170°

The Wii U Is Not Expensive, Lets Break Down The Prices Against The PS3 & 360

Since the Wii U Press Conference wrapped up last Thursday, I have heard some complaints across the internet by gamers and journalists that the Wii U is too expensive. We here at Playeressence.com could not disagree more. We actually think the price is just right for what you get.

Read Full Story >>
playeressence.com
cyclonus0074255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

"Not expensive"?

There's a $150 Wii U controller that says otherwise.

Hatsune-Miku4255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

The Wii u is rubbish and obsolete. It doesn't play DVDs or blu ray. The console is too expensive and it would be a better deal to get a ps3 or vita.its barely more powerful than a 7 year old console the xbox 360 and it has a control pad with a 10 year tech screen so the asking price for it is ridiculously too high.

The console is weak so one would expect there to be amazing software to back it up but it barely has any coming on release and a few months after. The older ps3 has more exclusive and unique games on the horizon due to be release more than the Wii u next year

Gazondaily4255d ago

What are you on about? Have you seen the launch line-up for the Wii U?

Furthermore, focusing just on the raw specs of the console is missing the point. Nintendo could deliver some amazing gaming experiences and really utilise the unique controller. I for one, am actually quite excited. Even the prospect of taking the game off-screen and playing on my controller sounds brilliant.

Your view is cearly short-sighted. There is a lot of potential for the Wii U to deliver and whilst it, most likely, won't be comparable to the PS4/Nextbox in terms of specs, it may benefit from some amazing gaming experiences.

Don't be so quick to judge.

ALLWRONG4255d ago

Worried much Hatsune-Miku?

You should be. 3 times the power of 360/PS3 and for the same price.

gaffyh4255d ago

@ALLWRONG - You're all wrong.

Knushwood Butt4255d ago

@ Septic

Yes, and it's meh.

Ports of PS360 games long after they have already been launched on other platforms.

Oh yeah, Zombi U and another Mario game.

AO1JMM4254d ago

Your opinion is rubbish. The PS3 is last gen and is "obsolete" by your definition.

-1 for trolling.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4254d ago
fermcr4255d ago

Wii U is not expensive. It's the dam games that are expensive. WiiU, PS3 and X360 games are way to expensive.

AsheXII4255d ago

That controller is actually a tablet that you get along with a console.

cyclonus0074255d ago

Can that tablet be used for anything other than playing WiiU games?

If so, thats's great.

If not, all MS & Sony have to do to overshadow the Wii U is offer iPad & Android tablet support to their new systems. Something they are both already working on.

Sanquine904255d ago

I think the wii U will flourish. I already pre-ordered and i hope that many gamers will follow. It is a shame that the wii U is doing so well and another device which is love is struggeling ( the vita)

bothebo4255d ago

The Wii U is doing well? Where are you getting this from?

Urbz78704255d ago (Edited 4255d ago )

Wii u sold out within 48HRs @gamestop and there sold out at most online stores too. .

Wii u sold out online.
http://www.joystiq.com/2012...

Wii u sells out in 48hrs link
http://n4g.com/news/1082835...

bothebo4255d ago

Okay. However, you don't know how many consoles were actually sold. If I recall correctly the Vita sold out in America.

http://www.playstationlifes...

So again, I'll ask the question. Is the Wii U doing well? You're answer: wait about a year.

Sanquine904255d ago

From the Shops who are stating the wii U is sold out. Thats all. But we will see:) I hope all consoles will flourish. Also my shiny vita:D If you are a gamer you want all consoles to become strong and sell a lot. War against mobile gaming ! ( handheld gaming is diffirent)

Father__Merrin4255d ago

the vita is struggling like the 3ds was before price cut, once vitas price is cut along with cheaper memory options its sales will increase, not 3ds levels but will increase never the less

metroid324255d ago

I agree the wiiu is a DX11/opengl 4.1 capable console with a GPGPU has EDRAM shared across the gpu/cpu and supports compute shader 11 enough said i think.

And a tablet controller that is just amazing for off screen web browsing or gaming wow.

