270°

5 Reasons Why YOU Should Be Excited for Sony's Meeting

Love Sony or hate them, their meeting which is set to take place on February 20th @ 6 PM EST/3 PM PST has large implications on the gaming market. Here are five reasons why YOU should be excited and/or intrigued for Sony's meeting.

GalacticEmpire4087d ago

Next gen is here and Sony are making all the noise. Come on MS get your finger out and give us something to get excited about. It seems like they're just giving Sony all the buzz.

LOGICWINS4087d ago

Microsoft doesn't have to do anything until they damn well please. Just like Sony. In fact now they have the advantage of knowing what their up against after the 20th.

dgonza404087d ago

Even if they do know, they can't change much hardware wise unless they plan on delaying the release or announcement which wold do more harm than good.

BanBrother4087d ago

Logic

At MOST, MS could change some of the software/features of their console. In no way would they be able to change their hardware, not unless they want a mid-year at the earliest release.

So, Sony have nothing to fear. Also, I won both the PS3 and Xbox 360. Even some of my friends on Xbox are getting sick to death of MS. They are very ready to jump ship next-gen, and some have moved onto PS3.

I like many games on PS3 and Xbox, but the fact is there are not enough unique experiences on the Xbox, no way. I'm not trolling, as I said, own both.

I just hope that people will open their eyes. All you have to do is ask yourself this;
Do you want a Kinect and 'app' oriented console, or do you want a console for the core? Easy. Just ask yourself that. At the end of the day, it is YOUR hundreds of dollars being used to purchase either console.

guitarded774087d ago

I agree, MS doesn't have to make a move on next gen until they want, but they could at least make a move for this gen while we wait. MS is too quiet... at least give us something to enjoy while we wait. Sure, there's Gears Judgement, but that's about it... and it's a spin-off from the main series at that, focusing on support characters.

LOGICWINS4087d ago (Edited 4087d ago )

What about features, exclusives, online integration, value etc.? There are many other ways besides hardware changes that Microsoft can make to improve upon whatever Sony does on the 20th...if they CHOOSE to that is. Hardware isn't the end all be all of a consoles success(hence the Wii).

"I just hope that people will open their eyes. All you have to do is ask yourself this;
Do you want a Kinect and 'app' oriented console, or do you want a console for the core?"

I don't...but that doesn't mean other people feel the same way.

Kinect sales are at 24 million. Just because we don't like it doesn't mean that there isn't an audience for it out there.

GalacticEmpire4087d ago (Edited 4087d ago )

I never said they HAD to do anything I just thought that, with Sony hogging the limelight and all the buzz around PS4, MS might want to grab a piece of the action. Seems to me like they're just twidling their thumbs and hoping people don't get too caught up in the excitement.

Is it so surprising to expect something from MS? These are the guys who sailed a giant barge ad past the PS3 launch.

Edit: @below

"You make it sound like some L.A Blood/Crip gang war where both parties MUST immediately react to every grievance the other side has imposed lol."

I'm British and have absolutely no idea what you're on about here :S

Only fanboys would scream "they are just copying or following" or whatever, the fact is MS have a good opportunity to steal some thunder and they're letting it pass.

LOGICWINS4087d ago (Edited 4087d ago )

"Seems to me like they're just twidling their thumbs and hoping people don't get too caught up in the excitement."

Or maybe their refusing to react because they don't want to put across that everything they do is a counter move against Sony. Thats called being a follower. Why would Microsoft put themselves in that position? They'd look stupid.

You make it sound like some L.A Blood/Crip gang war where both parties MUST immediately react to every grievance the other side has imposed lol.

MikeMyers4087d ago (Edited 4087d ago )

Microsoft might not change much in the way of design of the hardware but they can change the way they market it. You can bet they are going to be looking closely to what Sony shows on the 20th just like how both Sony and Microsoft looked closely at what the Wii U was going to be and what Nintendo plans on doing going forward.

Some people on here may disagree but all 3 of them actually respect each other. The problem is many of us get caught up in the daily drama from all the headlines, misquotes and interviews taken out of context. Of course some people like to cheer on their team like a sports fan. That's fine but some take it too far.

I'm always excited whenever we get to see new hardware, regardless of who's putting it out there. I like to see them push each other and innovate and come out with new ideas.

guitarded774087d ago (Edited 4087d ago )

@ MikeMyers

If by "respect" you mean the relationship a zebra and a lion have, I agree. They definitely observe each other, but even more so, they observe how the market responds to one another.

This can have a negative effect on us gamers when sales trends point toward less core AAA and more casual fluff. I agree with everything you said, and I cannot stand gamers who are more about brand loyalty than gaming in general.

Regardless of what Sony's long term plan is with the PS4, the 20th will be focused on the core gamer because Sony knows that is the early adopter market. We saw Nintendo attempt to focus on the core market when introducing the Wii U, because they know the same thing.

Sony will also show their ease of accessibility by (rumor) moving to an x86 architecture (even though the cell is a better architecture... it just hasn't had the time the x86 has had to build a library of instructions).

For MS, we can pretty much figure the NeXBOX will also have an x86 architecture, so it should get the same third party support as PS4 and vice/versa. So what is going to distinguish them from each other will be marketing, exclusives and features. And each will be watching the other seeing what needs to be done next.

jocomat94087d ago

i dont think there gonna release the tech specs on the 20th. atleast i wouldn't just yet.

MikeMyers4087d ago (Edited 4087d ago )

guitarded77,

You brought up something interesting. Do you (not you but Sony and also when Microsoft unveils the next Xbox) market the PS4 to the people you already know will buy the machine or do you try to market it to a broader audience as well? We both know gaming is changing but that doesn't mean we won't still see big games like God of War on the PS4.

