370°

Microsoft doubles down on Xbox One games, plans to invest $1 billion

Dan Graziano: "The company did confirm that it has big plans for its in-house gaming studio, however. Phil Harrison, a corporate vice president at Microsoft’s Interactive Entertainment Business, revealed in an interview with VentureBeat that Microsoft is investing heavily in the gaming experience for the Xbox One. The executive noted that the company is planning to invest more than $1 billion for new content, including 15 internally developed titles in the coming year, eight of which will be brand new. The Xbox One is expected to help breath new life into the struggling gaming industry when it is released later this year."

Read Full Story >>
venturebeat.com
ltachiUchiha4007d ago

I believe it especially with them spending a half a billion dollars on just advertising kinect but the real question is how many of those will be kinect games? We wont know until e3.

dedicatedtogamers4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

At this point, it doesn't matter if they're Kinect games or super-awesome hardcore games, for two reasons:

- Microsoft has ALWAYS supported their systems at launch. That's how they rope you in. My question is will they continue support? They didn't for Xbox, and they didn't for Xbox 360.

- with the almost-always-on DRM and no used games and Kinect required, etc, is it really worth it? Is it worth putting up with that crap just for a handful of neat-o games?

If you buy an XBox One, you are funding the death of gaming. I don't care if Microsoft invests $5 billion into first-party studios. Their anti-consumer practices will ensure I will never buy their console (and if Sony pulls a similar tactic, I will ignore the PS4).

Skips4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

^

This...

Also... hell, if $500 million was spent on ads for Kinect alone, and $30 million to market Halo 4 alone (Literally the same amount as the game's budget)! http://www.joystiq.com/2012...

...ltachiUchiha's question needs to be asked! How much will be invested on Kinect and ads???...

http://www.gamespot.com/twi...

^^^^

Gamers around the world are waiting MS....

Mustang300C20124007d ago

OMG just.....WTF. Some of you just need to find new hobbies.

NewMonday4007d ago

The NFL "partnership" alone cost 400$m

Gazondaily4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

"If you buy an XBox One, you are funding the death of gaming"

I'm sorry but what a load of sensationalist bull you've just typed out.

You don't even know half of what you're on about and just make sweeping points on conjecture.

People make a lot of noise on here about being gamers but they sure don't seem to act like them, instead they're too busy politicising everything.

The rational mindset would suggest that you wait for E3 and get clarity on the issue of the requirement to be online/used games.

Microsoft investing this much money on exclusives is brilliant news. If only you blinkered fanboy/ raging keyboard warriors would accept that fact (not specifically directed at you). You guys just love putting a spin on everything.

BitbyDeath4007d ago

@Septic, think you need to catch up on the news if you don't believe MS are destroying gaming.

MS controlling games through the internet means they can flip off your single player access at any time, do you really want them to have that kind of power? Not to mention relying on your own internet to be available, eg moving house and your internet can take weeks to come online. Also means you can't play on it that whole time.

Or used games, why buy a used game if you have to pay the full price to unlock it? That means you are paying more for a new game than something that is brand new. You don't see the problem with this?

And why would Kinect need to be on at all times when your playing a game like Halo? Why do they need to be so intrusive?

These sorts of antics will stop people from wanting to game and then you will see a downfall as less developers can afford to make games when less people are buying.

Their is a giant rollon effect you are not seeing here.

4007d ago
dedicatedtogamers4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

@ edonus

Funny. I'm not a gamer because I want to actually own the games I buy? Kindly shut your mouth. I was there saying "500 million for Kinect advertisement? You know how much AAA that could buy? 1 billion for RRoD? You know how much AAA that could've bought? $400 million for NFL "partnership"? You know how much AAA that could buy?" Where were you when all that money was being thrown around for non-gaming stuff?

Oh, you were there making apologetic and defensive posts for why Kinect is so awesome, that's where you were.

The reason why I speak out is because I know better. Microsoft can throw out all the numbers they want. It's no coincidence that they announce this on the heels of the horrible Xbone conference. It's double-talk. They ignore gamers during the conference, and then they - literally - throw money at the gamer by saying "but even though we have fundamentally put gaming on the back-burner with the Xbone, we would like you to know that we are investing 1 billion in gaming", whatever that means (advertisement, engine development, game development, R&D, Kinect stuff?)

DARK WITNESS4007d ago

I am really started to hate that word "content"...

1 billion on "content".. what type of content? who will this content be aimed at, core or casual gamer?