U can use 1 of 3 storage mediums all 3rd party so no need to worry about getting cheap high performance storage as thats all their i'm very pleased with wiiu its a next gen console with the best of everything.

ninjabake4255d ago

Yeah its more like 10.1 equivalent but either way they can't use Microsoft's API so there is no directX compatibility technically.

doogiebear4255d ago

The touch screen on the wii u pad isn't even multitouch. Just saying.

metroid324252d ago

Multi touch is invented for gaming on phones and ipads ect no dedicated buttons thats why its needed when you have joysticks and buttons multi touch is not ever going to be used ???? Hmmmm u can still touch and drag with single touch and its super sensitive on 3ds it never fails to pick up even the slightest touch due to nintendo tweaking hardware as always.

KonaBro4255d ago

So much damage control. Yes, for a "next-gen" that has 2005-2006 tech in it, $300 is expensive.

4255d ago Replies(3)
Shok4255d ago

Didn't know 2 gigs of RAM and a GPGPU was 2005-06 tech xD

vortis4255d ago

Yeah, it is.

Except, the GPU is more like 2008.

metroid324252d ago (Edited 4252d ago )

Its 2011/2012 and future tech all in 1 that's the truth.

2011 is the Graphics tech/2012 is the CPU tech and future tech is the whole concept in 1 package.

£350 is what the console is worth end of with the specs and ram and games out on release i've pre-ordered mine.

ALLWRONG4255d ago

If $300 is too expensive for what you say is "old tech" then what do you say about the prices of the tech that actually from 2005-2006?

Why does a PS3 cost the same as a Wii U when it would take 3 PS3's to match a Wii U?

Kingnichendrix4255d ago

are you out of your mind, do you realise how powerful the cell processor is? at 3.22ghz 7 spu's and 1 reserved for the os each running at 3.2ghz you must be out of your mind thinking the wii u is 3 times more powerful, graphically the wiiu is superior in every way it does have more ram also but to say its it would take 3 ps3's to match a wii u? really... smh

bahabeast4255d ago

i actualli want a wii u its first time i ever wanted a nintendo console from launch.

Show all comments (69)
280°

More Job Losses At Xbox, “There’s More To Come”: Paul Thurrott

Paul Thurrott in a recent episode commented on the on-going Microsoft fiasco hinting at more job losses and that "there's more to come".

Read Full Story >>
spieltimes.com
Sonic188122h ago(Edited 22h ago)

There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future . Xbox has to pay Microsoft back. It might take two decades to do that.

sagapo19h ago(Edited 19h ago)

I don’t understand what you’re saying. Xbox IS microsoft so there’s no “paying back “.
And MS gross profit in 2023 was over 140 billion dollars so forget your 2 decades.

Unless you mean the money MS invested in Xbox (acquisitions included) and the time it will take for xbox as a brand to gain that money back on it’s own, then yeah, that could take a while.

romulus2312h ago

The better term to use might be return on investment, xbox is simply a division of Microsoft one that MS can easily do away with if profit margins are not met. So in that regard he's right, if xbox isn't showing the expected return on investment the higher ups are expecting than it's unlikely Microsoft will acquire any other studios any time soon, especially if they are spending billions buying developers just to shut them down in the end.

MrBaskerville5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Xbox is a division that they discussed shutting down but doubled down on after Gamepass was pitched.

It needs to make money at some point. Big money.

rokos3h ago

According to Statista the net income of Microsoft is about $72.4 billion dollars which is a bit lower than last year profit. That is almost as much as Activision's acquisition but I assume that would be a one off since it costs so much plus I see how their focus has been shifted to AI, thus any major future investments will probably be in that area.

Markusb332h ago

i think you are really missing the point

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2h ago
SonyStyled18h ago

“There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future”

No bro, there do be is for Microsoft not acquiring for what is now if not what it be is 😂

16h agoReplies(2)
ChasterMies6h ago

Xbox isn’t a separate company from Microsoft. It’s all Microsoft.

Abear211h ago(Edited 1h ago)

Let’s be real, this is the media spinning all the acquisitions and liquidations of said developers and spinning it to make M$ the villain.

This was bound to happen, a bigger slice of pie and cut costs, when the games come they stand to make more and that’s their agenda—it was the writing on the wall when the sales went through and legally all those who approved the sale and mergers knew this would happen.

Snowflakes need to realize business is ugly and you can cry all you want but this is how capitalism works. And it works.