Perception is key and so is marketing. Sony could have the best tablet on the market but to try and get consumers to buy it in a world dominated by Apple is a tough go. This is why first impressions of the PS4 might go a long ways.

I'm a little concerned at todays market with the Wii U not selling very well or the Vita. So a good launch is very important. There are games on so many devices now that it's hard to know what the future lies and where the market will go. These systems they make cost lots of money from the ground up in research and development to retail outlets and I'm not sure if the old way of doing business will stand up as well as it used to. What I do know is a lot is riding on the success of the PS4 for Sony as the company tries move forward.

cannon88004087d ago

If MS decides to change the hardware in the last minute and not do any longevity tests to see if it's good, they might as well sell their console as a conventional oven or maybe a heater. That way you could play halo 5 and heat up some cheese sticks at the same time! :D

BullyMangler4086d ago

thats very sad if you think about it. Whats the advantage of waiting for others to go first?

we are supposed to be unique, not copy cats .

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 4086d ago
Milesprowers4087d ago ShowReplies(3)
-Falaut-4087d ago

A little bird told me there are other events planned for next week that journalists attending are not allowed to talk about. I have a feeling that these might be from the MS camp.

lolwithtim4087d ago

Totally agree. It's interesting that Sony has all the buzz with rumours and the 20th reveal. Just makes me think will Microsoft just sit there or try to ninja their way in with an announcement around the same time.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4086d ago
DigitalSmoke4087d ago

Need no reasons, just look at how PS3's blowing everything out of the water at this point.

Same momentum and on the PS4 and nothing can compete within the core gamer scene.

JohnnyAkiba4087d ago

I need to freeze myself just like Eric Cartman . xD

clrlite4087d ago (Edited 4087d ago )

Or build a time machine.

ApolloTheBoss4087d ago

FEB. 19th will be the longest day ever.

BanBrother4087d ago

Agreed. I'm supposed to be picking up a refrigerator that day, but CBF. I know I'll be yelled at, but hey, these announcements come once every many years.

You know how people say; "*grabs popcorn*"?
Well, I just loaded up on butter and Caramel popcorn yesterday lol. Looks like I will be bringing it.

lolwithtim4087d ago

For me the reveal is late in the evening. the 19th won't be that bad, the majority of the 20th on the other hand ...

Show all comments (44)
150°

Sony Patents To Prevent You From In-Game Harassment By Reading Your Emotions

A new patent recently published by Sony wants to gather biometric data of gamers to track whether one is being harassed using AI tools.

Profchaos1d 11h ago (Edited 1d 11h ago )

I hope this is one of those patents that never comes to fruition.

I already dislike the fact you can pay a significant amount for a online service buy associated games and content on said service and get banned from that service over potentially a misunderstanding the bans are already handed out for flimsy reasons

I'd rather see money invested in a ban that simply removes the offensive players ability to communicate with unknown players allow them to continue party chats with friends but not with Joe blow on cod.

exputers1d 8h ago

Agreed. Blizzard recently banned a college Overwatch 2 player who's dependent for saying "shit." Pretty harsh.

Profchaos17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

How rediculas really. You can't say a word that's allowed in most PG films and prime time TV but the game is based around killing the enemy team using guns, explosives etc.

It's just backwards.

just_looken18h ago

What your talking about is called block list

In 2006 a spaceship dropped of the playstation 3/xbox 360 i say that that generation was the last great gen with game functions/tech that has yet to comeback

Anyhow the playstation 3 if you block listed a id they could not talk to you in chatroom with either text or voice. But that was pre mind fucked 2018 when people were more human than sheep.

But hey gta 6 is coming out billion dollar budget without a single player custom character creator and without singeplayer coop off/online something saints row 1-3 had on the xbox 360.

z2g1d 4h ago

Take my social security and bank account numbers too! Here’s a picture of my wife and our address.

phoenixwing1d 3h ago

Cmon where's the pictures of your children. Don't hold out on them.

H91d 4h ago

At this rate I feel Sony will eventually sell a room to play games in it where they can monitor your every breath

jambola1d ago

I genuinely get a bit worried sometimes when a friend says something that could be offensive In a party
Because I have no trouble believing some bans would happen when in a private party for saying something wrong

SegaSaturn6691d 3h ago

I want them to censor erotic content by measuring my groin temperature so i dont get too distracted while playing black ops 2.

Popsicle1d 2h ago

Terrible idea. Not only do I not consent to providing my biometric data, the potential for mishandling biometric data is almost a certainty. Positive stress and negative stress can produce similar changes in biometrics. Interpreting the precise emotion a person is feeling is not only invasive but could be easily misconstrued. I hope this never comes to fruition.

Show all comments (14)
130°

Sony Could Increase Your Game's Difficulty If It Sees You Complain About It

Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.

jznrpg1d 20h ago

This is something I might use. Sometimes I play some good games but they don’t have difficulty option and are a little too easy.

Profchaos1d 19h ago

Souls games will be like that players struggling make it harder

PassNextquestion1d 18h ago (Edited 1d 18h ago )

I think if used correctly it could work well

jambola1d 15h ago

cool idea
cool idea for horror games especially
the way it's explained here sounds like it could never be forced hopefully, so that's ok with me

Show all comments (8)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies22d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken21d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga21d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken21d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6421d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long21d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197221d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic21d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 21d ago
DivineHand12521d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91321d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer21d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91321d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit21d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 21d ago
Christopher22d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6921d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit21d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher21d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken21d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197221d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic21d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2321d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218321d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder21d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts21d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)