At this point I think many people still don't trust this action plan as some sort of showing of commitment.

SolidStoner4007d ago

So what, we all know Microsoft have tons of money... and we all know they dont know how to spend it! They only know how to earn it!!!

4007d ago
andibandit4007d ago

@Edonus

"$1 billion dollars

do you know how much AAA that buys. "

I think it was all spent on that new Dog in COD:Ghosts.

GameCents4007d ago

Yes!! Down with anti-consumer policies!

It doesn't matter how much money they invest into the console and its games, they are trying to take away our right to do as we please with the games we buy. I've been a staunch 360 supporter for 5 years despite owning a ps3 as well and have taken alot of crap over the years including online fees and expensive HDD's. However, this is the last straw. I'm not bending over anymore and neither should the rest of you.

Let's not see this as Xbox fans vs Sony and Nintendo fans. Instead let us all band together as Gamers vs Greed.

GamingWorldPeace4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

Dawg, I thought this is a gaming site but boy was I wrong. I intend to buy the PS4 at launch and am happy of what Sony is doing with their plan so far but I am also interested in the games that MS are making. The stupid things that people say here and logic that are behind them are just childish! This site is like the Jerry Springer show of gaming. There are already 8 games inadvertently shown from the MS conference if any of you haven't noticed,
http://xboxonedaily.com/201...
They are also going to show a "historic" IP from Rare and the new game from one of MS new studio, Black Tusk will also make an appearance at E3. I think that is a pretty good start already and no doubtz I want to see what else they have at E3.

TheSurg4007d ago

If you would actually pay attention at the reveal and interviews later you would know that there is no requirement to be online. Your comment is full of bull. Xbox One is a console that does other things, like Iphone is a phone that does other things. You ain't a gamer but since you defend sony and b!tch MS you will get tons of thumbs up. N4G...

Anon19744007d ago

I don't know what to think here. I'm a gamer first and foremost so anyone announcing an investment of a billion into gaming is going to attract my attention. I just don't know how I can be expected to support a console that, buy design, will actively stop me from playing games I've purchased, or prevent me from or charges me extra for buying games from certain sources.

Even assuming the "internet once a day" connection worked out of the gate, what happens when it doesn't? We've seen XBL go down before and it'll always be a target for hackers, not to mention prone to human error or infrastructural problems. And, as I don't live in the US, I know from past experience that server issues outside of the US don't have the same priority as US servers.

Why would any gamer willingly put themselves in this position if they don't have to? Microsoft couldn't even launch hardware that worked last gen, and we're supposed to jump on-board this gen with a console that could actively stop us from playing our own games based on what? Faith that MS won't screw it up?

JokesOnYou4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

will actively stop me from playing games I've purchased, or prevent me from or charges me extra for buying games from certain sources.

-huh? No nowhere has anything said X1 will stop the original owner from playing a game he purchased, UNLESS he sells the game and thus loses the license code, same as now. As for the used game fee, we need clarity, but there are no concrete statements from sony on that matter either.

Even assuming the "internet once a day" connection worked out of the gate, what happens when it doesn't?

-What do you mean, it just needs to briefly connect to the internet once a day, OMG! that's tragic, does your internet go down for longer than 24hrs?....sheesh you need a new service provider.

We've seen XBL go down before and it'll always be a target for hackers,

-uhm down for how long? link please? xbox live has been the biggest, most played and most reliable online service this gen.

Microsoft couldn't even launch hardware that worked last gen, and we're supposed to jump on-board this gen

-ps2 had its issues, sony was even subject to several class action lawsuits, yet you willing jumped on-board last gen, right?

SecondSon4007d ago

Its sad that with the funds for the Kinect advertising Naughty Dog would have made 25 Uncharted games since they only cost them $20 million each :/

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 4007d ago
sengoku4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

more call of duty exclusive DLC??

that another billion wasted.
i'm sure it will buy them some games but the trouble with the one is beyond games at the moment.

they invested 1 billion in kinect and look what that got us

AngelicIceDiamond4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

@Uchiha I can tell you it'll be mostly hardcore. Considering Kinect is built into the console and it has its own processor MS could easily give it voice control or simple hand gestures within its core games hence, "better with Kinect."

Ryse and Black Tusks were originally hardcore Kinect games until MS noticed Kinect was failing as hardcore device. Ryse is now "Better with Kinect and I'm 90% sure Black Tusks is strictly core base with mild Kinect function.

