Remember the original allegation is that the NSA were given the ability to break all of the encryption that Microsoft employs on its file systems, servers, and services.

So the real problem is that any company, individual or municipality (big or small) around the world that has a Microsoft based system is at risk of intrusion.

On a side note, that the problem with letting one company get too much market share in the PC arena. The technology is too similar, so if Microsoft is compromised, it will effect billions.

XiSasukeUchiha3790d ago

I'M tell u Microsoft already knew and let them spy on u damn M$ shut your mouths already

Rzep3790d ago

The stench of bullshit is overwhelming.

Show all comments (41)
270°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv721d 1h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle12h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic18819h ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio9h ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Lightning774h ago

What he said was facts. How he plays games is no concern of you. Don't get too mad about it.

Cacabunga11h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

shinoff218311h ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga10h ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

itsmebryan5h ago

@shin
Well keep it simple Sony 's operating income is down 26% and Microsoft's is up 32%. No MS spin there, just facts. 😉
Cheers

romulus234h ago

Odd that a company that touts you dont need the hardware to play is already touting another console in the works.

darthv724h ago

They are not reliant on the HW but still want to maintain a presence (no matter how small) is a good thing. It shows commitment to the craft. It reminds me of SNK and how they made games for their own hardware (Neo Geo) while also making them for others because they knew there was a market to do so. They knew they would sell more to others but also sell to their own niche fan base.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4h ago
purple10114h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos14h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

DOMination-3h ago

In the last two years they've started exiting the consumer market altogether. All of the newest Surface products are business models only. They can't seem to work out what they want to do with it.

XBManiac13h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad13h ago(Edited 13h ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple10112h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos12h ago(Edited 12h ago)

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic11h ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

MrDead4h ago

The only growth MS will get out of the console industry is if it supports it's rivals platforms. Xbox is a pointless machine now. I can see them on a big push for live next, and they won't give up on trying to buy Steam.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4h ago
Show all comments (36)
300°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere1d 21h ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN1d 19h ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos1d 16h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN1d 9h ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo1d 11h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies1d 7h ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion1d 21h ago (Edited 1d 21h ago )

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger1d 19h ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Mr Logic1d 5h ago

What a stupid thing to say. The elites give 0 fucks what we say on an obscure website in the comments section.

Crows901d 4h ago

You can always reach out and give them jobs at your company man. Don't wait

blacktiger2h ago

You own nothing snd be happy. I'm sure you heard that

Profchaos1d 21h ago (Edited 1d 21h ago )

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto1d 21h ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos1d 20h ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long1d 17h ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel1d 20h ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos1d 18h ago (Edited 1d 18h ago )

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator1d 19h ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (23)
280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10113d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref12d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde12d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197212d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville12d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218311d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos11d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
isarai13d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref12d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan12d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00711d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197212d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

12d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

12d ago
12d ago
Zeref12d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde12d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197212d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier12d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto12d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218311d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto11d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
Hofstaderman12d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts12d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts11d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)