That said, M$ needs to steer the narrative and grab hold of all this, make their plans known, hype the hell out of all those dead IP’s they plan to revive, and be honest about the timeline. This is likely to involve mobile and IP on other consoles, and most people realize that.

The problem is this company is incapable of being transparent and seems to often want to dissuade and confuse is customer base. The lack of E3 has hurt Microsoft and I don’t think they know how to properly or effectively market their brand anymore.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1h ago
jwillj2k422h ago

There really needs to be a class action lawsuit here. You buy these companies just to put people out of jobs. And it’s not like something happened to derail their plans this WAS the plan. Microsoft has no business in this space at all.

franwex21h ago(Edited 21h ago)

Microsoft has been doing this for years. They simply want the IPs. Look at Nokia. Look at Skype. This time it simply expanded to games. Gaming is not as important to Microsoft’s executives as it was to the founders too. Bill Gates was willing to sell the og Xbox at a loss. Steve Balmer approved the red ring of death fiasco. This CEO isn’t really a gamer.

-Foxtrot21h ago

Maybe it's time though to put a stop to it and use a big giant like Microsoft as a huge example to the rest of these big companies.

There has to be a line drawn somewhere.

People like the FTC and the like went against Microsoft yet their Actvision deal was still allowed to go through yet look what's happened...it's not even Acitivisions studios aswell, it's Bethesdas.

Jon615862h ago

You do realize this happens in ALL industries? Or are you just saying this because it is Microsoft? In any case I feel for those that are being let go but the trch industry is suffering right now.

RNTody21h ago

Ninja Theory, Perfect Dark, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Wolfenstein 3, Dishonored, Prey, Doom, Quake... something tells me that bad things are going to happen to these entities under Microsoft.

MrDead11h ago

ID software, the makers of Doom and Wolfenstein that have been with us since 1991 could be gone and MS will keep the IPs.

I hope some of these studios can buy their freedom from MS otherwise this is going to be even more devastating for the industry and gamers.

Yui_Suzumiya8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

That's exactly what I'm worried about. I've been a fan of id since Wolfenstein 3D and I'm honestly afraid.

lodossrage4h ago

Toys for Bob saw the writing on the wall and bought themselves out.

Wouldn't be the first time a company did that under MS either. Bungie and Twisted Pixel did the same. Considering what just happened, I can see some other devs trying to buy themselves out too.

anast21h ago

Good thing the bosses of all those small studios made their money.

glenn197920h ago

they cant do it right now they will get burned

XiNatsuDragnel12h ago

Phil and his team need to be gone

lodossrage4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

Won't make a difference.

The whole structure needs to be overhauled. Anyone that replaces Phil will be no different than him, Mattrick, or anyone else.

Until the company changes how they go about business, nothing will change

glenn19791h ago

I just don't have any idea what they would do , they have done sooo much damage on their xbox brand, they have a show at July or June I think, but will it even matter even they show amazing games, idkn

lodossrage4h ago

True,

But they may as well get it over with. Whether it happens now or later, the burning is going to hit the same.

Reality is the ONE move that can alleviate a lot of this is the one move they can't make. Remove day 1 from gamepass.

Show all comments (55)
90°

Microsoft Opening Xbox Mobile Game Store in July

The Xbox brand is expanding, as an Xbox mobile game store is opening this coming July where Microsoft will brings its "first-party portfolio."

Jin_Sakai2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

“Bond adds that they will start on the web”

This will go nowhere.

Nice knowing you Xbox. This is what happens when the house never gets cleaned.

MrDead2d ago

The only this MS is expanding is the amount of feculence it sprays on everyone who just want to enjoy gaming and make games.

The best thing MS can do for the gaming industry is leave and never return.

XiNatsuDragnel2d ago

Good luck with this even it might not succeed.

Show all comments (7)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga1d 23h ago (Edited 1d 23h ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow2d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1821d 22h ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie1d 12h ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow1d 11h ago (Edited 1d 11h ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

1d 7h ago
Hereandthere1d 3h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 3h ago
Notellin1d 8h ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

1d 7h ago
Hereandthere1d 3h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow13h ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere1d 3h ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow13h ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX2d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney8h ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno2d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Sheppard7t31d 22h ago

How did Sony kill the series?

Inverno1d 22h ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

1d 7h ago
fsfsxii1d 8h ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno1d 7h ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)