Of course MS will show casual titles but I don't see very many though. Maybe 2 or 3 total. Remedy's Quantum Break looks interesting, combining Alan Wakes story telling and Max Pains brutal destruction seems like perfect fit.

Plus Rare and CrackDown 3 teased dang I can't wait now. E3 is where its at.

EDIT: @Thirty Whatever Kinect comes with it.

Doesn't matter because I'll get unfair BS disagrees anyway like always. Unless I blend in and be a fanboys less of a gamer sheep. But the Sony kids had to come in here and ruin everything like they aaaalways do. This is a good thing not a bad thing. I have to say something that makes no sense to get agrees. One sided, one sided everything always onesided its not fair, at all.

MS had a bad reveal I get it I didn't like it either. The last I checked a unveil doesn't give the other guy the win by default. I want both to do well unlike you fanboys who are less of a gamer.

Say something completely dumb and stupid get a pile of agrees, wow ignorance is bliss and plentiful here. Say something with logic and that's coherent pile him with disagrees. The fanboys and idiots rule this site.

Lol watch the idiots and less of a gamer fanboys will disagree because I'm talking to them and there angry and offended lol.

Thirty3Three4007d ago

"Kinect is built into the console and it has its own processor"

1) It's not built-in. It's separate, but mandatory for the Xbox One to function
2) It has its own processor? Never heard such a thing.

theBAWSE4007d ago

Kinect 2 is worse than the DRM ms have implemented

The camera is always watching and listening even when Xboxone is on standby

You have no privacy that is mad scary... You basically are inviting ms into your private sanctuary to log how you behave... Remember Kinect is 24/7 logged to ms servers

TheSurg4007d ago

You guys need to get your facts straight. Microsoft won't be watching you if you don't want them to. When you connect Kinect to xbox360 it asks you only one time if you are willing to send samples of voice and video to MS for some analisys etc. You just press NO and thats it! They cant force anything on you. Silly kids.

ABizzel14007d ago

Well if it's all their IP's for the first year that's still over $60 million in funding per game, but I'm sure some will get more than the other which is insane, but what they need to do a 360 after that awful reveal.

As far as game break down, I'm pretty sure the 15 exclusives will be like this.

9 Retail games
4 Kinect games
2 XBLA games

After looking at what all their studios are working on this seems to make the most sense. Based on sales / reviews / studio games in development the Kinect games should be Kinect Aventures 3 (or something similar), Kinect Sports Season 3, Dance Central 4, and Kinect Fitness (possibly one of the New IP's).

The retail games we know thus far are Halo 5, Forza 5, Ryse, and Quantum Break. We know Lionhead has a game (Froza 4 / MMO), Black Tusk game, MS LA is working on a core game, Platform Next Studios is working on a core game, and Rare is working on a game so that's 9 likely retail core games from 2013 - 2014.

The remaining tow unknowns I believe are XBLA just for a well rounded start.

BeZdaBest4007d ago

1 billion psstt.

how bout *puts pinky under nose*

100 BILLION dollars muwhahaha..

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

4007d ago Replies(2)
Ausbo4007d ago

i expect probably about half of these 15 exclusives to be kinect/arcade games. Despite that, i think 7 to 8 legit exclusives in the first year is pretty damn good. Only question is will these titles deliver?? Cause Sony's exclusives always do. If Microsoft can really bring it at e3, i might get thier console since i don't care about used games. I buy new games discounted on amazon.

Loki864007d ago

Really... Sony exclusives always do huh?

Ausbo4007d ago

Yeah pretty much loki. And this is coming from someone who doesnt own a sony console

BlindGuardian4007d ago

X1 used games system requires them to know when you sold a game so they can remove it from your HDD remotely

the only way to do that is to force online on you so they can check your HDD

otherwise I could fill the HDD with games and then sell the discs and keep playing them directly from the HDD

fact

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4007d ago
KingKelloggTheWH4007d ago

I wonder what amount of this will go into things that matter for gamers,I bet most will be rights for shows and advertising.

OlgerO4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

This is incredible big news people!! One of the biggest games like Skyrim cost only 85 million ( which includes marketing ) This means that at least 10 extra absolutely massive games can be expected on the xbox One. This is the first time im actually wavering in my decision for PS4.

DeadlyFire4007d ago

No. This means Microsoft is investing heavy into Cable companies to allow their TV service to work in every region likely.

Games will still have the standard budgets. Maybe extra millions thrown into advertising here and there for Halo, but that's about it.

M-M4007d ago

Remove all the restrictions/spying and extra subscriptions, then I'll buy it.

BeZdaBest4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

theres a fee for that..

just kidding..

or am i O_o??

Why o why4007d ago

Trust me. I even cover the built in cameras on my laptops, even after I've disabled them. Same for the mic. I just re enable if I ever need them. With the kinect I'm guessing there must be some type of off feature.

whoyouwit044007d ago

You sony fans just do what you can to try and down play any thing positive about the xbox; it's really just sad. they already said that 1 billion was invested in the games and there are more games being developed in the history of xbox how much do you fools are for the actual development of the game.

Soldierone4007d ago

They didn't mention what games are being developed. For all we know, all 15 or whatever number they said, are kinect dance games.....

Gazondaily4007d ago

So what? It's still 1 billion bring invested on games alone. So you naturally assume they'll be Kinect titles?

It's just pessimism borne out of fanboyism that's all.

SonyPS44007d ago

Well the XOne does require a Kinect to use (as it looks, good luck getting by without it, really) so yeah it is safe to assume most of these games will at least make use of some gestures of the Kinect, even if these games were full-fledged AAA games.

BeZdaBest4007d ago

so what..

if thats you type of game no prob..

but..

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Why o why4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

Fool me once septic...

Lets be hopeful and optimistic, yes but to expect those who predicted this same crap and seen it realised to have zero doubts is dumb. I'm a core gamer. So believe it or not I want more core games. I understand these super 15 will be a mix of core kinect and xbla games. My concern is the ratio of each. Ms, since kinect, have released around 10 kinect exclusives for every core game....alarm bells nah

BitbyDeath4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

We already know 2 of the 15 -
Kinect Fitness
Kinect One

https://twitter.com/superer...

https://twitter.com/superer...

http://www.neogaf.com/forum...

Kinect is mandatory so naturally it'll have a lot of Kinect titles.

GamingWorldPeace4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

Yo hommies, 8 games were leaked already if any of you are paying any attention.
http://xboxonedaily.com/201...

1. Quantum Break
2. Crackdown
3. Forza 5
4. A game based of water physics by Rare
5. A new Halo
6. A new game from Rare with Pixar style graphics
7. Ryse
8. A new Fable

Another Rare game that is a "historic" IP will be shown at E3.

Black Tusk will show their big budget IP at E3 as well.

More might be shown as the exclusive Respawn rumored game Titan might make an appearance and Epic haven't even show us what they got. I bet you they will use E3 to show off a game made with UE4 (Please be Gears 4 with the return of my man, Cole Train!).

Lets just wait for E3 and we will know foe sure.

DeadlyFire4007d ago

If you consider the franchises we already know are coming including Kinect ones will likely sequels coming. That leaves room for about 4-5 of those 15 games to be new IPs.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4007d ago
Hicken4007d ago

And, again, with the Kinect being MANDATORY, it needs to be asked: HOW MANY OF THE GAMES ARE FOR KINECT?

Mkai284007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

That's not your concern.. To be honest, even if the X1 was to do everything right for the gamer sake. People would still have the same reactions, just lest mess to talk about. You don't plan on getting it, so why care?

SDF Repellent4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

Hicken, oh no not you again. LOL

quote Hicken
" with the Kinect being MANDATORY, it needs to be asked: HOW MANY OF THE GAMES ARE FOR KINECT? "

potentially all games could use Kinect. Ryse is a perfect example of a core game that used a controller with the Kinect. That is the beauty of having Kinect in every system as third party ports can be made to take advantage of that added feature. An example of this is in a COD, for example. When you are in close combat situation, you can move your controller and perform melee attacks and the action will be display on-screen or use hand throwing motion to throw a grenade, for example.

maniacmayhem4007d ago

@Hicken

Like you care. You claim you're still on the fence about purchasing a 360 after SEVEN years of it being on the market. Why would you care now that Kinect is mandatory or any of the X1 games?

You stayed on this site like a pig in sh*t yelling and ranting about how MS left their gaming core, how they didn't have any exclusives, how they didn't have enough vested in games, how they didn't care about gaming or the gamer.

Now here's an article telling you just the opposite of what you ranted forever about their new system, PLUS the announcement of them having 15 new games which 8 are new IP's and STILL you complain ... about KINECT.

Kinect is what they invested in, yes there will be games that utilize Kinect that we can all be 100% sure of. There will also be games that use a hybrid of Kinect and the controller and I'm sure there will be games that don't use it.

Instead of being the class A d-bag that you usually are about MS (and anything non-sony), you should at least be giving them some high marks for investing that much money alone into gaming.

kenshiro1004007d ago

They showed Kinect titles last E3. If the focus is on media and entertainment, then you can't blame people for doubting that they'll show core titles, based on this new console disaster and last E3.

I have no faith in Microsoft to blow me away atm.

GameCents4007d ago

No friend. There are no SONY fans right now. The next gen has not begun yet (sorry Ninty) and so there are no divides.
There is no need to commit yourself to a company or console that will enslave you for 10 years to come. Right now we are all fans of gaming and this console is a threat to the hobby we love.

I know the other side seems to be taunting you about this and yes it isn't right how they are going on about it but this time they have a point and we have to join them.
I'll miss Forza Motorsport horribly, that sexy controller too! But nothing is worth losing our rights to the games we own and being able to just game whenever and wherever we want, not even sweet beautiful Forza 5 *looks back at SONY crowd for confirmation* *crowd nods*

Won't you join us, brother?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4007d ago
NateCole4007d ago

Well that is a great start MS. It was long overdue.

I want real exclusives and for the love of god develope a bloody Killer Instinct!!.

kenshiro1004007d ago

Thank you. I've been waiting for years for a new KI.

Show all comments (112)
290°

More Job Losses At Xbox, “There’s More To Come”: Paul Thurrott

Paul Thurrott in a recent episode commented on the on-going Microsoft fiasco hinting at more job losses and that "there's more to come".

Read Full Story >>
spieltimes.com
Sonic18812d ago (Edited 2d ago )

There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future . Xbox has to pay Microsoft back. It might take two decades to do that.

sagapo1d 22h ago (Edited 1d 22h ago )

I don’t understand what you’re saying. Xbox IS microsoft so there’s no “paying back “.
And MS gross profit in 2023 was over 140 billion dollars so forget your 2 decades.

Unless you mean the money MS invested in Xbox (acquisitions included) and the time it will take for xbox as a brand to gain that money back on it’s own, then yeah, that could take a while.

romulus231d 16h ago

The better term to use might be return on investment, xbox is simply a division of Microsoft one that MS can easily do away with if profit margins are not met. So in that regard he's right, if xbox isn't showing the expected return on investment the higher ups are expecting than it's unlikely Microsoft will acquire any other studios any time soon, especially if they are spending billions buying developers just to shut them down in the end.

MrBaskerville1d 9h ago (Edited 1d 9h ago )

Xbox is a division that they discussed shutting down but doubled down on after Gamepass was pitched.

It needs to make money at some point. Big money.

KwietStorm_BLM1d 8h ago

So you do understand it or..?

rokos1d 6h ago

According to Statista the net income of Microsoft is about $72.4 billion dollars which is a bit lower than last year profit. That is almost as much as Activision's acquisition but I assume that would be a one off since it costs so much plus I see how their focus has been shifted to AI, thus any major future investments will probably be in that area.

Markusb331d 5h ago

i think you are really missing the point

VariantAEC20h ago

@romulus23
That is not why MS buys studios. They might continue to buy because it's about taking that sweet sweet IP out of the corporate husks of their acquisitions.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 20h ago
SonyStyled1d 22h ago

“There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future”

No bro, there do be is for Microsoft not acquiring for what is now if not what it be is 😂

1d 20h ago Replies(2)
ChasterMies1d 10h ago

Xbox isn’t a separate company from Microsoft. It’s all Microsoft.

Abear211d 4h ago (Edited 1d 4h ago )

Let’s be real, this is the media spinning all the acquisitions and liquidations of said developers and spinning it to make M$ the villain.

This was bound to happen, a bigger slice of pie and cut costs, when the games come they stand to make more and that’s their agenda—it was the writing on the wall when the sales went through and legally all those who approved the sale and mergers knew this would happen.

Snowflakes need to realize business is ugly and you can cry all you want but this is how capitalism works. And it works.

That said, M$ needs to steer the narrative and grab hold of all this, make their plans known, hype the hell out of all those dead IP’s they plan to revive, and be honest about the timeline. This is likely to involve mobile and IP on other consoles, and most people realize that.

The problem is this company is incapable of being transparent and seems to often want to dissuade and confuse is customer base. The lack of E3 has hurt Microsoft and I don’t think they know how to properly or effectively market their brand anymore.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 20h ago
jwillj2k42d ago

There really needs to be a class action lawsuit here. You buy these companies just to put people out of jobs. And it’s not like something happened to derail their plans this WAS the plan. Microsoft has no business in this space at all.

franwex2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Microsoft has been doing this for years. They simply want the IPs. Look at Nokia. Look at Skype. This time it simply expanded to games. Gaming is not as important to Microsoft’s executives as it was to the founders too. Bill Gates was willing to sell the og Xbox at a loss. Steve Balmer approved the red ring of death fiasco. This CEO isn’t really a gamer.

-Foxtrot2d ago

Maybe it's time though to put a stop to it and use a big giant like Microsoft as a huge example to the rest of these big companies.

There has to be a line drawn somewhere.

People like the FTC and the like went against Microsoft yet their Actvision deal was still allowed to go through yet look what's happened...it's not even Acitivisions studios aswell, it's Bethesdas.

VariantAEC20h ago

Years?

Try several decades, and in the gaming space 2.3 decades.

Jon615861d 5h ago

You do realize this happens in ALL industries? Or are you just saying this because it is Microsoft? In any case I feel for those that are being let go but the trch industry is suffering right now.

jwillj2k41d ago (Edited 1d ago )

This absolutely does NOT happen all the time. Let me know the last time 1 company with a terrible product track record spent 100 billion onto acquire MULTIPLE successful companies in under a year only to shut them down and stop making their products regardless of how successful they were. Not merge them, completely shut them down.

And you can’t use Microsoft in your example.

Notellin1d 1h ago (Edited 1d 1h ago )

Class action lawsuit? The law is on their side and protects them at all costs. There are no rules to protect the people at the bottom.

jwillj2k41d ago

Not true when it comes to mass layoff do your research.

RNTody2d ago

Ninja Theory, Perfect Dark, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Wolfenstein 3, Dishonored, Prey, Doom, Quake... something tells me that bad things are going to happen to these entities under Microsoft.

MrDead1d 14h ago

ID software, the makers of Doom and Wolfenstein that have been with us since 1991 could be gone and MS will keep the IPs.

I hope some of these studios can buy their freedom from MS otherwise this is going to be even more devastating for the industry and gamers.

Yui_Suzumiya1d 12h ago (Edited 1d 12h ago )

That's exactly what I'm worried about. I've been a fan of id since Wolfenstein 3D and I'm honestly afraid.

lodossrage1d 7h ago

Toys for Bob saw the writing on the wall and bought themselves out.

Wouldn't be the first time a company did that under MS either. Bungie and Twisted Pixel did the same. Considering what just happened, I can see some other devs trying to buy themselves out too.

anast2d ago

Good thing the bosses of all those small studios made their money.

glenn19791d 23h ago

they cant do it right now they will get burned

XiNatsuDragnel1d 15h ago

Phil and his team need to be gone

lodossrage1d 7h ago (Edited 1d 7h ago )

Won't make a difference.

The whole structure needs to be overhauled. Anyone that replaces Phil will be no different than him, Mattrick, or anyone else.

Until the company changes how they go about business, nothing will change

glenn19791d 5h ago

I just don't have any idea what they would do , they have done sooo much damage on their xbox brand, they have a show at July or June I think, but will it even matter even they show amazing games, idkn

lodossrage1d 7h ago

True,

But they may as well get it over with. Whether it happens now or later, the burning is going to hit the same.

Reality is the ONE move that can alleviate a lot of this is the one move they can't make. Remove day 1 from gamepass.

Show all comments (68)
90°

Microsoft Opening Xbox Mobile Game Store in July

The Xbox brand is expanding, as an Xbox mobile game store is opening this coming July where Microsoft will brings its "first-party portfolio."

Jin_Sakai3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

“Bond adds that they will start on the web”

This will go nowhere.

Nice knowing you Xbox. This is what happens when the house never gets cleaned.

MrDead3d ago

The only this MS is expanding is the amount of feculence it sprays on everyone who just want to enjoy gaming and make games.

The best thing MS can do for the gaming industry is leave and never return.

XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Good luck with this even it might not succeed.

Show all comments (7)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel4d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow3d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1823d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie2d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

2d ago
Hereandthere2d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2d ago
Notellin2d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

2d ago
Hereandthere2d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow1d 16h ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere2d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow1d 17h ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX3d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney1d 11h ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno3d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno3d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

2d ago
fsfsxii2d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno2d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)